Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Didn't some Antifag get into a fight with a Proud Boy and get punched so hard he became retarded? And then the guy who did it got released on self defense claims? I remember something vaguely like that happening.
I believe so.. Also in France, a leftist, Clément Méric died from one punch by a Skinhead.
 
>first pic
Who's gonna tell them that the "every embryo starts as female" has been debooonked?
People don't care about actual studies. They get their popsci hot takes from scifi movies. If an asian actor who's playing a geneticist in Jurassic Park says every embryo starts off as female and we can pump in some frog DNA to clone dinosaurs, who the hell are you to argue that, shitlord?
 
It's less about right-wingers not understanding or just not caring about the alleged "message" of these stories and its more about the tweeter and those like him completely misunderstanding right wing politics. I don't think any of the comics or shows mentioned run antithetical to American conservative belief systems, especially more libertarian leaning ones. They all involve oppressive governments, out-of-control crime, or powerful corporations that the everyman underdog needs to stop. What's there for a conservative to hate?

And they like to cite that the protagonists are supposed to be an example of what not to do, but they completely fail at parodying and satirizing right-wing beliefs. For example, Moore wrote Rorschach to be a nutcase that people aren't supposed to agree or identify with, but he is arguably the most moral and heroic character for his story. Same for all these other heroes. They have problems, but in the world they live in they are the only ones trying to get shit done and fix it. Which resinates with right-wingers of all stripes.
I find, if the story and characters are well done, nearly anyone of any political affiliation can project themselves onto any sort of general "good-vs-evil" narrative.
 
Anyone here familiar with First Dog on the Moon? He's an Aussie cartoonist who can't draw but inexplicably got a job with the Guardian, probably because all his comics are about feminism and climate change.

1658173373962.png


1658173575741.png


1658173654491.png


1658173808982.png


He also has a comic about how sad men are funny to laugh at because men don't have problems, and while men having mental health problems is sad the solution to it is feminism, but I can't find it.

His wiki article has to be seen to be believed:

1658173690704.png


Yes, that's the actual picture used to illustrate him. Here's what he really looks like if it helps, though I do get a strong Nonce energy from him.

1658173723098.png

1658173741884.png


Source to prove I'm not making this shit up.
 
Dobson.jpg
People don't care about actual studies. They get their popsci hot takes from scifi movies. If an asian actor who's playing a geneticist in Jurassic Park says every embryo starts off as female and we can pump in some frog DNA to clone dinosaurs, who the hell are you to argue that, shitlord?
Exactly. It's cringey how they insist they love science, yet they've proven with shit like transgenderism that they can be just as virulently anti-science as any Christian fundamentalist.
 
I would totally have Snake dress up like that for a run-through and laugh my ass off the whole time.

On the Leftists not understanding why right leaning people love Punisher and all of those is one of the most basic differences between the Left and the Right.

The Right can look at critique of their own side and nod along, going "Why, you may have a point old boy. Jeeves, bring me my shotgun!"

The Left looks at critique and goes "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

That's the reason a lot of right wing will allow art that is critical of them to flourish while the Left spazzes out over a kid's drawing.

They really don't get that a lot on the Right would be perfectly fine with Frank Castle dropping most the Uvalde cops off a roof.
 
I would totally have Snake dress up like that for a run-through and laugh my ass off the whole time.

On the Leftists not understanding why right leaning people love Punisher and all of those is one of the most basic differences between the Left and the Right.

The Right can look at critique of their own side and nod along, going "Why, you may have a point old boy. Jeeves, bring me my shotgun!"

The Left looks at critique and goes "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

That's the reason a lot of right wing will allow art that is critical of them to flourish while the Left spazzes out over a kid's drawing.

They really don't get that a lot on the Right would be perfectly fine with Frank Castle dropping most the Uvalde cops off a roof.
You actually can. There's a mod on the Nexus that let's you play as Snake/V in Quiet's outfit and it's fucking hysterical.
 
Anyone here familiar with First Dog on the Moon? He's an Aussie cartoonist who can't draw but inexplicably got a job with the Guardian, probably because all his comics are about feminism and climate change.

View attachment 3503816

View attachment 3503827

View attachment 3503830

View attachment 3503840

He also has a comic about how sad men are funny to laugh at because men don't have problems, and while men having mental health problems is sad the solution to it is feminism, but I can't find it.

His wiki article has to be seen to be believed:

View attachment 3503834

Yes, that's the actual picture used to illustrate him. Here's what he really looks like if it helps, though I do get a strong Nonce energy from him.

View attachment 3503836
View attachment 3503837

Source to prove I'm not making this shit up.
Man, that comic is just WORDS WORDS WORDS.
And I don’t know if this belongs here, but I’m dropping it anyways.
BB9883AE-E701-41E2-85A7-358399233562.jpeg

Come on, you know why.
 
I disagree, her design is shitty. Not because it's trying be sexy, because the clothes are dumb and ugly and the writters tried really really hard to justify her sexy design in the current year. Overall she just was confusing because they tried to do too much rather than settling down on a personality, backstory and design that goes with that. Seriously all they needed to do if they wanted to do a overtly sexy mute chick is that she likes male attention, knows she has a killer body and sinse she can't flirt with word she flirts with her body. No, we go with breathing trough her skin and the the clothes don't even go with that explanation well.

View attachment 3499545

She is this absolutely baffling missmatch of practical and sexy elements that just don't go together. Like why fuck was she wearing stockings? They give no protections, are incredibly uncomfortable in boots, get easily tangled with stick, leafs and other bits of nature. Otherhand if she likes to dress for attention why does she have the ugliest low effort pony tail? Her fringe is not only uneven and thin like she is bolding, it looks to just the right length to get in her eyes. Very fitting for a sniper. Then there is the one long shiny black glove and one short dull green glove. It's a Final Fantasy 10 bad kitchen sink design, just without fun colors.
Not to mention how wildly uncomfortable/unstable that holster would be strapped to her bare thigh.

I've always thought it was such a bizarre design, the very plain face and hair combined with the ridiculous Final Fantasy/tacticool sexxxtume.
 
Been seeing Tweets like this a lot more lately and it really does just come off as nerds being mad that right-wingers can actually enjoy shit without it lining up with their politics lol

View attachment 3502951
At least two of the examples aren't even true and I'd question the truth of The Boys one since the comic never was a criticism of these things. V for Vendetta portrays "both sides" as bad (a sin nowdays) which the movie jettisoned to make itself into a critique of the Bush Administration. Watchmen never makes a critique of politics or capitalism, Rorschach is unhinged but he's also correct, the only one to recognize the plot and is the only one who provides the way to change things. (He's also not a capitalist or right-wing.) Snyder didn't change this in the film either.

The Punisher one is true originally but most Punisher writers have glorified him endlessly and modern takes almost never treat Frank as wrong just misguided.

The critique of people who think the Homelander is cool is also misguided (I assume this is what The Boys mention is about), nobody screams at you "THE JOKER/DARTH VADER IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE BAD GUY" as everyone recognizes they're still the coolest characters in their respective franchises. Billy Butcher isn't the "hero" of The Boys either, the comic makes very clear that he's arguably worse and his framing of his behavior as a noble pursuit of justice is equally and possibly more deranged than what many of the "heroes" are doing. He's openly lying from the start to Hughie and the others. Appropriately for this tweet thread, Butcher is also a critique of Frank Castle.

It's one thing for these people to be morons and not understand how people who think differently from them can also appreciate fictional works. It's another thing when these morons can't even read the fiction anywhere near accurately but feel the need to tut-tut others who are supposedly reading the fiction wrong.
 
I mean, it's still goofy, and there's no excuse for fishnets (unless Venom is projecting them because he always thought those were hot).
As you mentioned she is basically fem V and her outfit is supposed to be mimicking V's "naked" outfit with the sexy tactical look. But Kojima wrote a character who's pretty much allergic to clothes because she breaths though her skin. So she can't wear pants and not wearing anything would ruin the parody V look they are going for. So he has her wearing fishnet as the pants part of Quiet's naked outfit.
Personally she looks weird without them.

maxresdefault.jpg
MGS5_Screenshot_Quiet.png
 
Last edited:
They're still hung up on that sucker punching of Richard Spencer as if it were some kinda "own" wow🤔🤔
Even with a perfect shot for a sucker punch, instead of king hitting him or something they just barely mussed his hair. These noodly armed motherfuckers couldn't punch a doughnut shop bonus card.
For example, Moore wrote Rorschach to be a nutcase that people aren't supposed to agree or identify with, but he is arguably the most moral and heroic character for his story.
Arguably, he is the only heroic character in the story. Manhattan is literally inhuman. Ozymandias is an amoral monster who commits one of the vilest crimes in human history. The Comedian was a rapist. All the others, as likable as some of them (like Nite Owl and Silk Spectre) might be, all went along with the order to put down the capes, and all went along with Ozymandias's scheme, having nothing better of their own.

Rorschach could have easily survived that last encounter by simply pretending to go along with it too while actually spilling the beans anyway, but that would have required him to lie. He was the only character in the whole story willing to die for the truth. Of course, he was also willing to condemn all of humanity along with himself, but I'm not sure he'd have considered that part a minus.

It says a lot about Moore's narrative skill and particularly his skill with characters that he could create a character whose ethos he despised and yet develop the character so well that he ended up being deeply sympathetic and one of his iconic characters, arguably one of the greatest characters in comic books.

Many people consider him a contrarian asshole, and that's true to some extent, but how many people would tell Hollywood to take its suitcase full of Benjamins and go fuck itself, and then trash every single adaptation of his works they ever did? You'll note he actually has consented to these adaptations when his consent was necessary, while still refusing payment himself, because he is not a complete dick, and was okay with David Lloyd (V for Vendetta) and Dave Gibbons (Watchmen) getting their own payday.

Moore has a fair amount in common with Rorschach himself, in terms of having his own rigid moral code from which he refuses to vary.

This kind of moral complexity (and this is something you can find in Moore's literal comic books) is too much for SJWs to handle. You're not supposed to think about or (Satan forbid since these are SJWs) actually sympathize with anyone whose moral code is different than yours. You're just supposed to call them Nazis and punch them because they're baa-a-a-a-aaaad.
V for Vendetta portrays "both sides" as bad (a sin nowdays) which the movie jettisoned to make itself into a critique of the Bush Administration.
This (rightly) sent Moore into an absolute rage. There is nothing he despises more than American liberals.

I'm not one of those fanatical Snyder haters who can't stand his "adaptations" and "remakes" even though they are terrible (V) as (DotD 2004) both things. He generally has a smooth, glib directorial style that presents pleasing visuals and reasonably well choreographed action. I enjoy many of his films (including those two).

But calling either of his adaptations of major Moore works anything other than travesties of the original would be a lie.
 
Last edited:
At least two of the examples aren't even true and I'd question the truth of The Boys one since the comic never was a criticism of these things. V for Vendetta portrays "both sides" as bad (a sin nowdays) which the movie jettisoned to make itself into a critique of the Bush Administration. Watchmen never makes a critique of politics or capitalism, Rorschach is unhinged but he's also correct, the only one to recognize the plot and is the only one who provides the way to change things. (He's also not a capitalist or right-wing.) Snyder didn't change this in the film either.

The Punisher one is true originally but most Punisher writers have glorified him endlessly and modern takes almost never treat Frank as wrong just misguided.

The critique of people who think the Homelander is cool is also misguided (I assume this is what The Boys mention is about), nobody screams at you "THE JOKER/DARTH VADER IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE BAD GUY" as everyone recognizes they're still the coolest characters in their respective franchises. Billy Butcher isn't the "hero" of The Boys either, the comic makes very clear that he's arguably worse and his framing of his behavior as a noble pursuit of justice is equally and possibly more deranged than what many of the "heroes" are doing. He's openly lying from the start to Hughie and the others. Appropriately for this tweet thread, Butcher is also a critique of Frank Castle.

It's one thing for these people to be morons and not understand how people who think differently from them can also appreciate fictional works. It's another thing when these morons can't even read the fiction anywhere near accurately but feel the need to tut-tut others who are supposedly reading the fiction wrong.
Most of the right wingers they see the punisher symbol on aren't even aware it's associated with a comic book. It's commonly used by private military contractors and has just become another edgy patch to throw on the old body armor when it's time to go LARP.
 
Back