Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total voters
    610
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Wu, who now employs an assistant to document the online harassment she still receives, says that the FBI, as well as police in Boston and San Francisco, initially showed interest in her case. The Massachusetts attorney general investigated one man who tweeted, among other things, that he “personally sniped” 41 insurgents in Iraq, and was going to shoot Wu next.

But the AG concluded that the man, 20-year-old Jan Rankowski :deagleleft::jace:, was not mentally stable enough to prosecute, Wu says. And while the FBI did assign a special agent to her case, they eventually passed it on to state prosecutors and the attorney general’s office, who have not yet pursued charges. Documents show that law enforcement officials visited the homes of several of Wu’s tormentors, only to conclude that they were underage and leave them with a warning. Last May, Wu and her husband sent a desperate email to the agent assigned to her case, complaining that “we feel like we are sending emails into the void” and that “we do not have any faith that the FBI is interested in helping our family.”"

story.jpg
 
Last edited:
Only the ones who go directly to the FBI before the local cops.
Wouldn't it be a federal crime if the internet was used to send actual, believable death threats? It would've been passed on to the FBI regardless.

Not defending Wu, but that's a minor thing.
 
Wouldn't it be a federal crime if the internet was used to send actual, believable death threats? It would've been passed on to the FBI regardless.

Not defending Wu, but that's a minor thing.
They most likely would have no jurisdiction, which is why when she whined ti the FBI about it they sent it where it belonged.

Federal government has little jurisdiction over criminal offenses. They can be asked to provide expertise.
 
They most likely would have no jurisdiction, which is why when she whined ti the FBI about it they sent it where it belonged.

Federal government has little jurisdiction over criminal offenses. They can be asked to provide expertise.
I can't see that. Just wondering, because sending threats over state lines would make it a federal offense though, right? Why would the FBI have no jurisdiction in cases where credible threats are being made?

Again, not saying Wu isn't full to the brim with shit, just curious.
 
Real question: does the Washington Post even employ a fact checker?
That's incredibly shoddy work that I hesitate to even call journalism.
At least label it is an editorial or opinion piece.

CNN did a similar fluff piece on John late last year and repeated all of the same bullshit.
It really makes me wonder, honestly.
 
I can't see that. Just wondering, because sending threats over state lines would make it a federal offense though, right? Why would the FBI have no jurisdiction in cases where credible threats are being made?

Again, not saying Wu isn't full to the brim with shit, just curious.
No, they really don't have jurisdiction. If it involves anything other than regulating commerce between states, specific civil rights stuff (required a constitutional amendment for that), crosses the US border, or involves non-state and not otherwise sovreign territory they have little power.

States are actual states, it isn't just an American misuse of the term. They just ceded extranational power to a central authority. States even have their own militaries.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CWCissey
No, they really don't have jurisdiction. If it involves anything other than regulating commerce between states, specific civil rights stuff (required a constitutional amendment for that), crosses the US border, or involves non-state and not otherwise sovreign territory they have little power.

States are actual states, it isn't just an American misuse of the term. They just ceded extranational power to a central authority. States even have their own militaries.
Alright, I'm convinced. Much obliged!

http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/700102425496199168

What's the context here? Looks like a reply to a deleted tweet by Wu.

Is that the "Bernie supporters are probably all mysoginists/horrible people" brush that I just heard painting a picture in the background?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Luminous Being
One thing I was considering - If she always has the power to complain to someone to get accounts deleted, posts hidden, people banned etc, what if we paid for advertising on an SJW / similar site, or a site that brianna is fond of / frequents / can't live without, and upload some true and honest factoids, linking back to her lolcow page?

"Apples & Oranges <3"

briannawuis.jpg


"John W. Flynt: 100% Fuckin' Verified"

shereallyis.jpg


and my personal favourite -

"Feed the monster, win IPHONE 6!"

nyquil.jpg
Truly amazing. Same obnoxious font that all ads use too!
But you could do more! Tweak 'em a bit to have little tidbits of info like
*Racist past!* *Harassment Baiting!* Brianna Wu IS John W. Flynt! *Never graduated college!* *Commited RAPE under false pretenses!*


I definitely agree, there's so much more to be gained by exposing Wu as a shitty person rather than insulting her.
3d tits and asses make John uncomfortable because they have what John doesn't have and can never have.
Wow, this makes you wonder if John and Frank actually fell in love, or John just married him to snake his way into Frank's money.
For someone who hates tweeting about GG, he sure does love to milk it for all it worth:

View attachment 73781
No, GG brings facts to the discussion. You're just pissed that anyone with eyes can see that you ARE John Walker Flynt.
...Speaking of the Twitter Trust and Safety council, I have a suspicious feeling that the reason why John was rage-tweeting a while ago was because he wasn't included in it.
 
You know what I find the worst part of this? It's at least partly true.

Because lets face it, there's plenty of sexism in the gaming community that should be addressed, and I have no doubt that some of the "harassment" claims are indeed very true and in some cases even serious.

But before we continue, lets do a Godwin. Those are always fun.

Anyone ever heard of the German corpse factory myth? During the first world war there were widespread rumours of German troops committing all sorts of atrocities: rape, pillaging, looting, you know, the usual. Two of the most famous are crucifixion of British soldiers and the myth that the Germans had factories to corpses to soap and oil. It's often said that these rumours were initiated by the British government to increase the anti-German sentiment, but I'm not sure if that's actually true. But they sure as hell never did anything to waylay these patently false rumours and they were wildly printed in newspapers of the day as truth. Much of the public believed these fairly outlandish myths because, why would they lie about it? Why wouldn't it be true? It was a more naive time...

After the war the truth came out, and people were rightfully enraged. Much of the British public wasn't a big fan of the war effort after some spectacular losses early in the war, and the public pretty much got lied to in order to sucker them into the war (sounds familiar, doesn't it).

Now, fast forward 25 years and there was another war going on. This time the Germans really were the "bad guys" (unlike the first world war, which is a lot more murky), and when the German extermination camps started churning in 1942 there were again, rumours. But this time, the public was a lot more skeptical as they remembered the lies from the previous war. Some of the stories sounded really overblown and incredible, just like the stories from the first world war. Note that this applies to both the British *and* German population. Das habe ich nicht gewusst (I did not know) was for the most part true. Allied troops showed footage of the camps in movie theatres after the war, and it was mandatory for all Germans to attend. To make sure everyone knew this wasn't yet another rumour spread by the British government.

Would things have turned out different if the lies of the first world war hadn't occurred? Maybe, maybe not. But I feel that it's entirely likely that millions of lives could have been saved.

How does this relate to Brianna Wu? She also lies to gain support. Most likely some of it is true, but at this point it's difficult to tell what exactly. In lying (which she's not even very good at) she is really fucking over her own community. The next female gamer (or game dev) that really *IS* being stalked by some pathetic basement dwelling sperg will not be taken serious; "yeah, yeah, another Wu". And yes, there have been cases of internet stalkers killing people. Every time someone talks about sexism in video games eyes worldwide roll and thing "yawn, another Wu". And yes, sexism is video game community is real.

The best thing anyone interested in stopping sexism and harassment (and I'm one of those left-wing liberal bleeding heart assholes who cares) is to disown Brainna Wu as loud and clear as possible and then never ever talk about her again. I'll restrain myself so I'll be polite, but I have nothing but disdain for this pathetic cunt who rapes her own community for selfish personal gain. This is why she's an order of a magnitude worse than CWC or Nick Bates or any of those unhinged assholes with several personality disorders if you ask me.

So there. I've said my piece.

You raise a good point in that Wu is essentially a walking advertisement for her opposition. However, there is some really good, categoric examples of how much of a liar she is. I've had to essentially re-write her Lolcow Wiki article upwards of 10 times just for massive corrections about details of her life. But the harassment lies? That's the easy part. No one's doubting that Wu's received some harassment, because practically everyone has. Now that said, let's go and cross out the following:

1. Any "harassment" Wu has received in response to something inflammatory she has said and/or done, or for tragedy-milking. Wu is notorious for this, and I'm sorry, but if you act like a shithead online, then you don't get to claim harassment when you're called out for being said shithead. This means shit like this, the Trans Samus Incident, Oppressed Gamergate Meme, etc do not count.

T16QFfL.png

2. Any "harassment" Wu has received on the part of organized trolling communities and groups. There goes the Crash Incident and Chatterwhiteman Incident. Similarly, there goes Brianna Wu being forced to leave her home (which was categorically disproven for a very different reason). These are attempts by assholes to troll. Wu knew that SA was responsible for the Crash incident less than ten minutes in; she still claimed it was from "Gamergate" and acted like it was a legitimate thing for fucking days.

:jaceknife:
3. Anything related to Jace does not count. Wu knew about Jace (and Tyce) being a fucking hoax almost a month before the incident blew up due to her having conversations with Null about it. She still proceeded to treat Jace like a legitimate threat to her life, to the point where she harped on about him for close to a year after he was exposed as being nothing more than a hoax. Again, she knew it was shit well in advance, still decided to run on it, and got called out by it by pretty much everyone worth a damn (when Gamerghazi calls you out on your shit, you know you fucked up. With Jace out of the picture, the PAX East Incident is gone too.

And with this said:

But the AG concluded that the man, 20-year-old Jan Rankowski, was not mentally stable enough to prosecute, Wu says. And while the FBI did assign a special agent to her case, they eventually passed it on to state prosecutors and the attorney general’s office, who have not yet pursued charges. Documents show that law enforcement officials visited the homes of several of Wu’s tormentors, only to conclude that they were underage and leave them with a warning.

Can this be confirmed?

If Wu went to the FBI, then I'm secretly providing @BOLDYSPICY! with peppermint schnapps.

She has this little problem with Law Enforcement, you see, in that she has almost never fucking contacted them. It's not hard to see why, either: Wu'd have to make her case as to why, when she knew a case was from SomethingAwful or a known troll (and we have her dead to rights on Jace; Null contacted her directly), she still actively attempted to profit off it (illegal in many states). We know from contacting several police groups that Wu is not on file with filing a police report at all beyond the first one for Chatterwhiteman, and that nothing ever came of that one because Wu herself fucking publicized it (the exact opposite of what one is supposed to do).

PXZOFpK.jpg

4. Any case of Brianna Wu being caught trolling herself does not count. This includes the Steam False-Flagging and Operation FalseFag II.

What this leaves us with are minor trolls, and hardly something Wu can market for victimbux. This is why Wu is considered a fucking asshole even by Anti-GG standards.
 
Last edited:
I can't see that. Just wondering, because sending threats over state lines would make it a federal offense though, right? Why would the FBI have no jurisdiction in cases where credible threats are being made?

Again, not saying Wu isn't full to the brim with shit, just curious.

For the FBI to get involved, with a few exceptions that mostly involve children age 12 and under, the agency must be investigating a violation of federal law. Flynt/Wu's claims involve violations of state laws.

Flynt/Wu -- as a vastly experienced investigative journalist -- might also want to familiarize himself with Elonis v. United States before continuing with his ridiculous claims.

Personally, I doubt that Flynt/Wu has actually contacted law enforcement because of the nuclear fallout that would lay waste to his mountain of false claims when it was discovered how many of the threats were actually the work of his allies and of Flynt/Wu himself. It is also absolutely certain that Flynt/Wu does not want to be deposed by a defense attorney and have "aka Brianna Walker Flynt, aka John Walker Flynt" appearing on any legal documents. And Flynt/Wu's credibility would be an issue in court because of his trainload of online lies about everything from being born a woman to having academic degrees in journalism and economics and computer science to his job history in the tech industry.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back