Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%

  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%

  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%
  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Jen Rubin, never one to miss an opportunity to shill for dictatorship.

Screenshot_20220601-191936_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Every Crook and Nanny, Pig Cups, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 9 others
twitter clout chaser said:
Can't wait for women to see this as a step back for womenhood
Click to expand...
I think this is a step forward. Most women i know supported Johnny Depp and hated Amber Heard. The fact that two women were on the jury and still voted guilty is evidence of progress.

I think nearly everyone has correctly identified her as a psycho and a liar. I also think she is a malignant anomaly that has nothing to do with gender. The fact that many other women called her out instead of defending her means we are all on the same page that she is an anomaly.

I also think a lot of bpd and spoiled chicks got a reality check too. Equality cuts both ways in 2022.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Ira the Weatherman, FuckedOffToff, Rossacciu and 11 others
What movements will spill out form this verdict?

A movement by the BPD and HD groups wanting to distance themselves from being seems as abusers and Amber in general?


A movement called appeal for Amber heard?


Hmmmmm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doom Queef 666
Xer/xi/fae said:
Personally, i think any real victim will have real evidences backing them up, and in cases of abusers like Heard, there is always a trail of their fucked ups somewhere. There will people believe you if you already someone with credibility.
It's also an undenial facts that men are stronger than women and can get physical quicker too, so the domestic abuse statistics will sadly continue to skrew toward women.
So I'd like to believe that this will mostly affect celebs/influencers etc more and that people will start looking at abuse claims etc (especially if it's from those kind of people) more objectively
Click to expand...
Nope. [insert biggest optimism rainbow here]

From personal experience, here's how western society treats male victims of domestic violence:
Am male, twice divorced, was beaten viciously by both ex-wives during the marriages.

When I once took my first wife to the ER to seek treatment when she fell off a high ladder, she was seen to almost immediately. The staff gave me the side-eye during our stay and separated us for a few minutes so they could grill her about "what really happened." I'm told they were very persistent and she had to get pretty nasty with them to make them drop it. They openly scowled at me after that and they weren't too thrilled with her either.

When I presented at the ER after a hard beating, they gave zero fucks. I waited for hours in pain in the lobby. In the exam room, they took a cursory glance at best and only begrudgingly performed an x-ray after my wife raised a stink about it (DV is fucking weird -- she was okay with beating me herself but wouldn't tolerate anyone else treating me like shit). They made no effort to separate us to ask me if she'd injured me. When she went to the bathroom and I had a moment alone with a nurse, I did tell her what really happened, but she just rolled her eyes at me and walked out without saying a word. She never reported it. They did nothing for the pain. I was released with advice to get an ice pack. They didn't furnish one.

A few weeks later when I fled our home to escape another beating I went to a domestic violence shelter. There were two in the city. Both were very polite and sympathetic (it was obvious I'd been beaten -- cuts, bruises, a black eye and some caked-on blood on my face and arms) but said they couldn't help me because I could be a potential threat to the women already in the shelter. A nearby police station graciously let me crash on their break room couch that night, but nobody pressed me for details or offered to investigate or escort me home or anything though the next morning. Treated me alright though.

A therapist later asked me why I didn't just defend myself physically and wasn't pleased with my answer ("the police would arrest me because they won't believe she was beating me"). She plainly opined "maybe she just doesn't respect you because you're weak and make excuses instead of standing up for yourself" even though I'd just told her that standing up for myself was exactly what provoked the attacks.

When we finally split up, she called the police as I was packing up my car to GTFO and claimed I'd threatened and beat her. They arrived promptly, ready to rough me up and haul me to jail. A female officer (go figure) came to "get my side of the story" and -- for reasons I'll never understand -- actually gave me the benefit of the doubt and called the out-of-state sheriff's office where my ex had a colorful history to verify my claims that she did this sort of thing a lot. They corroborated, and to my astonishment the officer went to bat for me and actually convinced the rest to cut me loose.

Second marriage was about the same as the first. No cops involved at least. She's gone now. I've been alone for two years now but I'm finally working through it all in my head and healing. I still get really nervous when someone gets too close though. It makes dating mostly a no-go. I'm lonely, but slowly getting better.
TL;DR: no one believes them, no one wants to help, no one gives a shit. Men rarely report attacks and they're often ignored when they do. Men who "let" themselves get beaten and don't fight back are seen as weak pussies who probably earned it. A man who does fight back is automatically seen as the aggressor. Women routinely lie to police about DV just to fuck with their targets and police believe them. Avoiding arrest for DV as a man requires substantial proof of innocence -- the man's statements nor an absence of visible injury to the accuser are sufficient to avoid arrest even though the accuser's word alone is usually enough to guarantee it. In jurisdictions that mandate an arrest for all DV calls (i.e. "someone's going to jail tonight just so the other can get some peace"), unless the woman's being openly belligerent towards the police, the man always takes the ride.

Domestic violence stats are heavily skewed favoring female victims because because of these factors.

Feels bad, man.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cockyxx, BirdLaw, Jarch6 and 125 others
Neil said:
Holy fucking shit, Anita really does embody what a Third-Wave Feminist is. Women are god and are 100% infallible and even if the evidence is against them, they must always be believed and ruled in favor of in cases of Domestic Abuse even when the evidence proves that they were the abuser.
Click to expand...
On the plus side, it's mighty nice of all of the usual suspect degenerates to out themselves like this, particularly when this trial has been a redpill moment for a lot of people. (Heck, for a bit there we even had ResetEra people wondering why the fuck the Approved Narrative and what they were seeing with their "dirty lying eyes" were so different.)

They're starting to push the bounds of incredulity too far. Rate me 🌈 (lol you can't though) but I think the normies are starting to wise up to the nonsense.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cactuar King, Whatthefuck, AnonAutismo and 9 others
According to CNN her spokesman is saying she'll appeal the case. Anyone with legal knowledge know if the appeal goes through, does that mean we'll do this whole thing again, or does it just mean a judge will look at the case and decide it?
 
Machine head said:
What movements will spill out form this verdict?

A movement by the BPD and HD groups wanting to distance themselves from being seems as abusers and Amber in general?


A movement called appeal for Amber heard?


Hmmmmm
Click to expand...
It's very possible that she will push for an appeal to try to get more money out from Depp (instead of just *claiming* that she will appeal and then shitting the bed and do nothing). Her fans are also the type to ignore evidence of her blatantly taunting Depp and telling him that nobody will believe him about her abusing him, so they will probably back her up no matter what.

As for movements, I think maybe a fringe movement for Heard's appeal will be made, although other hashtag groups like #MeToo will distance themselves away from her after she rode on the #MeToo wave and played victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Water-T, GenericReviewerDraco, Associate Rick and 2 others
Greyfield said:
According to CNN her spokesman is saying she'll appeal the case. Anyone with legal knowledge know if the appeal goes through, does that mean we'll do this whole thing again, or does it just mean a judge will look at the case and decide it?
Click to expand...
There's no new trial. The lawyers make some arguments, the judge reviews the case, and decides if there's been some sort of deficiency in the law, and reviews the monetary awards. The judge can overturn the verdict, fine-tune the damages, or change nothing at all.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Whatthefuck, AnonAutismo, YarrBlueballs and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back