- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want Odysee to succeed but it keeps fucking up and has trouble with larger streams like Nick's. I remember he tried it back in the day and it insta died with his audience back then which was much smaller. As for Rumble I'm surprised he hasn't tried that one more as it actually has some main stream adoption as even Reddit mentions them and that's as normie as they get. Rumble also has decent infrastructure, but maybe it's done some shit I haven't heard about.He hasn't touched Odysee or Rumble since he got the strike. Just to remind people that an audience exists on both sites.
Rumble:
View attachment 3550404
View attachment 3550403
Odysee:
View attachment 3550402View attachment 3550401
Switching off the youtube feed and having a spicy section of the show on alt-tech sure seems to be a model others can follow.
That made it worse!
I just assumed it was fake outrage designed to get Joe more sheckles. He is a Jew after all.Joe nierman starting off his chris chan stream getting pissed about Nicks ban.
The timing of this is interesting. Right when he's due to be self promoting at a con as a big time YouTuber- poof! Account is suspended. And at least through the length of Matsuri.
I think it's sarcasm. He said earlier he already has or maybe was holding it for their weekly meeting?I don't know how to read this. It's not his normal 'social media genius' sarcasm replay. Did he honestly not bother to contact his youtube person? The guys point is valid and being ghosted by your youtube contact is a bad sign.
View attachment 3552672
Nice Joe rant, makes it as much about himself as Rackets.
Joe uploaded his rant.
If they were smart they'd get tailored advertisers for the weirder and edgier shit.... even at a lower rate it beats kicking them off.Nice Joe rant, makes it as much about himself as Rackets.
The problem Rackets, Joe, Legal Mindset, etc. all have is they aren't YouTube's customers- for that matter, neither are the viewers. The advertisers are YouTube's customers. Advertisers don't like risqué content. At some point, it is inevitable this content will be gone from YouTube.
This is one area where Rumble differs, as a (decent?) chunk of their revenue comes from licensing video content to 3rd parties.
The Grift King could stream on other platforms but no, he prefers to be passive-agressive on twitter.I don't know how to read this. It's not his normal 'social media genius' sarcasm replay. Did he honestly not bother to contact his youtube person? The guys point is valid and being ghosted by your youtube contact is a bad sign.
View attachment 3552672
I mean, people have been saying pretty much this about Nick's streams for quite a while now. Hell I started following the thread because after one particular drunk stream, where he went into too much detail about his sexual preferences and proclivities, a suspension or ban seemed inevitable.Say what you want about Nick but I don't want him gone from Youtube because he's one of the few content creators left on that shitty platform that are actually entertaining now. I think people tend to forget that Youtube has not been so kind to the whole concept of edgy content ever since Donald Trump got elected back in 2016 and a lot of the Big Tech companies felt "morally obligated" to combat "hurtful content" in the process.
If you remember how Big Tech on the Internet used to be at the time, they were far more free and open compared to now; Youtube back then was where almost anything goes. Things like conspiracy theory videos that were made by Alex Jones and other similar content creators back then, content creators that would do outrageous things like TVFilthyFrank, and edgy right-wing shit like those old Moonman songs that used to thrive so much on Youtube back then and these days not anymore.
May I remind everyone here that this is the same platform that nuked LeafyIsHere and when he got the hammer that should already tell everyone that Youtube doesn't want this kind of content anymore. You just can no longer make fun of idiots on the Big Tech platforms in full detail anymore (such as Randy Stair or Eliot Rodger) because platforms like Youtube doesn't see that as ad friendly (this is why content creators like Mumkey Jones got the hammer and Mister Metokur was forced to stop making videos in his style). You can no longer built yourself on being an edgy content creator in general like Smosh in the old days or singing a ton of edgy shit like what Joji used to do in his TVFilthyFrank years. And finally you can no longer post any edgy /pol/-tier shit unless you want to get nuked off Youtube a week later. The list goes on.
The Youtube that everyone knew back then simply no longer exists anymore, those days are over and any ultra edgy content creators that are still on Youtube either haven't been caught by Youtube's moderation team yet or they try to play it safe by only playing by the rules as much as possible while also seeing how far they can push it.
Now if Nick Rekita does get full control of his Youtube channel soon then good for him but at this point this should be a sign that Big Tech isn't going to end their stupid censorship crusade soon and people should use the alternatives more when it is possible to do so. Big Tech is no longer kind to people like us anymore and at this point we should just accept that Big Tech just wants ad friendly normie shit on their platforms and we should just move on from them because Big Tech doesn't want to sell you a Toyota or an Xbox on a video that highlight's Chris-Chan's most insane antics anyway.
The thing is all of these parties are customers but Youtube wants to pretend that's not the case.Nice Joe rant, makes it as much about himself as Rackets.
The problem Rackets, Joe, Legal Mindset, etc. all have is they aren't YouTube's customers- for that matter, neither are the viewers. The advertisers are YouTube's customers. Advertisers don't like risqué content. At some point, it is inevitable this content will be gone from YouTube.
This is one area where Rumble differs, as a (decent?) chunk of their revenue comes from licensing video content to 3rd parties.
I'd disagree with that, although maybe an argument could be made for people who pay for youtube premium or red or whatever it's called.The thing is all of these parties are customers but Youtube wants to pretend that's not the case.
I totally get where you're coming from. How does that saying go? If the service is free that means you're the product?I'd disagree with that, although maybe an argument could be made for people who pay for youtube premium or red or whatever it's called.
The viewers of youtube are the product they sell to advertisers (or if you prefer, the viewer's demographic profile). The videos on youtube are content/product they sell advertisers on. Advertisers don't want to sell soap detergent, political campaigns or, in the US, pharmaceuticals, on "Unbreaded" videos.
Tonight's stream will be rage-fueled.Nick has been unsuspended
View attachment 3553679
lol the blue haired whale who suspended him definitely waited till after matsuri to undo it. Get fucked Nick, maybe now you'll start to build elsewhere.Nick has been unsuspended
View attachment 3553679