What's the most absolutely wrong "lesson" you've seen taught in media aimed at kids?

Most of the morals discussed so far are good in moderation or certain cases. The problem is children's media HAS to be simple because kids can't go with the nuances of "this won't work now but it could work in a different situation". Young kids tend to try on morals and be absolutist about things until something IRL changes their worldview. Part of growing up is learning the grays of the world.

"I wish family wasn't so important" is true for a lot of abused children, but not true for all children. If your brother is bullying you, maybe he is a budding douchebag, but maybe he is genuinely acting out and you two can make up over apple juice and transformers later. Once you grow up YOU make the choices and are in charge. You can make the call that your family sucks, you can run away from your problems, you don't need to try and understand bullies, and so on.

Morality and expectations are dependent on situations. Children's media has to shoot for wide messages that most PARENTS (because they can get a show canceled) are ok with.

TL; DR: of course not everything applies everywhere.
 
It's little surprise that some KiwiFarmers are unable to understand the nuances of even the most basic children's story.

OP is wrong, of course. The family is important and vitally so given what we know of social outcasts in the news today. These aren't just some random individuals you get thrown in with. They are literally part of you down to the genetic level.
But the moral was always meant as a two way street. Yes, you are meant to better yourself to live up to your family's expectations and traditions. Help your parents, grandparents, siblings, and relations. But they also must reciprocate in kind.
Why?
Because it's IMPORTANT. And it goes back to your neolithic ancestors scrabbling out a living on the Russia steppe hunting mammoths and fighting off other tribes.
Now. Granted. You might have bad luck. You might be an orphan. Your family might well and truly be shit. But that doesn't mean the concept of "FAMILY" is bad though. That means YOU as the individual must work that much harder to achieve the ideal family and forge a future for yourself and your children.

The entire storybook of the The Ugly Duckling, the book should be about self acceptance and learning to be happy with not being a normally attractive being in society, but by the end of the book the duckling doesn't have an epiphany after all the shit that he's been through being shat on by other animals and even his own family, to be like 'Im different, I can be happy with that, fuck them! Instead, the dude turns into a beautiful swan for no reason at the end and is accepted for finally being of a high enough standard to cater to societies shallow outlook. Its basically unintentional or not saying 'If your not beautiful your life is worthless unless you change yourself to cater to other peoples opinions even if they treat you badly' Real nice message to give to like the 4 year olds who first read that guys.

This is completely incorrect. The moral of the Ugly Duckling is that SOCIETY shouldn't judge the "Ugly Duckling" based on something superficial. This is especially relevant today for our young single male Kiwifarmers since the Ugly Duckling metaphor is most often associated with "Ugly" little girls in school. Well it turns out those Ugly little ducklings grow up to be beautiful swans, and aren't you the stupid Goose to make fun of her throughout her entire life in school.

Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer goes out of it's way to make all of the other reindeer (and elves, various other Santa employees) out to be vapid cunts, especially because they start fawning after Rudolph the moment he acquires a powerful patron. Most of the adaptations go on to have him forgive all these assholes for being just the absolute worst to him his whole mutant life because, again, now they suck up to him because he's powerful so they must actually really like him now. Forgiveness morals are always taught so badly, and I think it does damage to the kids who internalize those shit lessons.

Again. Completely misunderstanding the moral of a simple children's story. Emphasis. Children's story. This a two-way street for society. The other reindeer shouldn't make fun of Rudolph for something as silly as a glowing nose when you never know what hidden talents that individual has.

More important for this individual. It is absolutely and literally crazy and creepy to respond the way you recommend to the kids who teased him in school. They're reindeer games. These are kids. Kids tease each other. It doesn't matter.

Because Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer grows up and has to act like an adult. And an adult doesn't sit around all day brooding over the fact that some kids in the fourth grade once made fun of him for his stupid looking nose.

Rudolph is a well-adjusted individual. He has girlfriend. He has grown-up friends like an elf dentist and a crazy gold miner. He does fun stuff like travel and fight Bumble Snowmen. Rudolph has adult responsibilities to take care of.

Like KILLING COMMIES!

...

I mean. Delivering Christmas presents.
 
All the "forget your past" bullshit that's all over modern Disney movies. I just don't get it.
If you had a shitty past, I understand that your memories are painful and that you want to get rid of them.
But if your past experiences were positive, what's the point of forgetting them?
Personally, I see the past as something neutral, with its good and bad memories. I'm not a nostalgia fag. And when I look back at negative experiences I think to myself "how to make sure it doesn't happen again".
 
Doug was pretty bad for having Doug never confronting his problems and him just daydreaming until the problem went away on its own.

So the moral was when you have troubles in life, shit yourself and do nothing about it and the universe will reward you for it. Every time.
 
Sharing and taking turns.

The way this was always portrayed, at least when I was growing up, was letting other people play with toys and such when they ask to. The problem with that is that power in that exchange always lies with the person who does not have the thing, while the owner/user is obligated to placate them or else be considered rude for "not sharing". Obviously kids don't pick up any notions about actual generosity from that because it doesn't involve offering anything, nor do they pick up anything about having respect for other people's belongings; all they pick up is that when they ask somebody for something, they should get it or else the other person is being mean. (And needless to say, this also quickly leads to learning that other people can be careless and ruin your stuff.)

I think a similar but much better lesson would be to emphasize taking care of and having respect for things that are public resources, i.e., not breaking or using them up, not leaving things a mess, not taking more than you need, etc.
 
The other reindeer shouldn't make fun of Rudolph for something as silly as a glowing nose when you never know what hidden talents that individual has.

I mean, isn't that kinda part of the core poorly communicated message? "Don't be mean to people because at some point they may become useful to you/famous/beautiful" is sociopathic.

Rudolph is a well-adjusted individual. He has girlfriend. He has grown-up friends like an elf dentist and a crazy gold miner. He does fun stuff like travel and fight Bumble Snowmen. Rudolph has adult responsibilities to take care of.

He has people who actually give a shit about him, not his connection to the god-king of the north pole. The better lesson for it to teach should probably be something along the lines of "find your real friends and be polite to but wary of people who only like you for your social status" or something like that. Kids aren't that dumb, shades of nuance get across.

My point is that I feel the core message of forgiveness is mishandled, too simplified even for the intended audience of small children.
 
You can trust the police.

Your teachers have your best interests in mind and you can trust them.

The US Government has a series of checks and balances to guarantee that the system works. You can also trust the government, they have your best interests in mind.

Things will turn out for the better in the end.

If you are an honest, moral, hardworking person, you will be rewarded accordingly for it.

Diversity and inclusion is a strength.

Doug was pretty bad for having Doug never confronting his problems and him just daydreaming until the problem went away on its own.

So the moral was when you have troubles in life, shit yourself and do nothing about it and the universe will reward you for it. Every time.

Doug had undiagnosed ADD and possible autism.
 
Last edited:
Back