Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
We must put a stop to white women until we can figure out what is going on.
View attachment 3425778
I always thought this was one of the most disingenuous points ever brought up in this argument. Even if the right to abortion were only extended to "rape and incest survivors," almost every one of these broads would still be kvetching. If you want abortion to be legalized regardless of cause, then the cause of pregnancy is irrelevant to the discussion.
 
kkkkkkk.png

As an europoor I am always in awe of how huge the US is. It's a long journey if you ditch the condom in the South
 
I have yet to hear a sound argument why eugenics is bad that isn't based on emotion.
The basic concept is that it's impossible to determine what genes are good and what genes are bad ahead of time - any artificial selection pressure we attempt to exert is extremely likely to have unintended negative consequences.

As a general rule, you want as much genetic diversity in a population as possible to maximize the likelihood of survival.
 
Many states allow abortions up to 12 weeks. Most women are probably aware they are pregnant by then. You are allowed to get it for any reason at all within certain windows, it just gets restricted after a certain amount of time. Also, if people really don’t want kids, I’d be fine subsidizing voluntary sterilizations. It would be like what the Social Darwinists of the early 20th century did, but consensual this time.
But not all situations like this are cut and dry.
Some people are in abusive situations who can't get out to get abortions in that period dur to the abuser won't let them leave or even possibly kidnapped by them, or may not even know they are pregnant due to the abuse is so prevalent the pain is normalized to them.
These are just a few examples of stuff that has happened with stuff like this before that stopped the 12 week period from being possible.

This does happen not to mention now many states are banning it outright so getting help for those women in those situations is going to be way more dangerous for them.

I do not believe abortion should be a contraceptive but it should be available to people who need it who been sexually assaulted or could risk killing them.
Some people don't even find out thier pregnancy could be deadly until 2rd or even 3rd term due to stuff can happen developmentally that occur after the 12 weeks.
 
But not all situations like this are cut and dry.
Some people are in abusive situations who can't get out to get abortions in that period dur to the abuser won't let them leave or even possibly kidnapped by them, or may not even know they are pregnant due to the abuse is so prevalent the pain is normalized to them.
These are just a few examples of stuff that has happened with stuff like this before that stopped the 12 week period from being possible.

This does happen not to mention now many states are banning it outright so getting help for those women in those situations is going to be way more dangerous for them.

I do not believe abortion should be a contraceptive but it should be available to people who need it who been sexually assaulted or could risk killing them.
Some people don't even find out thier pregnancy could be deadly until 2rd or even 3rd term due to stuff can happen developmentally that occur after the 12 weeks.
Im okay with forcing the 6 women a year who find themselves in those freak outlier situations you concocted to give birth if it means saving close to a million innocent lives annually.
 
Some people don't even find out thier pregnancy could be deadly until 2rd or even 3rd term due to stuff can happen developmentally that occur after the 12 weeks.
Pretty much every state makes exceptions for the mother’s life in danger already
These are just a few examples of stuff that has happened with stuff like this before that stopped the 12 week period from being possible.
12 weeks is actually the norm for most countries around the world. Even Saudi Arabia allows you to get an abortion within the 12 week period. The US under Roe has actually been an outlier in allowing abortions as late as they are at a federal level.
 
I love laughing at shit like this because fuck them and they brought it on themselves
The vast majority of the world except for homogenous white nations outlaw abortion without restriction
Go to the Caribbean, go to the middle east, go to Africa, you can't get one, yet as usual these racist bitches out themselves bitching about white men.

Abortion for rape or medical reasons should be allowed. Abortion without restrictions I'm like 50/50 on. I mostly want bitches to stfu and stop acting hysterical, racist, illogical, violent, etc.... when they don't get their way. The mere fact they keep shitting out this "my body, my choice" makes me want to deny it to them. Its someone else's child as well and another human altogether. I'm glad about this solely for the fact bitches in the west finally get some pushback and didn't get their way for once as most of them have become completely retarded illogical and ungrateful pigs.
I mean the thing is in Islam they settled the issue somewhere in the middle between shout your abortion and Catholics of 1900. The problem is the two extremes are abort the fetus for evil or if you use birth control you're a whore.
View attachment 3425828
As an europoor I am always in awe of how huge the US is. It's a long journey if you ditch the condom in the South
give us Florida, and the Carolinas and we will be set as a country.
 
The basic concept is that it's impossible to determine what genes are good and what genes are bad ahead of time - any artificial selection pressure we attempt to exert is extremely likely to have unintended negative consequences.

As a general rule, you want as much genetic diversity in a population as possible to maximize the likelihood of survival.
That makes sense.
But if someone has a higher than random chance of passing on a hereditary illness is it not better that they don't breed?
Like look at some of the parents in Tard Baby General, Gwen Hartley is a perfect example, they have one fuck up, are told that the chance of another one is extreme, but then continue to pump out potato babies.
Eugenics based on Genetic Engineering is out of our reach at the minute, we don't have the knowledge of how genes work and interact with each other, (we're a long way from breeding Astartes or Nietzsche's Ubermenche), but I don't think it's a bad thing to try and eradicate hereditary problems, whether sterilization is better than abortion for achieving this is something for wiser minds than I.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: RurkerHivemind
That wasn't even Christians who said it, that was Nietzsche, about as anti-Christian a guy as you can get. And he was right.

He then spent the rest of his life trying to get humanity to surpass itself and leave Christianity behind, but he died without success. Then all the secular horrors he predicted came true in the 20th century. Mechanized elective abortion in pursuit of empty hedonism is just one of those nihilistic outcomes.
Christians had been pointing out the need for the divinity as a foundation in moral matters for millenia, Thomas Aquinas being a good example.

But yes, Nietzsche was one of the few atheists intellectually capable and honest enough to see this problem coming and try to tackle it. Which is why I'll always have a soft spot for him, despite him being a heathen who accused Christ of being "too womanly"
 
Mhm, this could be a overall negative, the abortion ruling. Nothing lights a fire under a feminists arse like killing an unborn kid, it's like trying to take the favourite machine gun off of some mad prepper. If dems weren't excited over Joe, then they'll become hyper focused on the state races.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
That makes sense.
But if someone has a higher than random chance of passing on a hereditary illness is it not better that they don't breed?
Like look at some of the parents in Tard Baby General, Gwen Hartley is a perfect example, they have one fuck up, are told that the chance of another one is extreme, but then continue to pump out potato babies.
Eugenics based on Genetic Engineering is out of our reach at the minute, we don't have the knowledge of how genes work and interact with each other, (we're a long way from breeding Astartes or Nietzsche's Ubermenche), but I don't think it's a bad thing to try and eradicate hereditary problems, whether sterilization is better than abortion for achieving this is something for wiser minds than I.
The thing about that is many genes that cause hereditary problems are beneficial in other contexts - the gene for sickle-cell anemia being the classic example.

I don't have any problem with people deciding it's best not to procreate on an individual level, but any kind of program that attempts to select particular desirable traits is pretty much doomed to dystopia and disaster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back