𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

They know that their time is almost up, so best get to indoctrinating while they still can. At least, IMO.
I go to Twitter and see an obvious disparity with how utterly bloated even the most milquetoast leftie sperg is, while conservative accounts can barely scrape over 50k in engagement. This has been going on for a month and a half now.
 
Why does UEG want Elon to fail?

It will forever remain a mystery, because no one will ever sit through one of his videos. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Wow the Mickey Mouse guy who was masturbating over people who called him autistic being "wrong" has abandoned the thread again. Who saw that coming? LOL. Imagine being so autistic that basic business concepts like negotiations and leverage are beyond you. lol
 
Some people are saying Elon Musk might back out. I don't think he will. I believe he trying to get a better deal. By asking to see the Twitter user number data he just asking to inspect something before he purchases it. It's like taking a mechanic friend with you to look at a used car before you buy it. It's just a smart thing to do as a consumer. Especially when you are spending 44 billion dollars.
 
Some people are saying Elon Musk might back out. I don't think he will. I believe he trying to get a better deal. By asking to see the Twitter user number data he just asking to inspect something before he purchases it. It's like taking a mechanic friend with you to look at a used car before you buy it. It's just a smart thing to do as a consumer. Especially when you are spending 44 billion dollars.
The closing agreement, or pre-closing agreement, specifically required Twitter to turn over this information and Musk was considering it a material breach justifying pulling out. Whether Twitter's disclosures will allay his concerns or just prove they were right is the issue.

If their disclosures were incomplete, and there actually are more fakes than they claimed (5%), then he would be justified lowering his offer. The userbase is the product, despite the product thinking they're the customers (lmao). So if Musk went into this thinking it was a problem but 5% was acceptable, and it's actually 15%, that is like if you bought a truckload of potatoes, but 15% of them were rotting (and the Twitter userbase is pretty much a truckload of potatoes).

Worse, this bad 15% drives off the good. This isn't even getting into the absolutely shitty userbase that drives off normies and would only be interested in ads about dildos and gay porn and grey market Chinese horse piss pills. Musk apparently is entirely aware of those, though.
 
The closing agreement, or pre-closing agreement, specifically required Twitter to turn over this information and Musk was considering it a material breach justifying pulling out. Whether Twitter's disclosures will allay his concerns or just prove they were right is the issue.

If their disclosures were incomplete, and there actually are more fakes than they claimed (5%), then he would be justified lowering his offer. The userbase is the product, despite the product thinking they're the customers (lmao). So if Musk went into this thinking it was a problem but 5% was acceptable, and it's actually 15%, that is like if you bought a truckload of potatoes, but 15% of them were rotting (and the Twitter userbase is pretty much a truckload of potatoes).

Worse, this bad 15% drives off the good. This isn't even getting into the absolutely shitty userbase that drives off normies and would only be interested in ads about dildos and gay porn and grey market Chinese horse piss pills. Musk apparently is entirely aware of those, though.
Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jaimas and SBG
Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.
It can say whatever it likes but a material breach by the other side justifies breaching the contract yourself. If they don't like it they can hash it out in court.
 
Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.
Boyle had a couple videos on Musk and Twitter, he makes it sound like Musk isn’t in a great position.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gar For Archer
In case anyone was wondering why he was acting like a complete retard, @Sanshain has Asperger’s syndrome.

'Complete retard' apparently means 'people who were on the right track all along' to you. I guess I can understand the mindset of Muskrats a bit better now, at least. Just take a stance objectively opposed to reality, and never question anything, and you're onto a winner!

Boyle had a couple videos on Musk and Twitter, he makes it sound like Musk isn’t in a great position.


He's not, and never was. I'm 99% certain at this point he just used this as a scheme to sell a vast amount of Tesla stock before a predicted crash, effectively cashing out of the market like dozens and dozens of other billionaires in recent months. The rich are currently flinging their stock options away as far and as hard as they can by absolutely any means necessary, as the market is overdue for a massive recession.

Best-case scenario, Elon proves Twitter is hugely overvalued and forces them to sell to him lower than he offered, letting him pocket the difference. I consider this unlikely, but not impossible, though it depends on just how bad Twitter actually is compared to how bad Musk is.

Worst-case scenario, he 'has' to terminate the deal and pays a penalty, which is still vastly lower than the profit he has already made by selling Tesla stock at its absolute peak. He gets to whine about how Twitter didn't deal fairly with him and forced him out, farming pity-points with his retarded worshipers for months to come while wiping away his tears with all the gold-thread handkerchiefs the Tesla stock sale bought him.

Only a genuinely mentally disabled person thinks this is legit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
He can literally break the deal. Say publically the deal went to shit cause Twatter bad. Watch the stock free fall and then buy it then and still make a profit all before the legal enforcement for the penalty kicks in unless im missing something.
 
He can literally break the deal. Say publically the deal went to shit cause Twatter bad. Watch the stock free fall and then buy it then and still make a profit all before the legal enforcement for the penalty kicks in unless im missing something.
And might still end up owning a majority of it even if he does have to suck up the penalty. And if he took it private, what, he would owe the money to himself?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Here's some more news to send @Sanshain into an autistic sperg-out:


elon.png
 
Back