Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Screenshot_20220624-154148_DuckDuckGo.jpg
We replaced one old hag with a vintage WOMAN. DAMN.

NOW they're okay with guillotines.
 
I’m not anti-abortion (I think it’s morally wrong, but having been involved in child services, I think the damage that shitty people who shouldn’t have a kid having a kid does is worse). But the left deserves this. Play stupider and stupider games for a decade, win stupid prizes.
Great job, left! It's so fucking awesome you spent literal decades spewing absolute bullshit about troons, literally 0% of the population, weird freaks, while ignoring your actual core constituency.

Eat shit, Dems.
 
The idea that there's going to be a massive homemade spike in those demographics after this has been discussed already. The Planet of The Apes is unlikely with their crime rates and where many of them live (blue areas/cities) in mind. That's not even counting those people putting out interstate driving offers to abortion-legal states, easy access for them. Besides, you think it being illegal in certain states is gonna matter? They'll still do it in back alleys or with coat hangers, or just go to another state to get abortions. I doubt New Orleans, Birmingham, Atlanta or Baton Rouge will stick to honoring this law, looking at their political leanings and demographics.

If you need more persuasion that the country is not taking after Zimbabwe, 1.) The overall birth rate for negroes and spics has gone down, and 2.) there were nearly 2 million white babies born in 2020 and the only reason white births look lower on statistics is because of geriatric boomers that can't produce babby. The cultural enrichment floods in certain spots largely come from politicians and retarded people importing the fucks, not from babby being formed.
These trends are with Roe being in effect. I think the difference will be split as a lot of blacks live in places like NYC and Chicago but then on the other hand you have them in states like Mississippi and Missouri...
View attachment 3422299

What do I see? A beautiful woman that knows how to age.
Pity she adopted black children. I do not approve.
Did someone in this thread really say that gay marriage and abortions will lead to our extinction 🤣
Read Patrick Buchanan's Death of the West, look at unsustaianble demographics in much of Europe and the Western world. Europe and the West must turn to regime that is protalist, populist, and authoritarian.
As for gay marriage, they all told it was an immutable characteristic. Then once socalled gay marriage was legalized, the overton window was shifted. It is called Defining Deviancy Down. Gen Z has unprecdented numbers of kids identify as gay lesbian queer and the like. This as well as a brief survey of ancient history shows that human sexuality is malleable (especially among females). Need to keep that stuff under wraps....
 
Lol I always find it funny when troons get mad about abortion shit. Even if someone was willing to fuck them consensually, they basically took a blender to their genitalia so it's not like they're going to be having to worry about getting knocked up.
Regardless of whether you support abortion or not, it's weird that the majority of people most vocally angry about restricting it are troons, dykes, and gay guys. They say (straight) white guys can't have an opinion on it because they can't get pregnant, yet two of their biggest support groups can't even get pregnant and the other's very unlikely to ever do so.
 
it's literal poison to the brain and prolonged usage over the course of many years has been shown very plainly to lead to the atrophy and decay of brain matter in a physical pattern that's almost identical to hard drug addicts.
That research is applicable to sex addicts, which is why you see the correlation. That's not people who regularly watch porn.
 
Let's look at say 1960 and what they tolerated that could also be considered immoral, strip clubs and nude photography, I'm not necessarily advocating banning stuff like that, but notice what those two things have in common? Those things can still promote heterosexuality, a guy looking at some T&A might want to go home and fuck his wife which might lead to a baby he couldn't abort.

Hell even the 1800s had burlesque shows, my point is maybe we don't have to dial America all the way back to the 1600s, but a of the changes the 20th century enacted have had negative consequences and need to be changed back.
Why not? Because you like it yourself? Seems like you're afraid to bite the bullet.
 
Morality matters, gay marriage and abortion should be illegal because they're immoral, a society that's not willing to take a stance on some things for their immortality is a society that's on it's way to a hellish future, even if extinction isn't the threat, a world where everyone is fucking miserable is.
Your mother must regret not going to the clinic before YOUR birth.

I'm not necessarily advocating banning stuff like that, but notice what those two things have in common? Those things can still promote heterosexuality, a guy looking at some T&A might want to go home and fuck his wife which might lead to a baby he couldn't abort.
That's because you view women as objects. Don't start THAT shit.

but a of the changes the 20th century enacted have had negative consequences and need to be changed back.
Deal: no anime then.
 
I said "if"; in other words, how I feel or what I'd do is irrelevant. It's largely a matter of principle and truth rather than something I'm emotionally invested in.

You shouldn't be allowed to end a human life just because it's convenient, that's really it.
Okay 'life begins at conception' faggot. I can't wait for these unwanted babies to flood the country and drain it of it's resources.
 
It may have been posted previously (this thread is moving at a lightning pace), but I have a thought experiment for angry pro-choice posters ITT:

Chuck Schumer (the current Senate Majority Leader) had the votes to codify Roe vs. Wade after this opinion leaked. Manchin, Murkowski, and Collins were all willing to vote aye on a bill that:
-Banned any restrictions on abortion during the first trimester
-Demanded "reasonable regulation" on any abortion access during the second trimester
-Required exceptions be made for the life and health of the mother during the third trimester.

Democrats could've saved Roe. It would have passed 52-48. Instead they voted on a bill that
-Legalized abortion access through all three trimesters
-Permitted sex-selective abortions
-And refused any religious exemption for doctors unwilling to perform the procedure.
And they lost 49-51.

They did so because they knew this would happen, because they want you upset at the Supreme Court and not them, because they had 50 years to fix this issue and preferred to dangle it like a shiny set of keys over your collective heads in a cynical means to get your vote.
And because you're more likely now to foolishly approve of them doing whatever naked power grabs against the Supreme Court that are likely forthcoming.
Sis we been knew the dems don't give a shit about women either and just want to use abortion rights as a carrot on a string, because they know it's the only thing that separates them from the GOP
 
Last edited:
It may have been posted previously (this thread is moving at a lightning pace), but I have a thought experiment for angry pro-choice posters ITT:

Chuck Schumer (the current Senate Majority Leader) had the votes to codify Roe vs. Wade after this opinion leaked. Manchin, Murkowski, and Collins were all willing to vote aye on a bill that:
-Banned any restrictions on abortion during the first trimester
-Demanded "reasonable regulation" on any abortion access during the second trimester
-Required exceptions be made for the life and health of the mother during the third trimester.

Democrats could've saved Roe. It would have passed 52-48. Instead they voted on a bill that
-Legalized abortion access through all three trimesters
-Permitted sex-selective abortions
-And refused any religious exemption for doctors unwilling to perform the procedure.
And they lost 49-51.

They did so because they knew this would happen, because they want you upset at the Supreme Court and not them, because they had 50 years to fix this issue and preferred to dangle it like a shiny set of keys over your collective heads in a cynical means to get your vote.
And because you're more likely now to foolishly approve of them doing whatever naked power grabs against the Supreme Court that are likely forthcoming.
If they had made Roe v Wade law, it would have given GOP that much more ammunition for midterms, where the Dems are already at risk of losing the senate. Now they get a much needed electoral boost. Plus with Hispanics looking like they may become a moderate or even conservative leaning demographic in the future, they need to boost single mother households for future voters.

Truly everyone wins except liberal females, but who like them anyway.
 
Broken branch, ancestor cry


The problem there is that you will have Shanequa and others like that be emboldened to have more and more children as these so called pro life states grant them more money per child. The irony is that there isn't much maternal care to go around but each new nigglet gains you an extra hundred bucks.

You're asking for responsibility in those with below average IQ, who happen to be the ones contributing most to abortion and the welfare state.

Matt Walsh is one of those people. There is quite a contingent of conservatives and pro lifers who use the argument that a fetus should not have to pay for a man's crime. Or as Matt Walsh said, you NEED that baby to show that you were raped in the first place. So it's very common, and all it takes is a few prods to get them to admit it.

Would the ultrasound you watched be from The Silent Scream, by any chance? Because that has to be a late term abortion. Most abortions take place before 9-12 weeks. Wouldn't be a D&C, would it?
Wasn't the Silent Scream. I know the one that you mean, that film is old, the one I watched wasn't that old.
Personally I think it's immoral and fucked up unless it's an unviable for life sack of meat like a Hartley Goblin, or obviously if it endangers the mothers life.
I can see an argument in the case of Rape/incest, but I still don't like it, I can understand the argument about killing a baby to pay for a rape, then again I can see the otherside, I wouldn't be happy if my daughter was forced to carry a rape baby, so thats a hard subject.
Either way though even done with medical necessity, it's fucked up once its a baby and not literal cells, after theres a heartbeat, a brain, definitely too late.
Any "doctor" that performs a late term abortion should be burned at the fucking stake tbh.
 
Last edited:
So how about you have an actual child looking at great success in the future, and then you find you're pregnant with some fucking retard who will do nothing but suck up resources before inevitably dying. You could abort the retard or send your genius kid to college.

What kind of goddamn idiot would pick the retard?
Retards can live kick ass lives now, a lot of them are celebrities or senators
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back