- Joined
- Sep 16, 2021
What catches my attention in the recording which should be relevant
> when kids are unattended - and they're close in age, some of this shit happens
So from the get-go this isn't a James Bear kind of deal where you've got a teenager or tween who should know better, fucking a literal child.
HOWEVER
It does sound like he's talking about them being prepubescent children. Where do prepubescent children find out about sex or 'playing doctor' or whatever, at that age people don't have a developed sex drive yet, anything consciously sexual like that is learned. The more pressing question is WHO it was learned from.
Then there's the fact that he's heavily autistic, to the point where he struggles even with talking (at least in a semi-social situation). He talks about her calling him a pervert and a slut and grabbing his ass. Maybe she's teasing him and he interprets it as her being angry and aggressive because social cues. Without more information or someone normal observing them in the same room, there's little telling.
That said, I'm generally not a fan of 'canceling' people for being weird internet fetishists/degenerates. The only clear difference here is that he actually did degenerate shit in real life, for many years (if true).
Extremely short clips have a heavy correlation with gay ops for obvious reasons and stuff like "software issues" is often used to obfuscate discrepancies with what little material is presented.
All of the above and probably more reasons I haven't spotted are why there's bound to be people that are very skeptical from the get-go. If you want people to be less suspicious, just release the full 2-hour recording.
> when kids are unattended - and they're close in age, some of this shit happens
So from the get-go this isn't a James Bear kind of deal where you've got a teenager or tween who should know better, fucking a literal child.
HOWEVER
It does sound like he's talking about them being prepubescent children. Where do prepubescent children find out about sex or 'playing doctor' or whatever, at that age people don't have a developed sex drive yet, anything consciously sexual like that is learned. The more pressing question is WHO it was learned from.
Then there's the fact that he's heavily autistic, to the point where he struggles even with talking (at least in a semi-social situation). He talks about her calling him a pervert and a slut and grabbing his ass. Maybe she's teasing him and he interprets it as her being angry and aggressive because social cues. Without more information or someone normal observing them in the same room, there's little telling.
That said, I'm generally not a fan of 'canceling' people for being weird internet fetishists/degenerates. The only clear difference here is that he actually did degenerate shit in real life, for many years (if true).
I think what he implied by 'gay op' is someone taking clips from recording his voice in a discord call and splicing it together to make it sound like something different. You know in a similar fashion to the 'Patebin' incident. It's been done before, it's tremendously homosexual when it happens and even more so if people fall for it. That's why people usually demand full recordings/streams so they can root out gay op cases.
Extremely short clips have a heavy correlation with gay ops for obvious reasons and stuff like "software issues" is often used to obfuscate discrepancies with what little material is presented.
"I'm trying to protect my source/trying to not out my source" is another one of those excuses to obfuscate suspicious details on a 'leak'.
All of the above and probably more reasons I haven't spotted are why there's bound to be people that are very skeptical from the get-go. If you want people to be less suspicious, just release the full 2-hour recording.
Very weird if true. A known MAP eceleb comes out of nowhere and drags him into a several hour interview and then immediately sends the recording to the gunt?
Do you have something better to confirm that than your word? This seems like a really crucial detail. Too crucial to leave in the realm of "bryan dunn said so".
You seem to know more, does her dox give a definitive answer on what their ages really were at the time and how long this really lasted?
