- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
That, and the extra fingers.
Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner
- Thread starter Cryin RN
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
He also mailed a copy of his Taylor Swift book to Trump's White House and FULLY expected to get an audience with the President after he read it. When he got no reply, his attitude towards Trump started to deteriorate.
HavenlyKingdom
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
To be honest, Russ always striked me as a guy who would vote Libertarian.
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
He has no principles or thought-out system of beliefs. He’s not Democrat, Republican, Libertatian, Conservative, or Liberal. He’s literally nothing.
He votes for and supports whatever he currently thinks will benefit him sexually. That’s it.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Don't forget his writing to Romney and AOC.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
I'm sure Russ thought there was a chance that Trump would sign an EO to force Taylor Swift to recognize his efforts by sucking his goblin cock after reading his book.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
He also didn't get to bang Trump's daughter Tiffany, whom he had a crush on, and I'm pretty sure she got mailed a book along with the rest of the Trump family.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
Nah, the girls he wants to force to fuck him are of legal age.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
Russell's political stance in a nutshell:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
And he can't understand the difference between these two things. He thinks all opposition to prostitution is based on moral objections over sex outside of marriage, and not concerns over the abuse and exploration of sex workers. Sometimes he vaguely acknowledges some people are forced into sex work, but he usually glosses over it and gets back to how horrible it is he can't get all the fake girlfriend sex he wants.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
This right here (right here) is his sole focus. Rusty is gonna back whichever political horse is more likely to win him his own personal stable full of mares that he can dickride hard and put away wet whenever he wants.
Now that he lives in Nevada, Russhole probably has it fixed in his lumpy head that he will be rubbing elbows with the candidates that he so graciously awarded his vote to and they will immediately declare him the new Dennis Hoff and give him everything he needs to make his fap fantasies a reality.
Russ is and always will be a Conservative. But like the true narc he is, he is not the slightest bit ashamed to use anyone or anything else to further his own agenda.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
Is this something we should care about?
I mean, hey, whatever sinks your battleship, but this seems news for the sake of it. I chose to not have onions on my hamburger, but I wouldn't make a point of it.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
It's worse than that, though.
NB: I'm not actually making any of these arguments here. I don't want to derail the thread.
"My body, my choice" doesn't really work for prostitution, because then it would also work for, say, money laundering. Or bank robbery. "I CHOSE to put a mask on MY face, and use MY mouth to utter threats to the bank teller, and MY legs to make a getaway. MY BODY MY CHOICE!" is obviously nonsense. The real question about sex work is whether it ought to be categorized as the same sort of socially-harmful actions as armed robbery, or if it's not that bad, actually, and could be a legitimate trade. There are many arguments both for and against legalized sex work, but "my body, my choice" is a really bad one. You can fuck literally whoever you want (with consent, obvs). Your body, your choice. You just can't do it for money. That's nothing to do with your bodily autonomy.
"My body, my choice" with regards to abortion laws is a bit different. The stance here is that the state is in effect compelling you to use your body for a specific purpose, in a specific manner. You haven't committed a crime; pregnancy isn't illegal. So it's not like you're being imprisoned for violating a law or something like that. Instead, they're saying you're not allowed to take steps to avoid a disruptive, often dangerous, and extremely personal process from taking place within your body. The argument is not about the fetus. It's about the woman carrying it. That's where the slogan comes from.
OF COURSE, there are also arguments to be made that abortion is socially-harmful and ought to be banned, but they are not the same as the "my body, my choice" argument. They're about protecting the fetus or discouraging sexual licentiousness or whatever. Any argument that says, "Well actually, you're not allowed to make medical decisions for yourself -- your body, our choice" is a bad one. The question is whether abortion is, when all is said and done, just another medical decision, or if it's bigger than that and a situation where the government needs to intervene. "My body, my choice" argues for the former.
"My body, my choice" doesn't really work for prostitution, because then it would also work for, say, money laundering. Or bank robbery. "I CHOSE to put a mask on MY face, and use MY mouth to utter threats to the bank teller, and MY legs to make a getaway. MY BODY MY CHOICE!" is obviously nonsense. The real question about sex work is whether it ought to be categorized as the same sort of socially-harmful actions as armed robbery, or if it's not that bad, actually, and could be a legitimate trade. There are many arguments both for and against legalized sex work, but "my body, my choice" is a really bad one. You can fuck literally whoever you want (with consent, obvs). Your body, your choice. You just can't do it for money. That's nothing to do with your bodily autonomy.
"My body, my choice" with regards to abortion laws is a bit different. The stance here is that the state is in effect compelling you to use your body for a specific purpose, in a specific manner. You haven't committed a crime; pregnancy isn't illegal. So it's not like you're being imprisoned for violating a law or something like that. Instead, they're saying you're not allowed to take steps to avoid a disruptive, often dangerous, and extremely personal process from taking place within your body. The argument is not about the fetus. It's about the woman carrying it. That's where the slogan comes from.
OF COURSE, there are also arguments to be made that abortion is socially-harmful and ought to be banned, but they are not the same as the "my body, my choice" argument. They're about protecting the fetus or discouraging sexual licentiousness or whatever. Any argument that says, "Well actually, you're not allowed to make medical decisions for yourself -- your body, our choice" is a bad one. The question is whether abortion is, when all is said and done, just another medical decision, or if it's bigger than that and a situation where the government needs to intervene. "My body, my choice" argues for the former.
Russ thinks that if women are allowed to decide to end a pregnancy, they should be allowed to prostitute themselves. By that logic, they should also be allowed to be hitmen. The only connection between prostitution and abortion is that they revolve around vaginas. Other than that, he could be arguing for any illegal act to be made legal based on the fact that another act is not illegal.
"My body, my choice" is an argument that's explicitly, and exclusively, about bodily autonomy. LITERALLY NO ONE is saying women can't have sex with whoever they want (again, with consent, etc.). Their bodies, their choices! They are, however, saying women are not allowed to take Russ's money in exchange for fucking him. That's not an argument that involves bodily autonomy, so it doesn't apply.
It's funny because Russ is stupid. It's especially funny because Russ honestly believes he has a great legal mind. It's unsettling because it implies that he sees women as nothing but sex-and-baby-dispensers, and that he's trying to find a way to exploit them.
Saying, "If I'm not allowed to pay women to perform sex acts on me, women shouldn't be allowed to make controversial medical decisions" is both nonsensical and frightening. He's not hypothetically anti-abortion because of any moral or even logical standpoint -- he just doesn't think women should be free to make that choice unless they're also free to be bribed into sucking him off (or better yet, free to be trapped into an employment contract at his own personal brothel, enforced by the ADA). I wonder what other choices he thinks women (in general) shouldn't be allowed to make unless he also gets his own way.
He's disgusting.
Last edited:
DSP's Tax Lawyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
Someone with less melanin in their skin wanna archive this?
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
I think I did this right. Sorry if I fucked it up. I just wanted to make sure some sort of archive got caught before he deletes it.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
Nothing substantive to add, but I absolutely love how the layout of the stock photo plus Insta makes the woman appear to be extremely skeptical of Russ's claims to be performing the song live soon.
TOOTBLAN
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
"A popular Vegas venue" Why can't he just say where and when?
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
Performing live?? Don't tease us, Greer!
Screw Pride Month! All the
should be used for this.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
He's trying to build hype, and he's afraid we'll call up the venue and try to get them to cancel.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
At some point he decided that's how you "build hype" but he hasn't yet realized that teasing like that only works when you have a worldwide army of rabid fans. Lots of things he does absolutely require that.
Can't remember which song it was (Julianne's Smile maybe) where he just randomly posted it with no announcement because Taylor or Ariana once did a "surprise drop" of a song and it was a huge hit with the fans.