- Joined
- Nov 26, 2021
Honestly the fact that they had to pay a better-liked (as of about 6AM GMT) e-celeb to appear on their shit is more embarrassing than any hypocrisy they might be trying to call out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alright, who told dad?View attachment 3497708
Tardksi who trains 76 hours a day isn't in town? Come on man......
I have no issue with Godwinson being paid, I don't think money somehow makes someone compromised or corrupts the art. Honestly, if that was a standard belief, it just shows how childish and underdeveloped this faggot "sektur" is. The idea that a patreon "corrupts" art is so braindead it actually causes me physical pain, like artists haven't had patrons for as long as art has existed.Here's the delineation I make: Godwinson was paid a one-time, lump sum from the content creators for his appearance. Someone offered him a gig and it was enough to be worth his time. If attention was his angle he could have gotten on much earlier without payment. PPP/other grifters are looking to min/max content creation where it's minimum effort to milk maximum cash from their fans.
You're openly admitting to pay pigging while "claiming" you have disposable income!? Statistically people who tend to give niggers on the internet money are thousands of dollars in debt or mildly autistic. You should be ashamed, dumb nigger.not ashamed of pay pigging just didn't want to gloat that i have disposable income
The patreon/fan-support thing is kind of like a cash-only business. There's plenty of valid, good businesses that operate that way for one reason or another. It's also a major avenue for all kinds of illegal activity. It's not inherently bad but it's something scummy people can abuse. I.E. "zombie" patreons where someone is raking in $X/month and producing nothing at all. It's a valid question that can't apply to Godwinson's situation. It's a one-off appearance. If it was a scam for cash it's a shitty one because there was no guarantee of further income. He probably could make that back via fan donos if money was the goal.I have no issue with Godwinson being paid, I don't think money somehow makes someone compromised or corrupts the art. Honestly, if that was a standard belief, it just shows how childish and underdeveloped this faggot "sektur" is. The idea that a patreon "corrupts" art is so braindead it actually causes me physical pain, like artists haven't had patrons for as long as art has existed.
What's a valid question? If it's scummy? If it corrupts the person?The patreon/fan-support thing is kind of like a cash-only business. There's plenty of valid, good businesses that operate that way for one reason or another. It's also a major avenue for all kinds of illegal activity. It's not inherently bad but it's something scummy people can abuse. I.E. "zombie" patreons where someone is raking in $X/month and producing nothing at all. It's a valid question that can't apply to Godwinson's situation. It's a one-off appearance. If it was a scam for cash it's a shitty one because there was no guarantee of further income. He probably could make that back via fan donos if money was the goal.
Well, he ain't gonna do it here unless he socks, or writes a very compelling appeal. It looks like @Kinochet got the boot last night.Just hope that Kinochet leak all the discord meetings in the future
You're openly admitting to pay pigging while "claiming" you have disposable income!? Statistically people who tend to give niggers on the internet money are thousands of dollars in debt or mildly autistic. You should be ashamed, dumb nigger.
"Are they grifting?" The quality of KC has undeniably declined and some negative things have come to light. I won't say whether they are/aren't grifting but it is a situation where I can at least understand where someone would argue either side. This doesn't really apply to Godwinson for the reasons I've specified. It's a reaching, facile argument that works against their intent to come across as not grifting with the lowest of the low effort content.What's a valid question? If it's scummy? If it corrupts the person?
bro you can have disposable income while also being in a crippling amount of debt, just take out payday loans when you need disposable income it's easyYou're openly admitting to pay pigging while "claiming" you have disposable income!? Statistically people who tend to give niggers on the internet money are thousands of dollars in debt or mildly autistic. You should be ashamed, dumb nigger.
Ralph at least has the glow in the dark fed shirt which while stupid is at least a unique gimmick. https://killstream.live/product/fed-glow-in-dark-shirt-special-edition/how does ralphs merch compare per chance?
Ohh ok, I see what you're saying. Yea with KC it definitely seems like they're in it for the money, but I don't feel like the presence of money caused that like Godwinson is saying, rather it's because of Warski and PPP. Godwinson's belief seems to be that money in art corrupts people and ruins the art, which I think is a really dumb take. Some people end up grifting, but those people would have stopped making videos or their show if there was no money involved, so the presence of money hasn't ruined anything, it just means that instead of ending the show they pivoted to grifting."Are they grifting?" The quality of KC has undeniably declined and some negative things have come to light. I won't say whether they are/aren't grifting but it is a situation where I can at least understand where someone would argue either side. This doesn't really apply to Godwinson for the reasons I've specified. It's a reaching, facile argument that works against their intent to come across as not grifting with the lowest of the low effort content.
Yes.Are even guntguards this shameless?
They shadowbanned me during the Flam stream. I always keep a tab in a different browser open to make sure my posts go through. They have been sweeping a lot of (now former) fans from the chat since then.Same here, my account was banned. For those who don't know if you're banned in chat this is how to check. Type in the chat, exit the chat and reopen it. If your comment doesn't appear after reopening the live chat you're banned. As far as a shadow ban for comments you'll have to check with an alt account and hit new comments and scroll down to see if you're banned. Sometimes YouTube will remove your comments if you get too spicy. Same goes for live chat, for example if you say "You're a pussy PPP!" YouTube auto deletes it for bad language.
You mean when asston said "funny that Ralph stopped stream sniping" when he clearly didn't? Why don't you address the fact that OBS supposedly crashed live yet they were back instantly with no buffering or downtime on the stream, which also happened to be during an intermission?Retarded. They live reacted to Ralph sniping them lastnight. They even talked about how PPP has been too lazy to actually set the time on that clock behind him - it read 3 o'clock at some point during the stream last night.
imo there wasn't any point where Fred Fuchs was as obnoxious as Tardski when he goes on a live ego trip.The Kino Casino is to Ralph and AF what the Sons of Kojima were to DSP.
What about the time him and Sons of Kojima donated water wells in Africa to """own""" DSP and were huffing their own farts how morally rigtheous they are forimo there wasn't any point where Fred Fuchs was as obnoxious as Tardski when he goes on a live ego trip.
The old lore is that Baronet Adam Edge is upper crust, descended from an unironic old school liberalist, the type Sargon so greatly wishes he could be. Adam's aristocratic societal echelon most likely approves of laughing at obese alcoholics and new money prom kings who think they live in mansions. I imagine he regales them with tales about trashburgers over cigars and brandy.
As an Edge Lord, Godwinson, probably doesn't have to worry too much about being employable.
I have no idea how true this shit is.
Godwinson is just doing the thing you're meant to do as a character with opinions online. He holds to the most extreme version of the opinion and then carries it as far as it can go, because that's the most attention-grabbing and thought-provoking thing to do. It's reasonable to accept that he's right at least to some degree in all cases but then weigh exactly how poisonous the influence of money is on a case-by-case basis. It's a matter of degrees.Ohh ok, I see what you're saying. Yea with KC it definitely seems like they're in it for the money, but I don't feel like the presence of money caused that like Godwinson is saying, rather it's because of Warski and PPP. Godwinson's belief seems to be that money in art corrupts people and ruins the art, which I think is a really dumb take. Some people end up grifting, but those people would have stopped making videos or their show if there was no money involved, so the presence of money hasn't ruined anything, it just means that instead of ending the show they pivoted to grifting.
They could have literally pulled a Metokur and just disappeared for a while until Ralph/AF did something completely retarded and/or self-destructed then come back and do a show. They wouldn't be boring as fuck and actually had content. But they are grifting so that PPP can buy more fat food and Warski can get some cocaine to stutter moreMonths ago I recall saying to people in conversation that there's no way KC and PPP/Warski can be interesting on their own, without Ralph/AF non-stop self-destructing. If there's even a bit of a content dearth (Which there has been) from Ralph/AF, the KC and PPP/Warski become boring and start spiraling. Their momentum was entirely generated by Ralph/AF fucking up, and when those two go even a little quiet or just aren't self-destructing as spectacularly, there's nowhere for the KC to go but down.
I stopped paying attention to them at least a month ago because they've just been boring.