Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its another step towards our bodies being the property of the state and a way to spark outrage to justify more control over the masses
No it isn't, it just means you can't murder the unique person inside of your body. You don't get to treat it like a virus or an inanimate object, you have to respect it as human life worthy of human rights. This is control of the masses the same way making illegal to commit murder is control of the masses.
 
No it isn't, it just means you can't murder the unique person inside of your body. You don't get to treat it like a virus or an inanimate object, you have to respect it as human life worthy of human rights. This is control of the masses the same way making illegal to commit murder is control of the masses.

It’s a cluster of fucking cells, not a baby.
 
The United States Supreme Court has reached two landslide decisions this week.

Yesterday, an 135-page opinion delivered by Justice Thomas has outlined that a firearms license requirement for a specific threat is not Constitutional. This is the basis of so-called "may issue" states. Now, all states "shall issue" firearm licenses upon request without any specific need. The State of New York vows to fight this.

10 minutes ago, a 213-page opinion delivered by Justice Alito reverses previous decisions by the USSC that restricting access to abortion is an infringement on the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments. Abortion rights shall be legislated by the State and Federal representatives without Constitutional protection.

Many states have "trigger laws" enacted which would automatically ban or limit abortions as soon as Roe v. Wade was overturned, but it's too soon to see effects of this.

Court reporters remark these decisions are very long even by USSC standards, which suggest the decisions attempt to stomp out any loopholes or ambiguity.



UPDATE: The #TRIGGERING has begun.

#TRIGGERED states: MO, TX, WV.

View attachment 3421622
View attachment 3421625
View attachment 3421634

You're now caught up.
inb4 Fiery Peaceful Protests
 
WHAT ABOUT THIS EXTREMELY RARE LESS THAN .001% EXCEPTION? WELL?

1656094094460.png
 
SAY GOODBYE TO YOUR ABORTIONS WHORES
View attachment 3421643
I'm fine with this as it does not affect me in the least bit. I would never have an abortion, personally, but that's just me. I do know folks who had ectopic pregnancies and had to have "abortions" if you will, to secure the mother's life. We're talking about situations where neither the child nor the mother would live. Those families were devastated making that choice. I've also know, personally, women who carried a dead child to term (the child was dead in the 8th month or so), gave birth to a dead child all because they couldn't have a procedure to save everyone the pain. It's not as straight forward as you'd like to believe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back