Remilia was kind of weird for me. I cannot explain it, but I neither like her nor do I dislike her. Just didn't leave a big impression on me.
Wolf was pretty good IMO. Seems like a fun one. She knows her call and response stuff as well so that's based. Her game selections weren't half bad either so she may be an interesting watch.
Seamstress is great and left the best impression. She is doing everything right and keeps putting out quality content. Her singing is really nice to hear. Game taste is pretty average, so I'll have to see how she actually holds up during a usual stream. Hope she's not boring because I like all this other stuff she's been doing.
Now, a more thread meta topic
Her design? I think the discussion surrounding it has been poisoned because of a bad faith assumption. The people saying that she is a loli must be Australian. So she has a small chest, and what that automatically means she's loli material? Because absolutely nothing else about her suggests that she is one. I understand the rationale for not posting her because the leader would absolutely claim she's one (he thought Sachi was one after all), but the rest of you? Really? I am disappointed, not only in this thread, but also at the twitter normies for uoh-ing at her and seeing both KF and Twitter accepting that low of a standard for that content. I mean Remilia
actually has an unironic loli form lol. That is a what they look like. They are meant to look like kids. Seamstress does not, and I feel bad for you if you think she does.
It's like the difference between Gura and Ina. Gura is most definitely one, but no one ever says Ina is right? No one uohs at her. Seamstress is much more removed from it than Ina is and you know I'm right. I would like to put forth this idea, and hopefully people will agree, that being a small chested and slender girl is not loli material. Once again, I don't expect leader to come around on that so not posting her is a good idea, but maybe it will stop the clutching of pearls over her at the very least.
Edit for reply:
I don't think anyone here really thinks she's a loli. It's more just shitposting and joking about the thread getting nuked. Her roommate is already known since she was first shown. It's an adult woman in her 30s. If you use Josh's patented head trick™, Shiina is a full head taller than her adult operator. Therefore she must also be an adult as well.
I still wouldn't post her though, as I'm 100% sure he would pick and choose when to apply that rule as it suits him.
There are people here that do and that's who I'm talking about, but I'm not complaining about the jokes or what have you. I think that's funny lol. Say goodbye as the bomb drops kind of thing. I just think it's lame that she's treated as a loli at all, but the KF meta about the thread being doomed because of her is very funny. I've agreed with or liked many of those posts after all.
I Disagree. She looks like 15/16 at most. Chest size is irrelevant, what matters are the proportions of her body (just search for oppai loli) . Compared to Ina her legs are shorter and her head is bigger.
I disagree with your disagree! You say she looks 15/16, but how did you come to that conclusion? Which part makes you believe what her age is? I wouldn't ever be able to tell you what you just told me because she is a stylized anime character. Using real body proportions seems like it wouldn't work except in extreme cases. Like for instance, Anya from spy x family is obviously a child just from looking at her, but most characters that are teens and above couldn't be accurately placed in any age range unless you had other factors that were considered in the process. Like you see they're wearing a seifuku or something. Seamstress just looks like a small chested young woman to me, but I couldn't tell you her age just from her design alone.
