Alejandra Caraballo / Alex Caraballo / @Esqueer_ - Twitter trans rights activist, cyberlaw teacher who doesn't understand cyberlaw, mass flaggot, humiliated in congress by a real woman.

Help me here, for I do not speak Troonglish.

WTH does "stochastic" mean to these morons, anyway? I thought it meant something "random", which is weird to apply to
something that you think is organized nefariously. Or maybe "technical", as in "Alejandro's assholes are stochastically open for business 24-7, but sometimes he dilates the front one, and it may not be in service at the moment."

Also, where the fuck are you getting that this is an "inside job" at BCH, Alejandro? You think no one else could possibly call someone there, or what?
It's a catchphrase adopted from the loonier side of "scientific trannyism" like "bimodal distribution" and shit. Originally it referred to lone wolf attacks which are mostly unpredictable and it evolved to mean "demonization of X might incite some random lunatic to commit a lone wolf attack against X". I think the endgame here is to widen the definition of hate speech to "everything I don't like" on the grounds of "because it might lead to someone getting attacked".
 
WTH does "stochastic" mean to these morons, anyway?
Like most of the dumbshit words these quasi-literate clowns use, it means listen to me, me smrt. "Stochastic terrorism" is a term in the libtardsphere for defaming someone in a way that makes people want to go kill them, in the hopes of encouraging a lone wolf attack on them.

When you publicly announce your intention of grooming kids while simultaneously trying to outlaw accurately describing what you're doing by banning the words used to describe it, you're the one calling out a hit on yourself, though.
 
Help me here, for I do not speak Troonglish.

WTH does "stochastic" mean to these morons, anyway? I thought it meant something "random", which is weird to apply to
something that you think is organized nefariously. Or maybe "technical", as in "Alejandro's assholes are stochastically open for business 24-7, but sometimes he dilates the front one, and it may not be in service at the moment."

Also, where the fuck are you getting that this is an "inside job" at BCH, Alejandro? You think no one else could possibly call someone there, or what?
stochastic terrorism is when you call me him
 
Matt Walsh is on notice if he continues to try to get his Nazis to burn down a children's hospital:
View attachment 3597506View attachment 3597508

For someone's who's address is public, Caraballs-o sure seems to think people won't protest outside his condo too.

All these pedos had to do was stay away from children. Now people are fighting back. I don't condone or encourage violence, but I will absolutley laugh when one of these predators gets buried because they kept trying to hurt children.
 
Help me here, for I do not speak Troonglish.

WTH does "stochastic" mean to these morons, anyway? I thought it meant something "random", which is weird to apply to
something that you think is organized nefariously. Or maybe "technical", as in "Alejandro's assholes are stochastically open for business 24-7, but sometimes he dilates the front one, and it may not be in service at the moment."

Also, where the fuck are you getting that this is an "inside job" at BCH, Alejandro? You think no one else could possibly call someone there, or what?
If they said libsoftiktok is literally terrorism you'd go "lol wut" but if they call it "stochastic terrorism" you're supposed to go "omg ur rite BAN THEM" as if this changes anything. The extra word lets them claim that while libsoftiktok doesn't itself participate in terrorism that's only for plausible deniability, instead libsoftitktok simply identifies targets and then others who can read the secret dog whistles (like Alex) know that libsoftiktok is saying "go do terrorism now" and then people obey. And they know people they dislike are always constantly doing this because everyone they dislike wants nothing else but murder of anyone different from them, that's the only thing these immoral people think of, they're obsessed with murdering others.

You can't simply outlaw speech, and people are still skeptical of the claim that speech can be violence, but if you say speech will incite violence then you're getting somewhere. So they, without any evidence, simply claim that speech they don't like will inevitably lead to violence and thus must be restricted. If you ask for proof then you're simply willing to allow people to LITERALLY DIE by terrorism when merely restricting the speech can SAVE LIVES. Like always, since they can't make an argument on the merits they jump to accusing others of murder and hope enough people will act emotionally in disgust without questioning if murder is actually involved in anyway. If you disagree then you literally have blood on your hands because you're complicit in allowing the murders to happen even if they don't ever actually happen you're still making them possible.
 
Big thread trying to explain how the right's "word game" in the troon discourse is based on misinformation and lies, ends the thread by calling HRT "life-saving" :story:
View attachment 3597271
(Link) (https://archive.ph/aba65)

View attachment 3597281
(Link) (https://archive.ph/63b40)

View attachment 3597283
(Link) (https://archive.ph/gJSfB)

>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE
>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE
>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE
>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE
>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE
>LEAVE TRANS YOUTH ALONE

Same energy
wtf-jpg.3112495
"These people are absilute ghouls"
Says the guy who mocked a suicide victim and routinely supports initiatives to end women's spaces. Don't let that melon head get filled up, you know.
 
Daily Florida seething: This time he's angry that Jeremy Redfern, the press secretary for the Florida Department of health told a quack to stop trooning out minors:
1660689675114.png1660689691347.png
1660690212381.png1660690227324.png
Tweet | Archive

1660690294628.png1660690681345.png
Tweet | Archive

>"decided to mock Michael O'Brien after locking down his twitter account b/c of threats he received after being QRT by Libs of Tiktok. He's being paid by taxpayers to do this".

Getting paid tax-payer money to bully trannies and quacks on the Internet. Jeremy Redfern is truly living the dream.

>"All professional courtesy has gone out the window".

LMAO! Alex of all people complaining about people being someone else being unprofessional.
 
Interesting lawsuit, what's alleged?

1660692179418.png


lol about bragging about a lawsuit you "worked on" (aka were in the same building as someone who actually worked on it) because it wasn't immediately dismissed in its entirety:
1660692464981.png


Also, Alex doesn't mention that the lawsuit was citing published statements made by the Director of the Office of Civil Rights, not some irrelevant press secretary arguing on Twitter. Alex is attempting to argue that statements made by someone engaged in PR who doesn't decide policy should be an indication of the motivations of policymakers. To support this argument that the statements of B are evidence of the motivations of A, he's pointing to a case that went nowhere where smarter lawyers pointed to actual statements by the head policymaker.
 
wait so did alex just defame matt walsh by knowingly tweeting a false screenshot? he should have consulted with a lawyer before making such a legally risky tweet. well, a good lawyer at least.
Anyone who puts Esq. after their name is usually a black and terrible at law. Niggas get their law degree from Southern, lease a Mercedes Benz, and add , Esq. as soon as they can.
 
Alex is a stochastic terrorist confirmed.
"Stochastic terrorism" is quickly becoming the go-to term for people who didn't pay attention to the "what did the author mean when he wrote this?" part of English class, because this is some special-ed tier reading comprehension:
View attachment 3609553
(Link) (https://archive.ph/5l3id)
What a bad take in-between fisting lesbians, Eli.
 
"Stochastic terrorism" is quickly becoming the go-to term for people who didn't pay attention to the "what did the author mean when he wrote this?" part of English class, because this is some special-ed tier reading comprehension:
View attachment 3609553
(Link) (https://archive.ph/5l3id)
It'd probably be easier for alleged rapist Eli Erlick to list the things he doesn't consider stochastic terrorism. Like rape apparently.
 
I'm a faggot myself but nothing brings me more joy than Twitter troons, but especially Alejandro, having daily shitfits over "anti-LGBT" laws being passed. Like you can really tell this traggot is actually in fits of rage and despair over the faint, distant possibility that drag queens might not be allowed to flaunt their genitals in front of children in one singular state. Trannies blackpilled me so hard that I would sacrifice every right that gay people have if it meant that transitioning became completely illegal everywhere and for all ages . Sneed and seethe, Alejandro.

Edit after catching up: Very excited to see the Matt Walsh x Alemandro crossover arc. I would love nothing more than to see them engage in Twitter spats perpetually, especially if one of them doubles down and actually does take legal action. Which btw, still cannot believe that this chronically online retard who seems to spend every waking hour Twittersperging is an actual lawyer. Society is doomed.
 
Last edited:
When your entire identity and sense of self, and even what you call your existence depends on whether society continues to uphold an obvious lie, having people refuse that lie must feel like annihilation. I think that's what is behind the increasingly desperate authoritarian tantrums being thrown by people like Alex and Erin.

Like, probably all of us have gotten way too worked up about someone who was wrong on the internet once or twice, but at the end of the day we can shrug it off and go about our lives. But these men have spent years convincing themselves that their happiness and identity and their physical safety depends on everybody but the most silent and powerless in society accepting that humans can change sex, and that children can be born with souls that erroneously migrated into the wrong body (and thus that transing children is an uncomplicated moral good). They're unhinged and screeching for the authorities to do something because any evidence of opposition to any part of the gender system is like a physical threat.
 
Alex celebrating an anti-grooming account getting banned:
1660751722471.png
Tweet | Archive

And people wonder why Twitter troons gets called "groomers".


More Alex vs Matt Walsh. Alex deleted the fake Facebook post screenshot, but still finds a way to double down and claim that he is somehow a threat:
1660752420075.png1660752460329.png
Tweet | Archive
>"That being said, Matt Walsh still defended Josh Duggar in the Blaze after allegations first surfaced, so it was not that farfetched".

Alex is a noted Keffals (Lucas Roberts) simp. Lucas is a groomer. With this in mind along with him celebrating an anti-grooming account, it's not to farfetched to assume that Alex is a groomer or at the very least pro-grooming.

>"I'm not going to purposefully spread misinformation. Like I said in my previous post about BCH. We are better than them".

We all know the only reason he deleted is because Matt Walsh made a creditable legal threat against him. If he didn't, Alex would have no problem spreading a false accusation against someone like Matt Walsh.

>"'I've been effective in calling out his campaign of harassment and intimidation against LGBTQ people driven by his hatred of us".

His main interactions with Walsh have been him getting into a slap fight with him, losing said slap fight, and then crying to Lucas to get him to "ratio" Walsh to make himself feel better. Only thing Alex is effective at his stroking his own ego.
 
Last edited:
Back