- Joined
- Jun 11, 2022
The best reparation this white devil can have is giving Afrika back to the black man, let all proud black people move back to Afrika and finally be free of whitey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The best reparation this white devil can have is giving Afrika back to the black man, let all proud black people move back to Afrika and finally be free of whitey.
No.
Same to you, nigger.The best reparation this white devil can have is giving Afrika back to the black man, let all proud black people move back to Afrika and finally be free of whitey.
Judas sold Jesus out for NOT being a terrorist.Was Jesus just a benevolent Ted K.? That's the real question here
Just like how Ted's brother sold him out for being a terroristJudas sold Jesus out for NOT being a terrorist.
Actually, those who were faithful before the time of Jesus went to Sheol first, and then to Heaven after Jesus died as I understand it. There are a number of verses that imply the righteous not being sent to Hell before Jesus came: King Saul seeing Samuel's ghost in I Samuel 28 and some of the righteous in the tombs being resurrected in Matthew 27. Paul outright states that Abraham's faith was counted to him as righteousness:Christ's "sacrifice" is some stupid, dumb sob story and it means absolutely nothing, Christianity is founded on emotional manipulation, we are not better because some stupid carpenter died on a cross like thousands before and after him, the idea that a god would have to allow this to happen damning to Hell all generations born before this "sacrifice", no matter how faithful, is pure retardation. This is my beef with it, Jew god or not.
All occutlism and traidtional religions, including paganism, works on blood sacrifice. This is why Satanists to this very day still kill stuff as part of their rituals. The idea that Chrsitanity is based on the blood sacrifice of God in human form to forgive the sins of humanity in a new convenant makes perfect logical sense, and you'd have to be an absolute midwit to not understand it.Christ's "sacrifice" is some stupid, dumb sob story and it means absolutely nothing, Christianity is founded on emotional manipulation, we are not better because some stupid carpenter died on a cross like thousands before and after him, the idea that a god would have to allow this to happen damning to Hell all generations born before this "sacrifice", no matter how faithful, is pure retardation. This is my beef with it, Jew god or not.
Said this, if the religion can still piss off the right people, it must have some merit somewhere. Religion in general must have some merit.
But, among religions, few are as retarded and lowly as the stupid cross worship, I'm keeping standards low on purpose here, because atheism is always and every time worse than this.
Blood sacrifice is retarded.All occutlism and traidtional religions, including paganism, works on blood sacrifice. This is why Satanists to this very day still kill stuff as part of their rituals. The idea that Chrsitanity is based on the blood sacrifice of God in human form to forgive the sins of humanity in a new convenant makes perfect logical sense, and you'd have to be an absolute midwit to not understand it.
Great argument. I'm not going to take the bait and get into a debate on this, but if you have any understanding of how the spirit world works you should know blood sacrifice is very powerful. This is why most religions in the world practiced it in antiquity and many folk religions still do despite the taboo from PETA types, etc. Jews would also still be doing blood sacrifice if the Romans didn't destroy the Second Temple.Blood sacrifice is retarded.
What system of belief do you follow?Great argument. I'm not going to take the bait and get into a debate on this, but if you have any understanding of how the spirit world works you should know blood sacrifice is very powerful. This is why most religions in the world practiced it in antiquity and many folk religions still do despite the taboo from PETA types, etc. Jews would also still be doing blood sacrifice if the Romans didn't destroy the Second Temple.
All occutlism and traidtional religions, including paganism, works on blood sacrifice. This is why Satanists to this very day still kill stuff as part of their rituals. The idea that Chrsitanity is based on the blood sacrifice of God in human form to forgive the sins of humanity in a new convenant makes perfect logical sense, and you'd have to be an absolute midwit to not understand it.
Except for Esau.Jesus loves you man
No, it's still necessary. They went to Sheol because Christ hadn't died yet and paid for their sins yet; without the eventual sacrifice of Jesus, they would have been sent to hell. Jesus takes the punishment we would otherwise receive for our sin for us; that is why He had to suffer and die.That would make Christ's crucifixion even more meaningless.
Please demonstrate. I’ll apply the same logic you use to demonstrate the other religions are false to yours too.Other religions aren't necessarily primitive, but they're definitely demonstrably false. Globalism is evil because it's run by weirdos who dance around owls and rape kids
I'd like to see you try.Please demonstrate. I’ll apply the same logic you use to demonstrate the other religions are false to yours too.
You're arguing against paganism to an agnostic-atheist to start with. I did read your post but you fail to prove any other religion false outside of your own opinion. Your argument basically boils down to saying the religion you follow agrees with your philosophy, which proves nothing.I'd like to see you try.
Their epistemologies don't hold water. To start with, the statement "I know that I can't know anything" is a contradiction. This means that knowledge must be possible.
Only a fully benevolent personal God who creates by choice rather than necessity can justify our own faith in our knowledge faculties. As the history of Western philosophy has shown us, trying to base our epistemology in autonomous reasoning is impossible and has led to the collapse of Western philosophy altogether. This is because we make judgements about what's true based on our logical faculties, senses, awareness etc without first having a justification for why we can trust that those senses aren't lying to us. How do we know that we're not turtles dreaming at the bottom of the ocean (the "I think therefore I am" argument is bad for reasons covered in the paper linked).
The God needs to be a free creator of everything because one of our categories of knowledge is bias/attention, which is organized according to our sense of the relative purpose of things in relation to us. Purpose can only be assigned by a voluntarily creative agent. We also need to know what context we exist in (the "relation to us"). This means that history and where we are at least in some sense must be knowable, and it means that we can also make use of historical evidences.
Most pagan traditions don't even claim to have anything like this, and some don't even think that objective truth even exists at all. Buddhism in particular can get pretty crazy in some schools as far as this goes. The other "monotheistic" faiths rely on Hellenic arguments about absolute divine simplicity which make God's creation necessary rather than voluntary (removing purpose). Early Christianity (and contemporary Orthodoxy) have the essence-energies distinction, which avoids this problem.
The other "Abrahamic" traditions also are very obviously not in continuity with the tradition of ancient Israel, which they would need to be. Only Christianity has any remaining connection to the first temple, since early Churches were/are just the temples but updated in their new fulfilled form. There was a direct continuity before, during, and after the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. Rabbinical Judaism didn't take the form we know until after the destruction of the temple in 70 AD (no temple nor connection to the temple), and contemporary Hasidic Judaism takes after the sorceries of guys like Isaac Luria and his interpretation of the Neoplatonism-inspired Kabbalah. It's medieval occultism, not the old tradition. Islam isn't even worth mentioning, being 8th century fanfiction.
Christianity is the only religion which meets all of these criteria. It has all of the necessary metaphysics and epistemology, and also exists as an entity in history.
Purpose comes from within. I actually agree with you on this statement because we are the voluntary agents, where I disagree is that any purpose needs to come from external forces such as god.Purpose can only be assigned by a voluntarily creative agent. We also need to know what context we exist in (the "relation to us"). This means that history and where we are at least in some sense must be knowable, and it means that we can also make use of historical evidences.
I just don't understand splitting hairs over the nature of reality when you can't even prove god exists. Show me proof he exists outside of religious texts.The other "monotheistic" faiths rely on Hellenic arguments about absolute divine simplicity which make God's creation necessary rather than voluntary (removing purpose). Early Christianity (and contemporary Orthodoxy) have the essence-energies distinction, which avoids this problem.