Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 110 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 80 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 182 41.2%

  • Total voters
    442
Nobody brought up the scratch she didn't cover up in court with her stupid awesome injury covering makeup.

View attachment 3326378
I don't think they need to. Nobody believes makeup can cover savage bruises like she claims. Half of the jury are women. They know. This argument is stupid and could only exist on television.

I've never seen objections during closing before. I actually thought it wasn't possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puff
I don't think they need to. Nobody believes makeup can cover savage bruises like she claims. Half of the jury are women. They know. This argument is stupid and could only exist on television.

I've never seen objections during closing before. I actually thought it wasn't possible.
It's just "not nice" but these two groups of lawyers seem to really hate each other.
 
It's just "not nice" but these two groups of lawyers seem to really hate each other.
I'm guessing that most juries are like me and haven't seen those closing objections before. It does not look good to be dragged before the judge and scolded during closing. At least with Johnny, they won both objections and one time the one giving the closing simply glanced back and dismissed it.
 
Nicks kid was cute and better than Elaine speaking
I'm sure the internet would ruin it, but his kids are cute and I'd watch a stream with them in it.

Not a lot of streams because other people's kids stop being cute pretty quickly, but one stream. Maybe playing some video games with them or something.
 
I don't think they need to. Nobody believes makeup can cover savage bruises like she claims. Half of the jury are women. They know. This argument is stupid and could only exist on television.

I've never seen objections during closing before. I actually thought it wasn't possible.
There were a few in Rittenhouse and Taser Cop, I think. This is a stupid amount of them though.
 
Johnny's side: "We only care about the truth. Honestly, the money doesn't matter. Punishing Amber doesn't matter. We just want the truth."
Amber's side: "SHE LOST AT LEAST FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS BECAUSE JOHNNY STOLE HER ROLES AND SMEARED HER WITH POOP. HER EMOTIONAL DAMAGES ARE EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANT. but you don't have to give 100 million. just think about that she should get minimum 50 and her emotional damages are extra. Also punish Johnny."
 
The copypasta for $500 wasn't that great, but the panel and Nick's reaction to it suddenly appearing was amusing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: feral cat #6385
Nobody brought up the scratch she didn't cover up in court with her stupid awesome injury covering makeup.

View attachment 3326378
Those cheek implants are groteque. She is turning into Maureen Ponderosa.
Maureen Cheeks.jpg

She will be full cat by the appeal
Maureen Cat.png
 
I don't think they need to. Nobody believes makeup can cover savage bruises like she claims. Half of the jury are women. They know. This argument is stupid and could only exist on television.

I've never seen objections during closing before. I actually thought it wasn't possible.
It's generally considered rude since the whole point of opening and closing is argumentative.

That said I want to say I've seen a few here and there from the other Nick-covered trials.

I'm sure the internet would ruin it, but his kids are cute and I'd watch a stream with them in it.

Not a lot of streams because other people's kids stop being cute pretty quickly, but one stream. Maybe playing some video games with them or something.
I distinctly remember one stream (maybe a locals stream) where Nick's eldest(?) shilled with "don't forget to like and subscribe!"

He has a good relationship with his kids, and that would help.
 
It's generally considered rude since the whole point of opening and closing is argumentative.

That said I want to say I've seen a few here and there from the other Nick-covered trials.


I distinctly remember one stream (maybe a locals stream) where Nick's eldest(?) shilled with "don't forget to like and subscribe!"

He has a good relationship with his kids, and that would help.

Learning the grift from a young age, can't say I disapprove
 
  • Like
Reactions: P5Fever
Johnny's side: "We only care about the truth. Honestly, the money doesn't matter. Punishing Amber doesn't matter. We just want the truth."
Amber's side: "SHE LOST AT LEAST FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS BECAUSE JOHNNY STOLE HER ROLES AND SMEARED HER WITH POOP. HER EMOTIONAL DAMAGES ARE EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANT. but you don't have to give 100 million. just think about that she should get minimum 50 and her emotional damages are extra. Also punish Johnny."
It's worse than that.... they only asked for 350k. They went from 100m to 350k after saying the 100m was just a message. I'm shocked that's not considered malpractice.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fat Gay Riker
Back