US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Ruin said:
Because it all went to globalist mega corporations like Amazon and Blackrock not individuals.
Click to expand...
That's a conspiracy theory bigot.
The money ackshtually went to corporations, initiatives, and other assorted organizations with majority holdings by blackrock. SO #FACTCHECKED #NORECESSION. I was told by Washington Post so it's troooo
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Certified_Autist, BULLY HUNTER_77, Constellationzero and 7 others
Meat Target said:
Wikipedia wasted no time.

View attachment 3538062View attachment 3538063
Click to expand...

The political-media complex official definition of a recession is "2 consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth when the GOP is in office".

EDIT:
GuntPunt said:
And its not even fucking over. That brand new "Stop Inflation Act" wants to spend $750 billion with new printed money. We are completely fucked.
Click to expand...

In fairness to that bill, ALLEGEDLY they plan to raise $750B in new revenue and spend $450B.

Of course, that is slimy fuckin' politician math, so you can assume they really plan to target the middle class with some shitty new tax and then spend a 10x multiple of it.

EDIT2:
"Consumer spending is continuing to grow," Biden said.
Click to expand...

No shit, you mush-brained fuck. When prices keep going up, people have to keep spending more, even if they don't have the means to support that spending long-term.

God I fucking hate Lyin' Biden.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Humble Crab, BULLY HUNTER_77, Confused Doggo and 13 others
GuntPunt said:
All Biden can do is release media articles about how "shit is great, get over it." Its fucking asinine.
Click to expand...
Brandon admin: Why do the American people keep being pessimistic when the economy is doing so great?

American people: Because it isn't doing great, you lying sacks of shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Humble Crab, Certified_Autist, madethistocomment and 15 others
Vyse Inglebard said:
This argument that the Biden administration keeps trotting out pisses me off: companies are hiring, which is usually the opposite of what happens in a recession. As of May, the U.S. had 11.3 million unfilled jobs.

But an unfilled job doesn’t actually produce anything — other than perhaps help-wanted ads — which means that those 11.3 million openings aren’t contributing to the GDP. The Biden administration is pointing to the near-record number of job openings as a sign of economic strength. But all those empty office cubicles, empty spots on the assembly line, unanswered calls, and unfilled wait-staff shifts feel a lot more like a sign of economic weakness.

There are still a lot of, “Please be patient, we are understaffed” signs in the front of restaurants around the country, a lot of retail stores with only one or two registers open, and a lot of pharmacies with only one pharmacist trying to manage the phone and the line of customers in front of her. In case you haven't figured it out yet, Brandon administration, those aren’t signs of a thriving economy.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce notes that:

If the economy were as strong and healthy as the Brandon team and congressional Demonrats claims it is, there would be Americans working in those jobs. And yet there aren't. Big thunk.
Click to expand...
hey
those organizations needs dozens of PHDs with years of experience for those entry level jobs a retarded teenager could do if you just explained the basics and showed them how to
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Woe-B-Gon (TM), spiritofamermaid, Bugman's Burden and 1 other person
Legit disgusted at how many media outlets are parroting the "raising the odds of a recession" verbiage.
No, we're in a recession, you clods. 2 quarters of negative growth defines it. This isn't some affair where we're waiting for the Federal Reserve to make a speech.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
Reactions: wopirish, Humble Crab, madethistocomment and 24 others
Youtube gave me this through an ad.
1659020269132.png
She doesn't explain what foundation she's taxing these "millionaires" from. Is it net worth or is it yearly salary? Because she'll be very disappointed to know that Chief Executive Officers only make about $200,000+ a year in salaries in total most of the times and the money usually comes from stock investments and savings. She'll basically be taxing non-existent income with no foundation meaning competent people in congress will tell her this law is unconstitutional and strike it down.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: mrpatapon, Humble Crab, Chen Stirner and 9 others
Kuritan Deplorable said:
Its a fairly empty threat. There's no reason for China to open any Taiwan conflict by killing a high level US State official - Any sane invasion plan would hinge on the hope that the US Government takes some time to decide if it really wants to get involved in a land war in Asia before sending assistance, but killing a government official in a third party nation (I would bet anything that they'd recognize Taiwan as the legitimate government if they did something this stupid) soil would be a guaranteed US retaliation. There's been US Carrier groups in the region playing the usual maneuvering and interdiction games with a couple chinese counterparts (Who are outmatched and outnumbered in the region) and I could see the US basically going "Well if your gonna kill us with your force projection, we'll sink the force projection".

As much as China would be doing the US a favor, you'd have better odds of DSP admitting to bankruptcy fraud and his gacha gambling addition live on stream repeatedly with no weasel words or excuses.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't it be a naval battle since Taiwan's an island?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Open Window Maniac and Vyse Inglebard
Dave. said:
Youtube gave me this through an ad.
View attachment 3538230
She doesn't explain what foundation she's taxing these "millionaires" from. Is it net worth or is it yearly salary? Because she'll be very disappointed to know that Chief Executive Officers only make about $200,000+ a year in salaries in total most of the times and the money usually comes from stock investments and savings. She'll basically be taxing non-existent income with no foundation meaning competent people in congress will tell her this law is unconstitutional and strike it down.
Click to expand...
Where in our country of ours can you survive off of $1k a month? Maybe middle of nowhere towns. But in places like LA, SF, and NYC, that'll cover part of rent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Humble Crab, Open Window Maniac, DicksOutForKiwigglers and 6 others
Dave. said:
Youtube gave me this through an ad.
View attachment 3538230
She doesn't explain what foundation she's taxing these "millionaires" from. Is it net worth or is it yearly salary? Because she'll be very disappointed to know that Chief Executive Officers only make about $200,000+ a year in salaries in total most of the times and the money usually comes from stock investments and savings. She'll basically be taxing non-existent income with no foundation meaning competent people in congress will tell her this law is unconstitutional and strike it down.
Click to expand...
Yeah Elzzie is kind of crazy and has run Youtube Ads in the past. Its how they grew in their channel in the first place. All I can say is don't expect anything they say to make sense.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Feels
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: mrpatapon, Humble Crab, Ita Mori and 11 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Chen Stirner, madethistocomment, Rome's rightful successor and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back