US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Just show them images of dead kids lol

>"our usual methods aren't working anymore, people are tuning us out"
>"just show pictures of dead kids!"
Here’s a picture of a dead kid from the massacre at a San Ysidro McDonald’s in 1984. This image (in video form) could also be seen in 1984 newsreels of the incident.
68B21110-A88F-44FE-94E1-8EE7A690DD4D.jpeg
I remember being really taken aback at seeing this image for the first time, because the news *NEVER* shows graphic imagery today (seems like the 80s were different). Case in point, think about how they always freeze graphic footage right before it starts getting really good (e.g. shopkeeper draws pistol on robber-[FREEZE]).

Given that the media seems to strongly avoid showing graphic images, I doubt they’d be on board with it unless they got even more activist or received some serious marching orders from their leftist masters (remember how they put their censorship rules aside in order to hammer Trump for saying ‘shithole’?). I imagine there’d also be strong opposition from the victims’ families, where many would not want to picture/have their loved ones exposed in that way. At the same time, some would probably consent out of devotion to the gun control cause in the hopes that it would make a difference. But given that they obliterated the Sandy Hook building and forbade anything from leaving the site (along with the secrecy that shrouds that incident), I think we’re a looong way away from seeing mass shooting death photos on the 5 o’clock news. We’re in the age of the ‘trigger warning,’ for chrissake. But they could very well get that desperate…

A way that it could backfire would be where people become so accustomed to seeing such imagery that it stops affecting them. Ever wonder how those crowds that gather in city squares to watch an ISIL beheading are so stoic? It’s because it’s such a common occurrence that it doesn’t bother them anymore. I could see the frequent news and possible imagery from mass shootings having this effect as time passes. Remember, we’re vicious by nature, and graphic shit like that wouldn’t sway as many as they’d think. People love looking at dark/disturbed realities, and more so if said things are purposely kept hidden. True crime is a popular genre for a very real reason.

And I say all of this as someone who LOVES looking at uncensored evidence of grim reality. I remember the glory days of being able to see Indian train/highway accidents, Russian dashcam footage, crime scene photos, suicides, and cartel murders on BestGore.com (RIP). I’d be down to see classroom pictures from Sandy Hook in the same way that I’d be down to see pictures taken of Charla Nash right when the paramedics showed up. I mean, am I the only one who would be down to see the pics/videos from things like the Air France 447 recovery or Unit 731? Or the pictures of Anna Nicole Smith’s decomposing corpse after Joshua Perper told the judge that there would be no open casket?? C’mon, man!
 
Last edited:
lol. That's what they get for choosing weed, a substance that is vastly overrated by everyone.
Reeeeeeeeeeeeee

Anyway I'm glad I like weed so much I never got into doing harder stuff regularly. I definitely would have ODed on some Chinese fentanyl if weed hadn't been and wasn't enough for me 99% of the time
 
There's a good reason the feds won't legalize weed: too many people don't know that your MMJ card disqualifies you from owning a gun.
You'd have to be a fucking retard to get an MMJ card when you can just buy Delta 9 and Delta 8 shit at literally any smoke shop completely legally in every state other than Idaho.
 
Here’s a picture of a dead kid from the massacre at a San Ysidro McDonald’s in 1984. This image (in video form) could also be seen in 1984 newsreels of the incident.
View attachment 3335664
I remember being really taken aback at seeing this image for the first time, because the news *NEVER* shows graphic imagery today (seems like the 80s were different). Case in point, think about how they always freeze graphic footage right before it starts getting really good (e.g. shopkeeper draws pistol on robber-[FREEZE]).

Given that the media seems to strongly avoid showing graphic images, I doubt they’d be on board with it unless they got even more activist or received some serious marching orders from their leftist masters (remember how they put their censorship rules to the side in order to hammer Trump for saying ‘shithole’?). I imagine there’d also be strong opposition from the victims’ families, where many would not want to picture/have their loved ones exposed in that way. At the same time, some would probably consent out of devotion to the gun control cause in the hopes that it would make a difference. But given that they obliterated the Sandy Hook building and forbade anything from leaving the site (along with the secrecy that shrouds that incident), I think we’re a looong way away from seeing mass shooting death photos on the 5 o’clock news. We’re in the age of the ‘trigger warning,’ for chrissake. But they could very well get that desperate…

A way that it could backfire would be where people become so accustomed to seeing such imagery that it stops affecting them. Ever wonder how those crowds that gather to watch an ISIL beheading are so stoic? It’s such a common occurrence that it doesn’t bother them anymore. I could see the frequent news and possible imagery from mass shootings having this effect as time passes. Remember, we’re vicious by nature, and graphic shit like that wouldn’t sway as many as they’d think. People love looking at dark/disturbed realities, and more so if said things are purposely kept hidden. True crime is a popular genre for a very real reason.

And I say all of this as someone who LOVES looking at photos of grim reality. I remember the glory days of being able to watch Indian train/highway accidents, Russian dashcam footage, and gang murders on BestGore.com (RIP). I’d be down to see classroom pictures from Sandy Hook in the same way that I’d be down to see pictures taken of Charla Nash right when the paramedics showed up. I mean, am I the only one who would be down to see pictures of Anna Nicole Smith’s decomposing corpse after Joshua Perper told the judge that there would be no open casket?? C’mon, man!
How many skeletons are there in the crawlspace under your porch

Human, animal, either/or

Just asking
 
View attachment 3334776

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the US military under Joe Biden.

We are absolutely fucked if we go up against any enemy bigger than 1980s grenada.
While this is a hugely discouraging video to watch…

Today is Memorial Day here in Burgerland. Let us honor and remember the brave, selfless men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice while protecting and serving our country. I’m forever grateful for their courage and service 🇺🇸 🪖.
 
Today is Memorial Day here in Burgerland. Let us honor and remember the brave, selfless men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice while protecting and serving our country. I’m forever grateful for their courage and service 🇺🇸 🪖.
The oldies and people like @Jet Fuel Johnny and @JosephStalin, sure. The current military (specifically, people like the nog bitch in the video)? LOL NO. The most they deserve is shit in their goddamn left shoe.
 
The jew fears the Christian Nationalist.

View attachment 3334856

Seriously, despite all the lukewarm churchian pseudo-judeo-christianity that's actually practiced in America, they are opening this conflict with "You're Christian and we hate you for it."

What a BONEHEAD move! Nothing will fuel the rise of real Christianity faster than hard times and persecution.
"Now you Christians know your place or I'll echo the Democrat's talking points by saying the KKK is returning to prominence. Also keep supporting Israel because it plays an important role in your religious text's last chapter."
 
There's a good reason the feds won't legalize weed: too many people don't know that your MMJ card disqualifies you from owning a gun.
Doesn't that just give the federal government all the more reason to make it legal and have a big database of people who consented to a cannabis usage registry that functions as a firearm ownership blacklist? Just legalize weed already you fucking pussies.
 
Doesn't that just give the federal government all the more reason to make it legal and have a big database of people who consented to a cannabis usage registry that functions as a firearm ownership blacklist? Just legalize weed already you fucking pussies.
No. It'd be like being barred because you consume alcohol.
 
It's an inanimate tool that is no more capable or motivated than the person wielding it.
This, right here, is what you need to beat into the heads of progs screaming bloody murder over firearm ownership. Call me optimistic, but maybe some of them will take the hint and realize school shootings are a symptom of a greater social disease within contemporary American society.
 
Last edited:
A way that it could backfire would be where people become so accustomed to seeing such imagery that it stops affecting them. Ever wonder how those crowds that gather to watch an ISIL beheading are so stoic? It’s such a common occurrence that it doesn’t bother them anymore. I could see the frequent news and possible imagery from mass shootings having this effect as time passes. Remember, we’re vicious by nature, and graphic shit like that wouldn’t sway as many as they’d think. People love looking at dark/disturbed realities, and more so if said things are purposely kept hidden. True crime is a popular genre for a very real reason.
I think it's already started to set in, i've talked to people, not many mind you, but people who have said things in the vein of "Yeah, it's horrible, but shit happens" about the Uvalde shooting. Keep in mind, this is probably one of the worst tragedies to ocurr in Texas soil, maybe even in America as a whole

If you ask me, people are just tired of the constant political bombardment that follows after shit like this, specially cause you can tell it's all fucking fake, these politicians don't give a shit. It's all so tiresome
 
"Now you Christians know your place or I'll echo the Democrat's talking points by saying the KKK is returning to prominence. Also keep supporting Israel because it plays an important role in your religious text's last chapter."
Continue:
"Now that Isreal that exists right now is totally the one from book of Revelations, sure the people there have been statistically proven to despise you but you need to continue supporting and dying for that country at all costs."
 
It's an inanimate tool that is no more capable or motivated than the person wielding it.
This, right here, is what you need to beat into the heads of progs screaming bloody murder over firearm ownership. Call me optimistic, but maybe some of them will take the hint and realize school shootings are a symptom of a greater social disease is contemporary American society.
Correct. Mass shootings aren’t about psychological conditions, they’re about existential ones. For a person to make a concentrated effort to go out and indiscriminately murder as many individuals as he or she can, they have to be able to rationalize it. Crazy people don’t commit mass shootings, because crazy people lack the ability to justify their actions. Every mass shooter, however, believes that his actions ARE reasonable, and as horrible as they may be, can be justified as a response to greater social injustices. That mentality explains why 9/11 happened, and why Timothy McVeigh bombed Oklahoma, and why Anders Breivik murdered 70 plus people -- a widespread morally-motivated contempt for society itself.

Most mass shooters in this day and age are suicidal. Lanza, the Virgina Tech Guy, Columbine, that one guy that shot up the Navy Yard -- they all wound up just as dead as their victims. So, in addition to a widespread sense of social hate, these people typically have a deep hatred of themselves, as well. In the act of mass murder, however, they’re able to sort of transcend their own meagerness, and in turn, become more powerful, socially, than they ever would have been had they NOT embarked upon their killing sessions. All modern mass shooters, as such, view themselves as martyrs -- they’re taking themselves out by doing what they do, but in exchange? They become immortal fixtures of the American experience, individuals that are no longer anonymous but utterly unforgettable.

The negative connotations of their acts make no difference here -- by becoming mass killers, they become famous, they create an indelible legacy, and they make themselves important in a world that, otherwise, would never have cared about them. The horrific irony here is that the emergence of the 24 hour news cycle, in conjunction with the ADD-nature of the Internet and social media, means that mass shooters have to keep upping their body counts (or turn their hatred towards children/minorities, as seen recently) to remain relevant. Nowadays, killing just a handful of people won’t suffice -- if you want long-term attention, you’ve got to hit at least double digits. And now, we're living in a country where we can hear about twenty people getting shot to death and have it be completely irrelevant “information” the very next day.

Hatred is an intoxicating thing. There’s probably a litany of reasons why people hate their own communities -- how many of us hate our jobs, and our schools, and the people we're surrounded by, after all? -- but with mass shooters, that hatred is taken beyond the normal sense of temporary frustration we all encounter. In short, these mass shooters fall in love with their own hatred, to the point where their bitterness, and their resentment, and their utter spite of the world around them becomes their internal power source. It defines who they are, and it makes them feel powerful and unique as individuals. You combine that self-defining local culture hatred with a sense of existential gloom, and you have perfect conditions for a mass shooter to arise. Tack on a psychotic condition and a familiarity with deadly weapons, and now you’re basically staring at an unlit powder keg, ready to go off at any minute.

In part, we have so many mass shootings in the U.S. because we have so few social bonds with each other -- we don’t connect with others, we don’t empathize with our peers and we never reach out to help one another in times of need. Simply put, Americans really have no sense of communal purpose, or togetherness -- we view society as just a mass of people that are either insignificant, dangerous, or totally contemptible. We see community as a burden, a handicap, a thing that stands in our way -- instead of seeing other people, we see moochers, and potential victimizers, and people that aren’t worth saving, anyway. As Americans, we are taught from birth to look out for number one at all costs, even if it means screwing over everybody else. Ours is a culture that rewards both aggression and self-superiority -- we’re told that love is something that can only be reserved in small quantities, while indiscriminate hatred can be heaped on the masses sans consequence.

As a culture, we pride ourselves on being mean, and selfish, and predatory, yet we wonder why so many people in our own society have so little reservations about killing his fellow man.

TL;DR: Mass shooters are A.M. from I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.
 
Similarly, if you can handle a gun safely while shitfaced, you can be trusted with it.
Sounds like they should add another step to the CCW licensing process. (Just kidding, they should be issued automatically at 18.) But here are the people leftists say we should trust with guns, and they are presumably sober:
The police:

The DEA:

The FBI:

The military [bonus Ukraine content]:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back