hereh2read
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2021
That Danesh dude is clearly desperate for trans women to be viewed as women so he isnt viewed as gay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tony, you fucking asshole. Your people cry end over end about trans people being genocided when this decision will lead to women's deaths. Insurance won't cover most of the procedures women need but you can get free facial hair removal.View attachment 3420911
One of our favorites is already starting.
They're safeguarding their future pregnancies, you know for when they all get their successful womb transplants.You have nothing in common with us. Fuck you.
View attachment 3420911
One of our favorites is already starting.
Easy. The "transgender" delusion is often a symptom of addiction to pornography.I personally don't understand the porn obsession by trannies.
"Pretending to be the opposite sex" seems accurate.We need to stop calling this whole thing transition and detransition. Nothing is helped is we use their langauge. There is only self harm/mutilation and recovery from said self harm/mutilation.
Was it just his asshole, though? I think it was his asshole.I'm sick to my stomach.
View attachment 3417010
Male anatomy confirmed:this face triggers my fight or flight
I am praying for lawsuits that go nowhere because of signed informed consent forms that establish doctors have fulfilled their duty of informing patients and that it's on public record that trooning oneself out and regretting the decision afterwards will have lifelong repercussions that are one's fault (partial blame goes to groups that encourage said trooning without proper mental health evaluation).As for flood-gates opening...I don't, it needs nipping in the bud sharpish. Payouts to these fickle freaks is adding insult to injury, imho.
It's funny that they try to shoehorn themselves in when as far as I'm aware they haven't even done anything to help abortion rights. In fact they've actively hindered it by making a big screech over the use of the word "women." That's like sabotaging the gun rights debate by insisting "guns kill people" is disinclusive of animals because animals are shot by guns too, and making a big screech to get anti-gun people to say "guns kill sentient beings." It makes no sense to dispute the one single thing your argument is about, it's infuriating.BBC article - archive
"women"...no "transwomen" mentioned but "women" (although they do mention "pregnant people"). I expect the article will be edited once the squealy complaints and boycott threats start.
For now, read and weep "Erin".
...what fetuses are trans women—who are male—able to carry?
They couldn't even let FTM have this moment to argue trans rights when it comes to abortions. Somehow it has to be about transwomen getting access to fetishitic abortions instead....what fetuses are trans women—who are male—able to carry?
None, that's the point. And the problem with satire nowadays: you can only tell a joke from the real nutjob babble if you are familiar with the messenger. Blue-haired tumblrinas saying this? Yeah, they're probably serious, even if they're objectively wrong. But Gad Saad is firmly on the anti-woke side, so, unless he changed A LOT since his last JRE participation, I'm assuming he's screwing around....what fetuses are trans women—who are male—able to carry?
Yeah, the Republicans have been building to this for decades, as a stated goal, but it's definitely "transphobia" that opened the door to this. One thing that I find exhausting about twitter in general is (as I often harp on about) totally misunderstanding history. There were people predicting in fucking 2010 that if RBG didn't retire, Roe would fall, given the statistical likelihood of her death in the next administration. This course was set waaaaaaaaaayyyyy before the recent tranny nonsense reared its head. Can't make it about you without rewriting the narrative though.View attachment 3421653
View attachment 3421839
Oh, Saint Bernie. Noooooooooo...
Apparently, trans stuff is not just semantics. Who'd have thunk? Not me.View attachment 3421660
View attachment 3421670
No, it didn't? It never has. It protected some bullshit privacy and it was a poorly written decision. Could have been improved upon ages ago.
View attachment 3421672
View attachment 3421705
Blabla, all rights are interconnected, forced teaming, yeah we been knew. Ironically one comments that trans accounts are the shoutiest on twitter right now. Yeah buddy, bc you attach to any hot button issue like a leech and go "Has anyone thought of the trans people". It's narc rage, not interest or empathy.
I've only seen posturing and rage tweeting about inclusion and how pussy feminism makes their euphoria boners wilt.
Who knew that in 2022 wokies would be fighting for the rights of men to get abortions?
Who cares i can't get it? I want it anyways!Who knew that in 2022 wokies would be fighting for the rights of men to get abortions?
Nazinazinazinazinazinazinazi.Any other women reporters want to write pro-trans pieces that acknowledge the critical side? (This is not even remotely all of them, just a grab bag of some hits.)
View attachment 3420272View attachment 3420277View attachment 3420279View attachment 3420280View attachment 3420282View attachment 3420283View attachment 3420284View attachment 3420285View attachment 3420286View attachment 3420287View attachment 3420288View attachment 3420290View attachment 3420291View attachment 3420293View attachment 3420295View attachment 3420297View attachment 3420298View attachment 3420299View attachment 3420301View attachment 3420302View attachment 3420304View attachment 3420311View attachment 3420312View attachment 3420313View attachment 3420314View attachment 3420315View attachment 3420316View attachment 3420317View attachment 3420318View attachment 3420321View attachment 3420322View attachment 3420323View attachment 3420324View attachment 3420325View attachment 3420326View attachment 3420327View attachment 3420328View attachment 3420329View attachment 3420330View attachment 3420331View attachment 3420333View attachment 3420334View attachment 3420335View attachment 3420336View attachment 3420337View attachment 3420338View attachment 3420339View attachment 3420341View attachment 3420342View attachment 3420343View attachment 3420345View attachment 3420346View attachment 3420347View attachment 3420350View attachment 3420351View attachment 3420352View attachment 3420353View attachment 3420355View attachment 3420356View attachment 3420358View attachment 3420359View attachment 3420360View attachment 3420362View attachment 3420364View attachment 3420365View attachment 3420367View attachment 3420368View attachment 3420370View attachment 3420273View attachment 3420289
This doctor deleted this but thankfully this is the internet:
View attachment 3420380