Supreme Court Watch

[Eggwhore]

This wasn't a federal right though. You're talking to someone who understands the difference between a ruling and a actual codified law, something even RBG talked about. This was a legal ruling that upheld, just like how the supreme court also BTFO'd the vaccine mandate.

It was privacy. But now if the supreme court becomes blue they can argue that unvaxxed people indirectly kill others - its a dangerous precedent

 

[Wraith]

View attachment 3421543

https://twitter.com/CNBC/status/1540381683286933504

Will they be able to afford it with people not watching their garbage?


Post theme music:

 

[Hippopatumus]

Now govt can argue that you are infringing on the right of immunocompromised people to live by not getting jabbed.

Yes they could argue that. Fortunately there is no constitutional right to not get sick from a mild chest cold.

I am very worried about the vaccine-mandate implications of Roe being overtuned though, to be clear. I said back in December that if they were serious about the next round of oppression Roe would have to be overturned first, as it was in a lot of ways about medical privacy.

That said, anyone who shows up to my house to jab me against my will is getting shot in the face so, hey, find out I guess.

 

[Joe Swanson]

Holy shit I never thought this would seriously happen

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Abortion clinics in Louisiana are already closed and employees laid off.

Did they have a trigger law?

View attachment 3421550

I hear them singing Orff's "O bortuna"

 

[Full Race Replay]

Yup. And, surprising, at least me, at least one Justice (Clarence Thomas) wants to take it further and reexamine the legal grounds for the cases that made same-sex and interracial marriage federally legal. Like, Roe was pretty obvious judicial activism but I buy the legal arguments in favor of Obgerfell/Loving.

gay marriage and especially interracial marriage will not be overturned, but anyway those should be federal laws, not just "the status quo" based on supreme court precedent.

Speaking of which, I wonder why those states which had "trigger laws" lined up and ready to go did not go ahead and make these laws beforehand?

 

[Megaton Punch]

There's nothing I enjoy more than all the Let's Play children entertainers like Angry Joe, Markiplier, Jacksepticeye all screaming and virtue signalling because of this "taking away women's rights" and half the replies are people laughing at them or calling them transphobes because men can also have babies.

And literally the only one not saying "women" is fucking DSP and weirdly his tweet is the most normal and grounded of all of them lol

Like...just stay in your fucking lane. You make videos where you scream like a girl at Five Nights at Freddy's for your 10 year old audience. Maybe you aren't the font of knowledge for fucking abortion rights...especially when Jack is fucking Irish like me so who cares about his fucking opinion.

Twitter ushered in an era of people confusing followers for intelligence. The more followers someone has, the wiser they must be. Otherwise, why would they have so many followers?

When someone has a cloud of enablers and yes-men following them everywhere they go, whispering "you are a god" into their ear 24/7, they become an egomaniacal lunatic with a messiah complex. This is universally true of all humans, and is an excellent reason the concept of "celebrity" should not exist.

 

[Philier]

Maybe if the nation didn’t divide its wealth to only cater to the 1%, the nuclear family could be a reality again.
When you have dudes like Elon, Jeff, etc not paying a fraction of the taxes that the working class pays, it’s criminal to take the rights of abortion away.
View attachment 3421531
And what kind of fag believes removing a cluster of cells to be demonic?!

Commies: "Banning abortions will lead to more people!"
Also Commies: "Banning abortions will lead to less people!"

"B-BUT MUH 1%!" is a terrible deflection. The idea that people don't have children because there's a couple of super rich people around is completely beyond retarded. There's 0% correlation between the two. You have to be pretty desperate to try a deflection that terrible. Literally "I DONT LIKE THING SO MAYBE IF THIS OTHER THING I DON'T LIKE DIDNT HAPPEN THEY'D SOMEHOW BOTH FIX EACHOTHER SOMEHOW".

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

Right to bodily autonomy should be a federal right. Hopefully you are pro jab mandate too because this sets a precedent.

1. Overturning a decision does not set a precedent, it removes precedent.
2. "Bodily autonomy" is when one has control of their own body, not when they are protected from the consequences of the actions they perform with it.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Did they have a trigger law?

I hear them singing Orff's "O bortuna"

Yes.

New Orleans abortion clinic closed, workers sent home after Roe v. Wade overturned

After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its Roe v. Wade decision on Friday, activists gathered outside New Orleans’ only abortion clinic as workers locked its doors for the last time.

www.nola.com

Speaking of which, I wonder why those states which had "trigger laws" lined up and ready to go did not go ahead and make these laws beforehand?

Texas and Louisiana are two. Abortions are outlawed right now.

 

[Meat Target]

Post theme music:

My Brother in Christ, let me fix that for ya:

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Is it possible to have less than zero sex?

Yes, but it involves Robert Downey Junior/James Spader roleplay.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

View attachment 3421543

https://twitter.com/CNBC/status/1540381683286933504

Oh God, Disney is going to kill off their targeted demographic
They're no different than Big Tobacco!

 

[Eggwhore]

W

Which they already did, the supreme court said lol no earlier this year. Are you tired yet?

sure they said no this time but now that we dont have bodily autonomy included in privacy anymore who knows whats next when supreme court is maj blue again

 

[Android raptor]

View attachment 3421550

If you're threatening to forcibly make me or anyone else part of the trans community I strongly urge you to reconsider given the other major supreme court ruling this week.

Only if you get your dick out near

 

[Clint's Burden]

I was happy with my squishy feely ideals until the left shit all over freedom of speech and my bodily autonomy. Fuck them all to death with a metaphoric barbed wire wrapped bat.

I feel pretty similar, yeah.

I supported a lot of this shit. I still do, I'm down with people doing whatever the fuck they like. I like freedom. Back then, we were all individuals fighting for individual rights until I became a straight cis white male who's a fuckin' piece of shit, I need to shut the fuck up at all times on any issues that don't pertain to me. I can't tell jokes without some mass of retards screaming murder, can't refuse to call people shit if I don't want to.

Don't come banging on my door looking for sympathy, that bridge is burned. You people don't give a shit about freedom.

 

[Zeta Reticulan]

It was privacy. But now if the supreme court becomes blue they can argue that unvaxxed people indirectly kill others - its a dangerous precedent

Go ahead and explain your gymnastics on this shit take, please.

 

[Robotic Richard Simmons]

Cucks gonna virtue signal. It won't get them laid.

 

[CreamyHerman’s]

It was privacy. But now if the supreme court becomes blue they can argue that unvaxxed people indirectly kill others - its a dangerous precedent

Just like how vaxxed people indirectly killed others? Or how driving cars(which is a privilege btw) can also indirectly kill people? What about gun? Don't they indirectly kill people? Also you're being extremely indigenous here- because this ruling states states that it's up to local or federal to codify this type of law, not the supreme court.

 

[oramge cat]

How is that bad? If a state decrees abortion to be the taking of a human life then why shouldn't they prosecute one of their citizens for committing this crime?

There's issues around jurisdiction but there's precedent with crimes committed by American citizens overseas

Anyway it's about time that blue and red America physically separated themselves. Let the baby murdering whores go live among their own kind.

I don't like the idea of a state claiming to have jurisdiction over someone outside of its physical borders. Like, if I live in Alabama but I take a trip to Denver and buy an ounce of pot, Alabama shouldn't have the ability to prosecute me for possession if I smoked all the pot in Denver where it's totally legal.

The only laws I know of like this that exist are anti-sex tourism laws that could be invoked to prosecute someone who travels to a foreign country with the intent to have sex with a minor but these exist less because of morality and more to protect America's reputation and prevent an international black market that trafficks children from developing outside of the US.