- Joined
- Mar 17, 2018
Sounds like you hang out with some really mentally unwell people. Or you're full of it. Either way, yikes.
Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.
- Thread starter Mr Zero
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2021
I swear you guys just spout buzzwords to stay perpetually angry at shit. Is now the best time to stick it to the troons?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
The only people I've seen using standard deviation as a unit for IQ have also cut a hole in their copy of The Bell Curve so they can fuck it, literally or figuratively. They most likely learnt it from the Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability pdf that's floating around which fits with the kind of personality that fixates on supposedly fundamental differences between groups of people.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
government mandated girlfriends, all part of the plan
Although... it's less a question of getting laid, and more a question of having children anyways.
If there's one thing I hate, it's a woman wanting to have a career or the ability to have consequence-free sex. Those are only for me!
Your neighbor is encouraged to rifle through your trash for discarded medication containers in order to sue you (with no chance of their being on the hook for legal fees) in Texas. Plan B is like as not going to be construed as illegal in plenty of these states. Gee, might it be that people who aren't interested in becoming parents take the next logical step to protect themselves?
Next thing you're gonna tell me, it's all propaganda that female professionals are emigrating away from states with draconian laws on the topic. That simply couldn't be true! Alabama will flourish economically with all those incoming potatobabies!
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2014
Not all women are fit to be parents. Quite a few don't like kids, don't want kids, and/or are terrible with kids. Growing up with someone like that as a mother would be awful. Sure, she might learn to accept the child, but that resentment will always be there, especially if her financial situation can't support herself and a child.
"Just put it up for adoption!" The foster care system is fucked and going through with a pregnancy does irreparable things to a woman's body. It's not that simple.
"Just put it up for adoption!" The foster care system is fucked and going through with a pregnancy does irreparable things to a woman's body. It's not that simple.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
Is the right wing Lucas Werner?
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2018
Oh no, the moving to another state thing sounds absolutely plausible and I don't doubt it. But permanent sterilization? Yeah, that's a lot harder to believe.
Of course, lotta people in this thread seem to be pretty typically leftist, and I trust the word of most leftists about as much as I trust the fucking media.
Edit: Lol, seethe, cope, and kill yourselves leftist faggots. Your top hats are trophies to me.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2014
I mean if a woman has made up her mind on never having kids, ever, sterilizing herself is a pretty reasonable thing imo. Sure, she might change her mind, but most people I've met who don't want children are very adamant about it.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
lots of people get their tubes tied. I'm sure for some it's rhetoric and exaggeration on the level of "I'm moving to canada," but for others, they sure as shit weren't planning to be parents and they sure as shit aren't gonna risk getting slapped with fines and jail time for taking a pill
The world existed just fine at half of its current population for pretty well into the 20th century, we can afford to have people not reproduce. lol or was the plan to ban borshun and then they'd all become BASED tradwives who appreciate a man with a lot of upvotes
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
the women I know are mostly in medicine- doctors, nurses. maybe half are married. they do have access to at least two locals who will tie tubes, I think it's covered by most insurance here. I've heard at least a few discuss IUDs instead.
but it was all they were talking about yesterday.
a lot of them are religious/big family-seeming types, I'd never think they would do this stuff if I didn't have to listen to them sit and talk in the break room. one of their conversations was about staying at each other's houses afterward so husband wouldn't have to know.
one of them I do know a little bit better, she was planning to eventually have kids and yesterday said that's off the table, she won't be having any now.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2015
Really the things that should concern you from the two rulings is Thomas’s opinions in each of them. In the concealed carry case he reached the correct conclusion (may issue is bullshit) but how he reached it is correctly asserted by Breyer to be a real asspull, relying on cherrypicked historical interpretations as concrete fact, as though views regarding history don’t shift and change around as studies are done, papers are written, and academics debate endlessly over things. It’s not a solid ruling and Kav and Roberts both signal that they think the Heller standard still applies and that they used that to join in the majority. Barrett doesn’t fully agree with Roberts or Kav on this but asserts correctly that Thomas needed to actually set some sort of criteria for the use of historical standards and that question is left completely open.
His opinion in Dobbs is honestly one of the most concerning to civil liberties and rights in general, as Thomas throws up every major 14th amendment case aside from Loving (which isn’t a surprise as if Loving got overruled it would affect Thomas so he won’t touch that one) regarding the right to privacy in the bedroom and equal marriage. Thomas indeed insists these cases be brought back up to the court, despite Alito trying to insist the reasoning he used in Dobbs totally doesn’t open these laws up (It does and Alito fools nobody by trying to insist his logic this ruling is narrow and unique to the issue) which could easily become used to pare back rights to privacy in general, as it isn’t explicitly stated in the constitution.
The Dems dropped the ball in 2009-2011 to codify Roe. But pretending that Thomas and Alito and many legal scholars like them won’t happily try and take away other rights because “muh originalism and literalism” while twisting legal pretzels for conservative political causes in interpretation is laughable.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Technically, they'd be sperm into embroys during abortion, NOT babies.
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
A big gut buster from grandma Margeret.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2021
There is a good scene in Bombshell where somebody at Fox orders a quiche and Beth Ailes looks ready to douse her in gasoline.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Of all the things people give Trump credit for, the fact that he did more than Obama ever did to limit gun rights is just in such stark contrast to the weird belief Trump cultists have that he was somehow a Second Amendment hero. The bump stock ban in response to one event was so stereotypically New York liberal that it amazed me his bogus reputation survived.
Branco is kind of a drooler, but he's right about this one. Trump actually did do both of these things. Roe was a dead case walking the instant he made his appointments, and arguably the instant Obama pussied out and let the Republicans block Merrick Garland.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2021
Rightoids are miserable even when they win.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019