Of course, a lot of the “refugees” are migrants that jumped ship deeper into Europe once things got bad, while the ethnic Ukrainian men were forced at gunpoint to stay behind and die for Zelensky's regime. They're never gonna go back now that they can live in better-off Eurosphere countries.
No, exactly the opposite. They're almost entirely over turf and gaining advantage in maintaining an ongoing criminal enterprise for the purposes of profit.
They also do drivebys people who simply stepped out of the house wearing the wrong colors... most drivebys are just crimes of opportunity and not some thought-out tactical move. Also if having a greater purpose makes it not a mass shooting, wouldn't that disqualify mass shootings done by individuals trying to push a goal through terrorism like accelerationists, white supremacists, and Islamic terrorists? Then mass shooters with manifestos like Dylann Roof and the Buffalo shooter aren't mass shooters then. I think that this rule is kinda dumb because you can argue that all mass shooters have a greater purpose for their actions even if they are twisted and warped like Randy Stair ascending to the ghost realm or simply unknown like the Vegas shooting.
There are still different motivations between gang warfare (almost always over a money beef) and mass shootings for the sole purpose of shooting a bunch of people, and the different kind motivated by terrorism, like Breivik or Tarrant. It's why you generally don't call Uncle Ted a serial killer, because his underlying motivation was political and he was willing to stop what he was doing if he did get his message amplified.
As I've said elsewhere, the only difference between a cartridge and a ball round is efficiency. Otherwise, they perform the exact same purpose. This is just playing retroactive semantics in a vain attempt to earn an W.
We have the right to keep and bare ARMS. There was no other language specifying the type or kind we are and aren't allowed to keep. And given the founding fathers attitude during their time leading America their answer to the question "What kind of arms are we allowed to have?" has been "yes".
If you look at it with neutral eyes in engineering there is not so much fondamental differences between an arquebus from 1521 and an AR-15. Just a few twerks like metal cardridge, rifling and repeater mecanism added, but the basics were already there 500 years ago : a stick with a trigger, a chamber with powder that ignites and sends a projectile through a tube in one direction.
I'd make a reply about the first amendment only applying to the printing press but these idiots would probably agree to that.
Didn't y'all incite riots to DEFUND THE POLICE two years ago? Well, that's the result. More crime and slower response times.
The main gripe of that tweet might be black Thor, but it's hilarious how black Asgard looks so ghetto and shitty too with graffiti and shoes on the power lines
View attachment 3386569
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1536589036135288832 (A)
Police do literally nothing ever as proven by events that happened without them stopping them beforehand through clairvoyance, concrete proof of how the entire system does not work and should be abolished completely without establishing anything to replace it. Moving on, a further indictment of our system is how we have the largest prison population on the planet...
Offset printing was only invented in 1870, so the First Amendment only covers old Gutenberg style flat-press printing. Same tard energy.
Oh fuck off. Connery Bond was awesome, and modern Bond is becoming more and more pathetic as they try to make him into a woman or a nigger rather than creating high-stakes adventures in exotic locations with beautiful women.
