No logical human being would do that to be with stabby and put the emphasis on logical but this is Chantal, a woman who had sex with a homeless guy or the woman who prostituted herself for a whopper
Yes. Like for example, she is an ejaculator. You're welcome.
I don't believe that for one minute. Just more of her trying to push an image of being a sexy vixen who has so much wild sexy sex that it would make Caligula jealous.
She has also admitted to at least three phones in her name alone, all phones that she would be buying under contract with expensive data plans. She would also have the home internet, in all likelihood Peetz's phone (because we know he's not earning and paying bills), and at minimum two ipads given to Nader on payment contracts that include data. While I don't know how telcos work in Canada, I know here in Australia some of the TV subscription services are also paid for via your telco under agreements with them...and we know Chantal has a few of these subscription services (and that she'd never cancel them even if she stopped using them). I could quickly see that adding up to that amount. I doubt Nader is accessing her cards via google pay. If he was then he wouldn't be asking her for cash all the time, and we've been told many times about the "need cigarettes" and "need food" texts, as well as things like giving him her card to pay for his things like the gonorrhoea medications. Chantal is a pathological liar (as is Nader), and yesterday was in her revenge mood where she would say anything to make him look even worse than he already does, and make herself look even dumber than she already does. Plus when have we ever seen Chantal use google pay...she still uses a card with no tap in fast food drive thrus.
I think Caligula would've appreciated the creativity of the broom.
She's only doing this because this person SJAM2 gave her over $200 in superchats yesterday.
cus he cooks and eats food it is not meals and entertainment. He's not having meals while on travel for business. he's not entertaining and giving meals to clients. he's cooking the same dinner for him and his date he would cook if he was filming it or not.
There are beautytubers who are able to claim a portion of their skincare and makeup that they buy as business expenses because they would not buy every release if they were not doing YouTube. He could claim the same. That he would not have bought XYZ if he were not doing a YT channel. I think one of them said that they are allowed to claim 50% of the value. Now, they are American, so the Canadian laws are probably different, but I'm sure it is the same. They have to record the name of the video, the date that it was recorded, and the date that it was aired on YT. They also have to record if it was taken down from YT. Just because you can/do also use something for personal use does not mean you cannot claim it as a business expense if you use it for your business. This is how people write off cars and even additions to their houses as business expenses. Tax laws are quirky.
I think she's missing an opportunity to make custom postcards of photos from the dodgy motels she's been frequenting.
