Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I genuinely want to know how men would react to a sex strike. Would they applaud women for no longer being reckless baby murderers? Or will they rape and kill us for no longer being their willing whores?
Half would patronize prostitutes, the other half would get us flying cars and a colony on Mars by the end of the year.
 
Serious question, how can women rape men?
Rohypnol, blackmailing them by threatening to accuse them of rape if they don't go along with it.
Historically it would be pretty much impossible. Maybe get them drunk? But there are a lot of "men" who are so weak and effeminate these days, they could probably be overpowered.
You can just repeatedly call them a faggot and bully them into proving you wrong. Physical force is not required to rape.
 
Half would patronize prostitutes, the other half would get us flying cars and a colony on Mars by the end of the year.
I think that the chad types would just get even more pussy and the normie looking dudes who get some but not much would lose that. Overall may lead to an improvement long term and a rethinking of society towards traditional values again. Like are women and society happier since the pill came out and free love and hookup culture became a thing?
 
Like are women and society happier since the pill came out and free love and hookup culture became a thing?
No, based on self-reported happiness surveys they are more miserable than ever before. However it is difficult to determine if this is because of the social changes or if the pill itself just gives women mental health problems. Either way it makes sense to ban it.
 
I love how this completely overshadowed the handgun carry ruling, yet the former happened just in time for the protests.
In the grand scheme of things NYSRPA v. Bruen changes very little, at least directly. Most states were shall-issue (where shall is legalese for "must") for CCWs, and a handful were full on constitutional carry. The ruling affected the half dozen or so states that that were "may-issue", in which the applicant had to convince the issuing agency that they had a good reason to concealed carry, and the IA could reject the applicant for any reason or no reason.

Even then, you could argue this really only affected a handful of counties in the may-issue states. You get outside of the major coastal urban centers of California or New York and the region wouldn't look out of place for rural Alabama or Texas, and the sheriff's offices reflected that. You go to, I dunno, Humboldt or Fresno county in California, write "The 2nd is my permit, BITCH" and the sheriff would probably just chuckle nad rubberstamp the permit.

It's only in said urban centers where it was impossible to get a CCW.
 
Last edited:
Ratzinger should have gassed the pedo priests instead of covering it up. That's not a man of God.
He clearly regrets not doing enough though and says he fears God's judgement when he is soon to die. At least he will admit the moral failings. I guess though he figures works will save him though it contradicts the first part.

Joseph Ratzinger then recalls face-to-face conversations with victims of abuse committed by clerics. "In all my meetings, especially during my many Apostolic Journeys, with victims of sexual abuse by priests, I have seen at first hand the effects of a most grievous fault. And I have come to understand that we ourselves are drawn into this grievous fault whenever we neglect it or fail to confront it with the necessary decisiveness and responsibility, as too often happened and continues to happen."

"As in those meetings," says the Pope Emeritus, "once again I can only express to all the victims of sexual abuse my profound shame, my deep sorrow and my heartfelt request for forgiveness. I have had great responsibilities in the Catholic Church. All the greater is my pain for the abuses and the errors that occurred in those different places during the time of my mandate. Each individual case of sexual abuse is appalling and irreparable. The victims of sexual abuse have my deepest sympathy and I feel great sorrow for each individual case."

Benedict XVI then says he understands more and more "the repugnance and fear that Christ felt on the Mount of Olives when He saw all the dreadful things that He would have to endure inwardly. Sadly, the fact that in those moments the disciples were asleep represents a situation that, today too, continues to take place, and for which I too feel called to answer. And so, I can only pray to the Lord and ask all the angels and saints, and you, dear brothers and sisters, to pray for me to the Lord our God."

Ratzinger concludes his letter with these words: "Quite soon, I shall find myself before the final judge of my life. Even though, as I look back on my long life, I can have great reason for fear and trembling, I am nonetheless of good cheer, for I trust firmly that the Lord is not only the just judge, but also the friend and brother who himself has already suffered for my shortcomings, and is thus also my advocate, my ‘Paraclete’. In light of the hour of judgement, the grace of being a Christian becomes all the more clear to me. It grants me knowledge, and indeed friendship, with the judge of my life, and thus allows me to pass confidently through the dark door of death."

 
No, I'm waiting for an actual argument. Do you have sources for the black disabled homos that ran 90% of German businesses that the socialists liberated for the people?
I wouldn't talk about "actual arguments" when your "sources" are hyperbole and strawmanning.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Jacknife
Men are alread held liable for babies they dont want to have, I've never heard anyone speak about 18 years of a mans life being destroyed and having zero say in the matter.
Its always well don't cum in her, so I'll give these whores the same advice and show them the same compassion.
This is the problem: outside of rape, both parties have plenty of choices before pregnancy. I have no sympathy for either of them. Don't stick your dick in anyone you wouldn't give up 50% of your wealth to in a divorce.
 
No, based on self-reported happiness surveys they are more miserable than ever before. However it is difficult to determine if this is because of the social changes or if the pill itself just gives women mental health problems. Either way it makes sense to ban it.
I think it’s a combination of the hormonal changes from the pill, hookup culture, and being able to order dick easier than ordering a pizza that’s done it. There’s actually studies that find people are less happy with more choices. It’s a “grass is greener” kind of thing. Women are notoriously neurotic.
 
This is the problem: outside of rape, both parties have plenty of choices before pregnancy. I have no sympathy for either of them. Don't stick your dick in anyone you wouldn't give up 50% of your wealth to in a divorce.
It's funny how anti-natalist the arguments here are getting.

Also, prenups are a thing.
 
What do you mean "why"? If you get a girl pregnant you've got no say in it if she aborts it or keeps it against your wishes and sues you for child support. It sucks if she chooses the route you wouldn't want but that's just how it is.
That's actually exactly what I meant by why. Thanks for answering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back