Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
So do the people making pro-abortion arguments of "it's just a clump of cells" also advocate that a man should have the right to demand an abortion from someone he has gotten pregnant? I mean, the effects of an unwanted child on him are life-changing: 18+ years of child support payments under threat of imprisonment; social consequences, inheritance effects possibly taking from his other children... It's unarguably massive. And if a woman can choose to avoid major consequences in her life because it's a "safe and normal medical procedure" that only affects a "clump of cells" then should that not be extended to him also?

I assume all these feminist campaigners determined that abortion is a right because of the impact of being forced to keep it on the mother; similarly believe that a man should have the right to demand an abortion takes place because of the impact on him? Right?

Well, it's an American debate, it just boils down to "boys vs girls", just like preschoolers on a playground would do, it's what Americans do, it's all "white vs black", "men vs women", "poor vs rich", "right vs left", that's as far as they want to go; most interesting questions are dismissed by tired and old arguments like "it's the woman's body", or "this is a war against women", or "everyone will become a whore, won't somebody please think of the children?", and even then, most people participating in this discussion don't want to have children, or can't because of their sexual preferences or their old bodies.

I'd argue that even if the couple is willing to have the kid, they should receive counseling on a possible abortion if it is evident that they are unprepared (a piss poor financial position) or unfit (they are nuts) for parenthood, after all, if they end up having the kid and do a shit job at it, CPS will eventually intervene; why can't they save the clump of cells from a miserable existence?
 
The real victims here are of course trannies.

9F34ABD3-BE78-46AC-B43B-C84BCBA5AA43.jpeg
13EA2969-45A7-4FE8-9244-FD5BAB4340C7.jpeg
 
Well, it's an American debate, it just boils down to "boys vs girls", just like preschoolers on a playground would do, it's what Americans do, it's all "white vs black", "men vs women", "poor vs rich", "right vs left", that's as far as they want to go; most interesting questions are dismissed by tired and old arguments like "it's the woman's body", or "this is a war against women", or "everyone will become a whore, won't somebody please think of the children?", and even then, most people participating in this discussion don't want to have children, or can't because of their sexual preferences or their old bodies.

I'd argue that even if the couple is willing to have the kid, they should receive counseling on a possible abortion if it is evident that they are unprepared (a piss poor financial position) or unfit (they are nuts) for parenthood, after all, if they end up having the kid and do a shit job at it, CPS will eventually intervene; why can't they save the clump of cells from a miserable existence?
Then again, do you want to have Our Current Diversity Overlords to decide who should and shouldn't have a kid? By their standards, you and I are both awful, crazy, evil people who are Double Mecha Hitler, by just being here on this site, because some troon set himself on fire or whatever.
I sure as fucking hell wouldn't need some blue haired they/them to try and bully/trick me into an abortion because I'm "crazy" for saying men are men and women are women.

The money argument is also kinda questionable. On Reddit people told a woman she should have had an abortion because her kids are suffering because they have to share a bedroom with each other.

Sure, common sense standards are all. But where do you see common sense being common now?
 
this is because its all blackrock bullshit. This is all funded by the federal reserve. I remember reading in 2008 about how powerful black rock is. Now its super apparent.
 
The list of gaming companies that have virtue signalled have been shown, thanks to some troon who works at Blizzard. Remember to ignore these companies as irrelevant:
That's an awful lot of companies that are 'generously' offering to fund interstate abortion tourism, with money that I'm pretty sure the current state of our economy says they don't have.
 
Then again, do you want to have Our Current Diversity Overlords to decide who should and shouldn't have a kid? By their standards, you and I are both awful, crazy, evil people who are Double Mecha Hitler, by just being here on this site, because some troon set himself on fire or whatever.
I sure as fucking hell wouldn't need some blue haired they/them to try and bully/trick me into an abortion because I'm "crazy" for saying men are men and women are women.

The money argument is also kinda questionable. On Reddit people told a woman she should have had an abortion because her kids are suffering because they have to share a bedroom with each other.

Sure, common sense standards are all. But where do you see common sense being common now?

Well, I know that it would eventually turn into a 1984 situation with troons and Disney executives engineering the population to be diverse enough so that "Encanto 4 the return of grandma Coco" doesn't bomb; but I don't mean it as a eugenics argument, more of an if Juanito and Laqueesha already have 10 kids, and they are going for the 11th while making only 1k a month, someone should tell them to think it through... but as of late, American society seems to glorify mental illness and the struggle of being poor and full of melanin.

In the end, it's all about the standards of who calls the shots (who is always the worst person/group possible). It's mostly an idyllic argument, about how extreme poverty or mentally ill parents can ruin a kid, but as you said, how poor is poor and how crazy is crazy can be manipulated or misunderstood.
 
Last edited:
The wahmen protests have been incredibly low energy so far. They don't love killing babies nearly as much as saint floyd loved fentanyl. SAD!
The vast majority of women in the US aren't going to be effected by this. Most states in the US will still have the most progressive, least restrictive abortion laws in the world and women who don't live in those states will have access to them due to freedom of movement.
 
Looks like their accounting departments got back and determined paying for an employee's fetus deletes is much less expensive than paying for their maternity leave. Thanks brands, very cool
 
That's an awful lot of companies that are 'generously' offering to fund interstate abortion tourism, with money that I'm pretty sure the current state of our economy says they don't have.
It's ok, they'll just raise the price of games again to compensate for the Roastie Cross Country Abortion Fund.
 
The vast majority of women in the US aren't going to be effected by this. Most states in the US will still have the most progressive, least restrictive abortion laws in the world and women who don't live in those states will have access to them due to freedom of movement.
I wish that argument worked. Remember: these are the people who scream bloody murder about "voter suppression" over requiring an one-time investment driver's license or some other photo ID that in most states won't cost you more than 25 bucks. If an option isn't available at all times, for free, and preferably delivered right to their doorstep so they don't even have to leave the house, it might as well not exist for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back