Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Oliver Onions said:
If an actual woman ever acted like this in front of me I'd 100% assume she was waiting for me to look away so she could stab me in the neck with a pen.

I've never seen someone who could be so creepy just with their eyes and voice; he makes Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs look like a rank amateur.
Click to expand...
Late, but this post reminded me of another disturbed, unsightly gap-toothed troon who still passes better than Tony.
1E5BA9E8-9E48-4D45-8FBD-0D1D2BEC520E.png233A9FAA-419E-48B0-B23F-9F4B2E08D591.png
Do better, Tony.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Backinpogform, largetiger, lolcow yoghurt and 13 others
  • Like
Reactions: Backinpogform, AMHOLIO, A1 Steak Sauce and 3 others
The Silent Perjority said:
It's not till you see a montage like that Geranium that you can actually appreciate Tony's false visage. Look at the other guy, completely natural facial expressions, a different take in every pic. Then look at Tone's complete rictus countenance, he is performing every single minute.

Anyway, thanks for that but I don't think any of them Troons got up him, they actually look like they are having a fun day.
A fun day doesn't include trying to fuck a badly healing stench hole in a wooden-faced bastards crotch behind a dumpster.

Well, mine wouldn't.
Click to expand...
Totally agree. I commented a bit ago about how during that live stream, it looked like Tony was more focused on sitting and 'idly' acting feminine instead of paying attention to the speakers. Tony is a shitty performance piece and fancies himself a Triple Crown award winner. We don't ever see the real Tony. We see this image he's always pretending to be that he thinks makes him this amazingly moral heroic speaker of true womens. It's so obvious to everyone else what a complete fraud he is. He can't even let his poses be natural, he's one of those same face gif collages. He can be tucked into the dictionary under facade.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Thomas Eugene Paris, Cousin-Larry, mikomikonurse and 17 others
Blanche said:
Totally agree. I commented a bit ago about how during that live stream, it looked like Tony was more focused on sitting and 'idly' acting feminine instead of paying attention to the speakers. Tony is a shitty performance piece and fancies himself a Triple Crown award winner. We don't ever see the real Tony. We see this image he's always pretending to be that he thinks makes him this amazingly moral heroic speaker of true womens. It's so obvious to everyone else what a complete fraud he is. He can't even let his poses be natural, he's one of those same face gif collages. He can be tucked into the dictionary under facade.
Click to expand...
I'm darkly curious as to how long he can maintain the facade.

There are definitely cracks, going by his pallor in recent pics/videos.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: rusty shackleford 1, Helena Handbasket, AMHOLIO and 6 others
White-Kettle Shufflepunk said:
Having finally listened to his fucking voice, dear God, imagine going to that much effort every time you say anything. His throat must feel like a garbage disposal. Is this how he speaks to his son everyday. I know I keep coming back to this, but that poor boy. His father has been replaced by bad performance art.
Click to expand...
I tried actually watching some of his TikToks. I couldn’t even get through the first one. Everything is so mannered and unnatural. It’s like someone described a girl to him, but he never actually observed for himself.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Cousin-Larry, mikomikonurse, Mimitchi and 16 others
If I'm honest, Reed's got it all going on. His cold and calculated Erin character is well on its way to fame at the top of tranny town's talking head circuit.
I say calculated partly because in avoiding association with the tranny kink element that usually dooms such endeavors he's positioned his character to have the pick of the kink litter and show those female people he's always felt superior to (usually after they crushed him) that he not only never needed them in the first place, he can do them better than they do them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: The Final Troondown, Helena Handbasket, Cryptozoology and 3 others
Snarky Clark said:
If I'm honest, Reed's got it all going on. His cold and calculated Erin character is well on its way to fame at the top of tranny town's talking head circuit.
I say calculated partly because in avoiding association with the tranny kink element that usually dooms such endeavors he's positioned his character to have the pick of the kink litter and show those female people he's always felt superior to (usually after they crushed him) that he not only never needed them in the first place, he can do them better than they do them.
Click to expand...
I would agree, except he's never going to make it much further than the online commentariat with those teeth. America can forgive a lot of things, including gross males cosplaying as women, but it won't forgive those teeth.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Tombigbee, mikomikonurse, MysteriousStranger and 12 others
I'm fleshing out my database of people who are Tony-adjacent. I'd appreciate it if people could let me know about any I've missed.

Various people who have appeared in his tweets, at the John King event, or replied to his @erininthenight account:
The top-20 ranked Twitter accounts Tony replies to (some overlap with above):
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: mikomikonurse, Mimitchi, chickenbutt and 17 others
Geranium writes another informative post where I learn something interesting about history and I barge in to say, sweet Christ look at that horrible outfit

The best part is it’s his Fourth of July protest outfit:
A40F4D83-3B6F-4873-A4E3-3706ED1E29D2.jpeg
I thought he was using some odd regional term “robins of green and orange” I didn’t know, but no, this bitch literally meant RIBBONS on his amhole-hugging short overalls:
85601741-A2A3-40FE-8CCC-F96B8F2DE4A5.jpeg
This grown man thinks a TikTok trend to wear these random colors is so widely known that he looks politically astute, and not like a fashion tragedy or someone with aggressive opinions about Irish unity. Well done Erin, truly a fashion influencer :story:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Mimitchi, CraicRock28, ApeBass and 26 others
A1 Steak Sauce said:
While this article does an ok job at the basics, it seems to be a much less informative version of the OP for the Keffals thread in the Farms, which has been recently updated.

Moving back to Tony, here’s some tweets of his.
View attachment 3459806
For those of you OOTL, Robert Crimo III shot up an 4th of July parade in a town 25 miles north of Chicago. Police believe he dressed up as a woman to enable his escape after this attack was executed via covering his facial tattoos and giving him the appearance of someone escaping the chaos. He was likely not “trolling while engaging in mass murder”.
(A)
View attachment 3459805View attachment 3459807
I have no clue where any of this trans genocide is, unless dead hookers in Brazil count. I don’t think they do.
(A)
View attachment 3459809View attachment 3459808
For those of you OOTL on the Buffalo shooter’s manifesto, it was a copy paste job that was poorly executed while also containing memes and the body armor and weapons used to carry out the shooting. Citing that seemingly as evidence for a general sentiment or as a comparison to TERFs would be a mistake. Also, don’t troons have a tendency to claim they are better women and are the future?
(A)
Click to expand...
Dr Thrasher rails against Emily further in his tweet thread, blaming her for the new genocide. He also praised Linda Carter, who went full TWAW and states transwomen aren't doing anything to women, at all.
Thrasher has 60k followers yet cannot get more than 20 likes on a post. Only his Troon posts get popular.
Unrelated, he reblogs COVID shit, and that is also more cope.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Backinpogform, T0oCoolFool, AMHOLIO and 3 others
Geranium said:
The top-20 ranked Twitter accounts Tony replies to (some overlap with above):
Click to expand...
Just wanted to mention that this brave trans woman was recently doxed in the Keffals thread. He has a large number of replies to Tony on Twitter. I don’t believe he has gotten the chop yet, but he has gotten FFS. Since he lives in DC, he could be the amhole fucker. A quick GPS check puts them at about an hour apart.
64694175-2057-49E0-B623-36EABD595598.jpeg
They do appear to have met IRL at least once as well. This is all autistic conjecture of course and is likely wrong.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: rusty shackleford 1, lolcow yoghurt, MissAnthropist and 8 others
A1 Steak Sauce said:
View attachment 3459805View attachment 3459807
I have no clue where any of this trans genocide is, unless dead hookers in Brazil count. I don’t think they do.
(A)
Click to expand...
Even if these claims were true this wouldn't show a "direct link" between them. Really just begging Tony to learn anything at this point.

But also I am again forced into noticing that the "right side of history" is actively calling for the suppression of dissent no matter how small (as the NYT article was pro-trans except for noting that dissent exists) because they say that otherwise their entire platform of objectively scientifically proven correctness will collapse into genocide against them if anyone anywhere is allowed to think other than how they mandate. The "right side of history" is forever determined to do what the Catholic Church could not during the Middle Ages.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Thomas Eugene Paris, Backinpogform, chickenbutt and 9 others
Geranium said:
I'm fleshing out my database of people who are Tony-adjacent. I'd appreciate it if people could let me know about any I've
Click to expand...
How do you have so much steam to your autism? Semper fi.

A1 Steak Sauce said:
in DC, he could be the amhole fucker. A quick GPS check puts them at about an hour apart.
64694175-2057-49E0-B623-36EABD595598.jpeg
Click to expand...
Unrelated to how Ari & Erin know each other, the way he talks about women and how we learn how to present ourselves is fucking... something. Imagine being 30 years old and a woman in sweats and a hoodie yet we're seen as women still: is that practice? Maybe he didn't have the make up knowledge or the fashion knowledge (and still doesn't), but to say one has to practice to present as a member of the sex you were born as says something. I can't put my finger on it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: mikomikonurse, rusty shackleford 1, ApeBass and 18 others
Tony has another terrible, horrible, no good, very bad take on sport (Twitter, archive). This time after Zambian football (soccer) player Barbara Banda was revealed to be male and so excluded from playing in the Africa Women Cup of Nations. (There's a bit of a dispute as to whether Zambia even registered Banda with the organisers, but that's neither here nor there.)
tony-banda-1.pngtony-banda-2.png
This is getting quite boring at this point, and I'm unsure as to whether Tony is arguing this in bad faith or whether he really is as thick as two short planks.

So I won't tackle his whole thread but just take his knees out from under him. In his first tweet, Tony makes three points:
  • “What do we do when cis women fail the criteria used to ban trans women from sports?”
    The criteria are there, and have always been there, in order to exclude men from women's sport.
  • “Why should a cis woman be banned for producing too much testosterone naturally?”
    Adult males have testosterone levels well over 200 nanograms per decilitre, adult females have testosterone levels below 70ng/dl (source). Healthy men and women (as you would expect elite athletes to be) have no overlap in their testosterone levels.
  • “If a cis woman is not banned for that, why should a trans woman be?”
    Female athletes would have to be doping to reach the male range. But yes, testosterone level spot-checks is a dumb measure that lends itself to being gamed. Males should be excluded from the female category by virtue of their having developed as males.
Sports scientist Ross Tucker posted an excellent thread at the start of the year about this whole situation, so if Dr Tony Dumbshit, noPhD, wants more then here you are:
Ross Tucker said:
I want to try to explain something about testosterone and performance, since it has become the ‘fixation’ and the ‘the fix’ for inclusion policies for both DSD and trans athletes. So here’s a thread to ‘debunk’ and explain why T level, per se, is not quite the right place to look.

First, testosterone is clearly a significant driver of the biological, and hence performance, differences between M and F. Nobody should dispute that (yet they do - more on this later). What sport has done, understandably, is to try to capitalise on this “cause-effect” concept to resolve the tension that exists between self ID and entry into the closed women’s category. Recall that women’s sport exists to exclude people who do not experience androgenisation during puberty and development. So sport said “If we can reverse the T levels, we can achieve... a balance of priorities”. As we now know, this is untrue - there is too much asymmetry, and once androgenisation has occurred, some changes are irreversible (skeleton), some only partly reversible, and only a few can be “undone”. The result is retained advantage, which is why simply lowering T does not allow a balance between fairness, safety & inclusion (despite persistent claims that it can, including in the recent FIMS and IF position statement). However, the preoccupation with T persists, and even in the absence of the above, is still misplaced.

The reason is that a snapshot of T levels (which is what we do when we sample every athlete at the World Champs) is not actually the thing that is responsible for the problem. The T has already done the work - it happens in the womb, primarily at puberty, and into adulthood, but it is not in and of itself, the problem. That’s why it is a red herring to get sucked into debates about overlap in T levels between men and women. It’s irrelevant to look at the level of T on Day X and compare athletes and try to deduce which has the performance advantage.

All that matters is the “movie” up to that point, not a “snapshot” at that point, if this makes sense? A “snapshot” approach also invites disingenuous and dishonest portrayals of the actual importance of T, where people will say stupid things like “T has no performance effects".

They say this because when you look at a sample of elite males, or elite females, and try to correlate T with performance, you get very weak relationships. The Olympic 100m final finishing positions are in no way predicted by the who has highest T and lowest T. For many reasons.

You’ll also hear things like “Usain Bolt has higher T levels than teen-age girls, but many of them run 800m faster than him. Therefore, T is not that important for performance” (yep, this one actually happened). The point is this - it’s not the level of T, it’s the job done by it.

So the key is whether androgenisation occurred, and T levels at any time at life are an excellent guide to whether this binary outcome exists. It’s a “yes, it has” or “no, it hasn’t”, predicted remarkably well by whether T is high or low, but not by the actual level.

The same is true for things like VO2max in marathon runners, or height in the NBA. Nobody in their right minds would dispute that these characteristics matter for performance. But if you only looked at NBA players, height would be a poor predictor of NBA success, and if you only measured VO2max in elite marathon runners, you’d be led to believe there is no predictive power. So what’s going on? Well, the simplest way to put it is that “Everyone in that group already has it, so of course it makes less of a difference”. It’s like this: You need that thing to get through the door, but once you’re inside, a host of other factors are what makes the difference. The attribute is your “ticket to the dance”, but it doesn’t determine your ability to dance. There’a room for tall, there’s a room for high VO2 maxes, a room for Fast-twitch and of course, there’s an adjacent room for people who don’t have that attribute. Think of mass - there’s a room for heavyweights, a room for middleweights etc. And OK, in the case of mass, we can change rooms (within reason, anyway). A room for disability level. A room for age.

Now run this same hypothetical, but for biological sex, male & female. What’s the “ticket” to get in? It’s not the level of testosterone. That’s the fallacy. It’s the presence (binary) of testosterone during life PLUS the ability to use it, such that androgenisation has occurred.

So that gets you through the door, into the appropriate ‘dance’. But once there, everyone has the ticket - they’re either androgenised (male room) or not (female room). And the door between them must remain locked. Trying now to measure T levels, and lower them, is irrelevant.

Anyway, hope the analogy works. We create “spaces” for sport, into which we allow only certain people, and then recognise that once in that space, all the other things make the difference. That’s the whole point! It’s why teenage girls can beat Bolt in an 800m. It’s not the T!

This is also why it’s so stupid to keep saying “But TW are not winning everything”. Point is there’s a group in one room (male, androgenised) & a group in another (female, unandrogenized), and then everything else plays out. Some people in the male room are very unathletic and so if they climb through the window to enter the female room, they’ll still be outperform by exceptional women who have all those attributes that are meant to determine the result. That says as much about the women’s exceptionalism as it does the man’s relative mediocrity!

Which is the same phenomenon in play when a heavyweight sneaks into a middleweight dance and loses, or able-bodied athletes race the Paralympics and fails to win. That failure doesn’t invalidate the essential difference between rooms. You have to compare “like” vs “like” for that.

That “like” for “like” matchup is where we see thousands, possibly hundreds of 1000s, of males, with performance capabilities greater than the best female. That specific corner of the room (elite athlete, scholarship-seeking athletes) reveals how significant M vs F biology is.

Anyway, enough of the room analogy. We can enjoy the dance, but we have to sure people have the right tickets to the right place!
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Thomas Eugene Paris, mikomikonurse, Mimitchi and 26 others
A1 Steak Sauce said:
They do appear to have met IRL at least once as well.
Click to expand...
Ari’s Adams Apple could cut glass
7EFA9F61-9B1F-4A90-871E-9E183D4C0254.jpeg
A1 Steak Sauce said:
I don’t believe he has gotten the chop yet, but he has gotten FFS
Click to expand...
He says none:
B604CB44-0956-4506-B1FC-0F80C8EB9149.jpeg
AMHOLIO said:
the way he talks about women and how we learn how to present ourselves is fucking... something. Imagine being 30 years old and a woman in sweats and a hoodie yet we're seen as women still: is that practice?
Click to expand...
If it’s all down to practice fucking lol, maybe practice your shitty amateur eyeliner some more, Tony. Is this is what you’ve achieved with all your practice? A nightmare valley-girl falsetto and some bad clothes? The idea that womanhood is attainable through enough skinwalking or behavior mirroring is complete cope. It’s as sad as his Official Woman Certificate from McGinn
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Windows XP Home Edition, ApeBass, chickenbutt and 20 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back