US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
It reminds me when they changed the definition of election fraud indicators, such as Benford's law. Or when they changed the definition of vaccine.
yeah man, there might be concentrated election fraud and 300k ballots at 4am
BUT at least it's not widespread voter fraud, that would be way out of line
 
Last edited:
What would that accomplish? War with China?
Getting rid of China by nuking the 3 gorge dam.

China's economy isnt so hot. Its middle class can't pay their morgages for their homes. And they're over populated. So by nuking the 3GD, they can starve them and kill some in the insuing flood. Blame America for it. Win/win. They can just write off the dead peoples loans and pimp on to another day.

I'm a crazy person online so the above probably means jack shit.
 
>Sebastian Vettel
Literally who and why is this person a trending search?
He's some Formula 1 race car driver who was quite popular back in the late 2010s. He made some cameos in the Gran Turismo games starting with 5 and Sport. I don't like Formula 1 so I can't say why he's trending as of recent.
 
yeah man, there might be concentrated election fraud and 300k ballots at 4am
BUT at least it's not extensive voter fraud, that would be way out of line
My brother-in-law has actually adopted this exact same insufferable position. He's convinced that the election results are legitimate because he can't picture "widespread" voter fraud. I've shown him definitive evidence that the government has been quantifiably corrupt in other instances but you can only lead a horse to water, so I just let him wallow in his delusion now. The same people telling us "there's no evidence of voter fraud" are the same ones saying "there's no evidence that conservatives are being censored online" - anyone who believes them now doesn't deserve to know the truth.

The majority of poll workers are absolutely ethical, apolitical, and care about the integrity of the election. The problem is the handful of poll workers in inner city districts that regularly graduate "straight A students" who can't read on a 1st grade reading level, can and have put their thumb on the scale. It only takes a handful of cheaters to completely swing the "popular vote." In fact, I no longer believe the Democrats actually win the actual "popular vote" in modern elections, which is why they're so desperate to abolish the electoral college, since it's a safeguard against corrupt states that have vote manufacturing industries.

I've found the easiest way to explain Benford's Law to normies is to use building heights as an example, since buildings are an example of something in nature that follows Benford's Law so obviously that you can see it with your own eyes. People can look out the window easily enough and see that single story buildings are obviously the most common type of building, followed by two story buildings, followed by three story buildings, etc. The analogy I like to use is it's like Detroit's poll workers "counted" the number of 5 and 6 story buildings in their city and (wow) it turns out that there are so many 5 and 6 story buildings in Detroit that they "outnumber" the one story buildings in the rest of the state. Violating Benford's Law just means it's obvious from a mathematical perspective that they cheated.
 
Last edited:
From this article, I think that even the laptop class is starting to wake up a little. Especially for being #1 on the LinkedIn news (not sure if it's curated or not, though I'm assuming it is).


1659041266823.png

I think it's important to point out that even though the word is in scare quotes in the title, I don't think that would register to many readers. It's similar to how people put "allegedly" in headlines (even without quotes) because the reader has to remind himself that it may not be true (even I have to catch myself sometimes). So I think readers would, even if they ignored their lying wallets, still read it as without the quotation marks.

I included the full list to show it all. The Hulu article is that they're now including Democrat ads that talk about gun control, abortion, and climate change (whereas before they were either thrown out entirely or had it edited out).
 
>My economic plan is focused on bringing inflation down, without giving up all the economic gains we have made.
>Economic Gains

And what exactly would those "Economic Gains" be, cornpop?

(Hikes pants up)
Well, I'll tell ya, JACK. We added SEVERAL, I repeat, SEVERAL server positions at Sonic, A&W, Chili's, Lou Malnati's, Portillo's, aaaaaaaaaaand a few hundred call center jobs.
Look at the numbers, JACK!
 
Youtube gave me this through an ad.
View attachment 3538230
She doesn't explain what foundation she's taxing these "millionaires" from. Is it net worth or is it yearly salary? Because she'll be very disappointed to know that Chief Executive Officers only make about $200,000+ a year in salaries in total most of the times and the money usually comes from stock investments and savings. She'll basically be taxing non-existent income with no foundation meaning competent people in congress will tell her this law is unconstitutional and strike it down.

Other things this dipshit ain't taking into account:

* Higher positions offer shit like: company car, credit card, health club, Bulls tickets, free legal help, etc.
* What's she gonna do WHEN, not if, but WHEN they leave the country?
* Or if they "gift" assets or "sell" assets to the tune of 1$ to someone else

Remember, these kids have a DAGREE from COLLAGE.
 
aaaaaaaaaaand a few hundred call center jobs.
More Poo-In-The-Loo imports don't count
He's some Formula 1 race car driver who was quite popular back in the late 2010s. He made some cameos in the Gran Turismo games starting with 5 and Sport.
he's a German F1 driver who retired because of climate change.
lol Silicon Valley getting weak with their bots if F1 racer no one really gives a shit about is the best they can come up with as a distraction.
 
Why are they circling the wagon this badly when they have to know people will not only notice they're circling the wagon, but that we are in a recession. We're regularly hearing news of layoffs or companies still having trouble getting back to pre-pandemic levels of employment, and this is ignoring higher energy prices and inflation. You have to either be stupid or disingenuous to believe the economy is doing fine under those circumstances.

Edit : Also as @Meat Target posted earlier, the AP is reporting other countries (France and Mexico) suffering from a recession. I'm quite sure practically any time Mexico was undergoing a recession, the US economy wasn't doing so hot either. Again I reiterate, you have to be extraordinarily stupid or disingenuous to not believe we're in a recession.
 
Why are they circling the wagon this badly when they have to know people will not only notice they're circling the wagon, but that we are in a recession.
They'd rather go down with the ship than admit they were wrong.

Scratch that, they want *you* to go down with the ship for the hull breach they created.

Watch the Chernobyl miniseries, the conflict between what everyone can see and what the Party says. The parallels between the Soviets then and the Democrats now are uncanny.

3-6-roentgen-not-great-not-terrible-imgflip-com-when-i-point-58013195.png
 
Why are they circling the wagon this badly when they have to know people will not only notice they're circling the wagon, but that we are in a recession.
Because the democrats spent the majority of the Trump administration raising and encouraging organizations in their cities to look for government injustices and inaction, raise a violent militia, and force change by any means, and set that loose when it was politically convenient. Now they're fucking over those very violent, very activist groups they raised, and are trying desperately to keep them in the dark less we get Occupy Wall Street 2: Antifa Boogaloo, with added mob violence. Except this time it will be through all these democrat heartland cities, at their own doors.

I'd be trying desperately to evade this by any means if I was in their position. They're the rich evil guy who starts fucking with his mercenary army and decides to not pay them. You know what happens eventually.
 
From this article, I think that even the laptop class is starting to wake up a little. Especially for being #1 on the LinkedIn news (not sure if it's curated or not, though I'm assuming it is).


View attachment 3539205

I think it's important to point out that even though the word is in scare quotes in the title, I don't think that would register to many readers. It's similar to how people put "allegedly" in headlines (even without quotes) because the reader has to remind himself that it may not be true (even I have to catch myself sometimes). So I think readers would, even if they ignored their lying wallets, still read it as without the quotation marks.

I included the full list to show it all. The Hulu article is that they're now including Democrat ads that talk about gun control, abortion, and climate change (whereas before they were either thrown out entirely or had it edited out).
Funny you mention the laptop class and their interest. Not gonna PL too much but yeah this is brought up by execs over and over in company meetings and talked about by directors below them in other meetings and has been all summer. Basically "brace for impact" being shouted internally and "Everything's fine" being displayed externally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back