Disaster PhD Student Masturbated to Fantasy Child Sexual Abuse Material For “Research” - Surprisingly it's not a tranny... yet

1659998005319.png

An academic article published by a PhD researcher at the University of Manchester is raising concerns from child safeguarding experts after it was discovered the article was focused on the writer’s experience masturbating to fantasy child sexual abuse material.

Karl Andersson, a Swedish-born academic, is currently a PhD student at the University of Manchester in the Japanese studies department. According to his Researcher biography on the University’s site, his focus is on how “fans of subcultural comics in Japan experience desire and think about sexual identities.”

In April of 2022, an academic research paper written by Andersson was peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Qualitative Research. The paper, titled “I am not alone — we are all alone: Using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan,” outlines Andersson undertaking an “experimental method” of masturbating to shota pornography.

Shota, a shortened version of shōtarō complex, refers to comics, cartoons, and other forms of visual media which focus on young boys in erotic and sexualized situations. The boys are primarily depicted as prepubescent, often having hairless bodies and very small features, and may be engaged in romantic or sexual situations with other young boys or even adult men. Less commonly, the boys are shown in sexual situations with adult women.

The medium is largely regarded as a form of fantasy child pornography, and is illegal in many countries including Canada and Australia as a result. It is also considered illegal in the United Kingdom, where Andersson may reside.

“I wanted to understand how my research participants experience sexual pleasure when reading shota, a Japanese genre of self-published erotic comics that features young boy characters,” Andersson writes in his abstract, “I therefore started reading the comics in the same way as my research participants had told me that they did it: while masturbating.”

Andersson describes that he had masturbated exclusively to shota media for three months as part of his research. Andersson logged his masturbation sessions in a diary, excerpts of which he published in his paper.

In one, from September 2021, Andersson describes a shota comic he read and orgasmed to as featuring a young boy “sniffing” and “licking” the genitalia of another young boy after catching him masturbating in the bathroom. He concludes the excerpt by writing: “… and while waiting for the shot I came!”

While Andersson does not reveal the ages of the youth in the sexual comics, he does refer to them as “young boys.” Later in the paper, Andersson writes that “very young boy characters would greedily jump over the first cock that presented itself” in a description of some of the comics he read.

In another excerpt, Andersson writes: “Took long time before any action. I read everything and once they started undressing and comparing their cocks I came immediately. Vague memories of me and [name retracted] … What was exciting was definitely the whole atmosphere with two new friends who discover sex together. Something you only do once in life. … I was there, was one of them, not sure who, or wait a minute: I was Haru! The new boy. Whereas Ken was the active one, and the one who was sexy!”

Following the excerpt, Andersson states that he enjoyed the comic as he could “relate” it to his own experiences growing up, and ascribes the allure of shota to a sense of “nostalgia.”

Andersson goes on to describe that masturbating to shota provided a sense of “self-care” both for him and for other men who regularly indulged in this form of material.

“I experienced a sense of self-care, which I also call the ‘spa effect’, since I often felt so relaxed after these sessions that it reminded of going to a spa, or why not an onsen, a Japanese hot spring.” Andersson writes, continuing: “While my previous masturbation habits had been rather routine, masturbating to shota became more of a ritual: carefully choosing a [comic] (what am I in the mood for today?), creating a comfortable position in the bed, dozing off a bit afterwards – it was all part of the ritual.”

In the article, Andersson also states that drawn, 2D comics are not his preference and that he prefers 3D mediums, though does not elaborate on whether that means he also indulges in computer-generated fantasy child sexual abuse material of a similar theme.

Prior to publishing his article on shota, Andersson had made a documentary film on those who watch shota titled Unreal Boys. The film is described as featuring “three young men in Tokyo” who “explore the limits of fantasy through the comic genre shota, which features fictional boys in sexual situations.”

The film won two prizes, including one at the Kiev Film Festival.

On his YouTube channel Andersson regularly posts “hauls” of shota and other Japanese media he purchases. In one haul posted around Christmas 2021, he displays various comics he purchased, most of which featured an adult woman romantically or sexually interested in young boys.


In another video uploaded to his YouTube, Andersson insists shota does not represent pedophilic desire in Japanese culture, and it is only when it is “misread” or “taken out of context” that there are concerns.

Japan has been notorious for its lax approach to child sexual abuse material, with the country only having made the possession of photos and videos of actual children being raped illegal in 2014. At the time, those who possessed real child pornography were given a one year grace-period to dispose of it or face a fine and a short period in prison. Drawn and CGI depictions of child sexual abuse, including those of children of any age, is legal and widespread.

Japan is known as an international hub for the production of both child pornography and trafficked children. According to child safeguarding organization ECPAT International, the Japanese government regularly allows child exploitation cases to be suspended, and for suspects to walk free.

While Andersson claims in his research paper that “untangling [the] largely unresearched knot of desires for fictional boy characters will give us a better understanding of human sexuality and provide a more solid basis for policymaking,” child safeguarding experts are unconvinced.

Andersson’s article appears to be the latest in a marked increase in openly sympathetic views towards pedophilia and providing them access to “fantasy outlets” at the academic level, with multiple incidents being reported over the past year alone.

In October of 2021, a ‘non-binary’ assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, came under widespread scrutiny after going on a podcast to promote her book: “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity.” The podcast was hosted by Prostasia, a charity many consider to be “pro-pedophile.”

Copies of Walker’s PhD dissertation quickly began to circulate, showing Walker had entertained theories regarding allowing pedophiles to access “high quality child pornography” and other fantasy outlets in belief it may reduce offending. Prostasia, the group Walker was interviewing with, has also lobbied extensively to make or keep fantasy child sexual abuse material legal.

While there has been little research conducted on the impact of fantasy child sexual abuse material on actual offending, there is extensive evidence demonstrating a connection between the consumption of child sexual abuse material and the sexual abuse of real children.

According to one federal review, while only 12% of a sample of criminals charged with child pornography-related offenses had prior contact sex offenses in their official records, 55% self-disclosed that they had prior sexual contact with a child. Another study placed the latter figure at closer to 85%, another another places it at 76%.

Disturbingly, a 2009 study of men in treatment after being charged with receiving, possessing, or distributing child sexual abuse material found that while 74% of them had no prior criminal record for hands-on child sexual abuse, by the end of their 18-month program, 85% had admitted to having sexually abused a child in real life at least once.

Due to the illegality of fantasy child sexual abuse material in the United Kingdom, Reduxx reached out to Jordan Kenny, the manager of media relations for the University of Manchester, for comment on Andersson’s research but did not receive response in time for publication. This article will be updated in the event a statement is provided.

https://reduxx.info/phd-researcher-masturbated-to-fantasy-child-sexual-abuse-material-for-research/ (Archive)



Police investigate UK PhD student over masturbation study​


University of Manchester has suspended doctoral student as it assists police with enquiries

Greater Manchester Police have launched an investigation into a PhD student who used masturbation to erotic comics depicting young boys as a research method.

Karl Andersson, a PhD student at the University of Manchester, sparked a public outcry after publishing a controversial article on “using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan” in the Sage journal Qualitative Research.

Shota refers to comics and illustrations that, as the study described it, “feature young boy characters in a cute or, most often, sexually explicit way”. Some critics of the study have questioned the ethics as well as legality of viewing such materials in the UK, though it is not yet clear where the research was conducted.

Following the uproar, the article was first removed and then retracted by the journal. The University of Manchester has launched its own investigation into the matter.

A spokesperson for Greater Manchester Police confirmed that they had also opened an investigation. “We are working closely with the University of Manchester, who are assisting us with our enquiries to establish what, if any, offences have been committed,” they said. No arrests have been made.

The University of Manchester said it was assisting police with the investigation to establish if offences had been committed “in the UK or elsewhere”. The university added that it had suspended Andersson as a precautionary measure pending the outcome of its full investigation.

In a statement published on 22 August, the university said it had now completed the initial phase of the investigation.

“We are examining all aspects of the student’s work and academic supervision, the origin of the article, his prior background, the associated university processes for admission to our PGR programme and research conduct, and other questions that have been raised,” the institution said.

According to the university’s initial findings, some of the research described in the paper was conducted as part of Andersson’s Master’s degree course at Free University of Berlin. However, it adds that “there is contradictory information regarding when the period of self-immersive research activity took place”.

It adds that the basis for the article published in the journal was a paper for the course, ‘Topics in interdisciplinary queer studies: Autoethnography’ at the University of Stavanger, Norway.

Research Professional News has approached the University of Stavanger for comment. The Free University of Berlin declined to comment.

The University of Manchester added that the described research methodology and data collection for the study were not submitted to the institution for ethics approval and that the paper was not part of his supervised PhD programme of study.

Although Andersson was registered for a PhD at the university, it said the research design which he proposed for conducting the research for his PhD was rejected by the University Research Ethics Committee on 17 June 2022.

After the paper stirred controversy online, numerous people flagged up previous controversial work by Andersson, including his time running a magazine that published sexualised images of young boys.

The university said it was not aware of the background information on the student and that the case has “highlighted that we must ensure our PhD student recruitment processes are sufficiently robust to appropriately scrutinise the legal, ethical and safeguarding issues of the proposed research and applicants’ prior related activities where relevant”.

Research Professional News has approached Andersson for comment.

https://www.researchprofessionalnew...igate-uk-phd-student-over-masturbation-study/ (Archive)
 
Last edited:
Found the paper if anyone's curious. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14687941221096600

I know the social sciences are bad but its a fucking mystery to me how this motherfucker could have acquired PHD funding.
This moment right here:
2022-08-08 16.17.40 archive.ph 354e0f96e50a.png

Dude was thinking so much about the coom that he has since warped a childhood memory of his, and he now secretly wishes he did get to masturbate together which a friend of his from way back when.

Reminds me of that one crywank article about the woman who claims she didn't look up to an older girl like a sister-figure, but as someone she actually wanted to fuck because she's totes bi, yo. These people are not right in the head.
 
THIS IS NOT A STUDY

IT IS NOT.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT.

"I JERKED MY COCK TO LOLI" IS NOT A SUITABLE RESEARCH TOPIC.

FUCK YOU. YOU FUCKING SWEDISH NIGGER. YOUR PHD IS TOILET PAPER AND YOU ARE A HUMAN JOKE. NECK YOURSELF.

The humanities are a fucking massive joke and it is no wonder why we in STEM mock them mercilessly and consider every study they print absolute trash. Humanities are literally the worst, most inaccurate research I've ever fucking seen. Nothing they do can be reproduced, their ideas aren't backed up by anything and they barely even gather their own original fucking data anymore. Fuck everyone in it and once the money boom for their shit fields is over these 'PhDs' (and I use the term as loose as their assholes) are going to find themselves on the corner sucking tranny cock for rent until the local sharia patrol sodomizes them until they die.
 
THIS IS NOT A STUDY

IT IS NOT.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT.

"I JERKED MY COCK TO LOLI" IS NOT A SUITABLE RESEARCH TOPIC.

FUCK YOU. YOU FUCKING SWEDISH NIGGER. YOUR PHD IS TOILET PAPER AND YOU ARE A HUMAN JOKE. NECK YOURSELF.

The humanities are a fucking massive joke and it is no wonder why we in STEM mock them mercilessly and consider every study they print absolute trash. Humanities are literally the worst, most inaccurate research I've ever fucking seen. Nothing they do can be reproduced, their ideas aren't backed up by anything and they barely even gather their own original fucking data anymore. Fuck everyone in it and once the money boom for their shit fields is over these 'PhDs' (and I use the term as loose as their assholes) are going to find themselves on the corner sucking tranny cock for rent until the local sharia patrol sodomizes them until they die.
Well, now I have to scrap my thesis titled "I LIKE TO SCHMEAT MY MEAT TO BIG ASSES AND BITCHES IN FISHNETS".
 
Attaching documents. It doesn't seem to be paywalled at the moment, but that can change. I remember "Defining Trauma on Twitter" was free after people mocked it on Twitter for not being worth the research dollars, but then it became paywalled again after they thought people forgot about it.



As for my thoughts on the story... You know how in the early (pre) Gerson Fuentes threads people were questioning who nobody reported the case to the authorities and they questioned if the Ohio doctor even existed? Well I have basically the same question here. Nobody was concerned about the paper, the funding committee and the peer reviewers and the editor were all fine with this?

Granted, it's not like there's a victim here, nor are any of them mandatory reporters even if there were a victim... But seriously? Nobody thought twice about it?

The only thing that suggests that people realize this is not the poop they want to touch is the fact that there's no co-authors.
 

Attachments

Back