Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

It's good I found a way to make a Wii remote run without batteries: use the AC adapter thing made for the original GBA.

An awkward fit and one kind of has to force it in, but it works. Wireless (and motion sensing) controllers weren't the best idea.


Seems if the future was like The Jetsons - but run by Big Tech - it'd be full of stupid hipster tech that would run in BS ways.

I really hate any device where you need the battery to complete the circuit. Makes me worried about the future of my 3DS and the fact that my hot spot has to be recharged and it's my only internet for now. That said it's pretty good.
 
Why is Google Chromebook a thing?

Such amazing feats like:
* Everything is on cloud
* Apps are curated on the Play Store
* A 800$ Chromebook has the specs of a 200$ laptop

It's marketed as this "lightweight computer" where you don't need hardware cause it's all on cloud/iot and you can game like on a 3000$ PC cause Stadia but it's all bs lol and they try to market it to tech illiterate people.
On the other end of the Chromebook spectrum you have extremely cheap laptops that are good enough for most school assignments for kids.
The laptops are basically disposable and kids will often destroy laptops (ether physical damage, stickers/markers, gross kid stuff, etc) by virtual of being kids. ChromeOS runs better then Windows on the specs of these laptops too. Making it ideal for schools (and parents) who dont want to/are unable to shell out a lot of money for laptops that will be destroyed by the end of the school year.
 
I used to hate the wireless trend too but since changed my opinion a bit, if the implementation is good, there's really not much wrong with it. The problem is, rarely is the implementation good. It is a relatively complicated thing to get consistently right. Something you often just cannot expect from some $10 of chinkware.
I've got a good example of bad implementation. Recently got some chink made wireless headphones and they are actually pretty good. Use them paired with my phone and they're fine for music and podcasts.

However, they have a low battery warning which kicks in at around 15%, it cuts whatever you are playing and a robot voice says "low battery, please charge" and this happens every 30 seconds or so making them unusable when the battery is low. That's bad enough but the kicker is the capacity is fucking massive so even at 15% charge they should still be good for 10 or so hours.

I can't find any way to disable this nonsense. Fucking Chinamen, make a usable product and then fuck it up and ruin it with some bullshit.
 
I've got a good example of bad implementation. Recently got some chink made wireless headphones and they are actually pretty good. Use them paired with my phone and they're fine for music and podcasts.

However, they have a low battery warning which kicks in at around 15%, it cuts whatever you are playing and a robot voice says "low battery, please charge" and this happens every 30 seconds or so making them unusable when the battery is low. That's bad enough but the kicker is the capacity is fucking massive so even at 15% charge they should still be good for 10 or so hours.

I can't find any way to disable this nonsense. Fucking Chinamen, make a usable product and then fuck it up and ruin it with some bullshit.
A couple of years ago I was in the market for some wireless buds. Having tight ears and getting burnt in the past I didn't want to drop a lot of money on something I might not be able to use, but I wanted something half-decent.

Found a pair on Amazon for ~€35 euro from an unknown brand, they had good reviews when taking the price into account but here's where the chinesium comes in and EVERY review mentioned this: every alert including "battery low" played at MAX volume no matter what volume you set it at. Some reviews recommended taking them out of your ears while walking down stairs, riding a bike and things like that, to avoid accidents when it blasted out a jumpscare that made you shit your pants. It was plain dangerous and could not be changed. Otherwise they were supposedly good. Did not buy those, took a gamble on some more expensive Philips instead and I'm happy with those because they fit perfectly.

One time I needed a wireless keyboard/mouse combo ASAP so buying very locally was the way to go and I only needed it for a very short time, so something cheap and disposable was ideal. Found something a couple of minutes walk from me for ~€12, it was the mystery house brand of a chain you go to for batteries and lawnmovers and mosquito repellent... According to the reviews the keyboard was good but it didn't have a lot of range and moving the mouse blue screened the computer every time. That's getting close to god tier chinesium, how is that even possible?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: moocow
My Dad was a rather successful business owner and it seemed like most of the day when he was home when I was a kid he was conducting business calls on his Blackberry. When I was a kid the Blackberry seemed like a piece of Alien Technology on par with the Needler from Halo... I was determined to buy one of my own when I got my first job- as a status symbol more than anything.

I turned 14, the legal age to work in my old homestate, way past the point in time where Blackberrys were a historical relic on par with a physicla butter churner or a Nagant M1895. I've always fucking hated Iphones- the first phone I ever had was something called a "LG Chocolate" that I enjoyed. After that it was bottom-of-the-bargain bin fliphones until I bought a Xiami Redmi Note 8 Pro in 2020, until I replaced *that* for the experimental PinePhone I run Arch Linux on in late 2021.
The Palm Treo 650 was my summit phone and before that, the Nokia 9210 Communicator. There was nothing like it among my immediate circle at the time and the idea of surfing the web on a phone back then was just novel.

I had an LG Chocolate back in college. It tried to be a phone and a music player, but didn't do either one that well. The slider was novel, but nowhere near as sturdy as you'd think it'd be.

I hate that the iPhone immediately murdered interesting phone design. Now everything looks like an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy knockoff. Just boring black slabs all the way.
 
Honestly, I'm starting to hate the FPV drone trend.

For the uninitiated, it's basically small high power to weight ratio drones, with a camera and video transmitter for a real time video link to ground so you can pilot them like if you were onboard (hence FPV, first person view) either on a screen, or with goggles. Paired with recent gopros and other highly stabilized action cameras that can record videos in batshit insane conditions (vibrations, shocks, fast paced action, etc), prices for drones going way down and getting more and more beginner friendly, the space is being flooded with dudebros and social media personalities.

I get it, easy to fly (DJI, Autel, etc) drones cater to even more braindead normies who just want to shoot videos of them during holidays, and that's totally fine. Low maintenance, ready to fly sky cams are truly nice for an occasional cool shot, skill ceiling is low and everyone can have some fun before they eventually crash. They are 99.99% GPS aided and most have sonars/lidars so you don't crash on the first flight. Combined with the 3D fix/position hold flight mode enforced by default, they stay fixed in place when you leave the sticks, and that works basically as a panic button.
Airspace safety is kind of enforced after unaware retards flew in dangerous situations/places, and authorities cracked down so hard some manufacturers had to implement geofencing systems, no-fly zones, local limitation directly inside the drones' system (i.e. the damn thing doesn't even spin up within 5km from an airport). And that's fine too, prevents most bad actors from shitting up the space. Most drones even come with crash insurance, so you have another chance at filming your neighbor while she showers.


FPV drones? not even close. Most don't even have GPS. Most are fairly powerful and cost way less compared to "normie" drones. A racing FPV drone is around 100 eurobucks, throw in another hundred in goggles (can go lower with just a screen), another hundred in a nice radio controller, fifty bucks for a charger, batteries and you're set for less than 400 euros. Even less when you have no rush and can wait for the next big retard who's scared he'll crash again and just dumps his "rig" for half the price. A DJI Air 2? At least 600. Yes, you can get older/shittier drones like a DJI Mini for 250, but is it worth it? For a bit more you can be way more cool, faster and with less limitations.

Now, your average FPV drone (even smaller ones, as large as an hand) can go 100+ km/h and it's mostly controlled manually, with no stabilization nor aids. No-fly zones? Forget them. Regional limitations? You can go as far as the drone can. RC can do 20+km, video a bit less, the only true limitation is battery (but we are creeping up to 20+ minutes as standard). Panic button? LMAO, default flight mode is manual. You nose down, you crash.

This is the perfect storm for retards shitting up the space, and it's exactly as bad as it sounds. Factor in the "cool it's just a videogame", and "wow i can make stuff fly" factor and you can guess the target demographic.
 
Honestly, I'm starting to hate the FPV drone trend.

For the uninitiated, it's basically small high power to weight ratio drones, with a camera and video transmitter for a real time video link to ground so you can pilot them like if you were onboard (hence FPV, first person view) either on a screen, or with goggles. Paired with recent gopros and other highly stabilized action cameras that can record videos in batshit insane conditions (vibrations, shocks, fast paced action, etc), prices for drones going way down and getting more and more beginner friendly, the space is being flooded with dudebros and social media personalities.

I get it, easy to fly (DJI, Autel, etc) drones cater to even more braindead normies who just want to shoot videos of them during holidays, and that's totally fine. Low maintenance, ready to fly sky cams are truly nice for an occasional cool shot, skill ceiling is low and everyone can have some fun before they eventually crash. They are 99.99% GPS aided and most have sonars/lidars so you don't crash on the first flight. Combined with the 3D fix/position hold flight mode enforced by default, they stay fixed in place when you leave the sticks, and that works basically as a panic button.
Airspace safety is kind of enforced after unaware retards flew in dangerous situations/places, and authorities cracked down so hard some manufacturers had to implement geofencing systems, no-fly zones, local limitation directly inside the drones' system (i.e. the damn thing doesn't even spin up within 5km from an airport). And that's fine too, prevents most bad actors from shitting up the space. Most drones even come with crash insurance, so you have another chance at filming your neighbor while she showers.


FPV drones? not even close. Most don't even have GPS. Most are fairly powerful and cost way less compared to "normie" drones. A racing FPV drone is around 100 eurobucks, throw in another hundred in goggles (can go lower with just a screen), another hundred in a nice radio controller, fifty bucks for a charger, batteries and you're set for less than 400 euros. Even less when you have no rush and can wait for the next big retard who's scared he'll crash again and just dumps his "rig" for half the price. A DJI Air 2? At least 600. Yes, you can get older/shittier drones like a DJI Mini for 250, but is it worth it? For a bit more you can be way more cool, faster and with less limitations.

Now, your average FPV drone (even smaller ones, as large as an hand) can go 100+ km/h and it's mostly controlled manually, with no stabilization nor aids. No-fly zones? Forget them. Regional limitations? You can go as far as the drone can. RC can do 20+km, video a bit less, the only true limitation is battery (but we are creeping up to 20+ minutes as standard). Panic button? LMAO, default flight mode is manual. You nose down, you crash.

This is the perfect storm for retards shitting up the space, and it's exactly as bad as it sounds. Factor in the "cool it's just a videogame", and "wow i can make stuff fly" factor and you can guess the target demographic.
What kind of drone would you recommend for an absolute beginner?
 
What kind of drone would you recommend for an absolute beginner?
Depends on what you want to do with it and how much are you willing to spend, in terms of time and money.
In terms of time, you have to factor in learning stuff (how to fly, maintain, repair, or even build), ranging from low where you have to just get a permit/insurance (depends on where you live; in the EU an afternoon is enough to get your basic permit and insurance is instantaneous) and other stuff is negligible, to high, where you'll have to get multiple permits and follow mandatory courses just like with your driving license, and extensive pre-flight setup, maintenance, upgrades, editing (for video), etc.

In terms of money, can go as low as free if you can convince someone to lend anything to you, to tens of thousands of euros for custom built drones with custom payloads.
On the cheap side you can start with a couple hundreds, on average may be 500 to 1K, and on the high end over 2K spent to start the hobby.
I recommend you search around for actual drone usages before asking what should you get, as it's really a broad question without a real answer: it always depends.
Once you have an idea, here's a break down of usages and what you should get:
  • Is it for fun only?
Cool, get a toy drone. Any will do at your local store. Even better, get a drone simulator off of steam. There are free ones too, like the Orqa something FPV. For a better experience you can buy an actual RC drone controller and play with that to get a feel on actual hardware, but be sure to check compatibility. If you decide to buy an actual real 3D drone you'll most likely be able to use the same radio for it (like a Taranis Q x7) .​
  • Is it for fun but you're a grown adult TM ?
Get an FPV kit, like this.​
  • Do you need to film stuff?
Low time/money -> a DJI Mini used, can go for as low as 200€;​
Low time/high money -> DJI Mini 3, 800/900€;​
High time/money -> Autel EVO II Pro 6K or something similar, over 2K;​
High time/low money -> build it yourself. Get a frame on aliexpress (like an f450 clone), motors, props, escs, a flight controller, radio transmitter and receiver, a couple batteries and a charger, a basic gimbal (optional tbh) and a camera, following specs from maybe something older, like a Cheerson CX20. It can be a deep dive into electronics, or if you can find something used to fiddle with, all that can be had for 100 to 150€. There are plenty of online guides on how to build and configure a drone, mostly on YT and such. I recently found a blog and it gives solid advise on the build process.​
  • Do you need to film moving, action packed stuff?
No such thing as low time here, so:​
High time/money -> DJI FPV or something like an iFlight Nazgul 5, a nice RC (Radiomaster TX16s, there are multiple trims) and DJI goggles, well over 1K.​
High time/"low" money -> go used. Get a cinewhoop, any will do really, as long as it can hold something like a Runcam Thumb. A cheap RC, cheap goggles/video system, batteries and charger and you're set for under 500€.​
  • Racing?
I'd suggest you do as above, just skip the camera. If indoor a 2.5" cinewhoop is fine, outdoor i'd suggest something a bit larger (3.5"+ props size).​
  • Freestyle?
Same as filming with high money, just make sure the frame says "freestyle" on the box. Otherwise a racing drone can be stretched to do freestyle.​

I'm skipping other stuff because it's kind of covered under the "build it yourself", and i bet you aren't interested in farming drones.
 
Honestly, I'm starting to hate the FPV drone trend.

For the uninitiated, it's basically small high power to weight ratio drones, with a camera and video transmitter for a real time video link to ground so you can pilot them like if you were onboard (hence FPV, first person view) either on a screen, or with goggles. Paired with recent gopros and other highly stabilized action cameras that can record videos in batshit insane conditions (vibrations, shocks, fast paced action, etc), prices for drones going way down and getting more and more beginner friendly, the space is being flooded with dudebros and social media personalities.

I get it, easy to fly (DJI, Autel, etc) drones cater to even more braindead normies who just want to shoot videos of them during holidays, and that's totally fine. Low maintenance, ready to fly sky cams are truly nice for an occasional cool shot, skill ceiling is low and everyone can have some fun before they eventually crash. They are 99.99% GPS aided and most have sonars/lidars so you don't crash on the first flight. Combined with the 3D fix/position hold flight mode enforced by default, they stay fixed in place when you leave the sticks, and that works basically as a panic button.
Airspace safety is kind of enforced after unaware retards flew in dangerous situations/places, and authorities cracked down so hard some manufacturers had to implement geofencing systems, no-fly zones, local limitation directly inside the drones' system (i.e. the damn thing doesn't even spin up within 5km from an airport). And that's fine too, prevents most bad actors from shitting up the space. Most drones even come with crash insurance, so you have another chance at filming your neighbor while she showers.


FPV drones? not even close. Most don't even have GPS. Most are fairly powerful and cost way less compared to "normie" drones. A racing FPV drone is around 100 eurobucks, throw in another hundred in goggles (can go lower with just a screen), another hundred in a nice radio controller, fifty bucks for a charger, batteries and you're set for less than 400 euros. Even less when you have no rush and can wait for the next big retard who's scared he'll crash again and just dumps his "rig" for half the price. A DJI Air 2? At least 600. Yes, you can get older/shittier drones like a DJI Mini for 250, but is it worth it? For a bit more you can be way more cool, faster and with less limitations.

Now, your average FPV drone (even smaller ones, as large as an hand) can go 100+ km/h and it's mostly controlled manually, with no stabilization nor aids. No-fly zones? Forget them. Regional limitations? You can go as far as the drone can. RC can do 20+km, video a bit less, the only true limitation is battery (but we are creeping up to 20+ minutes as standard). Panic button? LMAO, default flight mode is manual. You nose down, you crash.

This is the perfect storm for retards shitting up the space, and it's exactly as bad as it sounds. Factor in the "cool it's just a videogame", and "wow i can make stuff fly" factor and you can guess the target demographic.
I have been starting to feel the same way with FPV quadcopters. I got into it back when there were no prebuilts except the first DJI Flame Wheel 450 kits and the emergence of their first Phantom 1 drone released in 2013. Even with the Apple esque nature of the Phantom 1, it still required a lot of initial config and calibration of the sensors. It was still tailored for an RC hobbyist.

Now FPV ready do fly units are readily accessible but only from companies like Xiaomi, Hubson, DJI that anyone with the dough can buy and start buzzing around in. That's the amateur market though.

As for the FPV drones you mentioned, the ones hobbyists want are still mostly diy, but there are a lot of rx ready and pnp quadcopters of all size range. It's nice, but it's clear that segment of the hobby has kind of lost the initial creativity. Back in the days, you had to do a lot of reading the docs to configure your Ardupilot or Naze 32, KK2 to get the GPS, barometer, compass etc to work together to stabilize the craft.

What soured me with the quadcopter side of it is the Drone Racing League stuff. It made the hobby chintzy and cheap and very prescribed. However, there are still cool developments being made with open source flight controllers like the F4, F7 and software like Betaflight and iNav. The accessibility of high power, programmable receivers and transmitters is a great benefit as well. Back when a modest amount of money could only afford a simple DX6 6 channel tx, we can now spend little over $100 for a nice Frsky or Radiomaster 16ch opentx transmitter. We now also have really cool and cheap LoRA protocol long range rx/tx thanks to ExpressLRS.

I tend to stick to airplanes more now since they're more interesting and don't need FPV.

What kind of drone would you recommend for an absolute beginner?
It depends how seriously you want to get into the hobby. If you plan to stick around for a while, you should get a transmitter that will last you a while like the Radiomaster TX16s or similar. I would avoid any new Frsky as they have started to go closed source. I would browse online retailers like racedayquads and find a prebuilt in your price range. Watch some youtube vids on basics of flight control and setting up the quad and you can teach yourself pretty easily.
 
@Car Won't Crank I can't find the button to quote you, but I disagree on one point: bnf/rtf or bind and fly drones are not that bad imo, they don't water down the overall market/experience.
Even with a prebuild quad you have to maintain a lot of it. For example, I started with an F550 kit, and had to constantly maintain/tune it. Moved to something bigger, same story. F450? Again, same story. Fast forward, I decide it's finally time for FPV and i get a Crux35, thinking it's all good, ready to fly for cheap. Not even close, every one of the same problems i had with bigger quads/hexas snuck its way into this small little bastard. Default config is great but not perfect. Then the crashes. I managed to clip a leaf, and the VTX antenna was gone, just like that. I kept getting RXLOSS due to how shit the FrSky rx is and almost lost everything in a ditch.
These are problems you get regardless of who built your quad, however I think the potential learning value stays the same. While I come from the software part of drones and my soldering skills are shit I managed to not throw everything out the window.

I think prebuilt hobby grade quads only scared true retards and posed a better challenge to who's really interested.
 
@Car Won't Crank I can't find the button to quote you, but I disagree on one point: bnf/rtf or bind and fly drones are not that bad imo, they don't water down the overall market/experience.
Even with a prebuild quad you have to maintain a lot of it. For example, I started with an F550 kit, and had to constantly maintain/tune it. Moved to something bigger, same story. F450? Again, same story. Fast forward, I decide it's finally time for FPV and i get a Crux35, thinking it's all good, ready to fly for cheap. Not even close, every one of the same problems i had with bigger quads/hexas snuck its way into this small little bastard. Default config is great but not perfect. Then the crashes. I managed to clip a leaf, and the VTX antenna was gone, just like that. I kept getting RXLOSS due to how shit the FrSky rx is and almost lost everything in a ditch.
These are problems you get regardless of who built your quad, however I think the potential learning value stays the same. While I come from the software part of drones and my soldering skills are shit I managed to not throw everything out the window.

I think prebuilt hobby grade quads only scared true retards and posed a better challenge to who's really interested.
I don't think I said the bnf prebuilts are bad. It's the rtf ones that come with proprietary controllers that you get from Hubsan and the countless other Chinese brands that skew more towards toy vs hobby. I like the pnp/bnf kits you find on racedayquads that come with good, reusable components like the F4 FC and ublox gps. I also hate soldering motor leads onto the pcb so I also like the rx ready prebuilts. Prebuilts made with hobby components are leagues different from the all in one closed system Hubsans and Xiaomis.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: baldo_giovane
I can't find any way to disable this nonsense. Fucking Chinamen, make a usable product and then fuck it up and ruin it with some bullshit.
It's adding "features" for the sake of adding features. The Chinese love that shit, it's why so many cheap (and not-so-cheap) Chinese flashlights have a strobe and SOS mode, even though literally no one uses those for anything useful.
 
I could also go full-on MATI in this post about CVT boxes - how literally all of them are hot garbage, and how they're bestowing horrible driving habits on an entire generation of drivers
eh I like the idea of a CVT box- you let the engine run at optimal RPM and let the tranny take the care of car speed at every moment, but I refuse to buy a new car, and those CVT trannies are usually very delicate and prone to fail while also being a pain in the ass to servce (in a place where AT is already an exotic thing, let alone a CVT)
 
eh I like the idea of a CVT box- you let the engine run at optimal RPM and let the tranny take the care of car speed at every moment, but I refuse to buy a new car, and those CVT trannies are usually very delicate and prone to fail while also being a pain in the ass to servce (in a place where AT is already an exotic thing, let alone a CVT)
In theory the idea is sound, but the gimp-mode "fuel efficiency" computer programs the manufacturers load into them basically force you to drive like a grandma all the time.
 
Back