Plagued Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

Nah retard real connoisseurs of the Atari era play "General Retreat"

Ah, the 80ies! A simpler and more innocent time!

You could make a video game about raping big, blocky boobied native chicks, or a timetravel movie featuring a teenager who’s closest relationship was with a disturbed older man, and nobody REEEED at you or thought it was weird.


If it works and does what you want it to do, then you can join every other techie in this thread who gets the tingles over vintage tech. If it doesn't work, then you are retarded for buying an ugly, trashy paperweight.

I bought more books again. Last month I donated a shitload to a library a few hours drive south that got flooded out (twice) but already the remaining volumes have started multiplying back to their previous numbers. Is it a losing battle?
I just found my old iPod Nano and have started using it. Not sure if it’s consooooming or anti consumption.

But those classic early 2000 Apple products really have a special thoughtfulness in both the design and function.

Plus, they didn’t nickel and dime you and threw a boatload of accessories at you.

If it works and does what you want it to do, then you can join every other techie in this thread who gets the tingles over vintage tech. If it doesn't work, then you are retarded for buying an ugly, trashy paperweight.

I bought more books again. Last month I donated a shitload to a library a few hours drive south that got flooded out (twice) but already the remaining volumes have started multiplying back to their previous numbers. Is it a losing battle?
I just found my old iPod Nano and have started using it. Not sure if it’s consooooming or anti consumption.

But those classic early 2000 Apple products really have a special thoughtfulness in both the design and function.

Plus, they didn’t nickel and dime you and threw a boatload of accessories at you.
I just spent off 40 dollars on a decent looking iPhone 4s.

Am I nerdy or retarded for buying this totally obsolete piece of technology?

Nerdy. The design on those is *chef’s kiss*.

It was also a much more interesting time in tech.

Fitting all that shit in there was an actual challenge, you had numerous SOC makers and competing technologies.

Today’s tech is fucking boring in comparison. Everyone uses the same processors, all the 99$ tablets come out of the same Chink firms that use the cheapest possible crap.
You don’t own anything and everything is in the cloud.
 
Last edited:
Today’s tech is fucking boring in comparison.
Yea, 4s is way more capable than I thought and can even do things today's phone can't.

One quick example: Gameloft's Modern Combat 4, one of the best FPS games ever came to mobile devices. Unlike any of today's online bullshit, it has a decent single player story and doesn't have a disgusting micro-transaction system built in. It's the type of B2P no one making anymore, and due to some 64-bit compatibility bullshit it is unavailable on any other modern platform.
 
You could make a video game about raping big, blocky boobied native chicks, or a timetravel movie featuring a teenager who’s closest relationship was with a disturbed older man, and nobody REEEED at you or thought it was weird.
Custers Revenge was one of the earliest video game controversies because retards thought it was made by Atari themselves and then there were of course Native American/feminist groups complaining too. I think it even made the evening news.
I just found my old iPod Nano and have started using it. Not sure if it’s consooooming or anti consumption.
I'm glad both of iPod Classics (120 GB and 160 GB) still mostly work.
 
Only reason as for why I changed out my iPhone 4S, was that the screen was way too damn small and all the colours on the screen turned weird after several years of losing it on the floor.
Build like a damn brick.
I got mine from a --Consoomer-- who protect it with goofy minion case and glass protector, it's the white 64GB model, she thought it was dead so give it to me for free.

I brought it back to life unironically with a $25 battery set and a 5$ old iPod cable...

Just saying, but it's much like a pattern on every Consumers. They claim how much they love a certain product but throw them away after it was outdated and unable to make them look trendy.
 
Last edited:
Since GTA VI is “woke”, I thought “Why not?” and show you what GTA consumerism can do to you when you’re not paying hundreds (if not, thousands) of money into wanting to play GTA Online:





Keep in mind, most of these were made five to almost eight years ago, so I have no clue if they are buying Grand Theft Auto VI when it comes out. Though, judging from the first two videos, I think I might come to the conclusion that they will probably say “Yes.”
 
Read a survey years ago where something like 40% of all reading for pleasure was done either in the bath, on the toilet, or at the beach/pool. None of those are kind to dropped electronics.
In all fairness they aren't very kind to paper either but at least I can dry out and salvage a book most of the time.
 
Only reason as for why I changed out my iPhone 4S, was that the screen was way too damn small and all the colours on the screen turned weird after several years of losing it on the floor.
Build like a damn brick.
iPhones before the 5s (when they switched to a 64bit processor) also tended to become unusably laggy after a couple of years of software updates. 5s and beyond are still reasonably usable phones, barring any app incompatibility from not being able to install the latest version of iOS.

iPhone industrial design easily peaked with the 4/4s, nothing since has even come close.
Read a survey years ago where something like 40% of all reading for pleasure was done either in the bath, on the toilet, or at the beach/pool. None of those are kind to dropped electronics.

Edit to add: @glass_houses : Yes. It is a losing battle.
Basic water resistance has been a standard feature on phones for ages now. Most popular phones from ~2015 onwards can easily survive a quick dip in shallow water without any special rescue procedure, aside from letting it dry fully before plugging in a charging cable. Like, you shouldn't be regularly submerging your phone, but the occasional accident isn't going to be a death sentence.
 
Ladies and gentlemen, coming straight from A&N, I bring you an article that embodies the modern consoomer bugman. Child-like attachment to a corporate product, wrapped with a coating of leftist political sperging and sexual identity, behold - the lamentation for the Choco Taco.

Not the Choco Taco​

1659068041699.png
Like so many of you, I didn’t want to believe it. Not with monkeypox on the rise. Not after three long years of pandemic life. Not after more anti-trans bills than stimulus checks. Not after they slashed Roe V. Wade, adapted Tiger King into a show, and told the climate to cool itself.

After all of that and so much more, now they’re coming for the Choco Taco. As reported far and wide, Klondike confirmed on Monday that it would be discontinuing arguably its most beloved product.

Why?

I know Klondike put out a statement of some kind, but I didn’t read it, and I don’t care. Sales, business, capitalism — whatever the explanation, we’ve heard it all before. My question is existential. Why, after we’ve been through so much, must the world move like this? How can we proceed as normal without her, our soon-to-be dearly departed frozen treat? Is there any sureness left in this life?

I am weary. I know many of you are, too. Perhaps this can be a place where we might join in our sadness, in our grief, in our everlasting love for the greatest underdog to grace a gas station freezer.

When I was in the third grade, I had no idea I was gay. But I did know love. I found it in a frigid place. She came on Thursdays, stale as the day is long. I would run to her from art class, leaving glued-up popsicle sticks to dry in the wind. Taking the steps two at a time, my rolling backpack clamoring behind me, I entered the cafeteria and went straight to the dessert corner. No sloppy joe or Danimals could come between us. For so long, I thought nothing could.

If you’ve never tried a Choco Taco, stop reading this article. Go, go now. Drive to the corner store, sprint to the bodega, bang down your landlord’s door and raid their freezer. For there’s nothing I can say here that could make you know. You must taste for yourself, while you can. Though if you’re reading this years from today, July 27, 2022, when the last Choco Taco in existence melts on a platinum podium in Elon Musk’s guest room, allow me to inform you of what you — nay, we — have lost.

“Perhaps this can be a place where we might join in our sadness, in our grief, in our everlasting love for the greatest underdog to grace a gas station freezer.”

Born in Philadelphia in 1983, the Choco Taco is inventor Alan Drazen’s definitive gift to humanity. An original multi-hyphenate, the treat is best appreciated through its component parts.

We start with the shell, whose iconic soggy texture introduced millions to the concept of irony. Coating the roughly four-inch, curved exterior is a layer of chocolate, sprinkled with peanuts. Within the taco sits a crescent of vanilla ice cream and a darker swirl of mysterious origin. Taken together, the Taco does what no cone could: It invites you to enjoy every element of the dessert at once, cone and all. Gastronomically, this is the great disruption of the Choco Taco. But anyone who has tried them knows that their undying appeal goes far deeper than taste and texture alone; that something far more resonant than vanilla ice cream lives in that miraculously delicious shell.

Okay, for the most part, this article is a joke. I mean, duh. The world feels unspeakably dark right now, so why not scream at the sky because of a weirdly appropriative dessert? At the same time, I think there’s something to the way the Choco Taco news has struck a chord. There’s no question that people are in mourning. And I think that something has to do with arguably life’s great challenge: Accepting that things change; that memory is imperfect.

With the omnipresence of smartphones, we can record a moment, even an entire performance. We can take an infinite number of pictures. But at least right now, we have no way of fully crystallizing what it feels like to eat. If the Choco Taco is truly set for cancellation, which is a big ifin the age of Twinkie fake-outs, that singular experience will be gone. Finished. Lost to the past. And what does that say about the memories we’ve tied to it? Will they be lost, too, now that we won’t have our frozen bridge to simpler times?

Yesterday, when the sad news broke, I took fifteen minutes from my desk to walk to the carniceria across the corner from where I live. With a heavy heart, I found the freezer spot once dedicated to Choco Tacos empty. I may never again taste my first love. And as not okay with it as I am, I feel supported in the knowledge that I am not alone. I never was.

Three cheers to you Mx. Taco. See you on the other side.
 
Last edited:
Ladies and gentlemen, coming straight from A&N, I bring you an article the embodies the modern consoomer bugman. Child-like attachment to a corporate product, wrapped with a coating of leftist political sperging and sexual identity, behold - the lamentation for the Choco Taco.
This whole thing looks like a joke, but we all know it's not. Even when he makes sure not to misgender a mass produced desert:
Three cheers to you Mx. Taco. See you on the other side.

I only had one Choco Taco years ago and didn't like it. The idea of an ice cream taco was always kind of gross, anyway.
 
Funny though that physical books continue to vastly outsell e-books, with the margins not really changing over the years. I remember when everyone predicted they would replace real books. Part of it is just some people prefer real pages (as we can see in this very thread), but also there are certain kinds of books that don't work in the e-format. I have alot of photography driven books, ie big full page photos of landscapes, buildings, etc - these are completely worthless in the e-format.

But I do prefer them in the e-format if its something I intend to read once and probably never again; I don't need my library filling up with paperbacks I couldn't sell for a penny on Amazon less a year after their release.
A vast majority of the ebook market is controlled by one or two companies as well, while physical books continue to have plenty of publishers and sellers, even as physical stores die.
 
Lego consooming alert!

An actual and functional Atari 2600 - 120 to 160 dollars
A new Lego set of Atari 2600 - 240 dollars
:story:

I know, I know. "Nostalgia", "piece of our childhood", I get it. I had Atari 2600 too. But why spending so much money on a non-functional piece of decoration, when with the same money you can buy the real thing, plus some games and whatever you need to make it work? Only a fool would not realize that Lego just milk their customers by releasing all these crap.
I don't remember actual lego sets costing that much either. Unless I'm wrong.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Yeah, I'm struggling to see the point of the Lego Atari 2600 as well. This is coming from someone who enjoys both Lego and old-timey vidya.

If I really had to scratch a Lego itch in an expensive way, I'd go with something from the Mindstorms or Technic lines. Way more interesting and educational (especially if working on one of these with your kids or something).

Seems like everybody had a copy of this classic for the C64 back in the day.
The Atari is just kinda baffling. With the SNES they at least had an interesting play gimmick in which Mario could “play” through part of a side-scrolling level. You don’t even need to care about Lego or Nintendo to find that at least mildly interesting from a purely technical perspective.

This Atari set on the other hand? Is literally just a box with some small vignettes for $10 more than the Lego SNES, which is objectively a better set in every way. Less interesting technical design, simpler build, hell even fewer parts (though this is likely because the SNES has an inflated parts count from the small pieces used to make the scrolling backdrop).
 
Another bug-person in NYC. Not really a "what I spend in a day"-type video but I still think it fits in here.
After seeing his "break" consisting of watching three animes at once I kinda lost some will to live.
Of course, we have to have the gym- and the "yes I totally have friends" *insert crying wojak behind mask* montage


Original:
what also kills me just a little is the commenters actually longing for this kind of life. lol.
 
Another bug-person in NYC. Not really a "what I spend in a day"-type video but I still think it fits in here.
After seeing his "break" consisting of watching three animes at once I kinda lost some will to live.
Of course, we have to have the gym- and the "yes I totally have friends" *insert crying wojak behind mask* montage

View attachment 3545141
Original:
what also kills me just a little is the commenters actually longing for this kind of life. lol.
That would actually be kind of cool, if you don't do the math and realize he's spending damn near his entire day either working or in transit for work related shit. At least he's got a good view.
 
After seeing his "break" consisting of watching three animes at once I kinda lost some will to live.
what the fuck. 3 animes at once. Why? I have trouble paying attention to 1 series at once.

Also check out his minimalistic apartment. Minimalism is a cool idea in concept but looks sad in reality.
 
Back