Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
And that's still thousands of abortions performed due to rape since there are millions of abortions performed yearly. That's just what was reported as rape too, not all rape is reported.
You have no source for those "thousands" of raped women and no, millions of abortions are not done every year jfc cunts like you are the reason men didn't let women vote
 
Screenshot_20220624-110321_Fritter.jpg

Screenshot_20220624-110435_Fritter.jpg
 
You have no source for those "thousands" of raped women and no, millions of abortions are not done every year jfc cunts like you are the reason men didn't let women vote
I'm already aware the reason men didn't want women to vote is because they wanted to keep being able to use them as broodmares instead of treating them like people.
 
The United States Supreme Court has reached two landslide decisions this week.

Yesterday, an 135-page opinion delivered by Justice Thomas has outlined that a firearms license requirement for a specific threat is not Constitutional. This is the basis of so-called "may issue" states. Now, all states "shall issue" firearm licenses upon request without any specific need. The State of New York vows to fight this.

10 minutes ago, a 213-page opinion delivered by Justice Alito reverses previous decisions by the USSC that restricting access to abortion is an infringement on the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments. Abortion rights shall be legislated by the State and Federal representatives without Constitutional protection.

Many states have "trigger laws" enacted which would automatically ban or limit abortions as soon as Roe v. Wade was overturned, but it's too soon to see effects of this.

Court reporters remark these decisions are very long even by USSC standards, which suggest the decisions attempt to stomp out any loopholes or ambiguity.

You're now caught up.
Unfathomably based and redpilled.
 
What do you think the role of the Supreme Court is in the legislative process?
To review legislation created by the Congress or other government entities like state legislatures. If a GOP congress and president approve a national ban and pro-choicers sue over it, the Supreme Court will then have to determine the constitutionality of said law. If the Court decides it is constitutional, it will be the law of the land. I suspect that enough of the Supremes will allow their pro-life sentiments to overrule their "State's Rights" sentiments if that was the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back