Orbiter Flamenco / FlamencoTV / Joshua Clayton Connor - The most autistic and degenerate thread on the site. Fierce torrenting of hentai mass debates. Possibly a pedo, can still pull more viewers than Ralph.

Should Flamenco be banned from life?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1,310 72.7%
  • No

    Votes: 493 27.3%

  • Total voters
    1,803
So, Flam successfully evaded the pedoschpergen accusations?
Null wrote a post about how he was confused and thought he was gay, admitting doing unsavory shit from 13 - 19 years or 14 - 21 years old. Need to find it, found this on the mean time.
View attachment 3368694
edit: this is from 2012, still searching the Null post.
New poll: "Does Null is gay?"
 
I dont think v-tuber stuff is borderline loli some of it defintely caters to that crowd but then again so do certain animes. I do agree he should be watched and is a person of interest but I dont buy him being a pedo just yet. I know it might be gay and maybe Later I'll get to hear I told you so, But I do think that accusation is serious one
"I don't buy the guy who hangs out with people in the Epstein-style steam/discord groups and masterbates to nonce porn being a pedophile, I need at least 10 heckin citations chuds"

Once again the avatar checks out
 
archive from october 2021, back when there were 13 members: https://web.archive.org/web/20211024114851/https://steamcommunity.com/groups/harri_koenig
pfps according to it were: lazy town girl, hat kid (both relatively popular among pedos but nothing too blatant), that one guy with legit pedo profile and real small girl pfp, loli from that popular anime, four anime girl pfps (dunno if they are lolis or not since I don't recognize them besides one looking to be from touhou), some furry anime girl?(i dunno), 3 meme pfps and flamenco.
lazytown girl guy (his steam name was lolik0n) was flamenco's friend and admin of the group. He later changed his pfp to more blatant pedo stuff.

So you got maybe 4 or 5 out of 13 members who do not suspicious at all in a group named after book about pedophilia. Whether you consider this a good clue or not is up to you.
This group was apparently among first three steam groups flamenco joined (https://web.archive.org/web/20211127225200/https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198876329374)
Hmm. I feel like Kino Casino should have waited a week or 2 before inviting Flamenco on. Everyone screeches about Good Faith as if theyre under 30 just joined the site and haven't been following this gay shit for 8 years but having something concrete to show and some reasoning to back it up would have prevented Flamenco from "winning" their tism bout.

If there is one thing anyone could rip from Metokurs playbook is presenting information as is
 
Never stated that Andy was the voice of reason, only that compared to everyone else on stream he was the only one not reducing himself to a complete sperg which is rare for him.
That Kino Casino reminded me of the Jim Can't Swim video where the cops get stonewalled, lose their patience and just start throwing out accusations and hoping something sticks.

It's blackpilling to think about how show audiences are filled with people who literally have no idea what the streamers they're watching are even up to.

PPP and Godwinson were running a carnival show and trying to get the animal to dance, just like they've done a bunch of times before. They're not laying out some case for the audience to deliberate on. All they're doing is trying to make the guest flip out. Yeah the show kinda fizzled out this time, in part because Andy's anxiety forced him to rein it in at critical moments and ruined the momentum, and in part because they were thrown off by how much of the audience just weren't getting it, but that doesn't mean it isn't what was happening from the start.
 
smeagmenco.png
vanmenco.png
 
Is this about the boy soprano shit? I'm not convinced he's into that if that's what your hanging off of. Pegging and Prolapse? DEFINTELY and the reason why is if he was into it you wouldn't find one doujin you would find tons
Unless I've missed something rather significant, the only thing conclusively tying Flam to underage content, and specifically loli or shota content, is the tags on Boy Soprano.

So, one more time for the retards in the back, who are cowards that won't even smoke crack fact check the original claims:

1) Boy Soprano does not contain any loli content. None exists within the 4 corners of the document. Go check it right now. There are fully clothed children in non-sexual situations that are briefly depicted as part of explaining backstory, which takes place 10 years prior. I have speculated where the tag comes from before, as there are external factors that influence tagging behavior on the site it was pulled from, but you won't substantiate a credible pedo accusation from that tag being on this particular story if there's nothing remotely loli-looking in the story.

2) It contains "shota" insomuch as the main character who does all the fucking of and getting fucked by grown women is 15, a point which only comes up if you do some mental math, because he's not depicted or drawn as a child in sexual situations. So while the tag is technically accurate in an age sense, it is very tenuous to make much of it for the purposes of a credible pedo allegation.


It's entirely fair to claim Flam's a sexual degenerate, Boy Soprano is an S&M tome of mommy issues degeneracy. And whaddya know, there's other evidence Flam is into S&M stuff, it's almost like he made multiple whole-ass personal ads in S&M communities to back that up...🤔


Look, I get that it's fun to jump on the pedo bandwagon, but that bandwagon makes people reeeaaaaally lazy about actually checking if any of the accusations are actually true or have any evidence, which we just saw bite PPP's ass on stream in real time. :story:
 
Unless I've missed something rather significant, the only thing conclusively tying Flam to underage content, and specifically loli or shota content, is the tags on Boy Soprano.

So, one more time for the retards in the back, who are cowards that won't even smoke crack fact check the original claims:

1) Boy Soprano does not contain any loli content. None exists within the 4 corners of the document. Go check it right now. There are fully clothed children in non-sexual situations that are briefly depicted as part of explaining backstory, which takes place 10 years prior. I have speculated where the tag comes from before, as there are external factors that influence tagging behavior on the site it was pulled from, but you won't substantiate a credible pedo accusation from that tag being on this particular story if there's nothing remotely loli-looking in the story.

2) It contains "shota" insomuch as the main character who does all the fucking of and getting fucked by grown women is 15, a point which only comes up if you do some mental math, because he's not depicted or drawn as a child in sexual situations. So while the tag is technically accurate in an age sense, it is very tenuous to make much of it for the purposes of a credible pedo allegation.


It's entirely fair to claim Flam's a sexual degenerate, Boy Soprano is an S&M tome of mommy issues degeneracy. And whaddya know, there's other evidence Flam is into S&M stuff, it's almost like he made multiple whole-ass personal ads in S&M communities to back that up...🤔


Look, I get that it's fun to jump on the pedo bandwagon, but that bandwagon makes people reeeaaaaally lazy about actually checking if any of the accusations are actually true or have any evidence, which we just saw bite PPP's ass on stream in real time. :story:
The people reading this have clearly never been on ehentai or a site like it. Go to any work on there and you'll find a phone book worth of tags, of which you can expect half to be completely irrelevant to the work in question.
 
Unless I've missed something rather significant, the only thing conclusively tying Flam to underage content, and specifically loli or shota content, is the tags on Boy Soprano.

So, one more time for the retards in the back, who are cowards that won't even smoke crack fact check the original claims:

1) Boy Soprano does not contain any loli content. None exists within the 4 corners of the document. Go check it right now. There are fully clothed children in non-sexual situations that are briefly depicted as part of explaining backstory, which takes place 10 years prior. I have speculated where the tag comes from before, as there are external factors that influence tagging behavior on the site it was pulled from, but you won't substantiate a credible pedo accusation from that tag being on this particular story if there's nothing remotely loli-looking in the story.

2) It contains "shota" insomuch as the main character who does all the fucking of and getting fucked by grown women is 15, a point which only comes up if you do some mental math, because he's not depicted or drawn as a child in sexual situations. So while the tag is technically accurate in an age sense, it is very tenuous to make much of it for the purposes of a credible pedo allegation.


It's entirely fair to claim Flam's a sexual degenerate, Boy Soprano is an S&M tome of mommy issues degeneracy. And whaddya know, there's other evidence Flam is into S&M stuff, it's almost like he made multiple whole-ass personal ads in S&M communities to back that up...🤔


Look, I get that it's fun to jump on the pedo bandwagon, but that bandwagon makes people reeeaaaaally lazy about actually checking if any of the accusations are actually true or have any evidence, which we just saw bite PPP's ass on stream in real time. :story:
71bc0Cbpx9L.jpgshounen-note-pilot-1-190x283.jpg11.jpg
DEFINITELY not depicted as a child
 
That's actually the boy soprano manga which is about a child pianist. Not porn, it's confusing because the porn doujin is called boy soprano so I can understand the mistake. Now that being said your point still stands, as the character is drawn to look like a child either way.
ef9dd32a352e228d2ceb11e3011d4eac.png
45c74f27c66ba60790ac22356c392609.png
8a18b752f9a694e0dacb92c322667cf3.png
 
Unless I've missed something rather significant, the only thing conclusively tying Flam to underage content, and specifically loli or shota content, is the tags on Boy Soprano.

So, one more time for the retards in the back, who are cowards that won't even smoke crack fact check the original claims:

1) Boy Soprano does not contain any loli content. None exists within the 4 corners of the document. Go check it right now. There are fully clothed children in non-sexual situations that are briefly depicted as part of explaining backstory, which takes place 10 years prior. I have speculated where the tag comes from before, as there are external factors that influence tagging behavior on the site it was pulled from, but you won't substantiate a credible pedo accusation from that tag being on this particular story if there's nothing remotely loli-looking in the story.

2) It contains "shota" insomuch as the main character who does all the fucking of and getting fucked by grown women is 15, a point which only comes up if you do some mental math, because he's not depicted or drawn as a child in sexual situations. So while the tag is technically accurate in an age sense, it is very tenuous to make much of it for the purposes of a credible pedo allegation.


It's entirely fair to claim Flam's a sexual degenerate, Boy Soprano is an S&M tome of mommy issues degeneracy. And whaddya know, there's other evidence Flam is into S&M stuff, it's almost like he made multiple whole-ass personal ads in S&M communities to back that up...🤔


Look, I get that it's fun to jump on the pedo bandwagon, but that bandwagon makes people reeeaaaaally lazy about actually checking if any of the accusations are actually true or have any evidence, which we just saw bite PPP's ass on stream in real time. :story:
OOOOHHH ohh ok phew it's ok the child was 15
 
OOOOHHH ohh ok phew it's ok the child was 15
Yeah, not to mention the premise is apparently that said child was adopted by a bunch of groomers in the literal sense, so the "But we aren't related teehee" skirting of incest still doesn't ignore the fact that to an outside observer a woman adopted an orphan who lost both parents tragically at age 5 and has been grooming them as a sexual partner for some undisclosed period of time. Flam would've done better to say he's into mommydom than trying to argue the semantics of whether or not there's age-inappropriate tones to the work, mostly because there are.
 
Back