Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
You were having a borderline panic attack during a simple conversation, and now want to pretend you're some kind of smooth-talking genius.
So yeah, hubris fits.

Do I need to respond to the "miniature essay" remark, or can I just expect you to know why that's hilariously hypocritical?

See, they always say that shit, but then shit starts happening and you throw a little tantrum.
To be clear, I don't really expect you to do anything different, I just figured you should know how this has gone for the last dozen idiots who've tried it. That way, you'll have little to complain about later.
Kayfabe, kayfabe and more kayfabe, I'm too overtired to care, let my brevity here speak to that.
 
And yet, rather than going the fuck to bed like a big boy, you feel the need to waste our time with content-free noise like this.
Some fucking philosopher king you turned out to be.

The philosopher-king idea seemed so cool when I first saw it. Plato was so awesome. I mean, holy fuck, he was such a genius. He imagined a perfect society, and of course, it was run by people like me!

There's exactly the problem with that bullshit. It had mass appeal, because it was basically fanfic about reality where people like Plato himself ruled society, because of course, things would be wonderful then. The philosopher-king was the first Mary Sue, but instead of being about a fictional franchise, it was about society itself.

The concept has attracted many derivative thinkers, all of whom immediately self-insert into the philosopher-king role.

Unfortunately, they've generally been fascists, perverts, morons, and autists like this one here.

Not one actual philosopher-king has ever emerged.

Okay, well, I suppose there was Marcus Aurelius. And Kemal Ataturk. And Frederick the Great. And the only Elizabeth worthy of the name. And the unfairly detested Catherine the Great.

Okay, I suppose these people have existed, but there's no way of guaranteeing they rise to power and the vast majority of people who espouse the ideas of Plato's Republic as being practical rather than pure idealism are generally fucking retards like Autphag here.
 
The philosopher-king idea seemed so cool when I first saw it. Plato was so awesome. I mean, holy fuck, he was such a genius. He imagined a perfect society, and of course, it was run by people like me!

There's exactly the problem with that bullshit. It had mass appeal, because it was basically fanfic about reality where people like Plato himself ruled society, because of course, things would be wonderful then. The philosopher-king was the first Mary Sue, but instead of being about a fictional franchise, it was about society itself.

The concept has attracted many derivative thinkers, all of whom immediately self-insert into the philosopher-king role.

Unfortunately, they've generally been fascists, perverts, morons, and autists like this one here.

Not one actual philosopher-king has ever emerged.

Okay, well, I suppose there was Marcus Aurelius. And Kemal Ataturk. And Frederick the Great. And the only Elizabeth worthy of the name. And the unfairly detested Catherine the Great.

Okay, I suppose these people have existed, but there's no way of guaranteeing they rise to power and the vast majority of people who espouse the ideas of Plato's Republic as being practical rather than pure idealism are generally fucking retards like Autphag here.
The truth of it all is that the people who most deserve power rarely seek it, and never for its own sake.
All of the above either had power thrust upon them, or acquired power in the pursuit of some greater goal. People rallied behind them because they were men and women of vision and purpose.
Meanwhile, Chuckles here has no vision beyond leeching off of others, and this thread is about the sum of his purpose in the world thus far.
Honestly, even by KF standards, this dude is a paragon of misplaced conceit.
 
I don't know why you're expecting me to write coherent answers to trivial questions when the feeling of condescension coupled with my insomnia-induced delirium and hypercaffienated state just compel me to be deliberately obfuscatory and off-cuff.
Maybe if you shot up a horseneedle full of high-grade heroin you'd have enough focus to stop being an obscurantist tryhard weeen-a-be. Also, YOU whining about condescension is priceless.
I don't know why you're expecting me to write coherent answers to trivial questions when the feeling of condescension coupled with my insomnia-induced delirium and hypercaffienated state just compel me to be deliberately obfuscatory and off-cuff.
When have you ever wrote a coherent answer? Never. There is no possibility for genuine profundity, when ones heroes are David Icke and Gene Ray. Both are imbeciles and one of them can't maintain focus for more than three words at a time. Speaking of which....
I've been tasked to write something. I won't detail more than that. I've kind of lost focus for now.
Yeah, lost it in 1989 and still haven't regained it. Hint: Worrying about Imaginary 'Global Conspiracies' are a waste of headmeat clock-cycles. If you could purge your brainpan of decades of mind-numbling propaganda you'd see how self-defeating, wasteful and silly such trains of thought are.
Now, answer my fucking questions, you bacon-dodging mong.
 
Last edited:
Kayfabe, kayfabe and more kayfabe, I'm too overtired to care, let my brevity here speak to that.

I'm confused. You think @Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. is staging his disagreement with the completely bizarre and pretentious things you sperg out onto the keyboard? And that he's somehow doing this to promote some other aspect of your interactions? Because that's what kayfabe is, hon.

Though, yeah, I can imagine you'd think he's secretly in love with you. You're about that delusional.
 
Lewis Carroll said:
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master – that's all.
" (Looking-Glass 6.63-65)

Humpty Dumpy believes that he can exercise total control over language. Unfortunately, as Alice realizes, if he makes words mean anything he wants, then nobody can understand him. People have to agree on shared definitions and meanings for communication to be possible.

This is something most kids learn in 4th grade; but since @Autphag must've been homeschooled by the dumbest and craziest person in the cult compound, he can't grasp that. So he takes random words from psychology textbooks and the rants of conspiratards -- words he then fails to understand -- and turns them into his own personal CWCisms
 
No bullying, but I was on a nostalgia trip watching old commercials from 5 years ago and came upon the Starburst commercial. The one about "Scottish-Koreans" or those of Korean genetics who adopt Scottish culture. I was thinking that Autphag is the bizarro/reverse of that: Phag is a Scottish man/womyn who adopted Korean Culture.
 
Last edited:
Aight, let's give this a good once-over. The play by play of my thoughts, written as I listen, are in the spoilers.
First 6 minutes are a lot of nothing. A few highlights:
- Overall, nice job, you've thus far kept your stutter and long pauses to a tolerable minimum. May want to invest some of your tardbux in a better mic.
-"Faggoty Scotch Addict". A new personal favorite, and I actually feel the need to thank you for it. However, this coming from a broke-ass deadbeat in a fairly unhealthy submissive sexual relationship with another man reeks of envy, but I'm not one to judge. If you got a job, you might be able to drink good shit too, you know. Food for thought.
-Something about a "retarded acquaintance" with something I didn't quite catch? Anyone get that?
-Some twaddle about the internationality of your nonexistent skill and how the image built of you here is less than flattering. Yes, you're kind of a shit person, and that's often reflected here.
-I don't think the term "internationality" means whatever you think it means, but you keep using it in a really odd context. Ditto for "infrared", "collectivism", and that's not how you pronounce "sobriquet". Have you ever said any of this out loud?
Post 6:00
-The stutter and pauses are back with a vengeance, and you've used roughly the last minute to say absolutely nothing in 2000 words.
- 6:30. I wonder if he'll make a point soon.
-7:03. Nope. He will not.
-7:25. Ok, so what I'm getting is that you were tricked by some people pretending to be your friends, because you're kind of a sucker. That would not have taken 10 minutes to say, but as you will.
-7:40. NOOOOO SUCH CHANCE!
-8:15. You have worked yourself into some kind of frenzy and seem flustered while talking to no one.
-9:10. Are you high? You have lost your train of thought in a conversation with yourself.
-9:45. Ahh yes, the old "You're not any better" bit.
-10:00-End. My goodness, but we seem to have some unresolved hostility with each other. Would you like me to call our Conflict Resolution Officer? I'm willing to try couples therapy.
Overall, it's the usual dreck with a few little gems, but many thanks for bringing us some content. I told you that you could be creative if you tried. You're already taking those steps towards neuromasculinity or whatever. Mazel Tov.
 
I'm here to save the day! What is the problem?
It makes me feel attacked when Autphag throws barbs at me rather than talking out our issues.
Instead, I wish he would address the root issues in our relationship, especially his issues with communication. I feel like he's just saying words sometimes, without knowing or caring what they mean, and that hurts me.
 
It makes me feel attacked when Autphag throws barbs at me rather than talking out our issues.
Instead, I wish he would address the root issues in our relationship, especially his issues with communication. I feel like he's just saying words sometimes, without knowing or caring what they mean, and that hurts me.
As someone who has successfully crammed several different university-publisher dictionaries, I assure you, although I care little for proscriptive contexts, I more than absolutely understand their conventional senses.

I'm here to save the day! What is the problem?
Yes, I have a conflict. You're female. Please stahp (as in, existing). Cheers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's a transwoman, you should be all over him
Normalfag transwoman is basically a woman by no other name. Neurotypicals per the sun-moon-earth model, having place as Earths, are known for their homogeneity of status irrespective of sex.
Were s/he an autistic transwoman that'd be different, but no, since he is a heretic he can happily die with all the others among his histrionic ilk that deservingly kill themselves, at the expense of due attention to those Aspergian transwomen who perish every day, unnoticed.

Also could you try breaking this pattern please, it gets a little repetitive even by my standards:
iP6pQy0.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back