Opinion The Y2K Style Trend Isn't Fatphobic, Our Attitudes About it Are

Link (Archive)

The Y2K Style Trend Isn't Fatphobic, Our Attitudes About it Are​

894E6BC8-BDA7-4E11-AB44-C52304CA6E14.jpeg
I remember walking into the Juicy Couture outlet store like it was yesterday – a shiny, pink embodiment of the phrase “that’s hot.” It somehow felt inspiring and depressing all at the same time. As a then-awkward preteen with lumps and bumps in all of the “wrong” places, this store was everything that I wanted to be, but wasn’t.
D4A6FA11-4E1C-4A00-A78D-035DA993662C.jpeg
Juicy Couture wasn’t an outlier. The fashion trends of the early aughts — when low-rise denim and tight-fitting velour pants with words like sexy splayed across the back were the cool thing to wear — were often exclusive of teens with larger bodies. Whether the clothes didn’t come in our sizes, or magazines offered tips on how to lose weight to better fit the trends of the day, young people like me were often othered. Popular clothing at the time felt not just ill fitting, but like a statement on whether or not we belonged.

As Y2K style makes a comeback, many have decried the trends as fatphobic — low rise jeans and crop tops, some say, aren’t inclusive of fat bodies. Fatphobia was, certainly, part of the trend in the early 2000s. It was hard to watch a show, read a magazine, or just exist in the world without seeing some commentary on what kind of body was good, and that seemed reinforced by the clothes that were popular at the time.

But acknowledging that the origins of a fashion trend are inherently and historically fatphobic should not necessarily translate to never participating in them, especially if you want to. To me it means that we should participate in them as a small act of reclamation.
1CAC6946-5098-4474-8FBD-8D42D6B80EDC.jpeg69E839ED-893A-4EA9-AFC0-AA3B48FA9663.jpeg2EDA8626-A1AE-4719-B036-1AF3855CDF33.jpeg3F146445-81A1-4859-9C64-00F88E4D3E32.jpeg
Writer, host and creator of Big Calf podcast, Amanda Richards tweeted in May, “Do not talk to me about Y2K revival unless you’re willing to admit you’re nostalgic for a time when fat people were not allowed to have clothes." She continued, "Sure it seems like fun and games now, but the reality is that Y2K fashion was all about scanning a deLiA*s catalogue and then feeling like shit for approximately 10-15 years.”
7D2E84E7-8D44-43F5-9532-05AB88F36674.jpeg
In the early 2000s, fatphobia seemed like an unavoidable accessory to the trends we embraced. Not only were these items largely not available in our sizes, most fat teens would likely not have been accepted wearing them even if they had been. This is, in part, evidenced by the myriad articles directing young people on how to lose weight, tone their muscles, and adapt their bodies to the clothes teen magazines at the time sold. Or perhaps in the fatphobia common in TV shows, movies, and all other sorts of pop culture from that era. (All of this, of course, didn’t just impact fat teens, but contributed to negative body image in people of all sizes.)

Journalist Jess Sims wrote in Harpers Bazaar that the trends seemed to cater to a certain body type: ”Y2K fashion trends—with their emphasis on low-rise jeans; exposed thongs; and baby tees—were understood to celebrate a very specific body type, one generally found in teenaged girls,” Sims wrote. This, she argued, started many young women “unknowingly embarking on a lifelong pursuit of youth and thinness.”
3B445F2B-AAD4-4247-86AF-074F40F6E4BF.jpeg0B34D6F1-BDF3-4703-9F7D-7568CED5DE27.jpeg432C4C94-FEDB-45A2-B82F-B82226CAFA5D.jpeg06CF8C17-E9A8-42B1-9493-28F9AAFFF0FD.jpeg
Ads and runways showcasing the trends also sent another message. In an article called The Fatphobic & Racist Origins of Y2K Fashion Trends, Aishwarya Jagani cites Sabrina Strings in Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia, in which she explains how “Y2K fashion’s emphasis on thinness…erased the creative contributions of the Black community, attributing styles popularized by people of color to the white celebrities of the time.” The popular image of the day was of thin, white women, further limiting what society saw as beautiful.
EEC7D545-BCAD-4A62-A6AF-6D48E09BA33F.jpeg
Given the problematic history of Y2K fashion, the visceral reaction many online had to its resurgence is completely understandable. A ticker tape of past tabloid headlines boasting about how to lose weight fast, and how much weight the latest celebrity had gained (or lost) ran through our minds like rapid fire. Some quickly recalled dark memories of blatant fatphobia, racism, dangerously-thin runway models, as well as their own experiences with past eating disorders – all of which had been perpetuated by unrealistic media standards for years.

But, it’s not necessarily the clothes that were fatphobic and exclusive — it was, and continues to be, our attitudes about who was allowed to wear them.

Since the early aughts, we’ve made some progress in fat acceptance. Runways have become more diverse both in race and size; social media has opened the doors for fat bloggers and models; and it’s become less acceptable to include fatphobia in media.
E4821340-60F2-430F-8424-0CB3BAE6B282.jpegE8523430-CC51-4E26-B860-62393434E674.jpegE6E7C005-53D3-429C-B125-4CB88CF5952C.jpegF244F31B-3317-412C-9947-598AA8D5C3C0.jpeg
Of course, society hasn’t fully embraced fatness, or seeing certain clothing styles on different body types, which is further fueled by the limited media representation fat people get. The messaging is still not perfect, and fat people still face discrimination.
7EF82A96-A22E-4265-92CA-1BBF2D46CDB3.jpeg
But that’s exactly why we shouldn’t perpetuate it by policing trends based on who we think they look best on. Y2K trends aren’t inherently exclusive of fat people (as long as they come in our size), our ideas of who looks good in them are.

With that in mind, I’d like to think that we are now in a time of acknowledging our past traumas, and then reclaiming them on our own terms as a form of self therapy. As people living in fat bodies, we were excluded from so many things, for so long – the Y2K trend being one of them – and continuing to adhere to those narratives gives power to the systems that for so long excluded us.

It is our time — wear the damn crop top, because that’s really hot.
A8F7E2FA-E00A-4D82-93C9-8619DAF6932F.jpeg
 
How fitting that fashion is going back during a time when people legitimately thought the end of the world was around the corner.

Though, the clothes don't look too bad. The models though... fail to capture the spirit of Y2k. People back then weren't colossal lards of fat.

Fatphobia is unironically important.
You should fear becoming fat. Too much fat is harmful to you.
As somebody who worked at medical coding, I can confirm that being obese especially once you hit the age of 50 is when you become big pharma's bitch. Everyone at that time are guaranteed to develop heart problems and diabetes if they are that heavy.
 
Presumably the 2K refers to lbs?

The giant patchwork leggings seem to work on the pink blob, though. Maybe it's the exaggerated size of the squares creating an odd forced perspective?

At very least it's a range of clothing specifically for fatties in mind, rather than trying to cram them into human sized fashion. Please don't bring that hat back for men, though.
 
What is this Y2K style? Is it supposed to be a throwback to the 2000s?
Another excuse to make money by marketing + advertising to create fake trends so that tards buy them.

You have to understand that the average American spends around $160 PER month on clothing items. 2 Grand a year. There is so much shit that is not only overflowing the thrift stores but 3rd world countries.


Again as stated before. When people stop needlessly spending on useless crap and take that money they were going to spend and save it is when they become less of a wage slave.
 
At this point I think they just do it to get on the nerves of the skinnies.
lmao that's what they think. like "you're obsessed with me" when people are jackasses. They hate being fat and think if they deny it loud enough they'll start to love it. If you asked any of these assholes if they could wake up magically thin tomorrow, all of them would take it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
What low rise pants? The idiot children are back to wearing crop tops, which most of them shouldn't, but they're wearing high waists. I guess you'd have to get out of the house and walk through places to see that and that's a big ask for these fatties.

90s fashion was pretty sad after a point, but at least the girls wore jeans that fit and weren't fatties with disgusting ghetto huge asses. I remember the aughts being kinda dull in comparison. Also increasingly fat.

I remember the low rise pants and being made fun of by idiots on the train because my pants weren't low enough. I hate pants. But I always do mid rise since I find it the most comfortable. I have one pair of jeans and one pair of shorts and they are both mid rise. Since I haven't shopped in two years and most of my stuff is older I have no ideas what's "in" and don't care. But I never did.

Crop tops aren't for fatties. It's disgusting seeing them waddle around with their fupas waving around.

But I've seen a lot of black guts dressed like the guy with the butterfly shirt. Better than saggy pants. I don't need to know what kind of underwear you have on.
 
Yeah, Y2K fashion - even if you are of an average weight - is geared more towards anorexically thin women. Back then they had awful standards for clothing. As aesthetically pleasing as Y2K is, I doubt most girls feel comfortable wearing it if they are anything above a size 5. Which is many women. It's one of those things that just literally isn't mean for most people, especially if you're as fat as the women in the article.

If you're fat don't wear it then? It's pretty simple.
You have to understand that the average American spends around $160 PER month on clothing items. 2 Grand a year. There is so much shit that is not only overflowing the thrift stores but 3rd world countries.

I personally blame women, I buy expensive shit but rarely. I'm a sucker for my overly bedazzled jeans but I only buy them maybe once every 2 years.
 
All I see is fat chicks and a regular nigger guy. Fat chicks dressed in clothing they are too fat to wear. But I don't see how this is a new trend because fat chicks have always done that.

My mother always said this. You only have two choices, you either lose weight or buy bigger clothes. This 100% true. They have stores for fat chicks. There was one place in an old mall that's now torn down called Lady Bug or something like that. It was a fat girl store.

I don't remember anyone in the early 2000's dressing like this. Not even teenage girls. It's not like I only saw them in school where they couldn't get away with dressing like whores. None of them are even teenagers.

The clothes look like shit. Like overpriced shit. No matter who wore them they would look like shit.

The dirty blonde with the pink top on doesn't look bad. If she had better clothes, it would help a lot. But the one with the mongoloid face and hip hugging pants isn't even fat. Neither is the black guy.

It's very confusing.
 
If you're fat don't wear it then? It's pretty simple.
Not really. Many fashion trends from every era are loved, and no matter what people will want to adopt them, even if they're hambeasts. That's how it works.
 
Oh God, Oh Fuck; the G4 Fashion has returned!
3517B5C9-A7FB-4B5F-853D-C5E1F80CD03F.jpeg

The dark times have finally returned
 
In an article called The Fatphobic & Racist Origins of Y2K Fashion Trends
TIL naff 2000s fashion was more based than I remembered.

As someone who was there, I remember it all being about hyper-sexualisation - women wearing pubis-flashingly low pants to show off their thong and tramp stamp tribal tattoo, with tops with slogans like "slut" "babe" "pornstar" "angel" etc and everyone was complaining that they were dressing kids like that, too.
For all current year's wokery, we now just go straight to DD/LG and troon adult babies and act like it's progressive. But apparently the main issue is that the fats feel threatened by clothes not meant for them.
 
You know my parents bought me saggy shit because they said id grow out of them.
I never did.


Apparently they thought I'd be a hamplanet like these guys?
I'm insulted.
 
TIL naff 2000s fashion was more based than I remembered.

As someone who was there, I remember it all being about hyper-sexualisation - women wearing pubis-flashingly low pants to show off their thong and tramp stamp tribal tattoo, with tops with slogans like "slut" "babe" "pornstar" "angel" etc and everyone was complaining that they were dressing kids like that, too.
For all current year's wokery, we now just go straight to DD/LG and troon adult babies and act like it's progressive. But apparently the main issue is that the fats feel threatened by clothes not meant for them.
I think you are remembering the early 2000's around the fucked up Janet Jackson/Timberlake bullshit done on the Super bowl. From that point onward the powers that be, mainly socialists started their campaign on reducing our liberties namely this as a turning point.

You would think it would be conservatives would be pushing far more harder but that is not the case in the Entertainment Industry. Pretty much as long as it makes money in the media Shows like American Dad. Simpsons, Archer, Venture Brothers, etc will continue and/or have long tv runs.

The leftist Media are the same fuckers that destroyed/damage the ability of just communicating one to one. Segregation through communication.

Siting "Stranger Danger" to people is one example of the lies the Socialists produced. Already proven that a very large amount of kidnappings/murders/injuries to children is not done by the mythical Boogie Man. It's done by uncle Ben, meaning Family and/or someone that the child knows.

Here is another way socialists in Congress are trying to snuff out the ability to communicate with one or another in rural areas. A fucking Radio Tax.
https://www.wktv.com/news/local/con...cle_460679b4-c671-11ec-85a9-c734c1c88168.html

I told you people that they, the socialists in congress wants to turn you people into slaves.

Segregation by Taxation.

With enough taxes in place and laws to reduce travel by any means.

The middle class will eventually be reduced to almost nothing and the poor will be poorer.

Sexualization?? Shit. You haven't lived during the 60's to 80's. Far worse overall. The late 90's to early 2000's of clothing was really a marketing gimmick taking idea's and concepts mainly from the late 60's and 70's exploitation of everything. Which it looks like marketing is doing it again with their own variation.
 
Back