Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
SaidNoOneEver said:
I've never thought about it but I can't think of a black person who has made more history in the past 50 years than Clarence Thomas. Except maybe George Floyd. We should just call it Clarence Month.
Click to expand...
Only thing that would make it better if Obama was forced to give up his Nobel peace prize to Thomas, who actually deserves it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot, StevieLasVegas, Autistic Joe and 4 others
JambledUpWords said:
The cringe, it never ends:

View attachment 3432726
View attachment 3432728
View attachment 3432733
View attachment 3432736
View attachment 3432738
View attachment 3432739
View attachment 3432741
Click to expand...
Untitled.jpg

Yeah, dudes are lining up around the block to impregnate that.
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Male Idiot, Autistic Joe, Exterminatus and 29 others
Fapcop said:


SO MUCH WIN!


SCOTUS is really on a roll, and I can’t wait to hear lunatic lefties seethe about how this means that the Christian Taliban is right around the corner.
Click to expand...
While I do actually agree with this ruling (as long as he doesn't force the players to pray, who gives a shit?), when you guys are celebrating this stuff and still denying being Christian fundies, it's pretty hilarious to see how much you're lying about the latter
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Eternal Gopnik, Fapcop, PickwickPub and 4 others
Gisvarg said:
These kind of policies existed since Augustan times. He had medals and honors and tax breaks for productive families.

Also I find trigger laws kind of unconstitutional and against the spirit of the constitution in general. Lawmaking is supposed to be slow as possible by design. The government shouldn't be able to rapidly pass laws whenever it wants to. Makes tyranny easier. Trigger laws are a loophole to that. If these states want to ban abortions, the current legislature should bring that to the floor and try to pass it.
Click to expand...
Oh I know but it wouldn't be KiwiFarms if someone didn't find a way to bring the conversation back to Hitler. Just doing my part.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Male Idiot and Vyse Inglebard
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
While I do actually agree with this ruling (as long as he doesn't force the players to pray, who gives a shit?), when you guys are celebrating this stuff and still denying being Christian fundies, it's pretty hilarious to see how much you're lying about the latter
Click to expand...
What's wrong with celebrating a man being allowed to practice his religion without being persecuted by an oppressive government? Whether he's Christian, Jewish, or Muslim, it's a victory for everyone who isn't a godless NPC.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Autistic Joe, Ndnd, madethistocomment and 6 others
Gezkill said:
Do religions have the right to deny a person to be married based on their beliefs yes.

Does the state, no.
Click to expand...
But most laws originate from some sort of moral assessment (eg theft and murder, age of consent laws,). The state has a legitimate interest in protecting families, and it certainly should have an interest in pro natalism.
If you create some sort of mechanism whereby gay couples can leave an estate to the survivor, have medical rights when one is in a hospital etc, there should be no equal protection issues. To be flippant about it, since marriage is between a man and a woman, a gay air lesbian can always still marry someone of the opposite sex (just like everyone else).
It is unfortunately a moot issue because the genie is out of the bottle, but mark my words gay marriage and the normalization of LGBTQ-YUCK will unleash the law of unintended consequences in the worst way since single moms became mainstream. Hear me now and believe me later.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
Reactions: Nod Flenders, HIVidaBoheme, Accidental Racism and 2 others
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
While I do actually agree with this ruling (as long as he doesn't force the players to pray, who gives a shit?), when you guys are celebrating this stuff and still denying being Christian fundies, it's pretty hilarious to see how much you're lying about the latter
Click to expand...
Step up your game old man

I don't read your posts with the expectation of seeing such weak shit, I come for the 24 inch pythons running wild with the power of the millions and millions of salty tears
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: DeathfatFag, Squid Diddler, JustSomeDong and 2 others
_giantmeteor2024_ said:
I'm thinking a lot of people out in the real world are sick of hearing about sex sex sex and gender identities 24/7. In that way, the repeal seems like a refreshing direction. In an individual experience, I get why this is distressing, but I can also see why many people welcome it during the era of 24/7/365 "Pride" and "Kink Positivity!"

Personally, too much sexuality rubbed in my face-- uninvited-- has the opposite effect on me from what is intended. It actually makes me find the human body and sexuality repulsive. It's not like the benign nudity one sees in ancient sculpture, or if someone's in a shower room changing their clothes-- it's like in-your-face porn-inspired-self obsessed "social justice" bullshit. You can practically smell the yeast infections and smegma through the screen on social media. I don't find putting a magnifying glass up to sex as appealing. I don't need to see every asshole hair, thank you.

It's actually a GOOD thing to suppress sexual impulses at times, because that energy can then be channelled into glorious things. Consider all the great artwork and music that was created during the time periods when various cultures had strict rules regarding sexual behavior and expression. Men with a creative sense had to use their capabilities to attract someone (outside showcasing their own bodily functions and sexual prowess)-- they channeled that creativity into creative trades, literature, architecture, painting, music, hobbies, philosophy. While acquiring wealth was one goal, it's not hard to imagine attracting women with a display of their skill wasn't another goal. Women developed creative abilities in the arts, learning language, and in terms of practical necessities, food cultivation and creation, creating clothing, weaving, embroidery, education in plant-based medicine. It might sound ludicrous, but those things are not easily "done from scratch" and require the ability to plan for the future, set priorities, etc..

My opinion... Flopping on one's back, getting a hard on, or sticking one's ass in the air doesn't require any kind of skill. Throughout much of history, people who did that excessively were considered burdens on society, brutish, cheap, as useless people.

There's no real magnetic energy there when you're with someone who feels entitled to a hump with you simply because they exist. Could be my lizard brain telling me "don't fuck a moron, you don't want stupid offspring", but who knows.
Click to expand...
I thought I was the only one. Just the constant hearing of sex, fucking, kinks, abortions, and "my body my choice" has reinforced my thought that there is nothing wrong with not having sex. Actually, the value of sex has been vastly degraded in recent years to the point of it being nothing more than a commodity.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Autistic Joe, Flan Handler, The Great Chandler and 5 others
SaidNoOneEver said:
Those trigger laws were passed to placate the pro-life groups, nobody actually expected Roe to be overturned in their lifetimes. I fully expect provisions to be added soon for rape/incest to any that lack them.
Click to expand...
Badungus Kabungus said:
Yeah, having those provisions in place is important as it robs the leftist idiots from their biggest talking point, despite making up maybe 5% of all abortion procedures.
Click to expand...
Puff said:
Every single state trigger law accounts for health of the mother. Most have a rape or incest exception.
Click to expand...
What @Puff said. See below for more deets.
umami's milk said:
I haven't actually seen the auto-trigger state laws discussed. There are links on the feature post, but no one's going to click that shit. This thread just turned into abortion reee-ing.
Here they are so the obese feminists can relax a little bit.

Bans that go into effect immediately
Louisiana, South Dakota:
- A class 6 felony to perform an abortion or attempt to perform an abortion
except to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency.

Kentucky:
- It's a Class D felony to perform an abortion or attempt to perform an abortion
except to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency or if the provider performs medical treatment that accidentally terminates a pregnancy.

Bans that go into effect 30 days after Roe v. Wade is overturned:
Idaho
-It is a felony punishable by 2-5 years to perform an abortion or attepmt to perform an abortion. Additionally, medical providers that perform an abortion will have their medical license revoked. Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger, if provider performs medical treatment that accidentally terminates a pregnancy, or if the pregnant woman is a victim of rape or incest and has reported the incident to law enforcement

Tennessee
- It's a Class C felony to perform an abortion or attempt to perform an abortion.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or at serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.

Texas
- 1st or 2nd degree felony to perform or attempt to perform an abortion. Additionally you will be given a civil penalty of $100,000.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or at serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.

Bans that require attorney general/governor action to go into effect:

Arkansas
-Anyone who performs or attempts to perform an abortion will be charged with a felony punishable by a fine of up to $100,000, up to 10 years in prison or both.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman's life is in danger

Missouri
- Anyone who performs an abortion will be charged with a class B felony, and their professional license may be suspended or revoked.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman's life is in danger or if she is at serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.

North Dakota
- Anyone who performs an abortion will be charged with a Class C felony.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or if she is a victim of rape or incest.

Oklahoma
- Anyone who provides an abortion service will be charged with a felony punishable by two to five years in prison.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman's life is in danger.

Utah
- Anyone who performs an abortion will be charged with a second-degree felony.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or at risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function, lethal fetal abnormality is found, or if the pregnant woman is a victim of rape or incest and has reported the incident to law enforcement.

Wyoming
- Anyone who violates the provision will be charged with a felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Exceptions are made if the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or at risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function, or pregnant person is a victim of rape or incest.

So there you go. You can shove the 'omg so many women r going to dieeeee' line because it's bullshit. As of writing this post, in all 50 states of America, it is legal for a woman to get an abortion if her life is in danger.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: DeathfatFag, SCSI, Puff and 3 others
WhiteNight said:
The Court already denied certiorari for this case. Thomas wrote an impassioned dissent, but that doesn't change anything. Sullivan isn't going away any time soon.
Click to expand...
You don't want it to unless you want this site to die, too. Someone would say this site is "media" by some loophole and the forum you can drop the n word on will be gone
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: SCSI, Accidental Racism, Overly Serious and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back