Cyber Bowling
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
While objectivity is definitely the creed of Mauler/the Efap crew, they're definitely not the only ones to use or even popularize it. And Jay is known for watching/following some more obscure/niche content so he could have gotten it from somewhere else. Heck, I bet it comes up in their comment section from time to time. But I admit, it is a possibility it was a jab at Efap. I know they've made a few jokes about people who obsessively make rant videos, but I don't think they'd have the patience to sit through something as long as Efap. I could definitely see a world though where fans sent links of Efap reviews though.He probably is. Objectivity is Mauler's trademark. But what the guy in the screencap said is retarded, I don't recall the Last Jedi too much but the scenes were two sides of the story by Kylo and Luke, it's supposed to show different perspectives with Kylo's being more vicious and menacing because that's how he remembered. It's a "revelation" thing, they showed two pieces of information for the story and then revealed what actually happened later. It's not "demonstrably bad filmmaking," fucking Reservoir Dogs did the same thing. A lot of films that show two sides of a story do that. TLJ sucks but you don't have to invent excuses for why it does.
As for the complaint, yeah, that's a pretty bad/dumb take. And it's not like there's a shortage of valid criticisms about TLJ. I mean, really, if you wanted to go with the "contradicting" argument, just point out the fact that Rian and Abrams clearly had differing ideas on certain characters/where to take the plot. Two characters having differing points of view of how an event happened is by no means an example of bad writing. Hell, I can't even say it's some weird artsy take on flashbacks, it's so standard that sitcoms frequently parody it.