Sorry but you can't break the laws of thermodynamics you fucking nigger. Good job posting your canned responses over and over again. None of that matters or answers what I just said. This is just another lame dodge by you.
So documents from German personnel stationed at Auschwitz in 1943 describing the specific cremation capacity of the camp (which is easily enough to account for the number of cremated victims mainstream historians talk about), "doesn't matter", "because science.." And of course "science" is really just some copypasta you found on 4chan or CODOH.
Again, I dont give a shit what documents claim. We can easily look at contemporary photos and tell its bullshit. Do you know how much wood or coal it takes to cremate a single person? No because you are a stupid child. There are no huge stockpiles of either in any photos, these are necessary components of a crematory to work. How did they cremate millions of people without the associated millions of tons of combustibles? If they had the capacity to burn them in crematory then why did they need open air pyres? You can't deny these exist without being a revisionist, so now you are caught again.
Are you actually stupid enough to think there is one specific number, that applies in all contexts, as to how much time and fuel it takes to cremate a bunch of corpses? Clearly this depends on the age of the cremated corpses, how heavy they were, and whether you cremate multiple corpses at once or (as funeral homes do, out of respect for the deceased) one at a time.
Lmao. Just lmao. See guys jews are made of wood because they are witches. So you don't even need anything. You just set them on fire and off they go!
No, you unbelievable moron, I am saying that a starved child requires less fuel to cremate than a fat adult.
So how much less fuel, I thought they were gassing and burning them in groups? Does a pile of kids take more or less time than a single adult? Why are all the crematory designed like ones used in a funeral home if they were going to be used in an industrial fashion. Are you saying they didn't know what a kiln or smelter is?
Of course, half-wit, a pile of corpses that includes half starved children and half starved adults, burned all at once, would take less fuel and time to burn than 10 corpses of well fed deceased adults, burned individually.
Quoting this retardation now before you edit.
Damn if only there was a way to figure out how to figure that out, like using science or something. If only that existed using known values so we could rationally deduce these things. Maybe we could use measurements to figure out an area and what could fit in it. Then, use specific heat values of different combustible material to figure out how much would be needed. If you had that, you could prove exactly what they could do with the equipment available. If only these things existed. In fact, so no one can make claims of bias, you could use independent calculations not involving the holocaust and use them as a rough idea for what would actually be involved. Damn if only someone wrote a meme about it. Then we could really know what happened at Auschwitz.
Lets see, lets assume that the average weight of all the hypothetical cremation people is 70 pounds to account for all the kids dragging down the numbers. We'll assume that while they might be starved, they aren't buried in natron for thirty days prior to cremation to fully dry them. The average human is about 60% water, so we have about 42 pounds of water per theoretical corpse. To cremate the body we need to at the very least bring that water from body temperature to total vaporization (after which the non-water parts may burn on their own or with negligible amounts of energy input). So lets do a little math:
Coal | 1 pound | 9988kj |
Gasoline | 1 gallon | 126858kj |
Diesel | 1 gallon | 144945kj |
Crude Oil | 1 gallon | 142960kj |
Natl Gas | 1 cubic meter | 38000kj |
Tell me you don't understand physics or even built a campfire without telling me, the post. Burning corpses together in piles is less efficient because each one works as an insulator to the corpses around it. Tightly packed materials take longer to dehydrate or burn because all the heat energy must pass through the insulating materials before it can transfer to the central materials. The increased surface area and air flow not only give the heat more access to get in, but the water to get out.
You are honestly claiming it would take 490 pounds of coal to cremate a single starved cadaver at Auschwitz? You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Do the math yourself if you want, Rabbi. It'd be the first bit of effort you put into this flailing shit show.
Well here I calculated (using numbers provided to me by a denier, 15 million gallons) that total energy cost of destroying these bodies would likely be equivalent to 1/200th of their yearly oil production. Bodies were destroyed over 3 years, so we're looking at 1/600th each year.
I know Rapechu so I can confidently say he was no rocket scientist. This is too much to ask of most deniers anyway. Instead Rapechu was something every denier should aspire to being. Intellectually honest or "courageous" in @Lemmingwise's words. Or perhaps just industrious.
Deniers emphasize the fuel costs of exterminating Jews, but never mention the money Germany made from plundering everything the murdered Jews had on their persons and in many cases in their luggage, nor the economic benefits Germany accrued by exploiting able bodied Jews for labor, nor the money Germany saved by not having to feed, for example, murdered Polish Jews.
You are right and I should not allow myself to be provoked so easily into making personal attacks, as it makes this goals even more difficult to achieve.
