Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
as crazy as this sounds there were a number of things that happened at BLM protests that made me have similiar suspicious. a lot of crazy stuff I saw online and in person made sense if it was being set up to generate agitprop by fucking boomer and older gen X retards who haven't figured out livestreaming.A theory I heard that makes some sense is that the Dems were planning some kind of major false-flag incident on 1/6 where a few heavily-armed patsies would enter the building and inflict mass casualties, kind of like a sequel to the Las Vegas shooting. It went wrong when the Capitol police opened the gates and let anyone in who wanted in. They were supposed to let just the designated patsies through but there was some kind of miscommunication (or sabotage?) and they threw open the doors for everybody.
As a result, there were hundreds of people milling around recording and streaming stuff on their phones. Livestreamers and false flag attacks are a bad combination. They couldn't safely pull off the gory spectacle they were hoping for unless they were guaranteed 100% narrative control, so they fell back on a plan B and decided to run with a party line that petty vandalism and discarded water bottles are worse than 9/11.
Because they were livestreaming. The plan, according to this hypothesis, was to sacrifice some Capitol cops, staffers and maybe a couple Congress members if they were unlucky enough to be around and blame it on MAGA nahtzees. The presence of so many people with cameras gave them cold feet and they canceled the fireworks. Even with all the cameras around, it still might have been possible for them to present the narrative they wanted, but... consider the consequences of failure. It would be like someone capturing indisputable proof of election fraud but even worse for the Dems.If the idea was to let in patsies to inflict mass casualties, why would letting in more potential dead bodies be a problem?
He's not even a fucking American - rake this fucking Leaf back to Canuckistan.Because a chickenhawk GWOT/police state architect has a truatworthy opinion on civil liberties.
View attachment 3398064View attachment 3398065
When I think of Uniparty fiends, I think of this beady-eyed fuck.
I hate it when politicians ignore a crowd that is booing them, it's disrespectful and cowardly. Man the fuck up and acknowledge the crowd you decrepit old fuck, defend your position that they're mad at you over, you'd get some respect for thatView attachment 3398021
Sen. John Cornyn getting booed at a Texas Convention just like Romney at his Utah Convention last year.
Lemon's gone quisling and is playing ball at the moment with new management (IIRC Tucker Carlson even did a segment recently where he was shocked at Lemon suddenly asking hardball questions to a Biden Admin talking head). Stelter is fucked though; it's been leaked that he's been trying to stir an internal coup against his new boss, especially after the new boss banned all talent from spewing the DNC talking point known as "The Great Lie" on the air. As well as leaking shit to rival DNC affiliated media outlets in hopes of fomenting a media backlash against Discovery and the new top brass over CNN no longer being an apparatus of the DNC carrying Biden's water.I won't believe that anything has actually changed there until they toss Stelter and Lemon out on their asses while also leaking the contents of their work email accounts.
Our modern politicians have grown up in an environment where everything has been focus-group tested and approved, all the way down to adoring crowds who clap and approve of everything you say at rallies. When there's genuine anger among the voters and said voters express it, they don't know how to respond.I hate it when politicians ignore a crowd that is booing them, it's disrespectful and cowardly. Man the fuck up and acknowledge the crowd you decrepit old fuck, defend your position that they're mad at you over, you'd get some respect for that
To add: a more specific version of this hypothesis is that there was a "radical right-wing group" - actually a team of duped morons led by a glowie instigator - who were planning some kind of mayhem in the Capitol. Their handler had been working on them for a long time, ginning them up for violence. The cops were supposed to let only this group of people into the Capitol but some wires got crossed, maybe someone's instructions got paraphrased by a diversity hire, and they ended up letting everyone into the building.as crazy as this sounds there were a number of things that happened at BLM protests that made me have similiar suspicious. a lot of crazy stuff I saw online and in person made sense if it was being set up to generate agitprop by fucking boomer and older gen X retards who haven't figured out livestreaming.
Fortunately, the New York Times of all places answers that for us:How much do you want to bet he will not bring up which counties the murders take place or what the race the perpetrator is usually?
don't forget that the Capitol unguided tour was spearheaded by a VIP for the DOJ who sold recordings to CNN.To add: a more specific version of this hypothesis is that there was a "radical right-wing group" - actually a team of duped morons led by a glowie instigator - who were planning some kind of mayhem in the Capitol. Their handler had been working on them for a long time, ginning them up for violence. The cops were supposed to let only this group of people into the Capitol but some wires got crossed, maybe someone's instructions got paraphrased by a diversity hire, and they ended up letting everyone into the building.
When the dupes got inside, they found it wasn't full of evil feds like their handler told them, but other pro-Trump protesters, who they identified as "our people." They didn't want to start an attack that would claim the lives of docile Republican boomers and the handler slunk away fuming that his hard work was ruined and now he'd never get his promotion to department head.
That depends on both elections mattering and there being several more elections cycles.The base is going in the right direction. It may take a few election cycles to purge the cucks, but the wheels are turning.
The whimpers of a man being slammed against the hard concrete of reality.Apparently the booing is working, since Cornyn recently walked out of gun control negotiations.
There were people videotaping and recording all over the place before anyone stepped foot into the capital. What difference does it make if they kill some cops, staffers and maybe some Congress members, or if they kill some cops, staffers, maybe some Congress members and random Trump supporters? If anything, having Trump supporters in there would do nothing but help their case, since then people could more easily claim that the shooters were fellow Trump supporters who also stormed (going with the DNC talking points) the building.Because they were livestreaming. The plan, according to this hypothesis, was to sacrifice some Capitol cops, staffers and maybe a couple Congress members if they were unlucky enough to be around and blame it on MAGA nahtzees. The presence of so many people with cameras gave them cold feet and they canceled the fireworks. Even with all the cameras around, it still might have been possible for them to present the narrative they wanted, but... consider the consequences of failure. It would be like someone capturing indisputable proof of election fraud but even worse for the Dems.
That at least makes it seem a bit more plausible, so I'll give you that.To add: a more specific version of this hypothesis is that there was a "radical right-wing group" - actually a team of duped morons led by a glowie instigator - who were planning some kind of mayhem in the Capitol. Their handler had been working on them for a long time, ginning them up for violence. The cops were supposed to let only this group of people into the Capitol but some wires got crossed, maybe someone's instructions got paraphrased by a diversity hire, and they ended up letting everyone into the building.
When the dupes got inside, they found it wasn't full of evil feds like their handler told them, but other pro-Trump protesters, who they identified as "our people." They didn't want to start an attack that would claim the lives of docile Republican boomers and the handler slunk away fuming that his hard work was ruined and now he'd never get his promotion to department head.
Similar but IMO more plausible theory - the glowies and Dems are high on their own supply when it comes to "white males are the most dangerous derps in the derp" rhetoric. They figured if you get enough angry redhats in one place and push them a bit, fires, beatings, and murders are sure to follow. After all, it works with blacks, why not with MAGA people? They may have also memed themselves into believing that the Proud Boys are a right-wing, more dangerous version of Antifa, so again, a little bit a of a cop nudge, and the truly violent nature of the right will show itself and take its natural course.A theory I heard that makes some sense is that the Dems were planning some kind of major false-flag incident on 1/6 where a few heavily-armed patsies would enter the building and inflict mass casualties, kind of like a sequel to the Las Vegas shooting. It went wrong when the Capitol police opened the gates and let anyone in who wanted in. They were supposed to let just the designated patsies through but there was some kind of miscommunication (or sabotage?) and they threw open the doors for everybody.
As a result, there were hundreds of people milling around recording and streaming stuff on their phones. Livestreamers and false flag attacks are a bad combination. They couldn't safely pull off the gory spectacle they were hoping for unless they were guaranteed 100% narrative control, so they fell back on a plan B and decided to run with a party line that petty vandalism and discarded water bottles are worse than 9/11.
The reddit gold he'll get makes it all worth it.View attachment 3397435
View attachment 3397437
You see it's deliberate, should be attempted murder, get that old guy to press charges.