War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
... Could be going off to Kherson but why they didn't take a more coastal route is anybody's guess.
I'd imagine it has to do with Russia not having total control over the Black Sea airspace, with every movement they make being reported by orbiting NATO/Ukrainian observation assets & harassed by drones/aircraft, while also being in range of coastal artillery/missile batteries in Mykolayiv & Odessa. At least inland the Russians can try to hide their movements. And it would also mean that Russian ships supporting those operations would vulnerable as well.
 
It's quite telling that these people consider affirming the fact that richest countries in the world are allied with Ukraine against Russia an argument in their favor.
It's even more hilarious to see them gobble up Xi's micropenis because they're supposedly supporting Russia and are its greatest ally, even though Germany probably did more for Ukraine in this conflict than China did for Russia.
To be willing to overlook everything that is China just to own the libs is exceptional to say the least.

Pathetic.
Not to mention the constant "he's against globohomo so we support Russia" refrain. Putin isn't fighting some grand, noble war against the powers that be; he's invading an independent nation in order to steal its land and expand the borders of Russia. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Late and gay but what was Putin referring to when he said he wanted Ukraine to "de-Nazify"? It does sound a bit preposterous, but I'm not one to take the side of the mainstream media so it'd be nice to know what he's on about.
 
Late and gay but what was Putin referring to when he said he wanted Ukraine to "de-Nazify"? It does sound a bit preposterous, but I'm not one to take the side of the mainstream media so it'd be nice to know what he's on about.
"nazi" in Russia is basically cognate with "enemy" these days. It definitely has nothing to do with a totalitarian fascist state, run by a dictator and his small cadre of loyalists who engage in expansionist warfare against weaker neighbours.
 
Stupidity aside, you're not going to get too many videos amusing or otherwise when next to nobody has advanced and nearly the whole thing has bogged down into a 2 week long artillery duel in which the Russians are usually blyatted by artillery before they get particularly close to the front lines of the conflict, or vice versa. Most Ukranians will be hiding out in bunkers while the artillerists play a combination of sudoku and mine sweeper.

Anyway, here's a load of videos I found posted within the last 48 hours and stopped 'cause I got bored.














Those fuckers sure are gunna get old very quickly. Clearly someone realised nobody's tuning into the old local radio stations.

And round it off with a Ukie shitpost/propaganda piece in the form of a catchy semi-folk song named after the drone that has caused so much monke tsar pain in this war so far:


 
Late and gay but what was Putin referring to when he said he wanted Ukraine to "de-Nazify"? It does sound a bit preposterous, but I'm not one to take the side of the mainstream media so it'd be nice to know what he's on about.
Easy thing to rally Russians around since a major faction of the Ukraine military is/were Nazis who fawn over Stepan Bandera. What the end goal is is anyone's guess but there will still be people like that in Ukraine (and nazis in Russia) after it's all said and done.

Personally I think it's just an easy "good guy" goal that is hard to condemn because "nazis bad" and with groups like the Azov Battalion (and more) being officially supported by Ukraine it's simple enough to say Ukraine has a nazi problem. That said, the justification has to be for Russians since the wider world has derided it, along with the other justifications, or outright ignored it.
Western media goes out of its way to avoid acknowledging Azov are nazis whereas Russian media makes sure to show their nazi patches, tattoos, and imagery which is funny to me as we come up on a decade of Western media seeing nazis everywhere.
 
Western media goes out of its way to avoid acknowledging Azov are nazis whereas Russian media makes sure to show their nazi patches, tattoos, and imagery which is funny to me as we come up on a decade of Western media seeing nazis everywhere.
I'll give you that. The overnight flip was magical, from articles just last year ranting about azov being nazis to the same papers - often the same journalists - repudiating anyone who repeated those claims. It puts the lie to the noble journalist seeking truth. They're all snakes, who only think in black and white, and who constantly seek to be on the "right side" regardless of what their position was before.

The reality the nazi claim is nowhere near as clear cut as either side wants the world to believe. And as I said, in Russia, "nazi" doesn't mean the same thing at all as it does in the west. For external consumption they use the word as a trigger, to try and manipulate people into supporting them, because "nazis bad therefore people fighting nazis good". This is how they got factions of antifa on their side, despite Russia currently being far closer to a fascist dictatorship. For internal consumption it means "anti-russian" and nothing else.

There is a certain level of hypocrisy involved in the whole act, given wagner group (and in fact members of the Russian military) use the same sort of decorative patches and symbology as azov. Not to mention, Russia is currently acting out all the performative aspects of totalitarian dictatorship, with the whole Z meme, veneration of the dictator, silencing of dissent where possible and so on.

Ultimately, "nazi", in the context of russia vs ukraine, is a meaningless sneer word used to justify a land grab.
 
Unironic cope, there's a lot less out there.

I don't care to try to track weapon shipments for either side. Unless you're an intel analyst for Ukraine there's no reason to since we can just wait and see. Surely we'll get dozens of clips of T-62s being destroyed and farmers towing them. 🙄
Well first off, why it’s surprising to see them right now is that these tanks are supposed to be part of Russias mobilization reserves, as in they’re supposed to be given to reservists to bolster the numbers. These are firmly Cat C vehicles, as they’re worse off than a T-72A in terms of protection, armament, situational awareness and more. Hell, the T-72A despite its cramped nature and Jack in the Box turret gives you a higher chance of bailing out successfully if a round gets into the crew compartment - the T-62’s all steel hull means fun times with spalling. Estimated survival rates for T-62’s crew in case of penetration by HEAT or APFSDS is something like 1 in 20 or something ludicrous like that due to the drivers hatch position and the insanely cramped interior. We’ve seen more successful bailouts from T-72’s with crew compartment hits so far if it didn’t set off the ammo reserves.

So, why the hell is this being sent up when we are seeing the Russians handing out T-72A’s and AV’s to front line combat units? There’s really only 3 options

1) Armor casualties have hit the point that stockpiles of more modern vehicles ran out and the Russians have been lying about how many tanks they have

2) The T-72 reserves need more time to be made actually functional and T-62’s which were recently put in the stockpiles are quicker to get ready

3) Russia is mobilizing reservists and these are for them

None of these are exactly great signs. It’s also a further strain on Russian logistics as the ammunition isn’t compatible with any other vehicle they have, the parts aren’t compatible either.
 
The Azov Regiment has or had (perhaps at the 'may his memory be a blessing' stage now) Jewish members, and most of primarily Russian speakers if later recruits matched the leadership and founders who were ultras for a local football team, and operates and is supplied like a specialised but regular regiment. The flag is a stylised acronym for 'National Interest' in cyrillic script and Ukrainian language. It is just utterly silly to give credibility to stuff put out on behalf of a third world dictator with several palaces and a tiny ruling class who also live like gods, who've sent a motley crew of the poor and the stupid (unlike those National Guards who refused to cross the border as they lacked passports, were sacked and are now suing for unfair dismissal) to fight for them. The looting of basic things like washing machines (plus smaller electronic goods and jewellery oft found on the dead Russians or stolen by postal workers), the rapes of men, women and babies (also some cases of bestiality) and murders are facts to all reasoning, educated men and women who follow this.

Putin went often to WEF and otherwise sent a delegation. The Russian social structure of a tiny ultra rich ruling class and relative (to even Ukraine for vatniks were stealing washing machines and John Deere tractors tho the based US HQ disabled them remotely so the thieves have nothing) and absolute poverty among workers and bourgeois matches 'you will own nothing and be happy.' There's pics online of Putin happily greeting Klaus Schwab at WEF. Putin is no based 'instrument of chastisement' for the degenerate West.
 
Last edited:
1) Armor casualties have hit the point that stockpiles of more modern vehicles ran out and the Russians have been lying about how many tanks they have

2) The T-72 reserves need more time to be made actually functional and T-62’s which were recently put in the stockpiles are quicker to get ready

3) Russia is mobilizing reservists and these are for them
I have a fourth option: The good equipment is needed to secure and maintain effective defensive positions on occupied territory and the shit equipment will be thrown onto the front line offensives in hopes that maybe they'll get some more ground or at least tie the Ukrainian forces and buy time to prepare for any counter offensives, it matters little, both the steel bricks and whoever is manning them are expendable, offensive is no longer a priority, maintaining any and all captured and occupied territory is.
 
That article have a good point about why Starbucks exits Russia but not China (the same question might apply to McDonald's as well).
May 26, 2022

Starbucks Exits Russia. Why Not China?​

By J. Robert Smith

In solidary with the Ukrainian people, and to put a punctuation mark on its opposition to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Starbucks is closing it’s 130 stores in Russia. The global coffee retailer joins a list of nearly 330 companies that have likewise pulled business from Russia, per Investopedia, March 10.
But at last check, none of these enterprises are dropping out of China. Anyone who loves freedom and stands for human rights should wonder why.
Starbucks and those other hundreds of companies yanking business from the Russian Federation is well and good -- Putin bad. Russia’s invasion bad. Check and check -- but why aren’t they exiting the People’s Republic of China? There isn’t a compelling moral case to be made that Xi Jinping’s regime is at least as reprehensible as Putin’s oligarchy?
Shall we say, “Follow the money?” Always follow the money and power.
The PRC is a documented ongoing, flagrant abuser of human rights. Even Biden’s State Department says so.
From “U.S. State Department Report: Human Rights Violations Against Falun Gong and Other Groups in China,” via Falun Dafa, April 2, 2021:
The 79-page section on China mentioned forced organ harvesting: “...activists and some organizations continued to accuse the government of forcibly harvesting organs from prisoners of conscience, including religious and spiritual adherents such as Falun Gong practitioners and Muslim detainees [Uyghurs] in Xinjiang.”
You got that right, forced organ harvesting, which the communist Chinese have turned into a lucrative enterprise.
This from NBC News, June 18, 2019:
Some of the more than 1.5 million detainees in Chinese prison camps are being killed for their organs to serve a booming transplant trade that is worth some $1 billion a year, concluded the China Tribunal, an independent body tasked with investigating organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience in the authoritarian state.
Ask the Uyghurs and Falun Gong about the truth. Both groups are the primary victims of this evil organ-harvesting scheme. The day will come when witnesses of this gruesome practice give chilling testimony before international human rights tribunals. Just like the illicit fentanyl trade that Xi’s China is neck-deep in, forced organ harvesting generates millions of dollars annually in revenues for the communist regime.
But why should Starbucks’ CEO Howard Schultz focus on so inconvenient a truth? Going crosswise Xi might imperil Starbucks’ mainland China operations. Can’t do that.
In addition to killing people for their organs, the communist Chinese are oppressors of liberty and democracy. Ask brave Hongkongers about the communists snuffing out freedom and rights there.
From the HK Post, May 23:
After the pro-democracy protests began in 2019, Beijing made the national security law in 2020, which had crushed the dissent on the island territory. Hong Kong’s Churches, which used to be the space for discussing social issues, have now come under pressure.
According to 18 pastors and religious experts, Churches have been pushed into censoring themselves and also avoiding appointing the pastors which deemed to have political views, and at least one major church is restructuring itself in case the government freezes its assets, reported The Washington Post.
Speaking of invasions, or the potential thereof, what about Taiwan?
The Taiwanese are routinely threatened with invasion by President-for-Life Xi Jingping and weekly menaced by the PRC’s navy and air
238195_5_.jpg
force.
From Online Columnist, April 20:
China’s Peoples Liberation Army [PLA] sent warships, bombers and fighter planes into the Taiwan strait after a visit by U.S. Senators to the independent island nation once a refuge for Mainland Chinese nationals led by Chiang Chai Shek fleeing the 1949 Maoist Revolution to the Island of Formosa.
PRC leaders, from Mao to Xi, have an oft-stated goal of conquering Taiwan. It’s simply a matter of when and how it will be attempted. It may happen sooner than later, Xi being an apex predator and addled Joe Biden being -- well, not a warrior, but something akin to prey. Biden is a wartime leader like Captain Kangaroo commanded a battleship in WWII. Xi surely sees his window for conquering Taiwan during hapless Joe Biden’s term. And you think Xi is the least bit intimidated by Kamala Harris?
Don’t the PRC’s widescale human rights abuses and its increasing belligerence toward Taiwan register with Howard Schultz and his crack team of affluent, mostly white progressives, all of whom, from the safety and comfort of their corporate suites in Antifa and BLM-trashed Seattle, love to be “down with causes?”
But here’s the real skinny. Here’s why Starbucks is glad to exit Russia but not remove itself from the PRC.
Starbucks has only 130 stores in Russia, as mentioned. Per statista, the international coffee chain operates a whopping 5,358 stores across mainland China. Starbucks opened its first store there in 1999, meaning its averaged opening 233 every year for the past 23 years. Expansion is ongoing.
Globally, Starbucks has 34,000 locations. Whereas the Russian stores constitute a mere .004% of its worldwide total, the mainland China shops are nearly 16% of its universe. Losing the Russian stores don’t even amount to a rounding error for Starbucks. On the other hand, closing the PRC stores would be a sizeable hit to the company’s multibillions of dollars in revenues.

Don’t expect Schultz to explain the contradiction. Don’t expect anyone in Corporate America to publicly discuss why doing business with Xi’s tyranny is good but Putin’s regime is bad.
And don’t expect corporate media to challenge big businesses raking in profits from their China ventures. None will be expected to go on record as to why it’s okay to engage a Chinese regime that’s as increasingly despicable as the Soviet Union or National Socialist Germany.
As for Democrats and establishment Republicans pressing the case -- nope, mum’s the word. When was the last time Mitch McConnell pushed legislation sanctioning the PRC for its human rights abuses? Ah, yes, McConnell’s wife’s family profits smartly from China trade. Plenty of D.C. players are reaping handsome retainers lobbying for big businesses engaged in China. Can’t turn off the money spigot, not for mere human rights’ abuses, murder, and oppression.
In years to come, as there’s a Holocaust Museum in D.C., so they’ll be a museum dedicated to the millions of victims of communist China’s tyranny, a tyranny started by the bloodthirsty Mao Zedong. Future U.S. business leaders whose enterprises made fortunes off communist China will eagerly stroke generous checks underwriting the museum. They’ll do so to try to expunge the taint clinging to their enterprises. They’ll do so to try to ease their consciences.
But in that future time, we must remember that those businesses today are doing so, following the money. Moral right and how their outfits enabled the Chinese Communist Party to create millions of victims never factored into their execs’ calculations.
We must never forget.
 
Well first off, why it’s surprising to see them right now is that these tanks are supposed to be part of Russias mobilization reserves, as in they’re supposed to be given to reservists to bolster the numbers. These are firmly Cat C vehicles, as they’re worse off than a T-72A in terms of protection, armament, situational awareness and more. Hell, the T-72A despite its cramped nature and Jack in the Box turret gives you a higher chance of bailing out successfully if a round gets into the crew compartment - the T-62’s all steel hull means fun times with spalling. Estimated survival rates for T-62’s crew in case of penetration by HEAT or APFSDS is something like 1 in 20 or something ludicrous like that due to the drivers hatch position and the insanely cramped interior. We’ve seen more successful bailouts from T-72’s with crew compartment hits so far if it didn’t set off the ammo reserves.

So, why the hell is this being sent up when we are seeing the Russians handing out T-72A’s and AV’s to front line combat units? There’s really only 3 options

1) Armor casualties have hit the point that stockpiles of more modern vehicles ran out and the Russians have been lying about how many tanks they have

2) The T-72 reserves need more time to be made actually functional and T-62’s which were recently put in the stockpiles are quicker to get ready

3) Russia is mobilizing reservists and these are for them

None of these are exactly great signs. It’s also a further strain on Russian logistics as the ammunition isn’t compatible with any other vehicle they have, the parts aren’t compatible either.
What part of my post prompted this autistic reply?
The Azov Regiment has or had (perhaps now at the 'may his memory be a blessing' stage now) Jewish members, and most of primarily Russian speakers if later recruits matched the leadership and founders who were ultras for a local football team, and operates and is supplied like a specialised but regular regiment. The flag is a stylised acronym for 'National Interest' in cyrillic script and Ukrainian language. It is just utterly silly to give credibility to stuff put out on behalf of a third world dictator with several palaces and a tiny ruling class who also live like gods, who've sent a motley crew of the poor and the stupid (unlike those National Guards who refused to cross the border as they lacked passports, were sacked and are now suing for unfair dismissal) to fight for them. The looting of basic things like washing machines (plus smaller electronic goods and jewellery oft found on the dead Russians or stolen by postal workers), the rapes of men, women and babies (also some cases of bestiality) and murders are facts to all reasoning, educated men and women who follow this.

Putin went often to WEF and otherwise sent a delegation. The Russian social structure of a tiny ultra rich ruling class and relative (to even Ukraine for vatniks were stealing washing machines and John Deere tractors tho the based US HQ disabled them remotely so the thieves have nothing) and absolute poverty among workers and bourgeois matches 'you will own nothing and be happy.' There's pics online of Putin happily greeting Klaus Schwab at WEF. Putin is no based 'instrument of chastisement' for the degenerate West.
This is excellent ironically ignorant material to try to downplay actual nazis in Ukraine. I don't personally care about nazis halfway around the world but I highly doubt you'd be so quick to say the guys with tons of Nazi tattoos, patches, symbols, and notable Nazi portraits on display were simply misunderstood before February. I agree they're not WW2-tier Nazis but they idolize them and that's really all you need.
They wouldn't be prominent without Jewish financial backing and their country's leader is a Jew but they're still Nazis, it just makes it all the more retarded.
 
Last edited:
You’re dismissing the concept of speculating on this at all. Weapon shipments like this to the front are a great source of information and something you should be following. Seeing T-62M’s at all anywhere near the front is a surprise.
Sure but what you said had nothing to do with what I said. You're replying to me but not really, you just wanted to sperg.

I dismiss the wild-guessing of where they're going to go, along with everything else, because the guessing is useless when you can just not do that and know where they are when when they get there. It has zero impact for anyone except analysts who inform decision makers.
 
Seeing T-62M’s at all anywhere near the front outside of a museum is a surprise.
Fixed it for you. I've seen a bunch of speculation about what exactly is going on eg they're being sent to occupied areas far from the frontline, they're being sent to Syria to free up more modern tanks there to come back to be used in Ukraine, they're potentially being sold etc etc. The thing is the fact that these obsolescent piece of junk are being used for anything at all, even backline duty, is a sign something is seriously wrong in Russia.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
What part of my post prompted this autistic reply?

This is excellent ironically ignorant material to try to downplay actual nazis in Ukraine. I don't personally care about nazis halfway around the world but I highly doubt you'd be so quick to say the guys with tons of Nazi tattoos, patches, symbols, and notable Nazi portraits on display were simply misunderstood before February. I agree they're not WW2-tier Nazis but they idolize them and that's really all you need.
They wouldn't be prominent without Jewish financial backing and their country's leader is a Jew but they're still Nazis, it just makes it all the more retarded.
muh actual nazis have no real pull in Ukraine. Is that so hard to understand?
Pretty much every country in Europe has a nazi party, whether officially recognized or not. Doesn't mean they have any tangible influence, they tend to be widely unpopular.
 
After a viral Russian video of russian kid saluting troops headed to the meat grinder, Russians made a chocolate "Alyosha" (... there is a popular Soviet chocolate Alyonka, they are still making it)




Be a Russia bro

Spend hours making Gorka uniform for your kid

Put a fucking flag of ... SERBIA because you are so patriotic that you have no fucking clue what your actual flag is or what it stands for, but let's go destroy other nations.
(it's no a photoshop, this is from RF source, they are this dumb)

1653568979277.png

1653569009476.png





Late and gay but what was Putin referring to when he said he wanted Ukraine to "de-Nazify"? It does sound a bit preposterous, but I'm not one to take the side of the mainstream media so it'd be nice to know what he's on about.

no one knows, polls after the invasion have shown that Russians themselves have no idea. That's the point, accept shit from the Tsar without understanding what it is. Obey without question.

Russian word "nahtsi" can stand for Nazi but also for "nationalism", so it technically can be construed to mean de-nationalize Ukraine, which seems fitting as well.

Russia is trying to absorb Ukraine, like it did other areas of Donetsk, Crimea, Dagestan, Chechnya ... essentially making it into a colony that supplies meat for the further conquests.
 
After a viral Russian video of russian kid saluting troops headed to the meat grinder, Russians made a chocolate "Alyosha" (... there is a popular Soviet chocolate Alyonka, they are still making it)




Be a Russia bro

Spend hours making Gorka uniform for your kid

Put a fucking flag of ... SERBIA because you are so patriotic that you have no fucking clue what your actual flag is or what it stands for, but let's go destroy other nations.
(it's no a photoshop, this is from RF source, they are this dumb)
Perhaps the patch is upside down?
 
What part of my post prompted this autistic reply?

This is excellent ironically ignorant material to try to downplay actual nazis in Ukraine. I don't personally care about nazis halfway around the world but I highly doubt you'd be so quick to say the guys with tons of Nazi tattoos, patches, symbols, and notable Nazi portraits on display were simply misunderstood before February. I agree they're not WW2-tier Nazis but they idolize them and that's really all you need.
They wouldn't be prominent without Jewish financial backing and their country's leader is a Jew but they're still Nazis, it just makes it all the more retarded.
Your concern trolling for a billionaire in a golden palace whose pathetic propagandists threatened to destroy Ireland (I note your Christian name) and who sent a horde with names like Chinghiz (one of the Bucha killers) to rob and slaughter European Christians and steal their land is a form of sad cuckoldry. I posted the same earlier with sources, which I'm not bothered to search out again. The Avoz Regiment are among those heroically defending the frontiers of civilisation from an Asiatic despot and his orc horde.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back