Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%

  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%

  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%
  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Oh I'm sure some Hollywood sicko will pork her and her turds. Is Woddy Allen still around?

I'm just saying that its ok to be turned off by her.

She was attractive. Very attractive. Long years ago, she was very smashable.

But now she is much older, and she gave the iron teeth of time a lot of helping with her drug habits.

Tl,dr, she used to be a delicious strawberry cake but she is way past her expiry date with mold settling in and smeared with shit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: mrpatapon, MicrowavedApple, GenericReviewerDraco and 9 others
Bitch got off light. Should have been taken to the fucking cleaners for $30M+

Watch it get reduced on appeal and she skates with only 2 mil to pay, so it works out as a net zero
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Allanon
Honka Honka Burning Love said:
this is also discounting actually wanting to spend time with her.

Does anyone think that Amber Heard is a person that will not be an absolute boring time to spend around for more than one sentence?
Click to expand...
She was really into obscure blues music according to Johnny. Some girls with weird, masculine habits can sometimes be more tolerable just because they're into something their man can relate to. Drinking scotch and smoking cigars is another example.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Male Idiot and Matt Damon
Hogar Grupal said:
I'm late to this, but how does Amber still get 2 million dollars after she lost?
Click to expand...
She doesn't "get" 2 million dollars. She basically owes 2 million dollars less than she would otherwise. And the reason why is because one statement by Waldmann is different from the rest of the subject at hand. Everything else was "Is Amber lying about being abused or not" - the jury overwhelmingly found her to be lying. The statement that was found to be defamatory was specifically "Did Amber personally call the cops to hurt Johnny, then upon failing to, call her lawyer and publicist, rough up her apartment, and then call them again?" - the jury did not find that to be true, and found it to be known by Waldmann that it wasn't true.

There's a good chance it was a compromise because someone on the jury didn't want to give Johnny the win/wanted Amber to win, but technically what was presented was that. Notably, the jury gave an extra 5 million in punishment damages with Amber's comments, but 0 in Waldmann's. Which means that they felt 'Waldmann's statement caused her damage, but we will not punish him for it' while they felt 'Amber's statement caused Depp damage and we need to punish her.'
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: mrpatapon, Ira the Weatherman, Chester Rigby and 6 others
AmQXPh.png

 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Ira the Weatherman, Cactuar King, Aum Shinrikyo and 10 others
  • Like
Reactions: Cactuar King, Associate Rick, Dolphin Lundgren and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back