Law Supreme Court says Second Amendment guarantees right to carry guns in public - The ruling expands upon a 2008 decision that said the Second Amendment safeguards a person’s right to possess firearms at home for self-protection.

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York law that placed strict restrictions on carrying concealed firearms in public for self defense, finding its requirement that applicants seeking a license to carry a concealed handgun demonstrate a "proper cause" to do so in public is unconstitutional.

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision upholding New York's 108-year-old law limiting who can obtain a license to carry a concealed handgun in public. Proponents of the measure warned that a ruling from the high court invalidating it could threaten gun restrictions in several states and lead to more firearms on city streets.

Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the majority opinion for the ideologically-divided court, writing that New York's "proper-cause requirement" prevented law-abiding citizens from exercising their Second Amendment right.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-new-york-gun-law-second-amendment (A)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

 

[Super-Chevy454]

So that mean we could play "Celebration" now?

 

[Bogliacci]

Now go after the NFA

 

[Bakarina]

Fucking good!

 

[Ratzinger]

That should please everybody.

 

[Breadbassket]

Some people will be extremely upset about this, although that shouldn't be too surprising to everyone.

 

[TheBest]

*ahem*

SNEED, DILATE AND COPE, TRANNIES!

 

[kcbbq]

I love Clarence more and more every day. He should be first in line for that de-aging therapy.

 

[KEKMUHLORD]

INJECT IT STRAIGHT INTO MY VEINS CLARENCE!

The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for selfdefense is no different. New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms in public

 

[Just_Somebody]

My big surprise is Roberts going along with it, rather than being the fence riding cuck he usually is. Maybe the Roe v Wade reaction soured him on the Dems?

 

[mandatorylurk]

My big surprise is Roberts going along with it, rather than being the fence riding cuck he usually is. Maybe the Roe v Wade reaction soured him on the Dems?

Or he's trying to play the "I voted for your thing, be my fren and vote for my thing plz"

Every New Yorker should watch Death Wish 3 tonight in celebration.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Or he's trying to play the "I voted for your thing, be my fren and vote for my thing plz"

Every New Yorker should watch Death Wish 3 tonight in celebration.

Now then you mention it, it's worth to post that clip.

 

[Extremist Frank]

https://twitter.com/electionwiz/status/1539988676020736002

JUSTICE ALITO RESPONDS TO LIBERALS CITING MASS SHOOTINGS: "how does the dissent account for the fact that one of the mass shootings near the top of its list took place in Buffalo? The New York law at issue in this case obviously did not stop that perpetrator."

 

[LOWERCASE LETTERS]

Sneed

 

[Corette]

Any change that they'll get rid of that pesky Federal Firearms act of 1938?

 

[Meat Target]

So that mean we could play "Celebration" now?

I was thinking something more smug and obnoxious.

Spoiler: Weeb faggotry, sorry not sorry

 

[quaawaa]

Any change that they'll get rid of that pesky Federal Firearms act of 1938?

You mean 1934 right?

 

[Plunkie]

Clarence dropping this on HIS BIRTHDAY is a fucking banger holy shit

 

[Corette]

You mean 1934 right?

Whichever gets me hypothetically a Chicago typewriter is ok.

 

[make_it_so]

Clarence dropping this on HIS BIRTHDAY is a fucking banger holy shit

I guess this is his gift to himself.