Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
For the record, having a father and a present father figure isn't enough for a woman to grow up sane. I've seen many deranged feminists who grew up with their fathers and speak of having a good relationships with them. Of course, that's what they say because such fathers were too permissive or maybe created impossible standards for them, which is the reason why they hate any other man who isn't the father that spoiled them. Shoe's problem could be a bit of this, a dad who never told her "no".

honestly been years since ive seen anything about her how is she getting by with such little content?
It's called being a woman. IICR, Sargon pointed this out at her once when she said how easy it'd been for her to reach 1M subscribers while Sargon wasn't yet there despite all the effort he puts on his videos and content. He isn't wrong: you might not like him, but he does put some effort when he used to make his videos, unlike most female political commentators whose content was bland and nothing that wasn't already said by another man before them.

She has not. Called it a "side kink" once.
Yes, but there is a chance that she might have changed her mind about this. I honestly doubt Shoe is a pedo enabler, she does think it's wrong. I think she could have been mistaken being a real pedo with people who simply have young/old fantasies, who aren't necessarily pedos themselves.
 
Yes, but there is a chance that she might have changed her mind about this. I honestly doubt Shoe is a pedo enabler, she does think it's wrong. I think she could have been mistaken being a real pedo with people who simply have young/old fantasies, who aren't necessarily pedos themselves.
difficult to say with how different the term is defined in different social circles

like, theres a world of difference between someone fucking a 16 year old and someone fucking a 6 year old, but some people just call em both "pedo" like it's the same thing
occasionally you even see people cry pedo when they see a 40 year old get with a 20 year old
 
Shoe's whole audience is "simps who aren't like those other simps." A simp is defined by masochism and a lack of self-respect, so her rolling her eyes and spitting at them, "Go make money and die in a war!" is like throwing red meat to a dog. They don't mind that she just lazily shitposts takes that are more than a decade old at this point such as: nice guys aren't actually nice! And: the 1% should pay their fair share!

It's funny that she tells her audience of sad dudes to follow the tradcon path of making money and dying in war while she herself doesn't follow the tradcon values of being a good wife and mother. The opposite, in fact: unmarried at 32, she builds a whole e-girl persona around using her looks to extract money from men on the Internet. Conservatives have a term for this sort of woman.

It's difficult to pin down how much she's making, but I'd estimate like $2400 a month at most on patreon because her average pledge rarely exceeded $3 / month and she currently has about 870 pledges:

shoeonhead earnings guess.jpg


After taxes and patreon's cut, I'd say that number is probably significantly lower. She might believe that she can take losers' money without also taking their loser energy. Is she correct? Only time will tell!
 
She has not. Called it a "side kink" once.
View attachment 3599340
Source is the Brittany Venti video because askfm is long dead and I can't be bothered looking for an archive.
The only reason she was early on the MAP train was because she was trying really hard to make up for this awful take and divert people's attention.

Now, is her skinwalking superficial and is she still is/always was a coombrain even before Skeptic, or does she absorb all the properties of the man she has sex with, which get replaced when she changes the man, which means she truly doesn't believe this anymore? Only time will tell, but I don't think I will ever see her as not a pervert.

Side kink pedophilia? wtf lol, I was going to say I might be warming back up the Shoe after all these years of ignoring her but this raises an eyebrow. She's definitely sounding less retarded these days especially on the MAP thing. I remember watching that Venti video and must of missed that, raising a brow to Venti as well to tbh, she be doing a bit of Flamguarding and Cumia guarding lately lol.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NOT THE BEEEEES!
There’s a way for her to shut up but you would have to pay 50k a month
There is another way.
Side kink pedophilia? wtf lol, I was going to say I might be warming back up the Shoe after all these years of ignoring her but this raises an eyebrow. She's definitely sounding less retarded these days especially on the MAP thing. I remember watching that Venti video and must of missed that, raising a brow to Venti as well to tbh, she be doing a bit of Flamguarding and Cumia guarding lately lol.
IIRC the context of the "side kink" comment was a response to an even-more-braindead take from one of the usual lolcow crybullies that for two adults in a relationship with a LG/DD motif or similar (or, even more generally/braindead, two adults with an age gap larger than what the woke-neopuritan pearl-clutcher considers proper) the older one is being pedophilic.
So, though you've never demonstrated, expressed, or even have any interest in kiddie diddling, if your boyfriend wears short pants or your girlfriend occasionally puts her hair in pigtails and you still find them attractive, we all know clearly you secretly want to rape children.
 
IIRC the context of the "side kink" comment was a response to an even-more-braindead take from one of the usual lolcow crybullies that for two adults in a relationship with a LG/DD motif or similar (or, even more generally/braindead, two adults with an age gap larger than what the woke-neopuritan pearl-clutcher considers proper) the older one is being pedophilic.
So, though you've never demonstrated, expressed, or even have any interest in kiddie diddling, if your boyfriend wears short pants or your girlfriend occasionally puts her hair in pigtails and you still find them attractive, we all know clearly you secretly want to rape children.

Apologies if I'm incorrect, but did she not defend Gregory for saying ephebophilia and hebephilia was a normal thing?

I don't see why people are defending her whatsoever, or believe she only condones pedophilia for moralistic reasons instead of the fact that she wants to be the child. She wasn't "early" on the MAPtrain, it was a topic that came out just around the time she was talking about it. How many times did she shit on women older than 30 in her 20's, and would flat out defend hypergamy? Some people on here act as if she doesn't seek out to be as young as possible for years, as if she didn't seek looking "smol" and cute. I sent proof earlier that shows pedophiles do take interest in "legal" outlets, as to where they do seek out women who act and look young. Pedophiles and sex offenders aren't inherently exclusive, and a lot of them DOES use these legal outcomes. Though, I am not saying simple attributes like "pigtails" add to it, however I am saying that if someone does seek out these types of behavior, say the "ddlg" behavior, the entire dogma that boils down to acting as a child, as ddlg quite literally means daddy dom/little girl, while they may not be pedophiles, they are auto pedophiles. People who enjoy acting like a child and finds that sexually appealing? Yes, that's an actual paraphilia.

June is a 30 year old woman doing this. She is no longer a 20 something year old with stunted child development. She's a grown ass woman who should at least, at the very least have a stable career or education, and if neither of those, then a family, but she has none of it.

Don't forget, if she can accept pedophiles like vaush, who is notorious for his pedophilic optics, and other pedophiles and can be quiet about it, just because she goes on a moral crusade about it, does not exempt her from secretly befriending them and being quiet about it. She has no backbone, she doesn't actually give a fuck about pedophiles.


I'll link it again.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (1808).png
    Screenshot (1808).png
    621.1 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:
I'm not sure why, when your take had already been pre-emptively identified as braindead neopuritanism, you felt the need to share it as if repeating it would make it less braindead.
It's puritanism to point out an existing paraphilia such as autopedophilia exists and a 30 year old woman that takes interest into DDLG is an indicator of it? Autopedophilia is a paraphilia of someone who takes pleasure into acting like a child. If you get off to women who act or look like children, or if you are an adult woman who gets off to acting like a child to your older daddy dom boyfriend, so be it, but don't go out years later going on a bandwagon for some clicks and views. She's just as bad, if not worse for shaming random multiple women for their age, posting them, etc, and she finally can no longer use her age as a scapegoat. She made her bed, she can lay in it.
 
Last edited:
I for one find it refreshing to see June shit on incels for once, although I am surprised. Maybe she's just getting a bit blackpilled by being considered an "old eggless whore" in the eyes of those very incels she used to defend. Maybe by the time she is 40 and still single she will be a full on man-hater.
This would be the good ending
 
There is another way.

IIRC the context of the "side kink" comment was a response to an even-more-braindead take from one of the usual lolcow crybullies that for two adults in a relationship with a LG/DD motif or similar (or, even more generally/braindead, two adults with an age gap larger than what the woke-neopuritan pearl-clutcher considers proper) the older one is being pedophilic.
So, though you've never demonstrated, expressed, or even have any interest in kiddie diddling, if your boyfriend wears short pants or your girlfriend occasionally puts her hair in pigtails and you still find them attractive, we all know clearly you secretly want to rape children.
lol

If a couple I know partake in lgdd or they like to dress and act like children/teens when having sex, then they ain't babysitting my kids.. nnope fuck that!. Putting full trust in people like that is irresponsible as a parent, do I know if they will do anything, of coarse not, but why would I take that chance no matter how small it is. If that makes me a "braindead lolcow crybully woke neopuritan pearl clutcher" then so be it.

Anyway

I really don't know what to make of Shoe, she makes public and strong anti MAP statements which is sorely needed right now, but at the same time has her own kinks, and is friends with people who are soft on Pedo/hebe stuff. I don't know man it's all kinda fucked, like someone said, women have a tendency to just agree and support whatever her man say's, suppose we'll just need to let it play out and hopefully get a giggle out of it along the way.
 
Shoe's last 3 relationships have been:

1. A man who openly flirted with other women (and traps), walked all over her, was very public about how submissive she was sexually, and broke up with her when she turned 30 after stringing her along for years
2. A catfish that leaked all her nudes
3. A schizophrenic trad cath that sees demons

While I agree with her that generally "girls don't like nice guys" is a cope, it's clearly true with Shoe.
I mean as savagely hypocritical as she is does make a good point in some regards, men should man up and stop expecting being ‘nice’ or functional should grant them rights in any way. Some women do not care and would rather have someone who’s more charismatic and interesting than having basic nice guys, relationships are immensely more complex than that.
 
Come on, Shoe is too dumb to discuss human sexuality and the shades between what's normal roleplay and criminal action.

And Greg too.

When a child starts their sexual development into adulthood, it starts to become attractive to the opposite sex. That's why a 15 years old boy finds a 15 years old girl attractive rather than a 10 years old and vice versa. For an adult though, this is still an early development to feel actual sexual attraction. Of course, a man could still see a young woman and recognise she's attractive. But that's as much, and it's not normal, Gregory.
 
Back