Crime (Update) Arrest Made in Rape of Ohio 10-Year-Old Who Had to Travel Out of State for Abortion

Link: https://www.thedailybeast.com/colum...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll
Archive: http://archive.md/2022.07.13-203034...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll


2BD82FDD-0F45-461E-A597-E6E5B37D2512.jpeg

An Ohio man was arrested Tuesday for raping a 10-year-old girl who became a central figure in the debate over abortion rights after she reportedly traveled to Indiana to have an abortion when Ohio outlawed the procedure last month.

Arrest records and court records viewed by The Daily Beast confirm that Gerson Fuentes, 27, was arrested Tuesday in Franklin County on a felony charge of raping a person under 13. The Columbus Dispatch, who first reported on his arrest, attended Fuentes’ arraignment in Columbus on Wednesday.

The unidentified girl’s plight became national news when the Indianapolis Star quoted a doctor who said a 10-year-old rape victim, who was six weeks and three days pregnant, had been forced to travel from her home in Columbus to Indiana for an abortion. Her home state had a trigger law that immediately outlawed abortions after six weeks once the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

A Columbus Police detective, identified by the Dispatch as Jeffrey Huhn, testified in court Wednesday that the 10-year-old victim was impregnated and had an abortion in Indianapolis.


“The victim went out of state to have a medically terminated abortion,” he said, according to video of the arraignment.

The video showed Fuentes staring blankly during the arraignment and standing with a slouch as a translator relayed the proceedings to him in Spanish.

Court records say the alleged rape occurred on May 12. Detectives said in court that police were made aware of the girl’s pregnancy through a referral filed with the local child services’ branch by her mother on June 22. Eight days later, the girl had the abortion in Indianapolis.

The aborted fetus has since been tested for DNA and entered into evidence, Huhn said, and officials say Fuentes confessed to the rape when he was questioned.

Fuentes’ arrest comes as conservative media claimed the girl’s story was made up for political theater, something parroted by Fox News presenters as recently as Tuesday night—while Fuentes was already in custody.

But those also with egg on their face in light of the horrific crime: the top law-enforcement official in Ohio.

Indeed, state Attorney General Dave Yost spent much of the past week effectively dubbing the story a hoax, suggesting he had heard nothing about any such crime being reported.

“We have a decentralized law enforcement system in Ohio, but we have regular contact with prosecutors and local police and sheriffs,” Yost said in a Fox News segment Monday. “Not a whisper anywhere.”


Yost released a statement Wednesday afternoon that did not address his previous comments.

“My heart aches for the pain suffered by this young child,” he said. “I am grateful for the diligent work of the Columbus Police Department in securing a confession and getting a rapist off the street.”

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who first described the rape and its aftermath to the Indy Star, previously told The Daily Beast she expected vindication.

“It will all come out in time,” she said via text message on Tuesday.


Court records show Fuentes is being held on a bond of $2 million. The judge said he was considered a flight risk and, given the brutality of the crime, a high bail was necessary to protect the child involved.

—with reporting by Pilar Melendez
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My niggah Chandelier,
Right, and which things can be addressed to reduce abortion?
- Better access to birth control
Or just stop fucking like dogs.
- Scientifically accurate sex education
lol
Have you seen what the pro abortion camp think about gender?
- Reversible, non hormonal IUDs
- Better social programs for those in low SES communities
- Better maternal care for those who might want to carry the child to term
Word.
Abortion is always going to happen, and we live in the era of CRISPR. So things like Downs Syndrome is going to be a thing of the past - well, not in the US.
Abortion is going to keep happening. So is organ harvesting, sex trafficking, gay parades an every other nasty thing that nasty people do. What's your point? It's going to happen anyway, might as well make it tax deductible and shit?
So...the ten year old should have the kid. A child whose body would split apart from giving birth.
Would it?
"She'll never be raped again" - chances are she will, and since it's been discovered the rapist was close to her family and her mother was running cover for him, she'll be seen as fresh meat. She'll live with that trauma for years, and she'll either be a shut in or a promiscuous teen. CSA leads to a fuckton of problems.
Again. What is your point? No shit she will have trauma either way. How the fuck is killing a child going to make another child's trauma any less?
This is not pro life, buddy. She's not a 15 year old teenager. She's ten. She was raped to puberty. If you want to argue a rapist should have greater rights over his genetic lineage than that of a young girl's life, those are some messed up priorities.
Spare me the emotional bitching. You miss my point.
Read it out loud. How the fuck does killing a child reduce the trauma of another child?
Where the fuck do you even see arguing for a rapist's rights, of such that I've stated multiple times, should deserve hanging?
Again, she's not a college student. She's not a loose teenager, abused and tossed around as a prostitute. She is a ten year old repeatedly sexually abused.
It doesn't matter. You're the one arguing for the leftist doctrine, you should know how the left looks at 10 year olds and sex. What are you trying to say here? That a child being raped multiple times suffers less trauma than a college student would? A college student would be better suited to handle the trauma on their own, perhaps, but the trauma is the same and the thing about trauma is that, as you've said, she was raped to puberty, in other words, she'd be in the same state of shock as anybody. I've seen what abuse can do to people, be it suffered a childhood from relatives or as an adult in a fucked up marriage. Trauma doesn't care about your age. Even more so, a child is better suited to cope with trauma doe to a 'simpler, more adaptive nature', if you will.
And how would you fix that low IQ culture? Do you think that low IQ culture can rise on its own? It's a self festering wound.
Are you self loathing or something?
How do you change your bad habits? You go out killing people? Do you start cutting your wrists? Or do you take charge cut off things that are bad for you, replacing them with better things?
It's a cultural thing, can't say that shit enough times, apparently. I'd change the culture.
If it's a culture problem, then we should address it. Abortion still wouldn't go away, but you would reduce it.
Word.
Not really. We don't get pregnant on our own - men impregnate women.
What kind of leftist are you that doesn't know that men can get pregnant now?
So we're back to culture. Alright, so what are some things to improve the sanctity of life?
Hanging rapists, deporting illegal immigrants, and creating better maternal care systems would reduce abortion and improve life outcomes for those born. Because, in the states where abortion is banned, there are some mighty high child poverty rates. You can start there.
How are the child poverty rates in your leftist shitholes? Or do the children live like kings in LA among the hobos because of their prostitute status?
So, based on the interview done, the rapist was close to the girl's family. The child's mother refuses to implicate him. My best guess - and rate me late - is that she knew full well he was abusing her and covered it up. This mother ruined her own daughter. I hope the daughter manages to find safety with other family members.
Imagine if the mother would have had an abortion. Or better yet, imagine her parents having had an abortion for her.
It would have solved everything. And the beaner couldn't have raped anyone that way.
 
The sperging about "natural conservatives" is your own. All the information about this case that would actually prove anything is protected (rightfully) by layers of confidentiality. So what we actually know is:

1. Some asshole abortion activist doctor claims that another doctor told her about a 10 year old who was raped and needed an abortion.
2. The AG of the state in question said he knew of no such case.
3. When it started to get awkward, a man was arrested.
4. We are told he is the one who did it.

Now it could be it happened and is real and he is the one who did it. Entirely possible. It's also entirely possible that these superficial facts point to something other than "it really happened the way these politicians and activists claim it did."
OK. I must have misunderstood you. Your series of scenarios also includes George Soros getting doctors and lawyers to COMPLETELY INVENT a 10 yo being raped when SHE NEVER EVEN EXISTED before the 2020 'Hispanics love MAGA' Trump voter gets arrested?
 
My only question then is why would the mother admit it happened? Talking with Telemundo, she had every opportunity just to say that the entire thing was bullshit, her daughter never pregnant, and this dude never raped her kid (she did say this last bit, but makes no sense without denying the first two parts), but she didn't...so...that's interesting also.

And I am not denying that this whole thing is very suspicious. For me it is just the date the pregnancy was discovered. It seemed way too early for 10 year old who may have not even had her first period yet that she knew of to know she was pregnant or for an adult to notice. So the rape had to have been noted before a pregnancy was suspected and just an incidental thing to be found out.

Regardless, 10 year olds cannot and should not be pregnant. It is very likely such a pregnancy would kill a child who also had no say in the whole thing. I am against abortion except in these cases because how can you possibly measure whose life is more valuable than who's when it involves two literal children? Especially knowing that carrying the pregnancy has a high risk of killing both anyway.

If we continue taking this all at face value, the mother says this guy didn't do it. Now it's very possible that she's a lowlife and covering for a bad guy. But there's also the possibility that the actual perp is [unknown rapist still at large] and this guy is getting thrown under the bus because the authorities felt stupid and awkward having this case go all the way to the White House and around the world while they stood around clueless.

OK. I must have misunderstood you. Your series of scenarios also includes George Soros getting doctors and lawyers to COMPLETELY INVENT a 10 yo being raped when SHE NEVER EVEN EXISTED before the 2020 'Hispanics love MAGA' Trump voter gets arrested?
You are the one obsessed with this Trump-Hispanics-based brown people meme, I don't give a shit about it. I just know that the left has been lying to us for a long time, the media has taken it to even greater extremes every year since 2012 (Smith Mundt), and I'm sick of being jerked around by conveniently timed emotionally potent anecdata. You're welcome to take this whole seedy tale as gospel. I doubt every word out of these sick fuckers' mouths.

Kids her age do get raped unfortunately. And even Mexicans on these boards admit there are factors in the culture south of the border that make it more common there. That problem is real whether this extremely suspicious and politically useful anecdote is or not.
 
Can someone help cross confirmation with some details, this fucking mess is confusing and I have such low trust in the MSM I don't know who to believe.

The current narrative:
-Bernard did everything correctly including mandatory reporting, although it doesn't look like she reported to police/CPS.
-There is no HIPAA violation even though '10 year old rape victim from Ohio' is hopefully not a huge pool.
-The mother is now claiming she didn't file any reports?
-Are Ohio doctors claiming that even performing medically necessary abortions is putting their careers at risk because they have to prove it was an exemption? That seems to be the explanation for why the girl was sent to Indiana, because of claims the State would investigate and prosecute doctors in poor faith.
-This is Fake News the Republicans pounced on despite being instigated from a Democratic slant (Look at the suffering Republicans are causing by banning abortions)

"COLUMBUS, Ohio — A terminated pregnancy report obtained by CBS News from the Indiana Department of Health on Thursday shows the doctor reported an abortion for a 10-year-old girl from Columbus, to the state health department.
Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist Caitlin Bernard reported a June 30 medication abortion for a 10-year-old patient to the state health department on July 2, within the three-day requirement set in state law for a girl younger than 16. The report indicated the girl seeking the abortion had been abused."
"Indiana University Health officials released a statement Friday saying that one of their physicians did not violate any privacy laws when she shared an anecdote with IndyStar about performing an abortion on a 10-year-old from Ohio.
Experts in HIPAA compliance say that the law exists to prevent the release of identifiable information. The question then becomes what the threshold is for identifiable information, said John F. Howard, director of the HIPAA Privacy Program at the University of Arizona, speaking in general terms about the law and not this specific instance."
"On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.
Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant."
 
@Chandelier

I asked you what we should do with these kinds of people since they have 'low inhibitions' who cannot be fixed. You're taking the moral high ground, so the answer should be simple.

Yes, we have laws, and enforcement of them depends on those willing to enforce them.
...there you go. We ensure that we maintain communities where we have people willing to enforce laws. It's what we're supposed to do.

First, the blame is always placed on the woman, and never the man who impregnated her.
t. woman comically unaware of how men and women alike view deadbeats and how men doggedly assure that deadbeats pay child support at the behest of the woman

Ahead of time: please do not try to downplay a unilateral government-mandated entitlement to someone else's fruits of labor. That it's in theory a substitute for his parental involvement is not the point, when it's only pursued by the government when the single mother asks for it.

The argument here as you've presented is that it's always murder, always
No, it's not.

Women in abusive relationships--
--are not even the most of the people caught in this circumstance, and are certainly not who either of us were talking about up to this point, seeing as we are talking about single mothers. What's more, we weren't even talking about the ten year old in this particular circumstance. We couldn't have been.

Now, for shame - there is no winning either way here. A woman will be shamed for being a single mother
Let her (the adult single mother who managed to enter her circumstances because she had willing sex with someone she knew wasn't father material) be. It's the most irrelevant matter in the entire circumstance.

The explosion of crime was due to urbanization.
Execution and harsh penalties for crime did indeed reduce the crime rate, as did better access to healthcare and education.
...so better quality of living-- and not executions that were already happening-- led to a decrease in crime in Victorian England?

This has to be the worst of your conversation threads.

That's cute, but when I ask you what solutions to be--
You have issues with being relevant.

You don't even know my position on abortion, you bring up women in abusive relationships when talking about single mothers, you bring up the ten year old when we couldn't have been talking about her in that segment given the context, and-- right here-- you keep harping on the falsehood that I haven't produced any solutions as an alternative to a statistically determined selective abortion system you'll never actually propose out of your cowardice... in response to me responding to someone who's already alive advocating for abortion.
 
If we continue taking this all at face value, the mother says this guy didn't do it. Now it's very possible that she's a lowlife and covering for a bad guy. But there's also the possibility that the actual perp is [unknown rapist still at large] and this guy is getting thrown under the bus because the authorities felt stupid and awkward having this case go all the way to the White House and around the world while they stood around clueless.
No. The mother says it isn't rape, because it's her shitbag beaner boyfriend.
 
I think we will continue to see doctors acting like they don't understand the laws in order to create scenarios like this. Malicious compliance, basically. It could be the fault of the media for lying about ectopic pregnancies and other exceptions, but you're basically going to get a lot of abortionists who are like, "But I thought I couldn't do anythinggg," and then calling their friends in the media to make a fuss about it and passing the buck on who is to blame while they let their patients twist in the wind. And almost all of these stories are bullshit somewhere down the line because most of the time, the law is clear, but someone wants to act like it's impossible to understand because they don't like the law.

You also have a lot of sudden claims that people can't get X medicine because it COULD be used for abortion, even though they have a proper prescription for it and it makes no sense that that's what would be happening. But it's useful to the media and certain activists to muddy the waters and not fact-check any of it. In this particular case, they've managed to make a scandal that touches every level of American political discourse where everyone from top to bottom is dumb or evil, but that's how they have to act to get their policy positions moved forward.
 
My only question then is why would the mother admit it happened? Talking with Telemundo, she had every opportunity just to say that the entire thing was bullshit, her daughter never pregnant, and this dude never raped her kid (she did say this last bit, but makes no sense without denying the first two parts), but she didn't...so...that's interesting also.

And I am not denying that this whole thing is very suspicious. For me it is just the date the pregnancy was discovered. It seemed way too early for 10 year old who may have not even had her first period yet that she knew of to know she was pregnant or for an adult to notice. So the rape had to have been noted before a pregnancy was suspected and just an incidental thing to be found out.

Regardless, 10 year olds cannot and should not be pregnant. It is very likely such a pregnancy would kill a child who also had no say in the whole thing. I am against abortion except in these cases because how can you possibly measure whose life is more valuable than who's when it involves two literal children? Especially knowing that carrying the pregnancy has a high risk of killing both anyway.
I'm more curious how Telemundo even found the woman.
Like did CPS tell them who reported the rape?
 
Cough

Atrazine (bug poison) literally makes Frogs sterile hermaphrodites/trannies friend. AJ was pretty much right in an ass backwards way.

Actually, Atrazine is a herbicide. A super potent one. Basically, if it's used, only corn or sorghum can grow on that land for 3-5 years. It saves in the cost of having to use a cocktail of a bunch of herbicides.

"Oops it was lost" is a coming I bet you friend.



Oh, you don't understand Clown/Hell-World yet do you? She'll walk.



Not Carpenter's finest, and it's a bit trash, but it's a fun movie and it's not The Ward.

> Surfs off with Steve Buscemi

Carpenter's best was The Thing.
Citation found, if anyone needs one.


A little more than "could" IMO.

One story made a weird claim

I haven't seen much if any discussion of the victim having siblings, but that's a more concrete citation than "sources familiar with the matter" so it's pretty reliable by current year standards imo.

I don't know why the siblings need DNA tests. Are they trying to confirm it was incest? Do they think the clinic lied and swapped samples on them? Whatever the case, the fact that there are siblings implies that the man who had access to the victim had access to multiple kids and this is just the one that got caught getting knocked up.

I wonder how many siblings there are, and their ages. Maybe this guy has been diddling older/younger kids. Maybe there are babies and toddlers that he is the father of in the household. Maybe he's been diddling them too. That seems to be a major reason for testing the siblings. Hell, do we even know for sure that the 10 year old isn't his biological daughter?

This shit could have been going on for years. He might have been so quick to confess hoping there wouldn't be more digging into things, thinking he might get a shortish sentence of 5 years or whatever, but with digging, maybe he'd get fifty counts running consecutively.

From what I can tell, this was reported this on June 22nd by child welfare, not the mother. Now, the Ohio dopctor (the referring doctor) might be fine in this situation if she worked with the child welfare agency, but that's currently an unknown. If she didn't work there, she didn't report it, and she should be in a load of trouble. Some real journalism should find that out, but I'm not holding my breath.

The Indiana doctor seems to have skirted this in a way that she may get out of it. If Indiana's law is report immediately and file in writing within three days, it's iffy. She might get a break for it just being a "mistake". The same thing with claiming th father's age as "17".... "Oops! I meant to write 27!"

I wouldn't believe her at all, especially when she knew enough to inform the press. I think everything she did was intentional as a past pattern of this exists, and I hope they go after her hard, but they might not have enough on her other than some disciplinary mark on her record.
 
I'm more curious how Telemundo even found the woman.
Like did CPS tell them who reported the rape?
It may be as simple as people from central and south America are far more comfortable and open with other people from there than they are with some white woman from Columbus. Because of that, word gets around in communities like this and the Spanish speaking reporters are far more quickly and efficiently able to locate the alleged mother.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: CashMoney!
Um. Are you suggesting George Soros conspired with a woman to artificially inseminate her 10 year old daughter and frame some random watermelon for doing it to own the conservatives?
Isn't this the same guy who funds Antifa and the Proud Boys?

image6-1-731x1024.png
 
If we continue taking this all at face value, the mother says this guy didn't do it. Now it's very possible that she's a lowlife and covering for a bad guy. But there's also the possibility that the actual perp is [unknown rapist still at large] and this guy is getting thrown under the bus because the authorities felt stupid and awkward having this case go all the way to the White House and around the world while they stood around clueless.


You are the one obsessed with this Trump-Hispanics-based brown people meme, I don't give a shit about it. I just know that the left has been lying to us for a long time, the media has taken it to even greater extremes every year since 2012 (Smith Mundt), and I'm sick of being jerked around by conveniently timed emotionally potent anecdata. You're welcome to take this whole seedy tale as gospel. I doubt every word out of these sick fuckers' mouths.

Kids her age do get raped unfortunately. And even Mexicans on these boards admit there are factors in the culture south of the border that make it more common there. That problem is real whether this extremely suspicious and politically useful anecdote is or not.
These people know nothing of Gerson. He good man, who come to America to become both doctor and lawyer. He sell bucket of chicken heads at side of road, but he he studying law by reading the Bible and he learn to doctor by examining my 12 daughters every night.
I'm more curious how Telemundo even found the woman.
Like did CPS tell them who reported the rape?

I bet this fucking scumbag called Telemundo directly and blabbed. In exchange, she probably asked for 500 dollars and a contract with television to be in their shitty telenovelas.
 
Can someone help cross confirmation with some details, this fucking mess is confusing and I such low trust in the MSM I don't know who to believe.
I will be referencing the timeline I made a while ago, but I'm updating it here with more points and (when I can remember them) sources
  • May 12 - Rape
  • June 22 - Mom tells Child Services, Child Services tells cops I now believe this was more indirect: mom went to the doctor to get her girl an abortion, the doctor told child services and child services told the cops. It's hard to tell who is doing reporting and who is doing resummarizing but some sources only say the mom reported a pregnancy [to whom?], and the mother she isn't acting like she wants child services involved
  • June 24th - RvW
  • June 27th - Indiana doctor receives referral about girl from Ohio doctor
  • June 30 - Abortion
  • July 1 - Cincinnati.com article published
  • July 2 - KF thread about Cincinnati.com article, mysterious lack of rapist being deemed newsworthy
  • July 2nd - Caitlin Bernard files the mandatory report on a Saturday
  • July 4th - Freedom Day, 3 day weekend. Not relevant to this case specifically, but noteworthy in that it likely affects the response time to the mandatory report filed Saturday, and because on the culture war front people were waxing hysterical about how they aren't free because they can't get abortions.
  • July 6th - Victim "referenced" (identified?) suspect
  • July 11th - AG still has not been informed of the case, beclowns himself on TV
  • July 12th - Cops get a warrant for a buccal swab, take the suspect in to the station, somehow get him to confess. I wonder how the confession was obtained, was it obtained through intimidation or blackmail? Presumably this is around when the siblings get DNA tested as well.
  • July 13th - AG praises cops for speedy work
  • July 13th - This thread's OP posted, man is in custody on $2M bond
  • July 13th - Article I just quoted posted, man has somehow posted bond and is out in the world again with simply a "yeah sure just stay away from the family be you're good". Note that this appears to be the only source that says he's out, but allegedly other sources say he was booked but not held whatever that means? It is also the only source I've seen that says the victim is knows as HVN in the paperwork (may be a point of credibility, if they're the only ones that looked for the paperwork) and the victim has siblings. Later sources say he's fighting for a lower bond, I'm guessing they just misread the paperwork. Still considering it a generally good source for trying to find the official paperwork.
  • July ??? - Not sure when El Telemundo found the mom and she defended the primary suspect, but I think it was around the 13th too.
  • July 14th - News breaks that Caitlin Bernard is under investigation by her school for HIPAA violations and the AG for failure to do her mandatory reporting
  • July 22nd - Court date, who wants to bet he won't be there?

-Bernard did everything correctly including mandatory reporting, although it doesn't look like she reported to police/CPS.
Short version she did it, but she didn't do it right and she may have done it specifically because people asked if she did it.

If you look up mandatory reporting requirements in Indiana, there seems to be two kinds of mandatory reporting at play.

One sounds like a specific case for abortions received by 16 year children, which I don't know the details of. I'm not sure if this is actually a different report or if it's an example that has to be spelled out in law because of childhood sexual agency faggots. This subcase is interesting because what happens if a girl shows interest in an abortion but doesn't follow through? Does it still apply? Does the counter only start when the abortion is performed?

The other is general, child abuse? Report it. Even if you're a school and don't do medical procedures, even if you tell your boss (unless you definitively know the organization's representative has already done the report), even if you yourself are less than 18 years old. This report must be made "immediately", but let's simplify it to "by the next day" if we want to be generous and assume the woman came aware of the case at 11:59 PM and literally could not report it same day. (eli5 explanation) (dry version)
If you look closely at the claims that she did the reporting, there are 3 ways people present it:
  1. Factual
  2. Get rekt conservatives
  3. Don't get mad at the doctor
Depending on which of these a person is speaking from, different deadlines are at play.

Factually, the claim is that she did the report on July 2nd. If you reference the timeline, she should have done it on either June 27th (the day she became aware of the case) or June 30th (the day she did the abortion and knew for a fact the girl is in Indiana). If you assume she's working at midnight, she can report as late as July 1st, which is still before July 2nd. Factually she may have submitted it but she failed to do so on time.

Get rekt conservatives - well, the story was published July 1st. They're talking about things as they stood on July 1st, it is accurate to say that until an update is made, the July 2nd report did not exist. When that update is made, it should be portrayed as new developments, not something that was true the entire time. Also these people are gross because they don't seem to be able to empathize with why people want a report made. They're more concerned with being right than about a child being raped.

Don't get mad at the doctor - basically get rekt conservatives with a different motive. They're more concerned with the people looking at the case than they are with stopping it from happening again.
The report itself isn't even done right, it describes the father as a teenage boy. This could be a mistake, but the doctor has apparently had issues with the report in the past and I assume that back in 2018 when it was noticed before, the government would have told her how to do better.

July 2nd when she submitted the report is a Saturday. Depending on if you like Bernard or not, this is a good thing or a bad thing. If you like her, she seems to be working overtime on weekends too turn the report in. If you don't like her, she waited until the 3 day weekend of guns booze and fireworks started before she made the report. The authorities were probably short staffed and less able to handle the report. I have compared this to the news posting an article on Friday if they don't want people to talk about it a lot, which is coincidentally the day the story broke.

I have a personal secondary gripe that she should not have gone to the media before filing the report because by making it a headline that we know a rape occurred, any man who has raped a 10 year old in Ohio in May now knows to flee the state. (Fuentes didn't because he can't read English). I do think it can be appropriate for her to go to the media, but maybe give the cops like a week to deal with things first and then make the tone of the story more "Why aren't they doing anything?" instead of "Why should she have to travel to get an abortion?"

Her other job (university professor) is upset she went to the media too and they're investigating her for HIPAA violations.

-There is no HIPAA violation even though '10 year old rape victim from Ohio' is hopefully not a huge pool.
There are two HIPAA violation considerations here.

1. Can she do mandatory reporting? A .gov says that actually such reporting is an explicit exception included in HIPPA.
2. Can she go to the media? I'm not sure, her school is investigating her for it but I'd bet they're actually more concerned with her making abortion doctors look bad than they are with the girl's privacy.

The sense I get personally is that HIPAA is generally fine as long as you keep the names out... Doctors BSed me about "confidentiality" all the time but it sounded like they were willing to talk to everyone, and yeah it's totes still confidential because hey nobody can tie it back to me specifically, they'd have to already know me to find me.

-The mother is now claiming she didn't file any reports?
My hypothesis is the mother "reported the pregnancy" [to a doctor] [to get an abortion].

Journalists are slime balls and they aren't above wording things like "the police were referred by child services after the mother reported a pregnancy [to a doctor] [to get an abortion] [not knowing the doctor would tell child services]"

-Are Ohio doctors claiming that even performing medically necessary abortions is putting their careers at risk because they have to prove it was an exemption? That seems to be the explanation for why the girl was sent to Indiana, because of claims the State would investigate and prosecute doctors in poor faith.
IdK about the doctors but the journalists are ignoring the category of medical exemptions.

Second search result I get searching for "Ohio 10 year old does not have exemptions":
Ohio’s new abortion laws do not include exemptions for rape or incest.

* I skipped the first result because it had EU in the URL and fuck going to Europe for their thoughts on American politics.

Every time I notice a line about exemptions, I notice something conveniently missing... Fucking journalists.

-This is Fake News the Republicans pounced on despite being instigated from a Democratic slant (Look at the suffering Republicans are causing by banning abortions)
Screenshot_20220716-110815.jpg
Actually I wanted to find some quote about the best lies being based on truths but I could only find the one about a kernel of truth.

Anyways, the people who say this aren't human and aren't capable of understanding why rape is bad. Just like Biden, who did good and at least called it a rape... Before failing to recognize hey maybe he should do something stop rapes too.

I'm more curious how Telemundo even found the woman.
Like did CPS tell them who reported the rape?
Well, if the boyfriend speculation is accurate, and the boyfriend is arrested and doxed... The first thing I'd try is looking up where he boyfriend lives on the off chance they're cohabitating?
 
Last edited:
sure, dude, whatever you say.
Not very believable after you crying about her doing her goddamn job and you're commenting on the thing her other job is investigating her for

i'm just helping you try to look less ignorant.
A futile effort when we're in the butthole of the site, and when I acknowledged your help, but I did thank you for that part.
 
Ye u rite they just went to where Fuentes lived and asked the oldest person there:

“Hiding her face, this woman who opened for us the door of the home where the police confirm Gerson Fuentes lives — charged with raping a 10-year-old girl, identified herself as the mother of the minor and stated that he is innocent,”

Which then means the girl's identity should be found easily and most likely she still lived with said rapist post-abortion. Holy fuck journalists are fucking stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back