Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[huecoffs02]

I won't be happy until they call the top LawTuber Award the Nick Rekeita Award and have him as the only voting party.

The Nick Award of Rekieta's LawTube for Excellence in Lawtubing

 

[Allanon]

I think deciding damages might take longer than who is at fault.

This is likely true, regardless of who wins.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Please just let them decide in two hours for Depp, make the damages $ 6,942,000.00, and call it a day.

 

[huecoffs02]

Sucks I had to come to the office today but I'll enjoy watching the shitshow all evening.

 

[Count Cumia]

Please just let them decide in two hours for Depp, make the damages $ 6,942,000.00, and call it a day.

$6 million after only 2 hours of deliberation? I doubt it $200k at most.

 

[Allanon]

$6 million after only 2 hours of deliberation? I doubt it $200k at most.

Many think it'll be $7m

Personally I think it'll be closer to $50m if Johnny wins because it's just simplest to do so.

 

[Count Cumia]

Let's all not forget with the LegalBytes nonsense that Chanley Painter sucks as well. She was used by the Heard side to push the calling Depp to the stand false rumor, she gets a free spot with no issue because of Court TV, and now she is copying Rob, DUI Guy, and Runkle with jury reaction notes.

DUI Guy might cause drama. He was annoyed Runkle said that he thought the defense had a good close and now he says he is unfollowing him on twitter over something to do with the jurors and who is the alternate. He just said Runkle wouldn't talk to him last night so I wonder if there is some drama from before.

 

[Allanon]

DUI Guy might cause drama. He was annoyed Runkle said that he thought the defense had a good close and now he says he is unfollowing him on twitter over something to do with the jurors and who is the alternate. He just said Runkle wouldn't talk to him last night so I wonder if there is some drama from before.

He is clearly joking.

 

[CrippleThreat]

Let's all not forget with the LegalBytes nonsense that Chanley Painter sucks as well. She was used by the Heard side to push the calling Depp to the stand false rumor, she gets a free spot with no issue because of Court TV, and now she is copying Rob, DUI Guy, and Runkle with jury reaction notes.

And what Nick said was hilarious: an overqualified woman (who is also a lawyer) is forced to copy some random dudes in the gallery because they're getting all the hits that her mainstream(?) platform can't by itself.

 

[Potatoherder]

Andrea is back and she is clearly the 2nd best lawtube waifu after Branca.

 

[huecoffs02]

Andrea vs Bytes arc next?

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Andrea is back and she is clearly the 2nd best lawtube waifu after Branca.

It's those fish. They're just... hypnotizing.

 

[Allanon]

Cops just ran into the courthouse, no word on why. Obviously Amber got stressed and started flinging poo.

 

[TexOffender]

 

[Kosher Salt]

DUI Guy might cause drama. He was annoyed Runkle said that he thought the defense had a good close and now he says he is unfollowing him on twitter over something to do with the jurors and who is the alternate. He just said Runkle wouldn't talk to him last night so I wonder if there is some drama from before.

If Runkle thought that was a good closing argument from the defense, his brain is clearly fried.

I'd almost credit Rottenborn for a decent closing argument, but I wouldn't call it great, and batshit crazy lady basically undid anything he'd accomplished and flung poo all over the courtroom.

 

[huecoffs02]

Was Elaine's closing really that bad that undid Rottenboy?

 

[Allanon]

Was Elaine's closing really that bad that undid Rottenboy?

it isn't that it was bad, because bad implies you can understand it.

 

[Count Cumia]

"Most women know that men just want us to love them." -Andrea

 

[TechPriest#42069]

If you're going to have a well-regulated group with rules that people are expected to follow, you need to found it as that. Go out and make yourself a guild or whatever of legal youtube streamers and from the outset have rules. Do not make a loose coalition of people who just happen to share the same job or interests or hobbies and then abruptly start telling people how they have to behave to be a 'part' of it. If you wanna play gatekeeping games, you'd better build the gate with the foundation, don't make a giant archway welcoming everyone and then suddenly step up with your hands out and start demanding qualifications to enter.

That's not the way to get popular though she had to start with the appeal to Nick's audiance. IMO Legal Bytes is just a snake, you could tell during Rittenhouse when she first showed up she was there to use Nick to build her brand. I mean just look at her during the Rittenhouse streams. It's not like she is just there and natural and part of the conversation, its more like she is spending the whole time looking at herself in the mirror, making sure she looks right for the simps. And trying to get the best angles possible. One of the most consistent to show up on those streams as well from what I remember.

Now once she built the audience she rarely shows up on his channel. I feel like she may have even asked him to come on her stream as a guest for the Depp trial. Nick made a few comments right before that trial started that made it sound like someone was asking him something along those lines. Things like "I do what I do and everyone else can do what they do and there are no problems with anything" My guess is that Bytes has aspirations to keep going up and as she does that she is gonna make herself more and more palatable to the average person. I doubt she has any real strongly held beliefs or morals to stop her from doing whatever is expedient.

 

[Allanon]

That's not the way to get popular though she had to start with the appeal to Nick's audiance. IMO Legal Bytes is just a snake, you could tell during Rittenhouse when she first showed up she was there to use Nick to build her brand. I mean just look at her during the Rittenhouse streams. It's not like she is just there and natural and part of the conversation, its more like she is spending the whole time looking at herself in the mirror, making sure she looks right for the simps. And trying to get the best angles possible. One of the most consistent to show up on those streams as well from what I remember.

Now once she built the audience she rarely shows up on his channel. I feel like she may have even asked him to come on her stream as a guest for the Depp trial. Nick made a few comments right before that trial started that made it sound like someone was asking him something along those lines. Things like "I do what I do and everyone else can do what they do and there are no problems with anything" My guess is that Bytes has aspirations to keep going up and as she does that she is gonna make herself more and more palatable to the average person. I doubt she has any real strongly held beliefs or morals to stop her from doing whatever is expedient.

It isn't about Legal Bytes any more than it's about that one frog idiot in comicsgate. It's a critical flaw of the entire concept of a "loosely connected group of people with similar interests/goals/expertise that suddenly becomes a solid group with leadership, rules, and outcast ex-members". There will always be a Legal Bytes - and worse - when taking that method. Because you have zero vetting about people getting in, then everyone experiences a little bit of success, and then some people in that group will want more success or will be afraid of losing their success and start making rules and grabbing power. Thus, if you're gonna have a well-defined group with gatekeeping and rules, you have to start with them, you can't add them in later.