Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
But it’s still a life. It’s not the baby’s fault the rape victim was only 13 and hardly a grown woman.
Which is what makes it unfortunate. But self preservation is pretty universally recognized as valid justification for killing. Nobody should be barred from any action taken to preserve life and limb.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Last Stand
I wish we had a SCOTUS like Dankula. Laws that make sense and are fun
Screenshot_20220626-220142_Brave.jpg
 
Holy shit, zoomers have the same amount of opsec as their boomer great grandparents.
View attachment 3429892View attachment 3429899View attachment 3429903 View attachment 3429906View attachment 3429918

This one thinks you can just gofundme yourself out of murder charges :stress:
View attachment 3429912
Eventually we're going to find out that there was a Zoomer equivalent of lead paint making them literally retarded like the boomers. Not sure what it is, but this is a level of retardation beyond being caused purely by social influences.
 
Personally I'd try to see if i could rip the eyes out with my bare hands. Newborn skulls are mushy, I'm sure it can't be that hard to just physically rip them apart with your hands. Would probably feel so satisfying too, soft skull and brains and eyeballs in your fingers <3
you are a literal disabled retard i dont think you could manage to do that
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Alex Krycek
Bring ur guns.
Too bad a fetus can't. I mean just think for one second the consequences of your logic. You are saying it is ok to kill people or not even recognize them as people simply because they are inconvenient. Why is it not allowed then to extrapolate on that?
 
Eventually we're going to find out that there was a Zoomer equivalent of lead paint making them literally retarded like the boomers. Not sure what it is, but this is a level of retardation beyond being caused purely by social influences.
It's chemicals and plastics in the water.

And I'm not even joking. It's actually screwing us up. People are only now starting to talk about it openly.
 
You know, I am seeing a lot of women here (even on this forum, jesus christ) that would rather kill a baby than use protection or, better yet, not have sex. In other words, no fucking sign of any accountability, with it being their own children who take the fall for their piss poor decision-making.

Lord help me, I think I'm actually becoming sexist. :story:
It's time, my friend.

 
It's chemicals and plastics in the water.

And I'm not even joking. It's actually screwing us up. People are only now starting to talk about it openly.
This was a shower thought I had recently. So it isn't safe to ingest soap. But it's okay to wash our dishes with it? And then where does it go when we wash it down the drain? The earth is a closed system. Any toxic substance can't really be disposed of.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Certified_Autist
uhh...did something happen to adoption while I wasn't looking? yes you have to carry and deliver the baby but you're not saddled with it for the next couple decades
it's so strange to me that it hasn't been mentioned in any capacity, like I'm in some bizarro world
We keep mentioning it, but the Pro-Abortionists like to keep conveniently pretending that Baby Safe Haven Laws DO NOT exist for just such cases. Y'know, because ignoring this fact makes their argument for baby murder that much "stronger."

"Many State legislatures have enacted
legislation to address infant abandonment
and endangerment in response to reports
of newborn infants abandoned in unsafe
locations, such as public restrooms or trash
receptacles. Beginning in Texas in 1999,
"Baby Moses laws" or infant safe haven
laws have been enacted as an incentive for
mothers in crisis to safely relinquish their
babies to designated locations where the
babies are protected and provided with
medical care until a permanent home is
found. Safe haven laws generally allow
the parent, or an agent of the parent, to
remain anonymous and be shielded from
criminal liability and prosecution for child
endangerment, abandonment, or neglect
in exchange for surrendering the baby to a
safe haven."
 
uhh...did something happen to adoption while I wasn't looking? yes you have to carry and deliver the baby but you're not saddled with it for the next couple decades
it's so strange to me that it hasn't been mentioned in any capacity, like I'm in some bizarro world
Uhhh..While I'm up for adoptions its currently probably the worst system to put someone into. The next thing would be jail itself.
 
This was a shower thought I had recently. So it isn't safe to ingest soap. But it's okay to wash our dishes with it? And then where does it go when we wash it down the drain?
Down the drain, back out and into the water supply, through the filtration plants and then back to you.

Problem is the filtering and cleaning does not get everything and is done with chemicals that cause issues to.
 
Down the drain, back out and into the water supply, through the filtration plants and then back to you.

Problem is the filtering and cleaNing does not get everything and is done with chemicals that cause issues to.
So we basically have to go back to using only substances that existed prior to the industrial revolution? I could be down with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back