- Joined
- May 12, 2020
You know. I've been noticing lately that there has been a higher percentage in leftist tweets being liked and RT. What happened?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They know that their time is almost up, so best get to indoctrinating while they still can. At least, IMO.You know. I've been noticing lately that there has been a higher percentage in leftist tweets being liked and RT. What happened?
I go to Twitter and see an obvious disparity with how utterly bloated even the most milquetoast leftie sperg is, while conservative accounts can barely scrape over 50k in engagement. This has been going on for a month and a half now.They know that their time is almost up, so best get to indoctrinating while they still can. At least, IMO.
Maybe they're all trying to overdose on their favorite drug before the supply gets cut off.You know. I've been noticing lately that there has been a higher percentage in leftist tweets being liked and RT. What happened?
But some autistic YouTuber's conspiracy clickbait fanfiction said it was all over for "muskrats"? LOL.Twatter has caved and said this morning it will give Musk full access to the data he wants
Elonfrens riding high again
Retards often confuse "is this plausible TO ME?" with "is this plausible?"But some autistic YouTuber's conspiracy clickbait fanfiction said it was all over for "muskrats"? LOL.
But some autistic YouTuber's conspiracy clickbait fanfiction said it was all over for "muskrats"? LOL.
Why does UEG want Elon to fail?Retards often confuse "is this plausible TO ME?" with "is this plausible?"
Why does UEG want Elon to fail?
Plot twist: nothing to be found.Twatter has caved and said this morning it will give Musk full access to the data he wants
Elonfrens riding high again
The closing agreement, or pre-closing agreement, specifically required Twitter to turn over this information and Musk was considering it a material breach justifying pulling out. Whether Twitter's disclosures will allay his concerns or just prove they were right is the issue.Some people are saying Elon Musk might back out. I don't think he will. I believe he trying to get a better deal. By asking to see the Twitter user number data he just asking to inspect something before he purchases it. It's like taking a mechanic friend with you to look at a used car before you buy it. It's just a smart thing to do as a consumer. Especially when you are spending 44 billion dollars.
Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.The closing agreement, or pre-closing agreement, specifically required Twitter to turn over this information and Musk was considering it a material breach justifying pulling out. Whether Twitter's disclosures will allay his concerns or just prove they were right is the issue.
If their disclosures were incomplete, and there actually are more fakes than they claimed (5%), then he would be justified lowering his offer. The userbase is the product, despite the product thinking they're the customers (lmao). So if Musk went into this thinking it was a problem but 5% was acceptable, and it's actually 15%, that is like if you bought a truckload of potatoes, but 15% of them were rotting (and the Twitter userbase is pretty much a truckload of potatoes).
Worse, this bad 15% drives off the good. This isn't even getting into the absolutely shitty userbase that drives off normies and would only be interested in ads about dildos and gay porn and grey market Chinese horse piss pills. Musk apparently is entirely aware of those, though.
It can say whatever it likes but a material breach by the other side justifies breaching the contract yourself. If they don't like it they can hash it out in court.Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.
Boyle had a couple videos on Musk and Twitter, he makes it sound like Musk isn’t in a great position.Another thing I’ve heard others say (…I dunno the veracity) is that based on the wording of the agreement, Musk has no legal way of backing out, so this could all just be bluster to force Twitter’s hand when, no matter what they do (or don’t do), he doesn’t have any choice but to buy them anyways.
In case anyone was wondering why he was acting like a complete retard, @Sanshain has Asperger’s syndrome.
Boyle had a couple videos on Musk and Twitter, he makes it sound like Musk isn’t in a great position.
And might still end up owning a majority of it even if he does have to suck up the penalty. And if he took it private, what, he would owe the money to himself?He can literally break the deal. Say publically the deal went to shit cause Twatter bad. Watch the stock free fall and then buy it then and still make a profit all before the legal enforcement for the penalty kicks in unless im missing something.