As Ohio restricts abortions, 10-year-old girl travels to Indiana for procedure

Link (Archive - http://archive.today/ravJs)

On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.


But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care.

Indiana abortion laws unchanged, but effect still felt across state​

While Indiana law did not change last week when the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking Dobbs decision, abortion providers here have felt an effect, experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of patients coming to their clinics from neighboring states with more restrictive policies.


Since Friday, the abortion clinics where Dr. Katie McHugh, an independent obstetrician-gynecologists works have seen “an insane amount of requests” from pregnant people in Kentucky and Ohio, where it is far more difficult to get an abortion.
A ban on abortions after six weeks took effect on last week in Ohio. Last Friday the two abortion providers in Kentucky shut their doors after that state’s trigger law banning abortions went into effect.
Indiana soon could have similar restrictions.
That pains doctors like Bernard.
“It’s hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care,” Bernard said.

For now, Indiana abortion providers have been fielding more calls from neighboring states. Typically about five to eight patients a day might hail from out of state, said McHugh, who works at multiple clinics in central and southern Indiana. Now, the clinics are seeing about 20 such patients a day.

Kentucky patients have been coming to Indiana in higher numbers since earlier this spring when more restrictive laws took effect there, McHugh said.

Indianapolis abortion clinics seeing surge in patients from Ohio, Kentucky​


A similar dynamic is at play at Women’s Med, a medical center that performs abortions in Indianapolis that has a sister center in Dayton, Ohio. In the past week, they have doubled the number of patients they treat for a complete procedure, accepting many referrals from their Ohio counterpart.

More than 100 patients in Dayton had to be scheduled at the Indianapolis facility, a representative for Women’s Med, wrote in an email to IndyStar.

Women and pregnant people are “crying, distraught, desperate, thankful and appreciative,” the representative wrote.

The two centers are working together to route patients to Indianapolis for a termination after a pre-op appointment in Dayton. In recent months, they have also had people from southern states, like Texas, come north for a procedure.

Many patients, particularly from Ohio and Kentucky, are seeking care through Women’s Med while also making multiple appointments in other states so if one state closes down, they will still have some options, the representative wrote.

The center is advising pregnant people with a positive pregnancy test to book an appointment even though prior to the Supreme Court ruling they asked people to wait until their six-week mark to do so.

For years people have traversed state lines for abortions, particularly if a clinic across the border is closer to their home than the nearest in-state facility.

In 2021, 465, or about 5.5% of the more than 8,400 abortions performed, were done on out-of-state residents, according to the Indiana Department of Health's most recent terminated pregnancy report. More than half, 264, lived in Kentucky and 40 in Ohio.

Midwestern residents can also travel to Illinois, where abortion is likely to remain legal even in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling but for many Indiana is closer and until the lawmakers pass any measure to the contrary, abortion will be legal here.

Still, it remains murky what the future holds.

Thursday a lower court ruled that abortions could resume, at least for now, in Kentucky. On Wednesday abortion clinics in Ohio filed suit, saying that state’s new ban was unconstitutional.

In Indiana lawmakers have declined to provide specifics of what measures any abortion legislation considered here might contain.

For now, then, abortion providers are doing their best to accommodate all Hoosier patients as well those from neighboring states.

“We are doing the best we can to increase availability and access as long as we can, knowing that this will be a temporary time frame that we can offer that assistance,” McHugh said.
 
Last edited:
To pro-life posters here:

I understand your viewpoints on preserving life, even in the womb. But I want to ask: why remain steadfast on that stance for a child being raped to preserve a life that shouldn't had been created under those conditions?
 
Normal age range for puberty in girls is 9 to 16 years.

TMI I got my period at 10 and had boobs by 9. You wouldn't believe how many creeps are out there leering at kids. An older boy used to threaten to assault me all the time and I was afraid to tell anyone. I wish I had.
 
To pro-life posters here:

I understand your viewpoints on preserving life, even in the womb. But I want to ask: why remain steadfast on that stance for a child being raped to preserve a life that shouldn't had been created under those conditions?
Why remain steadfast on allowing abortion up to and even past the moment the child is being delivered?

Both sides can do those coy word games.
 
A 10 year old getting fucked by an adult and a 24 year old woman having unprotected sex with some guy off Tindr is different, and I’m tired of pretending it’s not.
I didn't say it wasn't. I'm saying it's quite humorous that they are NOW concerned about children given their recent track record.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lead Sammich
To pro-life posters here:

I understand your viewpoints on preserving life, even in the womb. But I want to ask: why remain steadfast on that stance for a child being raped to preserve a life that shouldn't had been created under those conditions?
Are you saying this under a hypothetical scenario where there's not a risk of death involved? In that case, which I'm not sure even exists, explain how it helps her and why the baby should die.
 
Again, you're starting with a conclusion and then working backwards to support it. I could say that 10% of all 10 year old girls in Ohio is still a lot of kids, I could say that there's a chance the girl in the article had some details changed to protect her privacy, I could say that a random citizen somehow accessing hospital records to identify the girl (which you seem to be suggesting is a possibility?) is insanely unlikely and itself a grave violation of HIPAA; but it doesn't matter, because your mind is made up. Who am I to argue with a feeling?

Not sure I buy that 10% figure, btw. I had my first period at 10, and most of the girls in my sixth grade class that I was aware of had already had started menstruating.

Identifiability is, "if some rando read this and was able to accurately say hey, that's my coworker's daughter!" There isn't a specific number or algorithm for it. If you are a professional and you tell a story to a journo or on Reddit and someone figures out it's about the daughter of Jacinta in accounting, and blabs and she then files a grievance, you fucked up.

To pro-life posters here:

I understand your viewpoints on preserving life, even in the womb. But I want to ask: why remain steadfast on that stance for a child being raped to preserve a life that shouldn't had been created under those conditions?
At least two or three pro-lifers in this thread, myself included, have pointed out that this extreme scenario is exactly what is covered by the life-and-health of mother exceptions written into every abortion limitation in the USA. It's not automatically a threat to the life and health of an older adolescent to be pregnant, but at 10 the kid is undeveloped and small enough it likely is. When two lives are at stake and only one can be saved, you save the one you can save- the mother. No one is disputing that. There are also rape exceptions to every anti-abortion law I know of. A pregnant 10 year old is by definition a victim of rape. So two different ways she qualifies for an exception. I am not disagreeing with that or saying it should be different. There has to be discretion within the law that allows for these rare situations. But they are rare.
 
Are you saying this under a hypothetical scenario where there's not a risk of death involved? In that case, which I'm not sure even exists, explain how it helps her and why the baby should die.
Okay, let's have a 10 year old carry a baby to term from being RAPED and have no other choice with that situation. And still have to retain contact with her rapist because that's the baby daddy. What the actual FUCK?
 
I didn't say it wasn't. I'm saying it's quite humorous that they are NOW concerned about children given their recent track record.
Ah, you mean the recent track record of shielding groomers in schools and promoting troons in classrooms?

Newsflash: pro-lifers aren't the ones that are pushing for that.
They, the frantic left.
So, the ones that want abortion all the time. Thanks for clearing that up for the class.
Now, can you hurry up? I don't want the kids to be late for Drag Queen Story Hour. Their lunches might get cold.
 
Okay, let's have a 10 year old carry a baby to term from being RAPED and have no other choice with that situation. And still have to retain contact with her rapist because that's the baby daddy. What the actual FUCK?
I like how you didn't explain when asked to, and then pretended anybody thinks her rapist shouldn't be either killed or imprisoned for life.
 
To pro-life posters here:

I understand your viewpoints on preserving life, even in the womb. But I want to ask: why remain steadfast on that stance for a child being raped to preserve a life that shouldn't had been created under those conditions?

Fun fact, Planned Parenthood has been caught covering up pedophilia multiple times.

It's almost standard practice to not report these incidents to the police, and many people who posed as teenage girls to call up Planned Parenthood clinics even confirmed it.

It's almost as if abortion is inherently demeaning and misogynistic, because it's a tool used to cover up rape....hmmmmm....
 
Back