Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

View attachment 3420911
One of our favorites is already starting.
Tony, you fucking asshole. Your people cry end over end about trans people being genocided when this decision will lead to women's deaths. Insurance won't cover most of the procedures women need but you can get free facial hair removal.

You have nothing in common with us. Fuck you.
 
You have nothing in common with us. Fuck you.
They're safeguarding their future pregnancies, you know for when they all get their successful womb transplants.


View attachment 3420911
One of our favorites is already starting.
1656086823417.png BBC article - archive
"women"...no "transwomen" mentioned but "women" (although they do mention "pregnant people"). I expect the article will be edited once the squealy complaints and boycott threats start.

For now, read and weep "Erin".



edit: Was curious if any editing had been done since my post and it has.

The phrase "pregnant people" has gone, "women" is stated throughout and not one "transgender" piece of guff is mentioned anywhere. A small victory but I love it. BBC - revised archive
 
Last edited:
I personally don't understand the porn obsession by trannies.
Easy. The "transgender" delusion is often a symptom of addiction to pornography.

These people don't need surgery, they need to go cold turkey.


We need to stop calling this whole thing transition and detransition. Nothing is helped is we use their langauge. There is only self harm/mutilation and recovery from said self harm/mutilation.
"Pretending to be the opposite sex" seems accurate.


Was it just his asshole, though? I think it was his asshole.


this face triggers my fight or flight
Male anatomy confirmed:

boyoboy.png
 
As for flood-gates opening...I don't, it needs nipping in the bud sharpish. Payouts to these fickle freaks is adding insult to injury, imho.
I am praying for lawsuits that go nowhere because of signed informed consent forms that establish doctors have fulfilled their duty of informing patients and that it's on public record that trooning oneself out and regretting the decision afterwards will have lifelong repercussions that are one's fault (partial blame goes to groups that encourage said trooning without proper mental health evaluation).
 
1656086823417.png BBC article - archive
"women"...no "transwomen" mentioned but "women" (although they do mention "pregnant people"). I expect the article will be edited once the squealy complaints and boycott threats start.

For now, read and weep "Erin".
It's funny that they try to shoehorn themselves in when as far as I'm aware they haven't even done anything to help abortion rights. In fact they've actively hindered it by making a big screech over the use of the word "women." That's like sabotaging the gun rights debate by insisting "guns kill people" is disinclusive of animals because animals are shot by guns too, and making a big screech to get anti-gun people to say "guns kill sentient beings." It makes no sense to dispute the one single thing your argument is about, it's infuriating.
 
It's because with leftism in the west now, you have to have lockstep adherence whatever the new orthodoxy is. You can't be pro-abortion, but pro-freedom of speech, or pro-women's rights, but pro-gun. You must march in lockstep to whatever the twitter mind has decided is the correct stance on any issue, as determined by who can come up with the most viral hot take. These troons can't conceive of someone being pro-choice, but also anti-troon. They assume that anybody against the latter must secretly be against the former. Even as they have muddied the waters on the need for reproductive rights with their pseudobiological bullshit.


I mean, the right can do this too, and like the left it can often happen as a result of reactionary tribalism. If you maintain any sort of consistent set of political beliefs, you get left behind as the tides shift.
 
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.05.25.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.41.08.png
Oh, Saint Bernie. Noooooooooo...
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.25.38.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.26.37.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.04.00.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 19.57.37.png
No, it didn't? It never has. It protected some bullshit privacy and it was a poorly written decision. Could have been improved upon ages ago.
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 19.57.00.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 19.55.43.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 19.58.30.png
Apparently, trans stuff is not just semantics. Who'd have thunk? Not me.
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 19.59.12.png
Blabla, all rights are interconnected, forced teaming, yeah we been knew. Ironically one comments that trans accounts are the shoutiest on twitter right now. Yeah buddy, bc you attach to any hot button issue like a leech and go "Has anyone thought of the trans people". It's narc rage, not interest or empathy.

I've only seen posturing and rage tweeting about inclusion and how pussy feminism makes their euphoria boners wilt.
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.19.21.png
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-24 um 20.20.03.png
Who knew that in 2022 wokies would be fighting for the rights of men to get abortions?
 
...what fetuses are trans women—who are male—able to carry?
None, that's the point. And the problem with satire nowadays: you can only tell a joke from the real nutjob babble if you are familiar with the messenger. Blue-haired tumblrinas saying this? Yeah, they're probably serious, even if they're objectively wrong. But Gad Saad is firmly on the anti-woke side, so, unless he changed A LOT since his last JRE participation, I'm assuming he's screwing around.
 
View attachment 3421653
View attachment 3421839
Oh, Saint Bernie. Noooooooooo...
View attachment 3421660
View attachment 3421670
No, it didn't? It never has. It protected some bullshit privacy and it was a poorly written decision. Could have been improved upon ages ago.
View attachment 3421672
View attachment 3421705
Apparently, trans stuff is not just semantics. Who'd have thunk? Not me.
Blabla, all rights are interconnected, forced teaming, yeah we been knew. Ironically one comments that trans accounts are the shoutiest on twitter right now. Yeah buddy, bc you attach to any hot button issue like a leech and go "Has anyone thought of the trans people". It's narc rage, not interest or empathy.

I've only seen posturing and rage tweeting about inclusion and how pussy feminism makes their euphoria boners wilt.
Who knew that in 2022 wokies would be fighting for the rights of men to get abortions?
Yeah, the Republicans have been building to this for decades, as a stated goal, but it's definitely "transphobia" that opened the door to this. One thing that I find exhausting about twitter in general is (as I often harp on about) totally misunderstanding history. There were people predicting in fucking 2010 that if RBG didn't retire, Roe would fall, given the statistical likelihood of her death in the next administration. This course was set waaaaaaaaaayyyyy before the recent tranny nonsense reared its head. Can't make it about you without rewriting the narrative though.
 
Any other women reporters want to write pro-trans pieces that acknowledge the critical side? (This is not even remotely all of them, just a grab bag of some hits.)

View attachment 3420272View attachment 3420277View attachment 3420279View attachment 3420280View attachment 3420282View attachment 3420283View attachment 3420284View attachment 3420285View attachment 3420286View attachment 3420287View attachment 3420288View attachment 3420290View attachment 3420291View attachment 3420293View attachment 3420295View attachment 3420297View attachment 3420298View attachment 3420299View attachment 3420301View attachment 3420302View attachment 3420304View attachment 3420311View attachment 3420312View attachment 3420313View attachment 3420314View attachment 3420315View attachment 3420316View attachment 3420317View attachment 3420318View attachment 3420321View attachment 3420322View attachment 3420323View attachment 3420324View attachment 3420325View attachment 3420326View attachment 3420327View attachment 3420328View attachment 3420329View attachment 3420330View attachment 3420331View attachment 3420333View attachment 3420334View attachment 3420335View attachment 3420336View attachment 3420337View attachment 3420338View attachment 3420339View attachment 3420341View attachment 3420342View attachment 3420343View attachment 3420345View attachment 3420346View attachment 3420347View attachment 3420350View attachment 3420351View attachment 3420352View attachment 3420353View attachment 3420355View attachment 3420356View attachment 3420358View attachment 3420359View attachment 3420360View attachment 3420362View attachment 3420364View attachment 3420365View attachment 3420367View attachment 3420368View attachment 3420370View attachment 3420273View attachment 3420289

This doctor deleted this but thankfully this is the internet:
View attachment 3420380
Nazinazinazinazinazinazinazi.
1656096884010.png


Nah, what am I saying. They know, they just don't care. Raping the English language is a troon's favorite pastime.
They are tossing words like nazi and pedophile when they are just meaning "poopyhead". Eventually those won't mean a fucking thing.
I assume it's for the moment where those words are inevitably tossed against them. At that point it'll be kiddy insults and nobody will investigate their swastika child dungeon (egg carton?) because everyone cried wolf too much.
 
Gad Saad is a provocateur; that tweet isn't serious. He's a Rogan/Peterson compatriot and recently wrote a pretty good book called "The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense," which is about how nonsense concepts like gender ideology "infect" people and institutions and damage rational thought and political policy. He's very full of himself and annoying sometimes, but not wrong on most things.

Alas, the rest of those tweets are likely sincere.
 
Back