Debate Vtuber simps about being pedophiles

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So I have no idea of the metrics for the vtuber shit, like how many of this gura "chick" (assuming its not a dude with a voice changer) fans are minors/teens? how many are actually older guys/pedos?
She has 4 million subscribers on Youtube. so I say the range is decently wide.
 
A drawing is art
a film is art
The genre of said thing doesn't make something suddenly not art.
Also, art isn't objective.
I don't think video games are art
If the drawing is pornographic and the purpose of the drawing is not to convey an idea or express something, but to arouse the person looking at it, then it's not speech. If you want to debate this further maybe you should make a new debate thread about weather or not lolicon should be protected as free speech or not. It's getting kind of off-topic.

The point of this thread is not to discuss weather or not lolicon drawings of vtubers should be banned, but if the people who jerk their pickle to drawings of little girls like in the OP are pedophiles or not. In my opinion if you jerk off to drawings of feet, you are probably attracted to feet. If you jerk off to drawings of two men kissing, you are probably gay and if you jerk off to drawings of kids, then you're a pedophile.

So I have no idea of the metrics for the vtuber shit, like how many of this gura "chick" (assuming its not a dude with a voice changer) fans are minors/teens? how many are actually older guys/pedos?
You have to be 18 to use this site, so I assume the posters in the vtuber thread lusting after the shark loli are adult men. If you want you can just go to their twitter and look at the posters in the replies and see how many of them are grown adults.
 
If the drawing is pornographic and the purpose of the drawing is not to convey an idea or express something, but to arouse the person looking at it, then it's not art. If you want to debate this further maybe you should make a new debate thread about weather or not lolicon should be protected as free speech or not. It's getting kind of off-topic.

The point of this thread is not to discuss weather or not lolicon drawings of vtubers should be banned, but if the people who jerk their pickle to drawings of little girls like in the OP are pedophiles or not. In my opinion if you jerk off to drawings of feet, you are probably attracted to feet. If you jerk off to drawings of two men kissing, you are probably gay and if you jerk off to drawings of kids, then you're a pedophile.
Screeching "I FIND THING WEIRD AND I HATE IT" doesn't solve anything though. You somehow think slippery slopes are not a fallacy when the facts say you're wrong in this case. The mental gymnastics of "people jerk off to lines on paper, that must mean they'd probably do it IRL" is peak stupid and ignores the fact the human brain can compartmentalize fantasy and reality (unless you are a schizophrenic).
So that leads me to this question. Do you think anyone who jerks off to porn at all is schizophrenic?
 
You know, when your only defence on why the vtuber thread shouldnt be deleted is lolicons are based and shes 40000 years old excuse
Maybe, just maybe, you tards arent worth the headache, especially when the thread already posted actual cp like the retards they are
 
Screeching "I FIND THING WEIRD AND I HATE IT" doesn't solve anything though. You somehow think slippery slopes are not a fallacy when the facts say you're wrong in this case. The mental gymnastics of "people jerk off to lines on paper, that must mean they'd probably do it IRL" is peak stupid and ignores the fact the human brain can compartmentalize fantasy and reality (unless you are a schizophrenic).
So that leads me to this question. Do you think anyone who jerks off to porn at all is schizophrenic?
I think you might be, when I read this nonsense post. If you need more proof that people who post lolicon and who post real kids are the same people you should read some of the posts Null wrote about his time moderating 9chan, because he used to think the same thing until he saw the same IPs posting loli and real little girls to the site. Maybe not all of them jerk their dicks to real kids, but it's absolutely a big overlap and a slippery slope. They are pedophiles either way because they are aroused by a depiction of a child.
 
Agreed with this. Whatever happened to "I don't like what you say, but I will defend your right to say it?"
There's a lot of fetishes I find distasteful and disgusting but I don't think people should be arrested solely because of that. Personally I don't care about loli or shota. If people like it or draw it I could give a shit. But what bothers me when people focus on it and use it as a basis to censor or ban people they don't like. Because at the end of the day, they don't care about REAL children being abused or exploited. The dumbasses online who are trying to play Chris Hansen whenever they see someone posting hentai are doing more harm than good because the police can't do anything with picture of a fictional character. There are organizations that have had to plead with people to stop sending them cartoon porn because it doesn't help them find people who are spreading CSEM.

I honestly think v-tuber fans are the furthest thing from actual pedophiles online. Because it seems to me that the actual pedos dislike anime related things for being "too perverted". Plus pedos just look up webcam videos of real children on YouTube instead of watching Gura play video games, crazy right?
 
Any age metrics? demographics data?
I have some of Hololive's JP branch as a whole, but they're in Japanese, though some things are obvious to tell.

el2axgsza5l81.png


I think you might be, when I read this nonsense post. If you need more proof that people who post lolicon and who post real kids are the same people you should read some of the posts Null wrote about his time moderating 9chan, because he used to think the same thing until he saw the same IPs posting loli and real little girls to the site. Maybe not all of them jerk their dicks to real kids, but it's absolutely a big overlap and a slippery slope. They are pedophiles either way because they are aroused by a depiction of a child.
Personal experience isn't an argument towards something being factual. It can influence it, but it's not an "end-all, be-all".
And In terms of "depiction". I'm sure the blue and white haired shark girl is a great depiction of a living, breathing child
 
Last edited:
I think you might be, when I read this nonsense post. If you need more proof that people who post lolicon and who post real kids are the same people you should read some of the posts Null wrote about his time moderating 9chan, because he used to think the same thing until he saw the same IPs posting loli and real little girls to the site. Maybe not all of them jerk their dicks to real kids, but it's absolutely a big overlap and a slippery slope. They are pedophiles either way because they are aroused by a depiction of a child.
He poorly moderated 8chan so he really doesn't have room to speak on that.
 
I have some, but they're in Japanese, though some things are obvious to tell

View attachment 3402864



Personal experience isn't an argument towards something being factual. It can influence it, but it's not an "end-all, be-all".
And In terms of "depiction". I'm sure the blue and white haired shark girl is a great depiction of a living, breathing child
So the vast majority are between 18 and 34..........not good, tho 2016? are those numbers for gura? or any of the other big tiddy vtubers too?
 
Do you often have trouble with reading comprehension?
No, but I think he's just salty that 9chan wasn't successful as he thought it would be. So I'm not surprised that the same issues that persisted on 8chan continued on his "totally better 4chan with blackjack and hookers".
 
So the vast majority are between 18 and 34..........not good, tho 2016? are those numbers for gura? or any of the other big tiddy vtubers too?
I corrected it after the fact, those are specifically the statistics of the Japanese branch which has some big tiddy v-tubers like Choco ,Mel, Aki and Marine
wylq2msza5l81.png
Here's the statistics for Gura, the 2016 is when the company she works for was founded, not of when these statistics were taken.
They're from 4 months ago.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: ñññ
No, but I think he's just salty that 9chan wasn't successful as he thought it would be. So I'm not surprised that the same issues that persisted on 8chan continued on his "totally better 4chan with blackjack and hookers".
Is any of this relevant to the point that I made?
 
No, but I think he's just salty that 9chan wasn't successful as he thought it would be. So I'm not surprised that the same issues that persisted on 8chan continued on his "totally better 4chan with blackjack and hookers".
It had hundreds of posts per hour until it was flooded by child pornography by people protesting my rule that lolicon must go in boards specifically for lolicon/shotacon.

You're just wrong. Imagine if the law was that all any sexual exploitation of a real person, including adults, was criminal. It was a very serious crime that carried 5+ year prison sentences and sex offender registry. If there was any suspicion you had it or were distributing porn the police could seize all your computers. Even after you got out of jail you'd carry a social stigma until the day you die.

Do you think people who wanted porn would not just start looking at regular hentai?
 
I corrected it after the fact, those are specifically the statistics of the Japanese branch which has some big tiddy v-tubers like Choco ,Mel, Aki and Marine
View attachment 3402882
Here's the statistics for Gura, the 2016 is when the company she works for was founded, not of when these statistics were taken.
They're from 4 months ago.
The vast majority are still in that 18-34 section, underage teens barely make 6% of the viewers

Not good optics for a character that looks 12 given that she's flat af
 
Back