Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
View attachment 3357608

What did you animals do now?
"I can't log off cause I work online"
Yes you can because you can just log off or delete your reddit account. You shouldn't even be reading reddit while you are at work.
Posting your shit online is how you got people to find where you live (even if this is true) so just delete and no one will bother you. If you post anything on a public forum, anyone can Ctrl S, repost it somewhere else, and make fun of you for it.

To avoid double post:
A close friend from highschool trooned out. He updated his profile pic on Facebook and it's literally the same as his pre troon pic (same facial expression, shirt, camera position, and background, but now with no stubble) and the handmaidens are gassing him up. It's so tiring, now this white dude is gonna think he's so oppressed.
 
View attachment 3357628
View attachment 3357629
Oh no! The troons are ready for war against those dastardly evil villains of KiwiFarms!
:story:

I wonder who the troon is, probably some low tier faggot who is sperging out cause he found his tread in prospering grounds.
my main account is being targeted by those biggots [sic] alt right in kiwifarms and they are making my life a living hell.
Straight up random.txt content.

I'm just a Serbian autistic gay furry, please don't back trace me, my family is poor and I make furry porn so I can feed my family.
 
Quite possibly our resident Elephant Dick on the SRS thread, /u/Cryolophosaurus.

Posted their information all over the place, a keen Farmer spotted some details in her linked Instagram and Facebook.

She posted shortly after about it, thinks getting a VPN and putting a watermark on her posts means that the Farms will neither see her posts or be able to post them. The writing style is very similar.

Also has nothing to fear from us seeing as that thread is filled with people who want her to lead a fulfilling life and get out of the cult that is actively harming her. The only people who would harm her with her info are her fellow cult members who blast her and possibly chase her down if she ever sees the light.
It’s definitely her. She posted a very similar post on her actual account. She’s quite frankly overreacting because the only thing being debated on here is the weird shape of her dick and I’m 100% sure we would all do our best to avoid her irl and not the contrary.
 
I drifted out about 2016 and all the big organisations seemed to have been captured by the blue hairs. My local skeptics in the pub became insufferable. Did sanity return or are you from a more based part of the world?

The skeptic society (founded by Michael Shermer) was never ideologically captured. Mostly it just gets ignored because they never publish or promote without vetting, and it's so dispassionate it's hard to argue it's hateful. The left and the right both - whether it's the farce of "green energy" or Kansas's peculiar economic strategy.

Whether or not the women's cycling union in the UK decided on a boycott because of the skeptics society I am not sure, but they laid out the case that publicly boycotting the opportunity to lose to a man was the most effective way to force change. The UK's cycling was investigating people for stating opposition to their trans inclusion policy up until the women told them they wouldn't race.

There are lots of blue hairs here. It's important to remember that skepticism isn't about finding like minded people, only finding like reasoning people.

Speaking of skepticism - probably don't take everything you read from social media at face value. Some of my sock puppet accounts have been quoted here. All I do with them is point out the standard of care is affirmation, and their providers are expecting them to explore their doubts. It's kind of funny reading people claim a ftm doesn't understand being a man when it was written by a man though.
 
Not really sure what’s going on here, but if it really is a “community” of mentally ill frock-wearing gun enthusiasts, we will soon need a replacement for the Tenacious Unicorn guys…

F0022EB3-183D-4C3E-BEA4-C765866D6DDD.jpeg

 
The skeptic society (founded by Michael Shermer) was never ideologically captured. Mostly it just gets ignored because they never publish or promote without vetting, and it's so dispassionate it's hard to argue it's hateful. The left and the right both - whether it's the farce of "green energy" or Kansas's peculiar economic strategy.

Whether or not the women's cycling union in the UK decided on a boycott because of the skeptics society I am not sure, but they laid out the case that publicly boycotting the opportunity to lose to a man was the most effective way to force change. The UK's cycling was investigating people for stating opposition to their trans inclusion policy up until the women told them they wouldn't race.

There are lots of blue hairs here. It's important to remember that skepticism isn't about finding like minded people, only finding like reasoning people.

Speaking of skepticism - probably don't take everything you read from social media at face value. Some of my sock puppet accounts have been quoted here. All I do with them is point out the standard of care is affirmation, and their providers are expecting them to explore their doubts. It's kind of funny reading people claim a ftm doesn't understand being a man when it was written by a man though.
My last post here on this as I don't want to derail the thread but if you fancy scanning through the Skeptic Community thread and posting some thoughts I'd be really interested in what you have to say.

My last memories of Michael Shermer was a massive campaign to cancel him after some dumb cow got drunk and fucked him then tried to cry rape. Like I said, I've been out for a while.

Back to the troons and I look forward to your posts in the other thread if you are kind enough to make them,
 
This reminds me, is anyone else bothered by being addressed as they/them? Like, normally it wouldn't bother me much, but coming from troons and their woke drones it feels almost sinister. If nothing else it's like a marker of being pozzed by the ideology and a reminder of its reach, specially when the person knows I'm a dude and I never asked for any of that shit. People are so fucking scared of misgendering an obvious man and it's somehow not very funny. Not to mention all that bullshit about being accurate with pronouns or else you are the Ultimate Genocider, all to just call everyone "they". I think kids today call that "cringe".
I personally don't mind it and do it myself with strangers (especially online strangers with no identifying features) however, like you said the person saying it makes a difference and oftentimes to whom it's being said. People start they/theming a GNC woman or man and that feels very malicious and regressive.

It bothers me more when someone is being inconsistent.
I was playing a game with an enby who kept referring to players using a male character with masculine pronouns but players using a female character with they/them that really bothered me. It took every ounce of my power to not ask him what the fuck
I'm in awe. The FTMs turned the scars into an aesthetic! It's a symbol of Resistance and Defying Expectations and Taking Control of Your Life. More importantly it's a symbol of being Queer. I also love how the end result has her looking like a typical anime husbando.
I want this to catch on to as many people as possible, I want even the general public to be aware of it. If the fad dies it will remain as a clear mark of an era and just an "internet thing" no one can deny it. If it's not a fad and goes on then at least I know who to not take seriously or get close to.
Are there ANY subreddits left that are full of actual women and not ""women""? Closest one I can think of is something like BreakingMom, a sub where women whine about their lazy husbands and ungrateful kids.
If you're being serious then there's a lesbian subreddit r/actuallylesbian they ban all other forms of discussion if it doesn't pertain to being a lesbian which includes being a bisexual woman and a transbian.
Maybe r/abrathatfits and r/1200isplenty.
Hmmm, I’m noticing a disturbing pattern:
View attachment 3353612View attachment 3353613View attachment 3353615View attachment 3353616View attachment 3353617

I’m beginning to think it isn’t anime that turns you into a troon
I don't think it's "playing a video game" that does that to you the online space you inhabit to discuss your interests also matter. For a while Anglo-American video game spaces were filled with sexual and perverted jokes about Traps and Femboys among other things. In non-English gaming groups no one talks about this shit.
In the non-English gaming communities I'm in it's just filled un-PC guys that refuse to believe women play video games, reeeeing about how women look like in video games, and frequent discussion over whether piracy is a sin or not. English gaming communities that are for people in my country are a bit similar minus the meltdowns over piracy. I'm in an a geek hobby group my friends made back when we were in uni that still attracts new blood, the biggest problem is someone randomly losing it over a "woke thing" like a gay character, the last meltdown we had was over the Doctor Strange movie including a Lesbian Character and her Lesbian Mums.
 
Genderspecial on genderspecial violence. The solution here is to GTFO out of Portland, that place is a disaster.
Portlandia should be rebooted as a gritty depressing drama. Crime, drugs, troons, societal breakdown.
Just today on Twitter there was video of a deranged woman trying to steal another woman's dog and throwing a hatchet at her. (Tried to find the clip, found hatchet attacks in Portland are not unusual!)

It's weird that just 10 years ago light comedy Portlandia portrayed the place as quirky, fun, laid-back.
 
When I looked into it myself a couple of years ago, I decided to stick with the glasses, because I have dry eyes in the winter from heated air and LASIK apparently makes dryness symptoms way worse. I know that I saw implantable contact lenses as an alternative when I was looking around, but like I said, just ended up accepting the glasses. I don't know if the contact lens one is better, I didn't look into it too much, but it seemed to be a good alternative for people with dry eyes at least.

And to the others in the thread, the risks are not extreme, but the LASIK industry is notorious for having a lot of fly-by-night operations because the procedure is largely computer controlled so is more a matter of upfront cost than skill. There are no requirements for what surgeons need to disclose, and no industry standards on what information on risks to give to clients. There's definitely a lot of people who are helped by it, but it is absolutely true that the industry downplays negative outcomes and complications and pretends they don't exist.

If you are going to do it, just make sure you choose a surgeon who's willing to go through risk factors and really check to make sure you are a good candidate for it. Do not just trust that the closest provider will actually check to make sure you aren't at risk of complications.


Anyway:

View attachment 3357283

Spin


Truth:
View attachment 3357296

The fact alone that they use a poll of 14 - 16 year olds from 2018-2020, as though that is generalizable in any way to previous cohorts of troons, is hilarious. This is what comes from doing studies based on self-reported identity. But here's the kicker:

View attachment 3357509

The sample of transgender boys and girls included very few trans girls, which is to say, that the apparent finding that "trans and non-binary" youth are less likely to commit sexual assault relies on a sample that is mostly female compared to a overall normal population (especially given how often non-binary people are female). It's using self-reported identities to obfuscate the fact that women and girls are more at risk of being targets of SV than the perpetrators.
I hate this type of studies, is so easy to design a study and manipulate the conditions that will give you the conclusion you desire, the whole field of sociology specially is ripe with useless gargabe. People then won't even read it to see how solid it is and just scream "LE SCIENCE has spoken, praised be it"
 
View attachment 3357633 archive
2022...where some young kid's parents are lapping it up.

Coincidentally, there was an interesting thread on twitter today about queer theory and the sexualizing of children (archive)

It got me thinking: everyone here here is familiar with the "adult human female" definition that makes TRAs seethe but I think we don't focus enough on the "adult" part. The new and improved TRA definition is "a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman." But notice it's not "any adult who identifies as a woman."

I don't think that everyone who parrots that definition is consciously trying to advance pedophilia. But by swallowing the ideology, they have made it easier for pedos (and people who are happy to promote pedophilia to prove that they are groundbreaking non-normies) to advance their cause.

The issue is: once you have started placing feelings and desire over actual biological boundaries, why not try to push the age boundary next? A lot of victims of pedophilia end up convinced (because of grooming) that the relationship they are in is consensual. And child molesters will argue about how a certain victim is actually very mature for their age and was totally ready for a sexual relationship. Well, we have already decided as a culture that feelings trump biological sex, and now we have moved onto "biological sex isn't real anyway," so... why should the fixed adult/child boundary remain in place?

It's particularly ominous now that it's occurring alongside the push for puberty blockers and the reframing of natural puberty as something optional and possibly harmful. Once you decouple chronological age from physical and sexual maturity, the concept of a "child" becomes even fuzzier and easier to attack.

Note that the idea of suppressing some secondary sexual characteristics permanently is even being floated in science journals now, and has received zero pushback. Activists have tied puberty blockers to trans rights so successfully that the subject has become almost untouchable. And so now it's just ratcheting up, slowly.

Sorry for waxing philosophical, it's just something that really struck me, especially when combined with all the good liberals insisting that this sexualized drag queen stuff is good because they don't want to disagree and be one of Those People.
 
Well it proved it does it to rats anyway.
20220606_121242.jpg
Rats on estrogen cannot parallel park?
Absolute beta cucks lmao

20220606_124743.jpg
For as long as you have this profile image, i'mma be reading everything you post in Negan's voice.

20220606_124826.jpg
Since when did the "average build" of a woman include a chest as rotund as a barrel, and a cock?

It reminds me of this joke. (skip to 1:00 if you don't want the set up to the joke and just the punchline.)
 

Attachments

  • 21ABF5C7-1393-4B71-B5B8-66ACCEE1DF47.jpeg
    21ABF5C7-1393-4B71-B5B8-66ACCEE1DF47.jpeg
    242.9 KB · Views: 137
  • 14EC3E6B-C2E0-4F50-8D03-AA403A98AFEB.jpeg
    14EC3E6B-C2E0-4F50-8D03-AA403A98AFEB.jpeg
    161.6 KB · Views: 151
  • 285D9A25-67CD-4E1B-AFE5-6E9C4B84D2C8.jpeg
    285D9A25-67CD-4E1B-AFE5-6E9C4B84D2C8.jpeg
    221.3 KB · Views: 138
  • 61F2F1F7-88DF-4B9D-AD9A-556EFD3A7F35.jpeg
    61F2F1F7-88DF-4B9D-AD9A-556EFD3A7F35.jpeg
    145.1 KB · Views: 138
  • 00D200B9-3546-487D-A9A1-C743C1F31DAD.jpeg
    00D200B9-3546-487D-A9A1-C743C1F31DAD.jpeg
    128.8 KB · Views: 145
Detransitioner posts what we are all thinking - the trans community grooms the victims of child molestation to troon out, thus validating them.
detrans 1.PNG
Though they say it's "inadvertent".

Umm no sweetie, these people knowingly target vulnerable people with lovebombing to try and separate them from their existing support networks unless those networks allow them to be totally medicalized and "reborn".
 
Last edited:
These idiot men still aren't part of the "sisterhood". They don't realize that these women (if they even exist) are being nice. Even if these alleged women flat out say "Omg you're officially a part of the SISTERHOOD!!", that's fake. It's them being overly polite. As usual, troons can't tell when women are being nice due to fear or pity.

Even back in my peak SJW days, no one in my group ever saw troons as real women. The troons wouldn't know this though, if you asked them, they likely thought we were super nice and we let them join the "sisterhood". Not realizing that we acted completely different when they weren't around.

Even SJWs that are the biggest ass kissing handmaidens deep down can never treat troons as they treat real women... because they don't see them as real women.

Men will never understand what it's like to be seen and treated like a fellow women. Just like women will never understand what it's like to be seen and treated like a fellow man. Cope and seethe.
Seems to me that if “trans allies” really saw trans men as men and trans women as women, the Aidens would be center stage, and the troon girls would be shoved into the shadows. The fact that it’s still the wokey men who suck all the air out of the room and demand to be the center of the universe while their sycophants swoon says everything you need to know. I never saw what feminists meant until I encountered troon men, but once you see it…

Also kids don’t belong in gay bars. The only people who would want them there are pedos. Bars are for adults. Gay culture is for adults. There’s literally no way to spin this that doesn’t end in bad touching.
 
Last edited:
Back