Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
care to elaborate? I get how being an orphan or ward of the state or w/e we call it now is really bad, but don't adoption agencies exist for the express purpose of avoiding this outcome? networking pregnant women to baby wanters that have to at least be together enough to get through however many interviews and background checks?
Let's also ignore the fact that there are plenty of married couples out there who would love to adopt your kid, whether it's due to their own infertility issues or being faggots that can't conceive without a "womb bearing person"?

Better yet, if it's a white baby they'll probably pay you a shit-ton of money for it as well as cover all of your medical costs??
 
We’re not murderers. That always seems to be the pro life go-to line. I once had to order my 4 year old Husky Pitt put down due to Pyometra. I’m still not right even after all these years. Does that mean I should have PITA protesters calling me a murderer?

I don’t want to sperg but I encourage you to listen to people’s stories. There isn’t this “Hey I’m 8 months pregnant, I’m not feeling it anymore, let’s abort.”

Sorry to repeat this same phrase but you’re being very presumptuous about a lot on the topic. I get your pro life stance. I really do. I just don’t see the need to go around forcing my beliefs and personal life choices on everyone else.
Right, you're not murderers, just "pro terminating human life on demand", huge difference

lmao are you really comparing killing a person to putting down a sick dog? At this point I'm pretty sure you're trolling
 
I have an idea! Since you Americans like democracy so much why don't you have a referendum about the abortion part as well as many other questions? IIRC Switzerland is one country where any major law changes require a referendum with a majority vote. Or is that communism, socialism or whatever the current scare word Trumptards came use?
This is literatly what conservatives have been arguing for.
 
What a phenomenally stupid ruling. Abortions will still happen even if it’s legal or not. It will just lead to more dead women(from botched attempts) or more dead/abused babies(parents who don’t want their children will just either start killing them or abandon them to be mistreated in those shitty adoption agencies).
There is literally no upside to this.

Those crazy old fucks also want to ban birth control and condoms. The Red States need only to look at the violence in Central America, with their bullshit archaic laws regarding contraception and abortions to see where they’re headed. Abortion equals less crime.
 
Last edited:
I don't know. See the guy above me who is arguing that his own children should be killed out of inconvenience. How is that logical?
Well, chemicals in the water are making men into women. So any historical arguments about evolution don't really hold up. I could try to come up with a BS argument about how because he is unmarried, his GF isn't worthy of protection, but evolutionary theory is all hypothetical anyway.
 
I have an idea! Since you Americans like democracy so much why don't you have a referendum about the abortion part as well as many other questions? IIRC Switzerland is one country where any major law changes require a referendum with a majority vote. Or is that communism, socialism or whatever the current scare word Trumptards came use?
Why should the people living in San Francisco get to have a say in the laws in Montana? That's why we have a federal government and states. This really isn't fucking rocket science.
 
Women's behavior has almost turned me into an unironic evolution denier. The idea is that people evolve traits that are beneficial to survival, but there's just no good way to rationalize women's behavior. It certainly doesn't benefit men or children and women themselves are miserable. Maybe there are a bunch of spiteful gods laughing at our misfortune.
The founding fathers could not have anticipated the modern woman. Repeal the 19th.
 
Sure it is. If everyone was forced to donate 1 kidney at the age of 18, there would be no waiting lists for recipients, no more dialysis. People would no longer face life threatening decisions to make.

All we’d be asking is that people put the lives of someone else above ownership of just one organ. Uterus > Kidney.

I get that you don’t like the point I’ve made but don’t invalidate it just because.
Women get pregnant because of their own actions 99.9% of the time. By banning abortion, the government is not forcing them to do anything, they are forcing them to not do something. They aren't even remotely the same thing.
 
One thing I have learned is no one hates women like women do.
Except men pretending to be women.

Why should the people living in San Francisco get to have a say in the laws in Montana? That's why we have a federal government and states. This really isn't fucking rocket science.
Because San Fran is a forward-thinking urban bughive of the future, therefore their opinions are worth more than rural mayo ghoul obsoletes in Montana. You aren't even a person.
 
What a phenomenally stupid ruling. Abortions will still happen even if it’s legal or not. It will just lead to more dead women(from botched abortions)
I thought you said there was no upside?
Those crazy old fucks also want to ban birth control and condoms. The Red States need only to look at Central America, with their bullshit archaic laws regarding contraception and abortions to see where they’re headed.
Advocating in favor of deporting spics and niggers is pretty based, not gonna lie.
 
That seems rather overstated. Contraceptives (of varying degrees of efficacy) have been used for thousands of years.

People may have been more prepared for the consequences of sex, but that doesn't mean they didn't attempt to avoid pregnancy and decouple sex and child-bearing just as modern people do.
Yes. Literally removing the consequence from the urge. I’m not even against it but that’s the origin of the urge.

Food tastes good for the same reason and has been similarly hijacked by fast food and candy etc..
 
Anyone who is pro-choice should be more angry at the gigantic retards that keep trying to absolve the Democratic Party of any responsibility. It’s always muh Republicans. The constant finger pointing is so goddamn obnoxious that I’m surprised there hasn’t been a bigger call to nuke the entire platform and start from scratch.
 
Women get pregnant because of their own actions 99.9% of the time. By banning abortion, the government is not forcing them to do anything, they are forcing them to not do something. They aren't even remotely the same thing.
And by extension, the same for men get women pregnant out of the same action. Both sexes need to own up to their shit and stop killing children over their inability to accept responsibility.
 
What a phenomenally stupid ruling. Abortions will still happen even if it’s legal or not. It will just lead to more dead women(from botched abortions) or more dead/abused babies(parents who don’t want their children will just either start killing them or abandon them to be mistreated in those shitty adoption agencies).
There is literally no upside to this.

Those crazy old fucks also want to ban birth control and condoms. The Red States need only to look at Central America, with their bullshit archaic laws regarding contraception and abortions to see where they’re headed.
I don't believe in God at all but it's still fun to say baby killers are going to hell. Have fun LMAO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back