Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

[nouserhere]

..Uh...that wasn't exactly it like, AT ALL. No one should believe a word that comes out of Sierra's filthy pie hole. A full report just got created in Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/criticalab.../gcjewgate2022_dissecting_a_legendary_battle/

Removed. Zero upvotes.
You’re right. This changes EVERYTHING. I see things in a completely new way now. Joey Brite is my ugly angry man savior. Even if she claims to be a woman.

 

[Nigger Respecter]

Really? Men have destroyed every civilization throughout the entire course of human history due to your greed, incompetence and warmongering. The 20th century, as one example out of many that I could give, resulted in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people due to inane political ideologies, wars and genocides - none of which were by the hands of women...unless you think Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe, et al., were women?

By the way, men don't grow, birth or breastfeed babies. Only women do, but keep scapegoating and shitting on the people your existence largely depends on, at great risk to themselves, white "male."

Millions more would have died if women were in charge. So: you're welcome

 

[AnOminous]

Tamar the Great, Elizabeth I, and Empress Theodora also come to mind. Also Aggripina the Younger, but of course these are all much farther back in history than Thatcher.

Queen Gorgo of Sparta would be your perfect example. She was the daughter, the mother, and the wife of three Spartan kings and a powerful leader in her own right.

If anyone ever dared to question her authority, his name is lost to history.

There's also Aspasia, consort and advisor to Pericles, much beloved by actually intellectual women (as opposed to the usual Tard Studies suspects).

 

[umami's milk]

Queen Gorgo of Sparta would be your perfect example. She was the daughter, the mother, and the wife of three Spartan kings and a powerful leader in her own right.

If anyone ever dared to question her authority, his name is lost to history.

There's also Aspasia, consort and advisor to Pericles, much beloved by actually intellectual women (as opposed to the usual Tard Studies suspects).

Don't expect TERFS to actually know powerful wimmins in history. They simultaneously believe women are the uncredited omnipotent foundation of society while also believing that 'society is an evil rape culture made to keep women down!!!'

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

Don't expect TERFS to actually know powerful wimmins in history. They simultaneously believe women are the uncredited omnipotent foundation of society while also believing that 'society is an evil rape culture made to keep women down!!!'

There were Black senators in the 1890s that doesn't mean Black's were living in a post racial utopia.

 

[Trig.Point]

Queen Gorgo of Sparta would be your perfect example. She was the daughter, the mother, and the wife of three Spartan kings and a powerful leader in her own right.

If anyone ever dared to question her authority, his name is lost to history.

There's also Aspasia, consort and advisor to Pericles, much beloved by actually intellectual women (as opposed to the usual Tard Studies suspects).

Indira Ghandi is another good example, hammared Pakistan in the 1971 Indo-Pakistan war, then sent the tanks in to clear the Sikhs out of the golden Temple.

There's Golda Meir who was always up for bombing some Palestinian refugee camp, and then kept her head during the Yom Kippur war knowing that eventually Israel would win.

All these fucking idiots crying about how the Ukraine war wouldn't have happened if women were in charge, don't even realise that Ukraine is partly Russian because Catherine the Great killed shed loads of Tarters and settled Russians on their graves.

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

Historically, the big religions have given women a pass for this shit because it was believed to be basically a sign of psychological immaturity. They weren't wrong in that diagnosis, but they underestimated just how badly out of control that psychological immaturity could rage if permitted. For instance the Jewish legal scholars of yore would put down the harshest penalties on homo males or hetero adultery, but two women jacking each other off was seen as mostly embarrassing not evil. Logically, ok, buttsex can kill (even before AIDS it was obvious that it was dangerous) and adultery makes babies- makes sense. But once women cut themselves loose from traditional family life, the psychological harms of female homosexuality started to become more evident- society is now experiencing the horrific fallout of looking the other way from female depravity for so long, now. But even many of the "based" can't wrap their minds around how bad things really are, because of centuries of conditioning to think of it as embarrassing but harmless.



Sperging out about how men's lives depend on women because only women give birth is retarded, because no one will be born without genetic input from a male, too. All this war of the sexes bullshit is psychological infantilism, dignifying it with philosophical labels like "feminism" was the first mistake.

I honestly find this type of psychobabble bullshit fascinating. What exactly is infantile about homosexuality or feminism? Also what great societal harm are two women fucking each causing? Am not being facetious here I honestly want to know what's going through your head when you write stuff like this.

 

[Dagobert]

I honestly find this type of psychobabble bullshit fascinating. What exactly is infantile about homosexuality or feminism? Also what great societal harm are two women fucking each causing? Am not being facetious here I honestly want to know what's going through your head when you write stuff like this.

I don't know what OP meant with all of it, but Lesbians are the most abusive couples that exist. That's a good start for societal harm.

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

I honestly find this type of psychobabble bullshit fascinating. What exactly is infantile about homosexuality or feminism? Also what great societal harm are two women fucking each causing? Am not being facetious here I honestly want to know what's going through your head when you write stuff like this.

By framing this as my personal eccentric view, you're only revealing how poorly read you are. None of this is new or novel.

This "ew you're a weirdo and I find it FASCINATING" feminine aggression strategy is tiresome and this is as much engaging as I'll do with it.

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

By framing this as my personal eccentric view, you're only revealing how poorly read you are. None of this is new or novel.

This "ew you're a weirdo and I find it FASCINATING" feminine aggression strategy is tiresome and this is as much engaging as I'll do with it.

But am not being aggressive I really do want to understand your thought process,

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

But am not being aggressive I really do want to understand your thought process,

You don't. If you did, you could read classic works of psychological theory and moral philosophy and learn a lot more than you will poking the wrongthinker with a stick online. Also lol join date.

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

You don't. If you did, you could read classic works of psychological theory and moral philosophy and learn a lot more than you will poking the wrongthinker with a stick online. Also lol join date.

Ahh the classic do your own research dodge. Also, I have read a bit of theory in my day and I still have no clue what you're rambling about

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Ahh the classic do your own research dodge. Also I have read a bit of theory in my day and I still have no clue what your own about.

Asking "why has homosexuality been considered wrong and bad through all human history until last year?" is an actually stupid question. It shows you live in some kind of left wing bubble if you have never looked into this or even heard about it accidentally before.

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

Asking "why has homosexuality been considered wrong and bad through all human history until last year?" is a stupid question. It shows you live in some kind of left wing bubble if you have never looked into this or even heard about it accidentally before.

I have and I've come to the conclusion it was and still is an ad hoc attempt to logically justify the feeling of the gays being icky and weird. People have believed in a lot of weird ideas throughout history for very long periods like the Galenic idea of female semen or all the bizarre shit in the hadith. One last thing the dislike of homosexuality isn't a universal feature of civilization many cultures tolerated it.

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

I have and I've come to the conclusion it was and still is an ad hoc attempt to logically justify the feeling of the gays being icky and weird. People have believed in a lot of weird ideas throughout history for very long periods like the Galenic idea of female semen or all the bizarre shit in the hadith. One last thing the dislike of homosexuality isn't a universal feature of civilization many cultures tolerated it.

And why would people- pretty much all people, on every continent, in every epoch- feel "icky" about the same thing like that?

Could there be a reason?

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

And why would people- pretty much all people, on every continent, in every epoch- feel "icky" about the same thing like that?

Could there be a reason?

Like i said the idea of very culture throughout history having a prohibition on homosexuality is false. The Greeks celebrated it the Roman's tolerated it has long has you were fucking man of lower status. The Japanese never had a law against it until the Meji era where they imported homophobia.

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Like a said the idea of very culture throughout history having a prohibition on homosexuality is false. The Greeks celebrated it the Roman's tolerated it has long has you were fucking man of lower status. The Japanese never had a law aganist it until the Meji era. Homosexual relationships were celebrated among the Samurai class too by the way.

The Greeks celebrated it as long as you were fucking a man boy.

Go on.

 

[Shitposting boogeyman]

The Greeks celebrated it as long as you were fucking a man boy.

Go on.

Ya that's true people have been depraved throughout history. Modern age of consent laws are a unfortunately late invention.

 

[Dagobert]

Like i said the idea of very culture throughout history having a prohibition on homosexuality is false. The Greeks celebrated it the Roman's tolerated it has long has you were fucking man of lower status. The Japanese never had a law against it until the Meji era where they imported homophobia.

There was massive stigma to "receiving" however, even if homosexuality wasn't entirely stigmatized. (It's not gay if you don't receive line here) Homosexuality in ancient cultures seems more like a form of ritualistic dominance when it was tolerated, and they didn't see it in the same manner as a "sexuality" that modern society sees it as.

Ultimately homosexuality is almost certainly stigmatized historically because of disease-spreading issues. When even today, with all the knowledge modern man has, Homosexuals are statistically far more likely to have one or more STDs, you can imagine how bad it was back in the day. Plus, without modern medicine, many STDs would have a far detrimental effect on people, making an unnecessary sexual activity like gay sex a more dangerous issue.

Finally, add in how many homosexuals seem to have a callous disregard with the fact that they are spreading an STD when they are infected, and that they tend to be active with more sexual partners than heterosexuals, it makes sense why many societies either banned or had social pressures against homosexuality: it was a matter of stopping disease from spreading.

 

[umami's milk]

why the fuck are we sperging about homos this is a terf thread